Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again?

  • qx128@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Go bigger than IT problems.

    Most desk jobs are simply finding information: a suitable combination of 1s and 0s until someone else agrees that the combination is correct.

    Then, as a reward, the business slightly changes the 1s and 0s of my bank account.

    It’s 1s and 0s all the way down.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Under the same logic, All problems are also caused by turning it off and on again.

  • AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.

    Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: “You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong.”

    Knight turned the machine off and on.

    The machine worked.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    Turning it off and on again is a universal truth. A defibrillator works by turning the heart off then on again.

    (You don’t defib a patient who is flat lining. You defib to fix an erratic heart beat.)

    • SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Our University is a cosmic machine that has been running for billions of years, and as an IT guy reboots a computer when it’s been running for too long and has problems, will inevitably implode on itself and tear itself apart, which is the equivalent of God turning it off and on again.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      ECT basically does that too but for brains. Too sad and Prozac isn’t fixing it? We’re gonna put you under and slap the reset button every other day until you’re not. Shit works too its fucking wild.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I believe there is also a medical treatment that consists of wiping out your white blood cells entirely so your body has to make new ones.

        "Have you tried turning the immune system off then on again?’

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Studied computer science. The answer is yes.

    A computer is a funky thingy that’s a jumbled city of stuff turning on and off with the one master on/off thingy which is the clock on the processor.

    When it switches from negative to positive a lot of small switches everywhere switch, some stay the same, some flip. It’s all just a bunch of rythm dancing of switches going off and on.

    • Senseless@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Until some stray gamma ray hits just the right spot, flips a bit and either nothing at all of everything all at once happens.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you used mechanical switches, would it be possible to build a large version of some modern semiconductor chip? If so, I would expect that contraption to be slower and louder than the original.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you’re willing to sacrifice the clock speed it’s possible. One of the issues will be that the insane amount of logic gates would have to propagate through every cycle which happens stupid fast on modern chips. Still possible to model it and do a timelapse.

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is pretty cool. I don’t care how slow it is. It just shows that that it can be done. If you want something useful, use silicon. If you want something awesome, use creative alternatives like pneumatic pipes and valves. :D

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s all just a bunch of rythm dancing of switches going off and on.

      I want this rhythm game now.

    • lordnikon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I come from the net. Through systems, peoples and cities to this place: Mainframe. My format: Guardian; to mend and defend. To defend my new-found friends, their hopes and dreams. To defend them from their enemies. They say the user lives outside the net and inputs games for pleasure. No one knows for sure, but I intend to find out.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Since words can be represented in binary, thus as a sequence of ones and zeroes, […], doesn’t that mean that all questions can be answered by saying no, then yes again at some level?”

    How has no one pointed out yet that this is conceptually wrong? Turning something off & on again is cycling the same switch. Solutions to IT problems are setting different bits, which is binary for “using different words”.

    • Get_Off_My_WLAN@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      How dare you use logic on my computer logic-related shower thought.

      But yeah, I get what you mean. I had that thought at some point after posting. This is why I should probably just keep it in this silly thread and not write any philosophy essays soon.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, technically speaking, it’s cycling all the switches. You use one main switch to simplify the process, but it controls all the other switches as well.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, that’s the whole misconception here. cycling a switch means returning to the previous state. Turning it off and on again means going from ON -> OFF -> ON. Software problems are solved by going from one state to a different state.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Software problems are solved by going from one state to a different state.

          Or by moving to Canada.