• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    283
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, keep making enemies of the billionaires that got this administration into office and spent millions of dollars to do so. I’d very much love that for you.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      1 month ago

      Good thing this isn’t a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          In the most literal sense we have representation, but it sure as hell doesn’t seem like it in practice… :(

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          When elections are fraudulent, its the same as no representation. Besides, pretty soon they’ll be suspending elections altogether. It doesn’t get more “no representation” than that.

              • ggppjj@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                I really don’t understand the aggression, I was talking about the old rich dead people propaganda concerning no taxation without representation 200 years ago, I never said anything about the fuckwads we have today.

                If you think I’m saying something different, explain what you read and allow me the opportunity to clarify my intent.

                Saying I’m full of shit at this point is just asinine.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      The billionaires have thus far been too cheap to amass private armies to directly enforce their own will. Why, when you can lobby Congress for the price of a used Hyundai Sonata to get the Army to do what you want?

      The government holds the power of violence and Trump holds the power of the government. The billionaires will be reminded of that if they get out of line. Coincidentally, this is the arrangement of modern Russia.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        they have been too cheap thus far.

        I’m pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

        • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Personnel is one thing.

          Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

          They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

          There is a reason they’re all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

          • CitizenBrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You can have all the expensive equipment you want. They don’t have the numbers. When your enemies are all around you and this military historically fucking sucks at combating insurgency, you’re going to lose.

            The military would be smart to tell this dude to pound sand before they, and a bunch of people die in a new civil war that they can’t win against the most armed civilian population on the planet.

          • SaltSong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

            They don’t need one. They need a sniper.

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            its mostly asymmetrical/cyberwarefare now anyways. russia and china are both are good at this, but not militarily.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the crazy part, unless they’re “outlawed” billionaires should try and improve people’s lives since it means they would have more money to spend on the crap those billionaires are selling! It’s hard to sell stuff on Amazon if everyone is struggling to afford housing and food.

        • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 month ago

          UPS just laid off 20K workers on the expectation that Amazon deliveries will be way down.

          Container ships are down 60%. More than any month during the pandemic.

          Trump is imploding the entire economy.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

          They could work to remove the destitution and desperation of working people. But if their workers weren’t in such dire straits, then they wouldn’t have so much power over them. Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance also have more time to pursue unionization and other political activities. Even if improving the lives of the people would objectively increase the wealth of the ultra-rich, it would still decrease their power. And ultimately, the only reason people ever obtain that level of wealth is because they desire power more than anything else. People who aren’t power-hungry monsters cash out and retire early long before they reach billionaire status.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance are unlikely to pursue unions. That’s the stuff unions are trying to achieve.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      In the article, Amazon already back peddled and said it was just in the idea phase and they never really planned on implementing it.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      He’s brought down Tesla (bankrupt in 2 years, MMW), and now Amazon. We shpuld start a betting pool for who-s next. META? Google? Microsoft?

        • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wouldn’t that be wonderful? Those corporations are what helped this “voting” travesty into power.

          Corporations don’t have peoples’ well being in their sights except as target practice.

          Power to the people, not corporations.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the thing that was always gonna happen. They were always gonna bring themselves and subsequently society down. It’s just the crit multi of Donald Trump a lot of people seemed not prepared for.

    • Novocirab@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Thoughts on how to make this happen:

      • Whenever a shopowner is already critical of Trump, call them and suggest it directly.

      • Ask your local cashiers and other store clerks how come the prices rose, and whether that really is all tariffs. Again and again. And ideally so that other shoppers overhear it.

      • Make angry social media posts explicitly asking the same, explicitly tagging your local store and/or the chain to which they belong, and muse about looking into their competitors.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get that you want to aggrieve the owners but that last • tactic feeds into Reichwingers absolving Trump. Asking in person, where they have a chance to say, “yes, see this here is the tariffs amount” puts the blame where it belongs (and can also bring price-gouging into the light, because for sure some will happen).

        • Gouging will happen in every industry, by every corporation. The only ones that might not are locally owned, which has been dwindling since at least the 90s.

