• clearedtoland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    239
    ·
    11 months ago

    My god. This deliciously tasty excerpt:

    In various campaign biographies, a résumé and interviews, Mr. Santos said he graduated from Baruch College in New York City, where he was a volleyball star on a championship team. He boasted of working at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and amassing personal wealth. He claimed to be descended from Holocaust refugees; that his mother was in the World Trade Center during the Sept. 11 attacks; and that he lost four employees in the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando.

    None of those claims were true.

    • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      11 months ago

      The real question is where tf were the journalists while Santos was running his campaign on these false claims?

      Too busy playing horse race? Frantically trying to find something newsworthy about Hunter Biden’s laptop? Credulously glorifying some billionaire’s childish misconceptions?

      Guess we’ll never know.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why are you blaming journalists and not the GOP for not vetting their own fucking candidate.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Have you seen most of the recent GOP candidates?

          How do we know he isn’t above their threshold for corruption and dishonesty?

          Their bar seems pretty low.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        11 months ago

        I remember seeing articles about this stuff during his election. Republicans elected him anyway. That’s where we are now

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        where tf were the journalists while Santos was running his campaign on these false claims?

        There aren’t enough journalists to go around. There are hundreds of congresspeople and there definitely aren’t hundreds of journalists covering random unimportant congresspeople.

        People have voted with their dollars, saying they don’t care enough about vetting congresspeople before they’re elected to actually pay the salaries of journalists to do that.

        • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Wow, so It’s almost as if expecting unregulated capitalism to solve this problem is not working? How could that be?

          Oh well, I guess we just need to ignore the problem until it gets better.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Look the incredibly rich people who own the media wish that us peasants would care enough about politics to force them to cover these things properly but unfortunately all their journalists are busy writing opinion pieces about how we need to get back in the office, how we shouldn’t even try to make ethical purchasing decisions, and how great whatever makes them the most money this week is.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Jesus, after all the shit that has been uncovered about this fucker, 114 voted “No” to throw him out?

    Investigate those 114 motherfuckers.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s not rocket science. The only publicly said reason it’s never happened before is they want to respect the decision of their constituents. Unofficially, nobody wanted to see themselves on that chopping block.

      From a political scientist game theory point of view it’s possible that a majority faction of party A throws a minority faction of Party A on the chopping block and Party B obliges them because they think they can pick up those voters.

      So yeah, a lot of resistance to actually unseating someone. For good and bad reasons.

  • CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can’t believe that they treated the first Congolese-American female PHD/Astronaut this way. Did she cure polio for nothing? You can’t do enough for some people.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Nah he’s a piece of shit from my neck of the woods, he more than likely saw what Trump was able to get away with and said “I live in prime Trump moron land, I can pull this off.” So he lied about literally everything and almost got away with it lol I know 100 other people who would try the same thing.

      Most of us long islanders are absolute garbage selfish greedy assholes lol

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      This dude was a straight russian psy-op right?

      Well, he claims to be gay, but the rest is spot-on

    • CaioAbreu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hey everyone, so here’s the deal with Santos aka Kitara Ravache: he’s totally heading back to Brazil, probably to chill on a reality show. But the real game plan? He’s gonna make bank selling some sketchy stuff and, get this, he’s got a pretty good chance of landing a gig as a deputy back there

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I refuse to believe the KGB has that much of a sense of humor.

  • SauceBossSmokin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wow it finally happened. Now I wonder if they’ll take away his Grammy, 2 Oscar’s, MTV Movie Award, Nickelodeon Teen Choice Award, and induction into the Grand Ole Opry.

  • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    Now convict him of his crimes so he doesn’t have any of the other perks of Congress.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    We live in historic times. Sixth congressman ejected. First speaker voted out. I wonder what happened around all the other historic times?

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    So there’s finally a line: “you must be this shit to get fired”. I expect a lot of people toeing up to it.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    Goodbye to Rep. Evil Pee Wee Herman. He was often hilarious, but he had to go. 

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    And he went home and masturbated and the world went on like nothing happened.

    Seriously wtf, is this the actual end?

      • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Overall vote tally:

        98% (206) of Democrats voted yes (to expell)

        1% (2) voted No

        1% (2) voted present

        49% (105) of Republicans voted to expel

        51% (112) of Republicans voted No

      • kboy101222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m betting AOC is because they’re both from NY and they’re very close geographically. Definitely seems like a conflict of interest

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Their no votes were because they wanted due process and judicial conviction before kicking him out.

        Nikema Williams’ statement:

        “Unfortunately, George Santos won a free and fair election and elections have consequences. He also has not yet been convicted of a crime and the ethics investigation is ongoing. It would be dangerous to set the precedent of expelling a Member of Congress who has not been convicted of a crime. When and if Santos is convicted of these serious offenses an expulsion resolution would be more appropriate. Let’s be clear – we have current members who have been accused of even more egregious crimes while the Republican majority continues to look the other way.”

        Robert Scott’s statement:

        “The Ethics Committee is charged with investigating alleged wrongdoing by members of the U.S. House of Representatives. In the past, I have been appointed to serve on multiple investigative subcommittees, and I can personally attest to the nonpartisan, rigorous and deliberative process conducted by the committee. In fact, the committee is expected to soon release findings and recommendations on the Santos matter. These resolutions were rushed to the floor outside of that deliberative process. In 2002, I voted to expel Rep. James Traficant but that was after he was found guilty in a court of law. Absent any report or recommendation from the committee, or a criminal conviction, these resolutions are premature. For the sake of the institution, we must stop the cheapening of the censure and expulsion processes for political expediency and get back to the process that we already have in place to appropriately deal with these matters.”

        • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Congressional expulsion is not a “innocent ‘til proven guilty” situation and has never intended to be. Expulsion and conviction are unrelated, and these people struggle with basic elementary school level civic concepts for their reasonings.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          “We want to drag things out when people are blatantly lying because there is a sliver of a chance that it might set a precedent that clearly does not apply to the things we are worried about, like false accusations.”

          If any of those processes took less time than the two year term of a Representative I might agree with them.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            The two year term is key here. Let’s say that instead of just being a conman and liar, he was accused of being put into office by Chinese or Russian spies. Should he be allowed to spend 2 years voting on things, attending confidential meetings, serving on committees, etc. while there’s an investigation about whether or not he’s an agent of a foreign government?

            If he’s found innocent of everything, all that happens is that he lost his job. He could run again, and being kicked out over lies and rumours would be a good grievance to campaign on. But, the potential damage he could do during the time it takes to investigate, try and convict him is enough to say that he should be removed now.

        • Jaysyn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Which is bullshit, because his open, verified non-criminal lies should have been enough to have him expelled from Congress.

          I guess we know which side of the truth these particular so called politicians are on.

          • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            guess we know which side of the truth these particular so called politicians are on.

            Lying is the default position for politicians. Save the “so called” label for the rare honest one