cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51634640

A new Gamers Nexus investigation found a retail LG TV actively scanning the local network for phones, laptops, smartwatches and other connected devices, while also capturing microphone audio when the screen appeared to be in standby. The investigation found voice data being stored locally even after the TV was disconnected from the network, with the queued data uploaded once connectivity returned. Researchers also uncovered webOS vulnerabilities that could potentially turn the television into a remotely controlled surveillance device. The really unsettling part isn’t just the advertising angle. It’s the fact that a consumer television can sit inside your trusted network, enumerate other devices, access a microphone, store collected data locally and communicate with external infrastructure. Put that same device in a corporate office, hospital, hotel or conference room and the security implications become considerably more serious. I went through the investigation in detail, including the network scanning, microphone behavior, ACR, webOS attack surface, offline data collection and practical mitigations

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s hard to find a dumb TV.
    Monitors and projectors are going the same way. Not connecting them might not be enough.

    Time to learn how to use a soldering iron.

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Is this anything a VLAN and Pihole can’t fix?

    Edit: looks kind of impossible to prevent, if it can access an open Wi-Fi nearby.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      For now the only known thing to do that works is for it to never to be connected to any network.

      Also if a smart tv was connected to the WiFi there is a possibility it won’t forget that until factory reset.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Possible that they are piggy backing on other hidden networks. I remember there was a whole thing with Samsung years ago with their stuff doing something like that, and there are a few patents around that propose hidden networks from the “internet of things” days.

      I just don’t want to even truck with this nonsense, where the fuck is the line before we just stop using these things? I know there must not be a line, since we are talking about circumventing our shit spying on us like it is normal.

    • silicon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Also keep them off wifi/network and you should be good unless they’re smart enough to try to connect to any open network they can find like some sort of malware

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        unless they’re smart enough to try to connect to any open network they can find like some sort of malware

        Uhhhhhhh, bad news there. Many companies have been found to have their stuff make hidden networks and share info these days. I am sure you could figure out a work around if you are savvy enough, but the normal dood? Fucked and pretending this is normal.

        • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 minutes ago

          Yeah maybe there’s way to make a file explorer for them. Maybe there’s ways to jailbreak them. We focus on phones a lot, webos was on the hp bought out palm phones back in the 2010’s.

          We find out the operating systems, we jailbreak them and completely remove their programming and then, in-turn we can mess with hardware settings.

          So let’s start making a TV Linux that doesn’t suck or make an Ubuntu TV version or a KDE TV version.

          They can’t force people into using their OSes forever. The only thing I know is it’s like Pandoras battery trying to disable the wifi from the hardware.

    • yaroto98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And according to the article the data collection runs even if it’s disconnected. So, don’t ever connect it to the network. As soon as you do everything gets uploaded.

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        how is it collecting and sending data if not connected to a network?

        i read the article, it still needs a connection

        • WereCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          It’s not sending them, just collecting them. Then it sends them the moment you connect. They even transcribe speech to text via mic, according to GN they send about 4GB/month… IN TEXT FILES!

        • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          The person you are replying to said that the smart TV collects spy data onto a hard drive even when it’s not connected.

          Then once the TV acquires a connection, it dumps the entire drive worth of spy data to the mothership.

          The danger here is obvious, I think.

    • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up. They may also implement an always-online model and they’ll justify that it’s necessary to monitor users for “age verification purposes”. ATP better to get a good monitor and use it as TV cuz cable or satellite boxes are either way gonna be provided by the network companies so that’s there

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up.

        Surely only for “smart” features but without enabling any of that shit, you shouldn’t get any age verification prompt.

        • thejml@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I could see them doing it anyway as OTA broadcasts include rating data.

          That said, if it’s a family TV, you’re never going to put everyone on it, just the oldest one anyway.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If I had a LG the on thing it would spy on would be the other untrusted shit I have on the vlan I let them use.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If you are going to have smart devices, put them on their own VLAN. They should not have access to the rest of your network. TVs shouldn’t be connected at all. Use a PC or android box if you want to stream stuff.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The issue in this case is that they apparently use text to speech locally, store that information on the device itself, and then if at any point in the future gets connected to the internet for any meaningful length of time (be it by a subsequent owner) it will then be sent on to LG… for safekeeping of course /s

      The deep-dive by GamersNexus is pretty in depth.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In that case, it should be disposed of like an SSD that contains sensitive information. Find the flash chips and either drill holes through them or smash them into dust with a big hammer.

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s not just LG. It’s all of them.

