ampersandrew@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoVideo Games Can’t Afford to Look This Goodwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1193arrow-down117
arrow-up1176arrow-down1external-linkVideo Games Can’t Afford to Look This Goodwww.nytimes.comampersandrew@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squareTheV2@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·2 months agoWell, everyone has their priorities. The problem is that even the people, who do value realistic graphics the most, are not captured by new AAA games.
minus-squareteslasaur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoStory goes somewhere below Replay value, and controls go to number one. Gameplay and controls are pretty much interchangable unless you want a cinema simulator. Add sound design as number two above music as number three and then the list is done.
Well, everyone has their priorities. The problem is that even the people, who do value realistic graphics the most, are not captured by new AAA games.
Story goes somewhere below Replay value, and controls go to number one. Gameplay and controls are pretty much interchangable unless you want a cinema simulator.
Add sound design as number two above music as number three and then the list is done.