Statement: https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html

Mastercard has not evaluated any game or required restrictions of any activity on game creator sites and platforms, contrary to media reports and allegations.

Our payment network follows standards based on the rule of law. Put simply, we allow all lawful purchases on our network. At the same time, we require merchants to have appropriate controls to ensure Mastercard cards cannot be used for unlawful purchases, including illegal adult content.

Media contact

Seth Eisen

seth.eisen@mastercard.com

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    258
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    so this is a game of telephone between activists, payment cards, payment processors, and vendors.

    Also TIL mastercard HQ is located in Purchase, NY.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      18 days ago

      Their condition (both via and mastercard) include stuff which, when you read it attentively, boils down to “we only prevent illegal things. And stuff we deem bad.”.

      It’s not even a game of telephone or anything, they have their conditions that says “yes we did” and their PR that says “we probably didn’t”. They could be playing alone and still losing this one.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 days ago

      A game of telephone involves the message changing from each person. In this case, everyone but Visa/MC are blaming Visa/MC (valve, game stores, and collective shout).

      It’s more like a game of calvinball, only Calvin is claiming the rule they made up doesn’t exist

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Combining what Valve and Itch said, it seems like it’s Stripe or PayPal, and they cited MasterCard’s policies as justification…

  • Gloria@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    18 days ago

    American Payment Processors really need more competition. They can not be trusted to act in a free market sense and not drift into a chaindog for political ideas.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      18 days ago

      It feels to me like payment processing has a similar function to physical currency. Like all of those security features on the bills are used to ensure the transaction is trusted.

      Point being, I’ve long thought that payment processors are essentially doing a job that should be done by the government.

      There are strange gaps where physical services have digital analogues but are completely ignored by the government.

      I don’t understand why the treasury doesn’t process payments or why the post office doesn’t issue email addresses, for another example.

      Anyways, back to the point, physical currency specifically says that it is valid for all debts. If they applied the same logic to payment processing, then this would never happen.

      • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        18 days ago

        Probably because government and the people in charge of government are largely tech illiterate and being literate or seeking policy advice from literate people isn’t expected.

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Postal banking is a thing in some places.

        I’m not sure I want the government running those services. Like a basic one, sure, but for handling credit cards and general banking services? Nah, I don’t want the Trump administration having direct access to my purchases.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            The main reason is that the credit industry isn’t in the business of running an intelligence service or part of law enforcement. That said, what they are connected to is almost the same as an intelligence service, that being the advertising industry, and there’s literally nothing stopping them from selling or even being forced to give their data to law enforcement. The only reason it doesn’t happen more I’d say is just the optics of it.

            Ultimately what’s needed is a digital payment system that’s at least somewhat anonymous, but that’s an incredibly hard nut to crack. Bitcoin tried it, but largely failed to do so (and immediately got corrupted by speculators that wanted to use it as a forex instead of currency). A couple of the other crypto currencies that have come out since then have claimed to be better but I’m still incredibly skeptical that there’s any real anonymity there.

            • LwL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Someone above linked GNU Taler which seems to go in the right direction, but I’m not sure how mature it is yet. It specifically claims to not be a new currency, so hopefully the speculation part won’t be an issue.

              • orclev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 days ago

                Yes, that was me. Unfortunately much like GNU Hurd, Taler is less of a project than it is a thought experiment. It lacks a sufficient number of people pushing it to become a viable project. It exists, but as far as I’m aware it’s never been used seriously in the real world outside of some proof of concept type deployments at a university. Without a champion, ideally a major business or significant public figure, it’s likely to continue being far more conceptual than practical.

                • LwL@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 days ago

                  I guess the closest we might be getting anytime soon then is the digital euro. Which is supposed to end its preparation phase soon, and, in spite of being government issued, promises to be private (not like ccs are remotely private anyway, so nothing lost at least).

                  As always there’s some risk of it getting changed to allow tracking later down the line, but if done correctly it could still be a big improvement over the current situation for EU citizens. If it’s successful, maybe other governments will look into similar programs.

