• Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    227
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    After reading “Into Thin Air” by Jon Krakauer, I feel like anyone still traveling to climb Everest is a rich douchebag. It’s glorified tourism of the worst kind. It’s been done a zillion times already, and isn’t as impressive as they fantasize. Go run a marathon or something for your stupid adventure junky social media clout. The sherpas do all the real work.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s an incredible book. I highly recommend both that and Under the Banner of Heaven. Krakauer is just riveting.

      • mr_sifl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        Totally agree, I think Into Thin Air is maybe my favorite book and I wasn’t expecting that at all when I read it. I really enjoyed the show based on Under the Banner of Heaven too. What a bunch of crazies.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      9 months ago

      At this point it’d be safer to just build a tram line to the top and then hire the sherpas as the infrastructure mechanics to keep it maintained, raises their incomes and cuts the shit with people dying for dumb rich people nonsense.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Chinese already built a paved road to the North Base Camp. Only a matter of time before they build it all the way to the top.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Maybe but IIRC the Chinese side of the approach was already considered the less treacherous side, this would most likely require some serious capital investment just for hazard mitigation alone during construction.

          The long term net benefit though would be more than enough to warrant the costs IMO, would even facilitate recovering the dead bodies on the slope.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think the long term net loss of allowing anyone who wants to drive to the top to do so is a bigger issue.

            • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              The net loss of people not dying like idiots for a fake accomplishment? The net loss of the local communities getting high paying technical jobs? The net loss of all that shit and dead people the hike accumulates being removed from the equation since it’s now able to be safely transported off the mountain without making people hike for days to retrieve it?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                And a road to the top allowing endless tourists up there won’t result in more trash accumulating on the mountain? Not to mention erosion.

                Have you been to an easily-accessible natural wonder before? People who can get up close treat them like shit. That’s why most of them are only viewable from a distance.

                I give it two weeks from the time a road to the top gets completed before someone spray paints their graffiti tag on the summit.

                • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago
                  • who said anything about a road, I mentioned a rail car.

                  • that’s what you install guard rails and write rules of conduct for. This tragedy of the commons narrative more often than not comes from understaffed park workers not having the funding to adequately police park visitor behavior with the up close sites, the tomb of the unknown soldier is also easily accessible and yet is one of the most well maintained and respectfully observed sites in the world.

                  • I’m pretty sure the spray paint can would have blown off their hand by the time they got to the summit from becoming so much more pressurized by the high altitude.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        But the rich need to maintain their veil of accomplishment! And it’s dumb rich people dying, so who cares?

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ok, help me understand this.

        Muchu Chhish (7,453 metres (24,452 ft)) is a mountain in the Batura Muztagh sub-range of the Karakoram in Hunza Valley, in northern areas of Pakistan.[1] Located in a very remote and inaccessible region, only a handful of attempts have been made to reach the summit; and none have succeeded.

        Ok, that seems to track but then there’s this bit…

        most expeditions thus attempt it via the South Ridge of 7,462 m (24,482 ft) Batura VI to the immediate west. This ridge was climbed by a Polish expedition in 1983 using fixed ropes while making the first ascent of 7,531 m (24,708 ft)

        • OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Rest of the sentence (emphasis mine)

          This ridge was climbed by a Polish expedition in 1983 using fixed ropes while making the first ascent of 7,531 m (24,708 ft) Batura V and VI

          They ascended the Batura VI peak next door, which I guess happens to be almost as tall as Muchu Chhish (Batura V). Interesting that the wiki article claims they ascended Batura V and VI, but their linked references by the American Alpine club says it was Batura IV. Probably a scrivener’s error, since 7,531 is the height of Batura VI.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      IMO he was stressing how easy it has become to make the climb. In that it was expensive is another issue. His point was that people that didn’t have the ability to make the climb, could.

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That was definitely one of his major points. But he also talked about all the damage being done, and how people make really stupid decisions. And how it’s an arrogant and pointless endeavor. He was fairly self-critical, which I respect.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          He was speaking as a witness to a tragedy and as such was trying to identify why it happened. He himself was blamed for part of it by climber families. Of course any event that ends in tragedy seems pointless in retrospect.

          • Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Say they succeeded and nobody got hurt. I still don’t see the point. I’m not saying all of mountain climbing is entirely pointless. I’m saying most people going to Everest for the clout are dumb.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    They’re clearly not thinking this through. They all need to lug their frozen poo to the summit and pile it there, so they can stand on it when they take their selfie and declare that they’re at a higher peak than any previous summiters due to their poo pedestal.

  • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 months ago

    One thing that is not on my bucket list is climbing Mt. Everest. Any natural wonder and charm it once had have been destroyed by mindless tourists.

  • kellyaster@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    How much frozen human shit has that mountain accumulated since people started climbing it for fun? Can somebody do the math on that? I feel like it has potential for a really shitty trivia question. Like, for Shitty Jeopardy! or something. JFC, I am baked.

    @FlyingSquid omg I didn’t realize it was your post. Hi! Ok I’m gonna put the bowl down

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 months ago

      A shitload har har har

      Apparently the average UK adult defecates about 100g per day, and that’s the first link that showed up so I’m going to go with the UK numbers in that one study. According to wikipedia there were 11,346 ascents as of July 2022. Assuming two weeks from base camp to summit and back, based on Tom Kilpatrick’s article on The Manual, that means 1.4 kg of shit per climb for a total of almost 16 metric tonnes or 17.5 short tons

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        That number is definitely low, you eat more in the cold and with exertion. It is probably over double your number, that is a lot of doo-doo.

        I imagine all the loss of snow is exposing decades of accumulated mountain dookie.

        By 2100 they are estimating a 75% loss of snow/ice on the mountain, which means at 800 climbs per year(modern rate) by 2100 there will be over 186 metric tonnes of poopy on the mountain with very little snow to hide it. I don’t even think that number includes Sherpa scat.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    They need to just haul a big trebuchet up there.Then they can just launch poop down the mountain in sealed containers with the poop trebuchet. Ideally you could have a few poop trebuchets in a line to launch em down one after another.

    Easy peasy.

  • rab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    At least the idiots all funnel to the same place rather than fucking up every location. I feel the same about Joffre Lakes near Vancouver.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Support global warming! Let the earth clean up Everest poop the natural way! Decomposition in situ: transport costs more emissions!

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The thing that makes Everest dangerous is the air pressure combined with everything else, that’s why it’s such a long slow ascent, you have to acclimatize so your lungs don’t implode.

      In the summer the summit temperature is about the same as a bad Canadian prairie winter day

    • Rooter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      It already is a simple hike, it just depends on weather if it’s dangerous or not.

      80 year olds have climbed everest. So have 15 year olds.

      • rab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Simple hike? Haha have you ever climbed any mountain?

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        That 80 year old is a mountaineer. The youngest, at 13, went with three sherpas to help.

        It isn’t a simple hike, but since you seem to think it is- let’s see the pics from when you made the trip.

        • Rooter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah yes, I just talked about how stupid it is to climb everest, so I definitely did that.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    limit the permits to climb this mountain and charge people thousands of dollars for them

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I too, believe the best way to control a natural resource is to only allow the rich to use it. For they are truly better people. Always known for their consideration.

        • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          An upper middle class person can afford an Everest climb as a once in a lifetime trip. It isn’t an exclusive millionaire class trip.

          • yuriy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            9 months ago

            “Once in a lifetime” isn’t affordable, that’s someone sacrificing a lot to vacation outside of their socioeconomic class.

            • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              An “economy” climb is $60k. That is 10 years of saving $6k per year for a once in a lifetime vacation. That is totally achievable for someone making $100k a year that doesn’t let income creep put them in a stupid financial situation.

              You have more of a point if that same person making $100k a year spends $120k on a “premium” climb, but that same person would let income creep make that trip less reasonably affordable.

              • overcast5348@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                How poor are the people here that you’re getting downvoted and even got a “shut up” for this comment? It’s really not a stretch to call a $60k expense a “once in a lifetime” expense.

                How many people drive around in 80k vehicles that they “upgrade” every few years? How many people spend absolutely ridiculous amounts of money on designer brands, perfumes, watches, and shit? Sure, 60k is a lot of money for most people, but there’s a large number of people (at least in the western countries, in absolute numbers, not %) that could easily afford to spend 60k on something every 5-10 years if it fancies them, and an even larger number of people who could afford to spend 60k on something once in a lifetime.

                • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Those people with $80k cars tend to lease, which can have tax advantages, but you are still paying $1k a month to rent a car that you put 20-30% down on.

                  That touches on that income creep issue as people increase their lifestyle expenses along with income and don’t understand how they are living paycheck to paycheck with no savings, retirement, investments, and can’t afford to have your midlife crisis on the world’s tallest peak.

                  Buy a Honda, climb the mountain.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah seriously, just limit the amount of people who can climb.

        I personally believe that anyone should be allowed to go on a suicide mission should they chose to, whether they be rich or poor.

  • FunkyMonk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    You really can’t have a better headline for the wealthy enshittifying the world for their singularity point egos chef kiss