• Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ironically if they do capture and interrogate one ‘terrorist’ who was a childhood friend of theirs, all they will talk about is mosques and ancient Islamic antisemitism.

      • Eximius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You must have limited retrospective abilities, because sure as hell, the ideas from your childhood guided your life.

        • Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          My point is that children lack the understanding of what caused this. It’s the reaction of the adults / role models in their life that will radicalise them.

          • Eximius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think you misunderstand how people grow up and introspect. There is a lot in childhood that will give an initial push and motivation, and it is not a desire to live up to their parents or other adults, and their desires. As people grow up they desire individuality, and their own life.

            Role models can be a part, but these are usually exceptional people in some way. But at this point, wrt the topic, you should consider why these role models exist, and what they stand for. Not immediately jump to the conclusion of smth smth propaganda. If you want that discussion you should very specifically define the term of propaganda.

            • Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ve worked quite extensively with youth, including in radicalisation prevention. Children model their lives after adults. The term role model is simply different for children and for older people.

              You are mixing up a lot of terms here without actually defining for what age group you want to apply them. So yeah, I can say with a lot of confidence that the death of young children is horrible, but it’s not the driving factor behind radicalisation. The reaction of the people around is.

              • Eximius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I dont apply to a specific age group. From my personal understanding, as people grow up (and of course it depends heavily on education, culture), people will have strong memories from childhood and will reflect on them throughout life.

                Hardships would likely cause people to not want their children to have hardships. Loss would likely cause vengeful directions to be righteous.

                It’s only if the losses or hardships (over their life) are resolved do they go away, otherwise, it is fuel for fire. Whether radicalized or not. In this case, I would like to know what you perceive as radicalized here. I would only attribute terroristic desires or genocidal intentions, or other inhumane (as defined by international law) goals as radicalization.

                It is not radical at all to want vengeance, or to punish for pain inflicted. It’s natural and even lawful if done within confines of agreed law, and many times required, otherwise anyone can do anything without objection or accountability.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        The stuff is blowing up inside stores and buildings around innocent people. How is that targeted? Israel doesn’t give 2 shits about innocent people being injured and possibly killed.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s still a million times better than dropping a thousand pound bomb on a refugee camp to take out 1 hamas guy, and that’s at least commendable.

          It’s worse that they’re blowing up people in a country they’re not openly at war with, stirring shit and risking even more retaliation.

          • BearGun@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Being better than war crime is not commendable if you’re still at terrorism. Just because they’ve done horrible shit before doesn’t mean slightly less horrendous shit should be remarked upon and punished.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Explicitly combatants… and anyone who happens to be in their vicinity when the bomb goes off.

            “Extremely” targeted you say? So when they were detonated, the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians?

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Since this targets explicitly combatants

            Hezbollah is, also, a political party. It’s military wing was formed to fight the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              From what I can tell online its militant wing predates the political wing. Just adding that in because I thought it might be the other way around based on your comment

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              2 months ago

              The people getting these communication devices aren’t exactly the kitchen personnel

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Customary international humanitarian law prohibits the use of booby traps – objects that civilians are likely to be attracted to or are associated with normal civilian daily use – precisely to avoid putting civilians at grave risk and produce the devastating scenes that continue to unfold across Lebanon today. The use of an explosive device whose exact location could not be reliably known would be unlawfully indiscriminate, using a means of attack that could not be directed at a specific military target and as a result would strike military targets and civilians without distinction. Human Rights Watch

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The pagers were very questionable. Even assuming ONLY hezbollah had the explosive pagers, they were still detonating in public since the point of a pager is to be able to carry it around.

        Walkie talkie wise? I still need to reflexively condemn anything that kills children. But… that actually does seem super targeted and would presumably not be something a terrorist “should” carry around in public during their non-terrorist lives.

      • Broken_Orange_Juice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We’ve seen targeted attacks before in Lebanon, and they can hit an individual target with a drone without any interference. A targeted attack kills and harms its target, and only it’s target. No one else.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bibi and co need the endless cycle of hate and violence to go on so he can rob his own with impunity.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is the biggest “problem” of modern warfare. We don’t fight wars of conquest anymore because that tends to actually make other countries care (because those brown people have resources!). So we attack and then leave.