                  I feel like ideally the digital euro project would work with GNU Taler since the goals seem to align, with the main difference being that the digital euro would be government backed. I don’t have high hopes since governments always fuck this up somehow, but I guess in the best timeline the EU is that champion (since using the same technology even with a different currency would give some trust into the concept, so it could help with finding early adopters - likely outside of the EU since I’d imagine in that scenario the digital euro would just be preferred here)

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 days ago

        It is fucking wild that we don’t have INTERAC credit cards here in Canada

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Payment processing is one of those things that really should have been treated as a public utility from the start. The same way we treat water, electricity, and phone lines. But even getting the internet treated as a utility has been a losing battle thus far.

      • aramova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 days ago

        Only problem with a public utility like that now would be Trump and his Insane Cunt Posey would weaponize it for the religious right.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        18 days ago

        They’re trying with GNU Taler, but it’s pretty much a pipe dream at this point.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          With how volatile cryptocurrency has been in general in the last decade or so, I wouldn’t bet on it.

          Crypto is ultimately a different form of money, as compared with fiat.

          What I think people in this discussion are seeking is an electronic, FOSS , secure network that can facilitate economic transactions of fiat currency.

          Of course the two don’t have to be mutually exclusive

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Bitcoin is sadly a failed experiment and you’re not a luddite for pointing out its various shortcomings. I was an early adopter back when you could get an entire coin for a buck or two, but never invested much in it and lost most of what I had when one of the early exchanges imploded.

            The concept of bitcoin was great, a decentralized currency not under the control of any government or institution, but that was still reliable and pseudo-anonymous. The execution however was beyond disappointing. It was quickly commandeered by “investors” looking to gamble on something even more volatile than forex markets and ceased being able to function as an actual currency due to the wild swings in value. In order to be a useful currency something must have a relatively stable value. Additionally scammers and criminals also gravitated to bitcoin further driving legitimate businesses away from it not wanting the guilt by association. Finally it turned out that the anonymity was even easier to break than initially thought and the tax headaches involved in buying, selling, or trading in bitcoin or any cryptocurrency make it too annoying to actually use (massively compounded by its wildly fluctuating exchange rates).

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      I feel like it should be super easy now for smaller competitors to pop up by just offering digital credit services using tap on mobile phones. No need to manufacture and ship out plastic cards, just a digital version people keep on the phone, until they get large enough to be able to provide physical cards.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        18 days ago

        The issues here are trust, security, adoption and so forth. It’s not easy to start a competition here I’d say.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s a catch 22. You need a phenomenal amount of capital to stand up a payment network with all those criteria, but anyone with that amount of capital can’t actually be trusted not to abuse their position in exactly the same way the existing banking networks have.

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            Probably not just capital, also political influence and other ways I guess. But yes, it’s always a problem if it’s like that. If you ask me, there should be a generic independent payment backbone, where many providers could provide payments - like internet or something like that.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Well at least with phone tap there’s like a limit of $200, so maybe some company can corner a niche market where they only cover small daily purchases. No $10,000 credit balances or $2000 purchases and points and whatnot, just like $1000 balance limits and max $200 on purchases through tap.

          You wouldn’t need quite as much capital that way, and I bet that would eat a good chunk of business from visa and MasterCard.

  • candyman337@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    Effecting the brand?? Who in their right mine would associate them with anything but payments? That’s ridiculous

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Like for real, the only reason I’m associating them with these games now is because they’ve actively brought it into the limelight, so we can see that

      I wouldn’t have even thought anything of association if they hadn’t done so.

      But now, anytime I see an NSFW game on Steam, I’m immediately associating it with Visa and MasterCard due to the fact that the news is that they’re trying to get rid of those games, which I assume is not what they wanted, but you know it’s what’s happening.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      They think they’re more than a money pipe.

      A competitor to MasterCard and Visa could show up with double their combined budget and do what they do to massively disrupt this particular industry. The average Joe would not give half a shit and continue paying for stuff with whatever card their bank gave them just like they always have.

      The specific brand of payment processor a card uses is just not a thing people care about unless they have an Amex and that’s essentially because places don’t always take it.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      The astonishingly hypocritical part:

      Guess who does payment processing for OnlyFans?

