• potpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      138
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pay billions for a userbase, then drive away the ones that aren’t Nazis or bots.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Been saying it for a while, but his plan was to run it into the ground all along. Who is he buddy-buddy with in public? The Saudi’s and the Russians, who both have an interest in seeing Twitter burn to the ground. He started by laying off people, not paying their bills, and making stupid brand decisions. This has been the plan all along and there’s really no other logical explanation. 44 billion is nothing to the Saudis and Russian oligarchs if it takes away a key tool for organized dissent and the spread of western ideals.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pay 54 billion dollars to utterly destroy a platform which gave normal people the ability to effectively spread information about the wrongdoing of the upper class, and which often promoted that very information.

      That’s why he did this, he knows it’s killing g Twitter and wants it dead.

    • Leafeytea@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can throw Warner Brothers Discovery in there while you are at it (HBO now stupidly referred to as “Max”)

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just saw a trailer for an adventure time spin off on a youtube channel called “Max” and though it was a random channel that post trailer lol. Granted i rarely watch anything and while i know about HBO i don’t ever remember watching anything from them.

        • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I watched a South Park movie for the first time in years. In this one they traveled into the future. Everything had Max or Plus added to the name. It seemed pretty spot on with where we are going

      • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get the feeling that these execs need a plan to increase profits every quarter, and this is one of the gotos.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lessons for whom? I have several things I would like to kill but lack the requisite trillions to execute my vision.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You know I wonder if we could create a non profit that exists only to buy things and then donate them (IP, closed source, whatever) to the public domain. If you had a savvy board, such an organization could do a lot of good.

          Something like this must already exist, right?

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean they would need to be paid, but idk about a percentage. Mostly just to fairly compensate them for the time spent vetting deals.

              • jarfil@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What’s savvy about getting paid just for your time? You need to get paid for expertise, opportunities, networking… that’s at least 10%, since a non-profit wouldn’t have preference shares.

                • MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m leery about a percentage just because I perceive a conflict of interest. Overall compensation of 10% might be about right, but tying actual compensation to the cost of stuff that is bought creates a perverse incentive to overspend on things. That’s money donated for the betterment of humanity, not so I can have a 3 acre swimming pool.

                  But IDK maybe I’m looking at it wrong.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 year ago

    When they start focusing on the brand, it’s over.

    I was part of a “startup” that was all volunteers. We called ourselves Citizens Market, and the idea was to produce an app that let you scan a barcode to get ethical info on the company who made the product.

    Like GoodGuide, but they got to market faster.

    After a few years of effort, a marketing person joined our all-volunteer team and convinced the head to change the name to Fosfo. Why Fosfo? Because matches have phosphorous in them, and so it referenced illumination, and the illumination had to do with our mission of … you guessed it: providing information.

    The thing failed. I mean, we were already failing because we didn’t have the profit motive cutting our decisions down to what worked. But the name “Fosfo” was when I knew the project was dead.

    “Citizens Market” was the perfect name for what our app would do. But no, had to have some web 2.0 jackass giving us a facelift. That was our path to salvation: a rebrand.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure all the brands who are unsure about continuing their advertising on the platform are going to love having to derail their UI teams to go change dozens of different social media icons implementation.

    McDonalds Web Team on Friday: “I think we’ve planned a great sprint for Monday everyone. It’ll be tight but we should be ready in time to promote the anniversary of Grimace’s bris!”

    McDonalds Web Team on Monday: “Shit”

    • Zapp@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m getting sidetracked here, but I want to give my support of McD’s turning every possible life event Grimace can have into to a new marketing event, so long as each comes with a new Gameboy color game.

  • Hexorg@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    What was that about him doing twitter’s technology policing and leaving running the company to the new CEO?

  • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I can think of when he talks about how “X will be an app for everything” is:

    Welcome to Zombocom, you can do anything at Zombocom, Welcome to you. Anything is possible at Zombocom. The infinite is possible at Zombocom. The unobtainable is unknown at Zombocom. Welcome to Zombocom.

  • patchymoose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    It must be incredibly frustrating to be the new CEO that he just appointed, only to have him continuing to run his mouth and make ruinous decisions that tie your hands.

  • Snapz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only clearer by the day that this was all an exercise to intentionally kill Twitter to the benefit of billionaires, fascists and other extremists.

    Twitter existed as a relatively free and open public space to communicate, organize and assemble to take actions for and against things at scale before musk (e.g. The Arab Spring, a terrifying moment for the Saudis especially - the second largest shareholder behind musk).

    When people collectively laughed at elon and his cringe, inbred, emerald boy antics or his humiliating divorce and other routine failures, Twitter was the bullhorn.

    Now elon and his desperate far right Toadies will work to try to rewrite reality so they can eventually have this conversation:

    "Twitter? What’s a Twitter? Wait, are you talking about blork? A bird? No, blork’s logo is a dinosaur with chainsaw arms… and everyone wants to be his best friend… and it’s against the law to divorce him… and he’s cool… and…"

    What an everlasting tool history will remember you as, elon. If they remember you at all, it will be to laugh at you - you’ll never outrun that.

    • Saganaki@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t attribute to malice what is absolutely just idiocy. Musk is not some genius. He is quite literally a man-child who made money because he came from money (and maybe a little luck).

      His hubris led to this disaster with twitter—nothing else.

      • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This would make sense if he didn’t constantly amplify right-wing rhetoric and antics. You’d just be ignoring the evidence to think anything else at this point.

        • Saganaki@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not ignoring evidence, I just see an alternative you don’t: He wants attention and he always has. He’s “losing” and the easiest way to get validation is to get it from those that are right-wing. He wants so badly to be treated as “a genius”.

          Nobody other than staunch right-wingers believe his non-sense. He only gets headlines because controversy sells.

          • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is not correct I don’t think. He’s always been right wing, it’s not a new thing. The more important thing is to look at his intentions right before being forced to buy the company.

            And those intentions were clearly to use a large amount of cash to bully the company into following his orders. He didn’t like them censoring things. He didn’t like they’re politics. And it was where he spent most of his social media time.

            People seem to underestimate the absolute power of elites. He bought an entire company to kill it because he can do that. How many lives will this impact? A ton. All due to the ego of one awful man.

  • Techviator@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Xwitter by Musk - the best social media in all 4 corners of this Flat Earth! Starting at $8* per month.

    *Basic plan has a limit of 50 xweets per month.

  • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    In ten years some kids in a discord round robin gonna ask why the fake social media in fanfiction are little blue birds. Wait they used to be real??