      It is similar to why France and England (or China/Japan/Korea) were basically at continuous levels of war for hundreds (?) of years. Because when you roll up and kill a bunch of people and maybe steal a goat? The remaining people want revenge. When you conquer them and either ethnically cleanse them to nonexistence or integrate them into your society? They forget why they were angry after a generation or two.

      I very much do NOT believe the world would be a better place with more ethnic cleansing and stealing of land. But we also are in a mess where retaliation between countries just continues with no real consequences to the people who are calling for the attacks. And the civilians just get rightfully angry when their kid is permanently blinded because she was looking the wrong way at the Lebanese equivalent of a Kroger.

      And then you get the keyboard warriors who hop in decades (or even centuries) into the conflict, pick a side, and immediately say THESE terrorists are good guys and THOSE terrorists are bad guys.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    You know whats even scarier? Out of the thousands of devices produced I bet none of them have gone through proper quality control and testing (because it requires documentation, which kind of goes against the whole “covert” thing), which means the failure rates are probably through the roof. This means that there are most likely dozens of unexploded devices still around filled with plastique. This means 2 things, 1st you essentially gave away military grade explosives to uncontrolled civilians which can be harnessed and reused for other malicious purposes, and 2nd if a media illiterate civilian doesn’t know to chuck their device in a tar pit, they will continue to walk around with an unexploded bomb strapped to their leg for a long time.

    All in all, whoever came up with this Idea, should be gunned down in the streets like a dog. Or at least be prosecuted for every confirmed civilian death.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Israelis are the world’s largest terrorists and the world’s largest cause of terrorism. I have had many ‘debates’ with zionists before getting permabanned off reddit who actually tried to frame Israel as a stabilizing force in the region where all the whining infantile Arabs can blame all their problems on (which they don’t and never did BTW) instead of tearing each other apart for land and on religious grounds (also bullshit).

      I simply pointed out how absurd their beliefs are and how utterly baseless. As you would expect, they constantly shifted the goal posts in ways that revealed the sheer depth of ignorance that they had about anything.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll agree with that only because the US cops aren’t using their military hardware yet. Give them time and they will start giving Israel pointers.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      All in all, whoever came up with this Idea, should be gunned down in the streets like a dog. Or at least be prosecuted for every confirmed civilian death.

      Biden would personally strap a medal around their neck. As would Trump… and Harris

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t you think Hezbollah is going to do a little ‘recall’ on these products?

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Kill, injure and seriously disrupt the communication of Hezbollah, no matter the consequences or civilian casualties. At least this time there was a tiny bit of military assassination type logic to it, and they weren’t just blatantly shooting civilians and bombing hospitals as they usually do, but they just had to trigger it during rush hour because of course they did.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago
    KABC - Los Angeles News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for KABC - Los Angeles News:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://abc7.com/post/explosions-witnessed-beirut-funeral-hezbollah-members-child-killed-pager-attack/15320074/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      2 months ago

      As this story has developed it has become increasingly clear that this was a supply chain attack where explosives were inserted into the electronics

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The shit the Mossad comes up with and pulls off would be impressive if it weren’t to serve an appartheit State.

          It also helps they can ignore the fallout from blowing up stuff with total disregard for international law or basic morals

      • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The BBC reported it was a Taiwanese brand to let a Hungarian company manufacture them on their behalf. The pagers were brought to Lebanon 5 months ago. The Hungarian company has been around since about 2022.

        For this to be a supply chain attack, the level of sophistication indicates Israeli intelligence was at this for years, from setting up a shell company, infiltrating manufacturing companies, etc. We don’t know whether the Taiwanese company was compromised as well.

        Now this last part is a bit of a conspiracy theory, but it makes you wonder what the real reason the US banned Huawei. Could they have been approached as a potential manufacturer and they said no? The timeline certainly works.

        Edit: BBC link