      Visa.

      And MasterCard.

      =D

      All you need to verify your id is a credit card!

      Then you get all the pr0n you want!

      Hope you didn’t borrow one from your parents!

      No child has ever thought of that before!

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 days ago

        Tbf in my day the children who thought of that and followed through got caught. Statements and such.

        Those who didn’t get caught either stole it in magazine or VHS/DVD form straight from the store, or from an older relative, and then when internet happened, from free or pirate sites (pics at first that took forever on a 56k modem, then videos as tech progressed). Or if you were lucky someone would burn DVDs and sell them.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          The trick is not actually buying anything.

          Just using it for an id verification.

          On a site that actually doesn’t cost anything.

          It could be done, over a 56k modem, guess how I know?

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            Oh, that wasn’t even a thing back in my day. At first there was no age verification, then it became the familiar “Are you 18? [Yes] [No]” system we all know and love.

            Well I suppose there was ID checks at the store, but ykwim.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              18 days ago

              IIRC, I genuinely, accidentally, first discovered internet porn on an elementary school computer, as a 5th grader.

              Tried to go to the website for the whitehouse.

              Turns out, the real website is whitehouse.gov, not whitehouse.com

              At the time… yep, whitehouse.com was hardcore porn, this was way before school network admins… really even existed? muchless had any kind of url/ip blacklists.

              So yep very old school, early days, near-miss or adjacent url hoarding… I think that would have been all the way back when expedia, yahoo, askjeeves were all still competetive search engines, and I am pretty sure I was using Netscape Navigator, hahahah!

              Anyway, I was quite shocked, rofl, having grown up thus far literally going to church every weekend, being told by my parents that I couldn’t participate in the school Halloween festivities, as that was a ‘Satanic’ holiday.

              Hooray fundamentalist upbringing!

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I associate them with religious pundites and discrimination of payments. A payment is a payment, for christ’s sake! If it’s illegal, report it to the relevant authorities.

  • seejur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    18 days ago

    Of course, because when everyone buy a game on steam the FIRST thing it comes to their mind is the credit card brand they used. What a load of bullock.

    FFS I don’t even remember which one of my credit card I have saved on steam.

    MasterCard can go fuck themselves. Great job saving your brand

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Seriously rediculous, most people don’t even know if their card is Visa or Mastercard, nor do they care (because they dont know what they are or what they mean).

      (This is from my experience with people i know)

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 days ago

        Mastercard have changed their design so that it no longer says Mastercard on it, and it’s just the two circles. I bloody hate it, MasterCard thought they were able to get away with it because they thought they had brand recognition but literally no one cares about them.

        Also they’ve been fine with porn games up until now and literally no one cared.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      I use Paypal and they charge my Discover (Novus network, IIRC). No MC policy issue, let me buy what I want.

        • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s purely because steam hasn’t been able to keep my login info secure for almost a decade. I’ve changed emails, passwords, both, and yet I will always get random 2FA attempts from other places. I just don’t trust them to keep my bank info safe either.

          • Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            18 days ago

            I’m looking at this and I am just wondering… Did you also check the computers your using?

            It’s quite a bit easier to get in the pc of a normal user than it is to get into the computers of valve, or at least that’s to hope.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            Interesting. I’ve been using steam for decades and the only time my account was compromised was due to my own machine getting some malware. It was easy enough to clean up, reset password and reset all my steam sessions.

            Now my blizzard account on the other hand… I got so tired of defending it that I’ve cleared all my CC and personal info from the account and just decided to let the hackers have it. Their shit leaks bad.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Ah yes PayPal the completely benign brand that Elon was trying to shove the fact that he registered X dot com down our throats with decades ago

        e: didn’t realize it would link to that shithole

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      18 days ago

      Honestly, wouldn’t be surprised, they have spent god knows how much to push linux to unshackle themselves from Windows and Microsoft

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s multiple steps to this sadly, including the payment gateway, processor, acquirer and this is before even Mastercard, VISA, Amex or other card companies come into the picture.