          It happened with covid, it happened with bird flu, and it’s about to happen the biggest ever with tariffs as the excuse.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, it’s never going to happen in the first place

      «Amazon moved to distance itself from the report, saying the idea had been considered by Amazon Haul, the company’s recently launched low-cost shopping hub, but had been rejected.

      “The team that runs our ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products. This was never approved and is not going to happen,” said Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesperson."

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 month ago

    Telling people how much the Trump Tax costs them is now considered “hostility”. Got it.

      • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The dude looks like he keeps a half billion in cash on him at all times to try and buy his way out of the angry mob(s) that will eventually come for him… Because he’s that much of a doucher.

        What’s really insane is that even with all his money, the best he can do for a wife is some kind of plastic surgery experiment that looks like it came out of the Tool Prison Sex music video.

        Just so afraid of losing a small amount of the fortune he can’t spend in his lifetime, that he’s given up the true power that comes with that type of wealth. The power to help

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maybe this will show him that you can’t buy Trumps loyalty because he has no loyalty. However, I have my doubts that even Trump going from going from “My good buddy Bezos” to “Amazon is the enemy” in the course of a day will be enough of a object lesson for Bozos.

          • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I know, but but even so the whiplash move from “best buddy” to “enemies list” (and probably back again after this capitulation) should tell anyone who wants to ally with Trump what a futile of a move that is. It doesn’t matter how much you schmooze him, how give him, or how much he owes you; the moment you’re not useful to him Trump will throw you under the bus.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “but all I wanted was an even more negative tax rate and to be able to fire workers for getting hurt on the job! I didn’t want the dictator to threaten me with the window treatment”

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
        To call upon a neighbour and to say:–
        "We invaded you last night–we are quite prepared to fight,
        Unless you pay us cash to go away."

        And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
        And the people who ask it explain
        That you’ve only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
        And then you’ll get rid of the Dane!

        It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
        To puff and look important and to say:–
        "Though we know we should defeat you,
        we have not the time to meet you.
        We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

        And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
        But we’ve proved it again and again,
        That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
        You never get rid of the Dane.

        It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
        For fear they should succumb and go astray;
        So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
        You will find it better policy to say:–

        "We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
        No matter how trifling the cost;
        For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
        And the nation that plays it is lost!"

        - Rudyard Kipling

    • qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seemingly because their stock price started to fall due to the Trump admin’s reaction. Which, what? Why would that negatively impact their stock?

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    “The team that runs our ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products. This was never approved and is not going to happen,” said Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesperson.

    Lmao some poor team gets thrown under the bus

      • nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nah, not chickened out, they’re in cahoots. Example … 40 mil for a shitty Melania documentary is outrageous. For reference, BBC’s planet earth cost 25 million. So… yeah…

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Who the actual fuck cares about Melania? I get watching a documentary on Chris Chan cause at least that’s largely a self contained train wreck, but the fuck has Melania ever done that’s even passingly notable?

          By the Allfather I can’t even fathom the fucking vanity of these pissants.

          • nyctre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Eh, it’s mostly about the bribe, I’m sure. Having people pretend to be interested in her is just a bonus.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Probably mostly the bribe, but for them to settle on a fucking documentary is just alien to me. Like it’s just asking for folks to take a find toothed comb through her shit, the concept alone makes me want to climb into a hole and further blend into the paint. But I am admittedly coming from a background that utterly encourages being unnoticed except to those you like, good way to not be shot.

              • nyctre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Easy to produce, spend the bare minimum, “spend” the rest on “marketing” and voilà, ez 38 mil in Melania’s pockets. Nobody said anything about the documentary being thorough or factual or anything of the sort, you’re thinking of the alternate reality where truth is a thing and Gwyneth Paltrow and other cunts aren’t allowed to peddle their bullshit

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    I do so wish they would. Certain they won’t.

    Bezos bent knee & kissed the ring. Chances he’ll grow a spine? 1 in a few million.

  • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, no shit it’s hostile. This Administration is being hostile to their business! What in the fuck did they expect to happen?