Digital streaming is displacing the last remnants of physical media.

In a disappointing turn of events, FlatpanelsHD reports that LG has ended production of its Blu-ray player series, which includes the UBK80 and UBK90 models. With limited stock available, prospective buyers should act quickly to secure the last remaining units before they are sold out.

After Samsung and Sony’s departure from physical media, LG was one of the last major manufacturers of Blu-ray players

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Not owning just means you don’t have to pay anything. Have at it. World’s free now

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’ve been actively avoiding it forever, but my peers are all-to-eager to give up any control or ownership of anything.

      It’s really a cultural problem, and most of the people receiving the short end of the stick aren’t realizing it.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        There’s a lot of stuff that isn’t really efficient to own individually. I need a power drill one day a year or less, it’s just gathering dust in my closet the rest of the time. I bet most of my neighborhood does the same.

        I often dream of a local community center of sorts that lends out tools, and other such things, maybe for a small yearly fee. They could spend to get something robust, good quality that lasts for a long while. And the whole neighborhood could benefit. Sort of an expanded version of a library? I guess none of that is very profitable.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    On one hand I’m happy less plastic shit will be produced and consumed. On the other hand, this is leading more towards dystopian timelines where we can never own anything anymore.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      You can own DRMless media instead. BluRay was already more restrictive than DVD, from what I understand.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Eh. A few more steps to rip the content, but not bad really.

        Now UHD Blu-ray is a different story. There are a limited number of drives that could do it before their firmware was patched.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I find buying DVDs just to rip the contents impractical anyway. If I were concerned with ethics - I’d likely do like I do with Steam games and buy a DRMed version corresponding to my DRMless download. Because I’d rather not deal with a disk taking up space or needing to be disposed of, not to mention potential scarcity if it is no longer in print.

          Agree on Blu-Ray. Also, weren’t there region restrictions?

          • ch00f@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            Yeah, it is frustrating that the license is tied to the physical disc. Especially when they won’t send you a replacement for a damaged disc.

            I personally buy, rip, and keep the physical discs of my collection which is now well over 1,000 titles. It’s a lot of work, and takes up a lot of space, but it’s also a hobby I enjoy. I’d much prefer if I could just buy a license for the film and watch it or store it however I want.

            You know, this might actually be a decent application for NFTs.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              I wouldn’t want that, NFTs are wasteful and also very much public.

              I see the value in disks if you’re into collecting the physical pieces, but if you’re not into that, I don’t find it a good way to own - for me that would be useless pieces of plastic occupying space. Very much not for everyone.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I had a Minidisc recorder I would use for field audio recordings back in the 90s and I really loved the format. Small, portable, didn’t fuck up like a DAT but was close enough in quality to work in most instances, and basically indestructible.

        You could probably drop a Minidisc from the top of a skyscraper and put it back in the player after dusting it off and there wouldn’t be an issue.

    • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 days ago

      Xbox can play Blu-ray as well, iirc. Still though, your point does stand. Let’s just hope that All-Digital consoles don’t supercede physical media consoles.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Or they might just make all disc drives extra attachments you have to get separately in the future.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Floppy drives died decades ago, yet you can still buy the drives and disks, brand new. This end of production will create a void, and it will be filled by someone else. No innovation will occur, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing here.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I bought a 5.25" bay LG one for my PC and installed libredrive on it a year ago. So far all I’ve done with it is burned a few CDs for a friend with an old car lol

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I guess home users will be without any viable long-term backup media soon. The only ones I can think of are those special blu-ray discs that promise to last for archival. After that we have spinning disks, but those only last a few years and will eventually be phased out, and then all we’ll have is flash memory that degrades rapidly. Oh, and paying through the nose for someone’s cloud service so they can hold our data to ransom while mining it for AI, and delete it as soon as we miss a bill payment.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Oh, and paying through the nose for someone’s cloud service so they can hold our data to ransom while mining it for AI.

      That’s what “they” want. lol. Everything seems to be pushing that way for sure.

      Though I am a little less pessimistic about spinners fully going away until all-flash datacenters are the norm. I’ve also had some running for close to 10 years, and they’re going strong (I’ve also got much newer ones as well)

      I forget the article I posted here months ago, but there’s a new optical format which is in the multi-TB range. Not sure if/when it’ll be commercially available, but maybe that will come about?

      https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/23/optical_disc_breakthrough/

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        That’s technically promising, but I can’t see it being a mass-market item since most people don’t care about backups, so it will likely be prohibitively expensive for most home users.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      but those only last a few years.

      Where do people get this information? Hard drives are very stable now (as are SSDs). All of mine are still going strong after 6+ years.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        That was true a while back, but yes drives have gotten way better.

        That’s just failure rate though, not data loss. You need your drives using a sane file system like zfs or using raid 1/10/6 where discs can do error checking as well to prevent silent data loss.

