Donald Trump has said that Palestinians have “no alternative” but to leave Gaza due to the devastation left by Israel’s war on Hamas, in effect endorsing ethnic cleansing of the territory over the opposition of Palestinians and the neighbouring countries.

Speaking as he prepared to host Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, on Tuesday, Trump repeated the suggestion that Gaza’s population should be relocated to Jordan and Egypt – something both countries have firmly rejected.

Trump claimed Palestinians would “love to leave Gaza”, telling reporters: “I would think that they would be thrilled.”

MBFC
Archive

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Wow it’s almost like this was predictable. Good thing all those liberals who didn’t vote for Harris could not have possibly known Trump would be even worse…

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    If you have absolutely no empathy for fellow human beings, no sense of morality, no concern with topping off a holocaust with a cultural genocide, no concern with what anyone wants for themselves …… I guess that describes the orange guy

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’d ask protest voters if they’re feeling pretty stupid right now, but the truth is they never gave a flying fuck about Palestinians. They only cared about feeling morally superior.

    Trash humans.

  • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Wellllll technically those who voted against Kamala to stop israeli genocide got what they wanted. Israel no longer has to genocide Palestinians.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If he said this to people in my home town, there would be 1 resounding answer from those left standing “Live free or Die” so actually Palestinians that have nothing to lose because it was taken from them, literally don’t have a choice but to stay and fight the boot on their neck.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s right to be angry. I don’t have an answer. I think few people realize that most genocides are actually successful and forgotten.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The important thing is that everyone should know my hands are clean of this because I didn’t vote for either party.

    • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      You break it, you buy it. Let’s move the Israeli officials to Gaza and let the Palestina citizens live in Jerusalem. ^/s

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In 1940, the Nazis’ plan was to relocate all Jews to Madagascar.
    Just 2 years later, they started exterminating them systematically.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yup.

      They went from passing oppressive laws against Jews to turning them to ash in a frighteningly short period of time.

      Fascism is 100% here and our nation is asleep at the fucking wheel.

      Never been more ashamed to be an American.

    • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Population transfers aren’t unheard of. In Greece/Turkey, Italians from eastern Adriatic, German from Prussia and Silesia, Pakistan/India millions of people moved.

      This Holocaust comparison is completely dishonest and betrays any knowledge of how it happened. Used in this context, it’s Holocaust relativism at best and likely antisemitic.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Well, i have bad news… all of those were genocides

        Edir: purging an etnicity from a land to gain a claim over that territory makes it sound bad enough?

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Americans making this about Trump vs Kamala is getting really really annoying. I mean, we get it, you are pissed off at each other. We’ve read the same arguments dozens of times already, and at this point it is getting extremely tired. It sucks the oxygen out of every conversation. Is this what the discourse is going to be around Palestine and Israel the next four years?

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think these people actually care about Palestinians, it’s team sports. They care more about saying “I told ya so” than advocating for people who are suffering.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The US President, yes. You have to understand that internationally, at this point, we just see him as just that: The US President. Your elections are your internal issue and we don’t need to be expending all our energy psychoanalyzing your electoral system. As not-an-american, I don’t give a damn about how mad you are at your fellow citizens who might or might not have stayed home at election day or voted in a way that you think was stupid. Not every fucking world event needs to be understood from the perspective of the role of Jill Fucking Stein as a spoiler candidate.

        EDIT: Rule number 1 says “[…] Not United States Internal News […]”. This applies to posts, but I think after a certain point, overtly brigading every fucking world event thread with the internal US perspective kind of beats the point.

  • sozesoze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The amount of hatred against phantom leftists that on the one hand lost the Dems the vote and on the other were too weak to have their demands considered is crazy.

    No, these people didn’t lose you the vote. They don’t even exist in this ambivalent form. It was everyday citizens that heard Democrats push the same racist border talking points Trump spewed last election and went “Hm, if even the Dems say this is a problem, I’ll vote the party that talked about how evil Migrants were for decades, the GOP”. It’s people tired of increasingly struggling to make ends meet and the Dems saying everything will stay the same, while Trump promised them change. We know that he just means destroying the last remnants of social security nets for poor people and everything that stands in the way for oligarchs making kaijulllian dollars. But people are stupid and desperate. Why can’t the Democratic party be held to a higher standard than whatever this is?

    • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The Dems are constantly held to a vastly higher standard. This was true when trump first came to power too.

      Hillary: competent politician, could have smiled more maybe, no big changes.

      Trump: grab em by the pussy, pay hush money to porn stars, ramble incoherently.

      Public: what about her emails?

      • sozesoze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No, they aren’t. Expecting the Dems to get the vote by not being the fascists is a low standard. They have to present more than that. They didn’t, in fact, and now the party blames leftists for not voting hard enough when it’s their failure.

        Jesus, when Luigi Mangione allegedly killed that healthcare CEO, it showed how the entire country liked seeing that, and the Democratic party has no idea what kind of campaign they could maybe run? I’m not saying they should run on a billionaire purge platform, but c’mon, maybe use your one billion dollar campaign funds for sending a message for you and not against the other one. Instead we got a 25k grant for a house purchase if you jump through three hoops. Wow, inspiring stuff.

        And Hillary Clinton being characterized as making “no big changes” tells the whole story here. Her opponent went on a “drain the swamp”, “we’re going to make America great again” campaign and building up a hispanic and muslim scape goat. Everyone who is educated knew these were lies, but people were bad off, even then, and needed change. To be a hawkish candidate in a war exhausted society who runs on nothing but trying to achieve the first female presidential office is a weak attempt at saving America from Trump.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Single-issue voters, when EVERYTHING was at stake, deserve all the hate they get, but are too stupid to understand. The worst kind of trumpers, ones that don’t think they are.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Everything was at stake, so Democrats brought out Dick Cheney, Mark Cuban & continued spewed anti-Palestinian messaging to help Trump win. Got it.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yup.

      I see no difference between a Trump voter and those stupid enough to vote 3rd party or abstain from voting.

      They are all scum, equally.

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It isn’t blame, it’s observation. It is also not relivent to the second part of what you said.

      • Netrunner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Who else would you blame when you lost a vote?

        Something not directly involved?

        Beep boop?

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Who do you blame for climate change? The sun, chemistry or humans releasing chemicals to the atmosphere?

          Arguably all 3 contribute to climate change, but only the last one is something you can change. So you blame humans, because it is the only productive option.

          In an election, you can blame the party that lost or the voters. Blaming the voter is about as productive as blaming the sun, distracting from what changes have to happen in the Democratic party to guarantee a win in the next election.