• Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Kinda wild that their previous flight simulator was met with near flawless reviews across the board, then the complete opposite for the immediate successor that probably shares 90% of the same code.

    • lustyargonian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think the issue was precisely that. They didn’t plan for the surge of users coming in on day one and whatever cloud hybrid system they have for this game got overwhelmed. We’ll get to know about the game’s actual quality a week from now I guess.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 hours ago

    God I love having a future where my ability to play a fucking flight simulator depends on both internet access and server reliability.

    Completely unnecessary to boot. Store a low res copy locally, offer the high res as regional packs. 0 reason to stream this data in.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For low res, no.

        Hi res, sure. Make it optional, or let players download the region they like. Or just the airports with much lower res landscapes, etc etc.

        Or just, let them have it all and make these choices. Memory is CHEAP nowadays. If you’re a flight sim enthusiast, a few terabytes for the map data is the least expensive part of your setup by far.

    • barryamelton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Sims are a captive market: all enthusiasts just buy it once, and there’s limited number of enthusiasts. Companies either have finite money and resell the same sim again and again with a different coat of paint, or over promise and under deliver. Long gone are the days of a company that doesn’t need to be profitable (like Microsoft with the early flight sims, made at a loss to showcase and sell their OS), and games are more expensive to make nowadays, not less.

      To break a captive market you either increase customers (not gonna happen, in fact simmers and interest in aviation is trending down compared with the 80s and 90s), or remove the market part altogether.

      Removing the market is the solution: be need an open source sim for the community by the community. Sims and libraries that can aglutinate all work done in academia, gaming, and different styles of sims under one umbrella, bringing a symbiotic work that is way better than the separate parts. We need to pull a Blender.

      We are in 2024. Sims suck. They are barely multi threaded. They reimplement all planes again and again, losing all info in what they falsely call themselves “a sim museum”.

      We can do better.

  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    game was too hard for my smoothie brain

    also the AI voice actors are kinda rude and sound very bad by today’s standards

    the engine is off
    you left the brakes on
    stop fucking with the egg yoke I swear to god I will BSOD;you

    anyone have recommendations for flying games that were made for dipshits like me?

  • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was surprised at the long load time initially and had a quick fly of an A10 warthog from a local small airfield.

    This was on my Xbox Series S and it was a bit stuttery in places. It’s clearly not meant for this console. This is for the pcs with big GPUs.