• Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

    To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.

    Even if they use the “right” restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground

    Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. The point of laws like this isn’t to protect cis women and girls, it’s just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that’s all Republicans care about.

    • valek879@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Also there is evidence that it is harmful to cis people. Especially cis women who might be queer or straight or gender nonconforming or not. These fuckwads always forget trans men exist and just harass women more with this shit. They don’t give a fuck off you’re trans or not, it’s about control. And their especially interested in controlling women.

      It’s also directly tied to fascism. Eco points to Machismo in point 12 of Ur-Fascism. “[Fascists hold] both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.” Meaning it’s not just women, trans women, gay men, people outside of traditional 1940s gender roles, but it also includes straight, cis men who just don’t seem to be straight and cis enough.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      harmful to trans people.

      And there’s the true intent of the Republican legislators.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      What, we’re supposed to let them use the restroom that matches their identity just because it’s the moral right thing to do, costs us nothing, and the alternative harms everyone!? Sounds like someone is WOKE!!!

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

      Can confirm: Having shared many a bathroom with trans folks and I have managed to survive unharmed. Who would have thunk?

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I was once in a public bathroom. Just when i was about to wash my hands, a women walked in. I was shocked, i looked around and saw that there were urinals, so the lady was in the wrong bathroom, not me. We laughed and then we both left. That was i close one, i tell you.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Can confirm: have no idea if I’ve ever shared a bathroom with a trans person because I am there to go to the bathroom, not interact with strangers.

  • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.

    You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.

    We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that’s an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don’t let this bullshit dim your shine.

    I love each and every one of you.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        Pssshhhhh!!! Look at this bourgeoisie mother fucker over here, refusing to share their stall with others!

        Selfish. Yes, that’s the word!

        The common working man poops on the left half of the toilet, and a stranger from the streets poop on the right half! AND THEY BOTH HATE THE YANKEES!!!

        Because fuck the Yankees. Can’t believe I have to cheer for the god damn Dodgers …

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’ve done things like this when people do the ‘trans women make “real” women feel uncomfortable in locker rooms’ argument.

      “So you’re saying women would be more comfortable with that guy changing next to them?”

      They don’t really have an argument against that part.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 days ago

      Each and every one of those fuckers looks like they’re in a retail store about to demand to speak to someone’s manager.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Johnathan Gooch, communications director for Equality Texas, told the Texas Tribune, “It’s a very aggressive way to alienate trans people from public life, and I think it is counter to the spirit of friendship that most Texans embody.”

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 days ago

    Cool, they got a useless law to “protect” children. Where is the law that protects them in churches/camps/etc?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Why would they do that? These laws are there to convince ma and pa dipshit that child predators are trans people not a group that’s not open or openly or formally organized and consists of people in all strata of society. In short these laws are to protect the pedos in power from suspicion

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 days ago

    Step 1: Identify as cat

    Step 2: Turn yourself in

    Step 3: Claim 10,000 bucks

    Step 4: No crime was committed, goto 1

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    While the bounty is set to a minimum of $10,000, there is no cap on how large the bounty can be.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    statutory damages in an amount of not less than $10,000

    Fuck, its a minimum fine of $10,000 every time you have to pee. Wtf

    • iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 days ago

      Out of curiosity what’s their fine for regular public indecency, like, urinating in an alley? I’d imagine it’s literally cheaper for a trans person there to piss on the side of city hall than it is a regular god damn restroom

      What an awful little shitville

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        Maybe that’s their plan, to get trans people on the sex offender list because they peed in public.

        I think it’s illegal in some countries to deny someone to pee.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        The penalties for peeing in public in Texas can range from fines of up to $500 to facing charges that might lead to community service or even a short jail term, depending on the circumstances and whether other offenses are involved. The variance in these penalties is due to factors such as the offender’s intent, location of the act, prior offenses, and any additional disruptive behavior associated with the incident.

        https://1800lionlaw.com/is-peeing-in-public-illegal-in-texas/

        That said, baring yourself in some alley may expose you to dangers other than the cops.

      • Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        When I lived in Texas, urinating in public was a potential misdemeanor crime, but was also a affirmative defense against public indecency. One of the few statutes in Texas that actually made sense.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Actually the fine is $500 at most. This is a guaranteed civil court payout, on top of any “damages” someone may receive. And since this is civil court, you operate on preponderance of evidence instead of beyond a reasonable doubt.

      This sort of legislated punitive damages is what should be happening for instances of wage theft, but instead we’re using it for harassing trans people while wage theft tends to have few if any punitive damages and mostly amounts to “ok, now give them their paycheck.”

            • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 days ago

              The bounty itself reads that any person besides local and state government officials may sue a trans person using the restroom that aligns with their gender, with payments including “injunctive relief sufficient to prevent the defendant from violating the provisions of this ordinance; nominal and compensatory damages if the plaintiff has suffered injury or harm from the defendant’s conduct; statutory damages in an amount of not less than $10,000 for each violation of this ordinance; and court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.”

              As with the abortion bans, the “”“criminal”“” themselves has to pay.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              So it’s the person you’re suing. Essentially, it’s a civil case like a car accident, but you’re suing someone for going into the wrong bathroom. You’re guaranteed a $10k judgement but can get more for “emotional damages” if the judge is a particular bigot.

              Edit: it also means you can blackmail a trans person for a settlement and that’s legal too, since the threat isn’t so much the criminal fine but the civil one

  • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 days ago

    The bounty defines biological sex based on birth certificates, either at the time of birth or corrected if there was a clerical error.

    What if you were born intersex? The story talks about the lack of provisions for disabled persons. There are so many holes in this ordinance. It is so going to get thrown out in court.