I didn’t mean to type those six words. I meant cat.
The only sane conclusion
Cat*
There’s always an xkcd
Actually, this XKCD doesn’t apply. It’s really the opposite case. I can’t figure out what cat should replace here.
title text
Title text:
I like trying to make it as hard as possible.
“I’d love to meet up, maybe in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty. *witchcraft”
I think the least horrifying answer is word 2, referring to a consensual encounter between gay furries.
Or burly jazz musicians.
Cat cat in cat cat cat.
As a unix shell script:
(cat ‘cat’) in (cat ‘cat’ ‘cat’)Which should evaluate to true, because ‘cat’ can be found in ‘catcat’.
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `in’
A gold star for you! Now find a language where “cat cat in cat cat cat” is legal.
cat cat in cat cat catis legal Bash ifcatandinexist,"cat cat" in "cat cat cat"is Python.My point is that it’s not a shell script.
BOOOO!
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
Deleted
Cat cats in cat brother’s cat?
Cat dicks in this brothers bum
Big dick cats his brothers bum
Big dicks in cat brothers bum.
cat -A bum_sentence.txt
They meant to just say “Cat.” Damn autocorrect!
Sounds like fever dream posting
Big.