        They also need to be powered on. Offline drives will lose data to bit rot over time.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          The lifetimes have improved, but according to your link, the currently measured average age of a drive at failure is 2 years, 10 months. They expect that to increase as they roll over to newer, more reliable drives. These drives are under heavy use, unlike drives used for offline storage, but still it’s not really the kind of lifespan you’d ideally want in an archival medium.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Blurays are too small for backups anymore. It would take hundreds of them to backup all of my stuff. If you want long term backups, you have to spend a couple grand on a tape drive.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      If you’re looking for something to write once read nearly never, just get 3 USB drives with the same thing written on all three of them

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        My understanding was that flash memory, especially modern flash memory with tiny gates and multiple bits per cell, degrades the fastest of all storage media (possibly apart from badly made plastic discs). Especially if it isn’t regularly powered up, the memory cells will just use their charge after a while. If you used three it would reduce the risk, but if they’re all degrading untouched at the same speed they might still all lose data around the same time.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            The device itself degrades from writes, but the data degrades anyway as long as it is not powered. The bits are stored as charges in tiny capacitors, and if you leave it unpowered this charge gradually leaks away, leading to data loss over the long term. The device needs to be powered up to be able to refresh the charges and preserve the data.

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Are you sure? Do you have a link to more info on this claim?

              If true, I want to know if its orders of years or decades od centuries or millennium

              • floofloof@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                Accounts differ but most reports say a low number of years. Older flash memory is more stable than the newer stuff, because it only stored one value per tiny capacitor, so the charge had to drop by 50% for the bit to be lost. In newer flash memory they use each cell to store more than one bit, which means they need to make finer discriminations between charge levels, so there’s less tolerance for weakening charge levels. Many people report losing data after only a couple of years unpowered with modern devices. Some older devices can go for more than a decade. I don’t have any studies to hand but if you search for information about bit rot in flash memory you will find plenty of discussions online.

                If you power up the device and read all the data, this will refresh the charges.

  • leverage@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    Fuck LG, not like they made good BR players. I’ve sworn to avoid buying their shit since they discontinued support for a BR player within a year of release, which back then meant you wouldn’t be able to watch any BR movie released after a certain date due to new DRM or whatever. They just up and decided to not release new firmware for units still under warranty.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Never really bought into bluray. DVD was still good enough on early HD TVs, and at the time where the really good ones became affordable, you could buy decently sized HDDs and later SSDs for little money. Ever since my video library has been entirely digital.

    • Dempf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Right, but if you want a digital video library that hasn’t been compressed to hell by some streaming company then your only option is using Blu-ray as a source.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think the appeal of blu-ray today is for large amounts of long-term storage.

      For you or I who just save the files we’re interested in, it’s not that big of a deal. For the archivists who provide those files, it could be significant.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s really about quality imo. Not all 4k video is equal, and streamed video tends to be especially bad. It’s possible to download decent quality video files, but they are all from blue ray rips. If blue ray goes away, streaming sites might be the only remaining source for digital video files, and high quality digital video will essentially die.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    What brand would you recommend for a blu-ray burner?

    For long term storage of my several TB of “family photos and videos” of course.

    Or any other way to do “cheap” long term storage without maintenance (burn and forget). I heard that hdd are not reliable for long term unmaintained storage like that so I thought some form of optical storage.

    • teuniac_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      One that is capable of burning M-disks. They are available in sizes up to 100gb and are supposed to last a few hundred years. They can be read by most Blu-ray players made after 2011.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-DISC

      Of course, this is more suitable for genuine family photos and videos. For “family photos and videos” you could use any Blu-ray disk, but I doubt it’s the cheapest way to store them.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      When CDs were introduced they were touted as essentially eternal and damage proof. Id take M discs xlaim with a pinch of salt

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    You can sound the real warnings when Panasonic and Sony stop making them.

    But the writing is already on the wall. You used to be able to go into any supermarket and have a whole aisle for DVDs and Blu-rays, and now it’s like a single rack of things that came out recently. People have spoken with their wallets, and these things will go the same way as CDs before them.

    Now we just need to get back to a streaming service that doesn’t suck.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      NOT a streaming service. Rather - DRMless purchases. GOG did it, Bandcamp did it, now we need it for films. If not available, I would rather buy a DRMed version to correspond to the one I downloaded.

      But yeah, sad for those who are into collecting, the physical experience and extras.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        DRMless. Purchases.

        Seems to be an either/or situation right now. I’ll happily take the first one though.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Yeah, exactly - I specified that. Back when I had some money for media, I bought games on Steam (because they weren’t on GOG, sadly) and had pirated copies correspond to this. That seems about as fair as a rip corresponding to a DVD but without clutter and inconvenience.