      It’s not impossible, but Valve would need to convince the card issuers that they are a valid processor and then also make deals with banks all over the world for GWs. Or they could just act like Stripe and own the full stack and bully their way through the fintech world.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        18 days ago

        They already support local payment processing schemes such as Bancontact, iDEAL, JCB, Pix, etc. A good chunk of their international customer base already isn’t dependent on the big American payment processors.

        The way towards undermining Visa/MC’s power is for more governments/Central Banks to push for indigenous alternatives which abide by local regulations rather than foreign puritanism. This is already a desirable goal for most both from a geopolitical POV (reduce American control over world finance) and a financial one (VISA/MasterCard charge outrageous transaction fees).

        American consumers are fucked whichever way things go though, it’s not like the regime is going to make a move to break up the monopoly nor to push for less censorship in media. If Valve somehow goes through with this and makes deal with all major American banks, they’ll be done just in time for the Save The Children From Pedostanic Video Games Act or whatever the fuck that will force them to purge all thought crime from their platform.

          • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            18 days ago

            Weird, either there’s some backroom drama with Interac or now might be the time for you to ask their support about it.

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        In America I think you also either literally or effectively (to compete) have to own some banks as well.

      • Billegh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        That, and I’m like 70% sure that as a payment processor you can’t take your own payments in the way that valve would need to.

      • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Unfortunately Taler still needs a lot of maturing, but having a distributed payment system not running on that horrendous waste of time and energy that is the block chain is promising!

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’d never heard of this before. I hope Liberapay adds support for it. I don’t think all itch.io developers would be interested. I’m not sure it quite solves all the problems that Steam has with getting payments to game publishers.

        Quite interesting; thanks for the link!

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    18 days ago

    I expected nothing less from them. They did pretty much the same exact thing when Japan tried confronting them after they started blocking Japanese retailers from trading internationally. I can’t find the article anymore but IIRC, Japan’s Prime Minister tried having an in person interview with them about it but it was cut short because he stormed out of the room after Visa tried denying everything. I don’t think that the payment processors will ever take responsibility for their actions.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    18 days ago

    They are a fucking payment processor; the only brand that matters is reliability and confidency, which they damaged now.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 days ago

      They’re not talking about with Steam customers though, but rather with the religious idiots who have decided to crusade against porn, feel emboldened by recent age-ID bills and are now pursuing the “MasterCard funds filth” angle.

      I’m kinda wondering what the ratio of anti-porn religious knobs is you gamers. There’s a lot of religious folk but many of them also enjoy porn so …

  • rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I kill people in GTA 5. I don’t kill people in Hentai Incest Generator 3000. Yet someone prefers to see my transaction only for the first one, citing damages to “the brand”.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Hire prostitute in GTA, kill her, get money back - ✅

      Have consensual sex with character in hentai game - 😤

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    18 days ago

    Why doesn’t valve simply restore games back then? Tell payment processors MC is OK with them (as evident by this statement) and tell them to come back with a reply from MC?

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    More people should watch this:

    The Secret War To Censor The Internet

    The CC companies have religious morons contained within their executives but they’re mainly being puppeted by outside religious evangelical organizations with a long history of wanting to destroy all sex work or erotica art.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 days ago

      I’m so confused; I thought MC and VISA were payment processors. So when I buy a game off Steam, I have two companies handling my money?

      • Caedarai@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        MC and VISA are the networks. They allow communication between banks, and the entire operation is packaged up by payment processors like Stripe, Square or PayPal. So you have processors, the banks on either end (perhaps two separate ones), the network operator, and additionally any extra companies that might offer additional services for the transaction, like for fraud prevention or financing.

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 days ago

          I see, thank you for the explanation. I’m ashamed to say I never knew how any of this worked. I just knew it magically got me the games I wanted.

  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    But what was “illegal”? I mean, if we’re applying real life laws to video games, that completely removes any game where violence is portrayed, GTA, Sonic the hedgehog, animal cruelty in super Mario. That’s why they are GAMES.

    dumbasses. All of them.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 days ago

    Oh I’m so glad that their brand isn’t being damaged. It’d be terrible if that were to happen.