    And, the cheaper the TV, the more often and intrusive these settings are.

    It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

      Consumer projectors come with the same “smart” shit as TVs these days. Just don’t connect either to WiFi. Problem solved.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Apparently not solved. They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

        Per the marketing chief at LG; (paraphrased, from memory) “we own the glass, and we know everything beyond the glass.”

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

          That’s a wild claim and either I accidentally skipped a paragraph in the article or you should cite a source. Quick googling doesn’t show up anything of that sort for me.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            Look for articles about amazons sidewalk network and devices that connect to it without any kind of authorization from users.

            That shit has been around since the echo came out and it’s open to any manufacturer.

            There’s are lots of articles but my phone is too slow to load them at the moment.

          • undrwater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’m looking for a source as well. The “apparently” I used was supposed to cover the whole comment, but I can see how it didn’t.

            The video goes into detail, and could be staged, but comments seem to support the idea anyway.

            Amazon devices are known to do this with other Amazon products to create a mesh.

            It’s not outside the realm of possibility.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I was at my parent’s house, trying to add some items to the smart TV. They started listening to these awful AI interpersonal dramas read by AI, on YouTube.

    My thought was to add some podcasts and their Audible account, for more selections. Maybe they’ll still only listen to that, even so. You can’t add much to a smart tv. No podcasts. No podcast app. A pretty spartan selection of apps. Even something as large and mainstream as Audible. No go. Libby? Yeah, right.

    I don’t get it. What’s the point? Just buy a monitor, jack it into a PC for media, and have everything you want minus this telemetry.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        We’re fully Linux now, various distros per machine, so I no longer pay much attention to windows news.

      • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ah doesn’t matter. Dont use windows. Use a pi and something like LibreELEC or even you can run debloated android on it with the TV interface and a remote. Just get a BT remote or an IR receiver plug into the usb port. Either of them are pretty cheap

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      My TV has no Internet connection, but does connect to my gaming desktop. I agree with you. There’s no reason TVs should not just be dumb displays. I do also have the Apple TV, but it never ever shows ads and is a one-time purchase. The day it starts showing me ads is the day it meets the bin.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s no reason TVs should not just be dumb displays.

        At least, no reason that benefits the consumer. There are strong monetary incentives to spy on customers and sell the data that’s collected.

        • Zephorah@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Once again I’m reminded of Season 1 of Black Mirror. Second episode? Worker drone is “home”, “relaxing” in his sleep cubby and the walls are a barrage of ads. Occasionally he taps to pay credits to shut one down as the rest continue, as casual as anyone scrolling in boredom.

          Or a shut down golden retriever in those old, now illegal learned helplessness experiments.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      jack it into a PC for media

      Even a proprietary streaming stick like FireTV would be an improvement because it only collects telemetry from the stick itself and not devices connected to other HDMI ports.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    My LG TV is blocked from my network and always has been. However, the andriod tv connected to it is a different thing, so it’s more or less lost cause anyways and I haven’t had enough incentive to block the android box from the rest of network since it’d need some tweaking so that casting and other occasionally used features still work. And even if I’d block the android tv box there’s still our cellphones gathering all the data, so I’m pretty much just running things on hopium that EU offers at least some protection on my data.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Well, if you watch the Gamers Nexus video, you’ll see that even if you don’t connect your tv to the internet, you’re still not safe.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I keep mine offline and fully turn it off via the power switch on the extension cord. My steam deck is my smart TV instead. Yay Linux!

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Bosch fucking dishwashers do this, once connected there is no way to disconnect them so I sink all its outgoing traffick at the router level

    Complete garbage

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, what kind of idiot wants an internet-connected dishwasher?

      How about an AI-powered pair of chopsticks?

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        exactly! it’s so useless they had to hide regular features under the wifi connection to force customer’s hand

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Why would you connect a dishwasher to the internet? Setting a timer can tell you just as well if the dishes are clean.

      • WWLAladdinSane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sadly, the only way to change most of the settings or running a cleaning cycle is via the app. It’s insane.

        • dragonlover@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No way in hell id buy that. Soon as the app is dead so is your dishwasher, at the whim of the manufacturer

          • silicon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Planned obsolescence is great isn’t it. /s I try to keep my appliances on life support as long as I can.

    • fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Mh. What about… creating a guest network, connecting that abomination to that and deleting the guest network? Hopefully it can remember only one…

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        My TV is wired to the router but blocked from WAN access.

        Only connected to the internet to install jellyfin on it.