• FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m sure there are some preists who are good people, but enough of them are predators that it ain’t worth the risk

      • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Most priests aren’t paedophiles.

        The problem is that the hierarchy actively protects and covers up those who are, to the extent of moving them to different parishes if people get suspicious. And to be clear, this isn’t because popes are necessarily in favour of paedophilia (though I’m not saying none are…), it’s because the clergy are more concerned with the prestige and survival of the institution than they are with the well-being of lay believers.

        • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 days ago

          Also the seal of confession. Paedo priests would confess their abuse to all of their colleagues using it. Thus they can’t do anything or they’d be accused of breaking said seal

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s been a trope since at least the 1500s that clergy are pedos, “Julius Excluded from Heaven” by Erasmus contains this exchange between Saint Peter and the recently deceased pope Julius:

          PETER: [… ] I hope it won’t be too tiresome for you to answer a few clumsy questions about the details. Who, for example, are these little curly-headed striplings? JULIUS: I brought them up for my diversion.

          https://web.archive.org/web/20090326073147/www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/lansing/classes/hist4b/materials/Week7.pdf

          • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Yes but statistics indicate priests are not more likely to be pedophiles than any other profession that works regularly with children.

            • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              The problem with the catholic church isn’t just that a lot of preists are predators, it’s that the church covered up these crimes and moved preists to new places where they could continue being predators

              • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                You’re right, my comment didn’t address how the church protects predators compared to other professions that work with kids.

            • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              Statistics need someone to report them, and someone to record them.

              If you haven’t experienced it you don’t know how tightly faith communities protect the people they worship.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        I don’t know anybody, myself included certainly, who doesn’t have a story about a youth pastor.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 days ago

    Recently had to file a report at a state-run insurance and they have a dedicated button on their webpage for “sexualized violence in churches”.

    I do wonder, is it the churches themselves that are insured that way? Because surely the victims get paid from the lawsuit, not from insurance.

    But either way, that is fucking harrowing that they have a dedicated button for it.

    I get that it’s probably just a matter of “we offer insurance for this, so we’ll have a button for it”. But even that someone in a government-near position decided “kids get raped in churches so often, and we expect more cases to happen or be uncovered, so we should add an insurance for that to our portfolio”, that concept just does not fit into my brain.

  • Floodedwomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 days ago

    Any place where individuals hold a position of trust and authority is going to attract all kinds of abusers.

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Not to mention that no one brings their kids to drag shows. But everyone takes their kid to church, and a lot of churches even have daycares attached where you can leave them all day.

    • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Drag performers sometimes do child friendly events such as story time, but there’s nothing sexual about those events. In fact, it’s no question why kids would be drawn to being read stories by someone in a whimsical costume.

      Fwiw, even burlesque performers sometimes do family friendly events (for obvious reason they do an outfit change rather than a strip tease). Anyone who does adult shows is very aware of the line between family friendly and not, and likely knows the local blue laws better than anyone else

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Yeah like there are definitely some drag shows you shouldn’t take your kids to but there’s also movies and concerts you shouldn’t take your kids to. There’s even kids horror movies vs the obvious r rated adult stuff. If they’re old enough to know boys and girls are different they’re old enough to understand that sometimes people do other shit for fun the same as they’re able to watch fucking Casper and experiment with the idea of death. It’s just a fucking genre.

  • DonkeyStar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Oh, really?

    •music too loud

    •choke on rhinestone that flew off during dancing

    •crushed between two sweaty drag queens

    •drugs sometimes

    Oh, wait, you said safer. Yeah.

  • HeHoXa@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 days ago

    Genuinely one of the kindest gentlest most wholesome environments I’ve been in.

    Not that my experience is super broad or representative, but, maybe because there’s so much misunderstanding, they’re particularly patient and warm.

    Would definitely bring my kid to a drag show before leaving him alone with a priest.

  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 days ago

    Welcome to the mids 2010s, may I take your coat? This was a very common thing to say, down to the word, and was posted everywhere for years since that was the peak of when the American right-wingers had temper tantrums over kids being around lgbtq+ people (mainly drag shows etc.).
    This isn’t a shower thought, it’s just a popular opinion.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    maybe not a maga drag/ conservative dragqueen, these do exist.

    i think evangelicals, and probably mormon churchs hides more pedophelia, SA.

    better of with MS rachel.