• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think one of the scariest parts here is how only one news source cracked 50% for Republicans. That indicates a rejection of the concept of news

  • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The most striking thing in this graphic is that Republicans don’t trust anything except Fox and Joe Rogan. Shows the lack of critical thinking imho.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I will hear out Associated and BBC but if it’s in the US? Nah, probably owned by some billionaire parasite shitbag.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Trust is a strong word for almost all of these. A lot of them have betrayed my trust before so I don’t trust them anymore. Like who would trust the New York Times? Honestly? They do some good reporting. But I think you’d have to be naive to just trust whatever they say these days, or ever really.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah they lost me when in 2004 they buried a story about all the WMD experts leaving Iraq on the back pages of section A while vocally supporting the war on the front page.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The trust in Fox News is SO disheartening. It’s almost completely sensationalist propaganda.

    I’m surprised NPR has low trust rates from both parties. I can feel a liberal bias, their long-form stories are excellent, but they do try to present both sides which probably makes some liberals unhappy.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I took the results a bit differently.

      First, I ignored the dislike slices. Who’s watching sources they distrust? Nobody, so that’s personal bias, IMO.

      Now, look at the Trust slices. Other than FoxNews, no news source really breaks 25% for the Repubs. They just don’t seem to follow any source. If they did, they’d trust someone. So half watch FoxNews, and only a quarter watch anything else.

      For the lefties, half the sources have 30-60% trust. That is a lot more sources getting regular eyes and ears on them. Something like NPR getting less high reviews is likely just less listeners as it’s a bit “drier” news and a bit “both sidesey” due to it being public media. The dislike for it is only 3%, tied for the lowest dislike. Counterpoint is Newsmax for the left. Really low like and dislike because why would a liberal ever watch that?

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Fox News admitted under oath in a court of law that they intentionally mislead their audiences with bullshit in order to push an agenda.

      After that happened, Fox News should’ve been either forced to shut down or their audiences should’ve walked away in shame.

      Instead, Fox News audience: WE WANT MORE OF THAT!

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think they should have just been told they cannot use the term news. They could use the term Knews if they like. Like Krab for News

        If the just went with Fox Entertainment, that’s fine as well. But if the information you are putting out there you are saying your viewers know isn’t necessarily factual, it shouldn’t fall under news. The Onion Im sure would be fine with BREAKING KNEWS

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I mean the answer is really obvious. Fox and right-wing news outlets in general are designed to elicit strong emotional responses with the stories that they run and how they run them. It is, without exaggeration, literally - in the classical sense of the term “literally” (fuck I hate that I have to specify that now) - the daily hour(s) of hate. Strong emotions elicit the release of dopamine. This is why it “feels good” to many people.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      but they do try to present both sides which probably makes some liberals unhappy.

      I’ll tell you why they lost me. In the run-up to the Iraq War II, the GeeDubz administration was obviously pushing bullshit. Like - everyone who wasn’t already subsumed into the Fox News talk radio hivemind knew - with very very little-to-no doubt, they were lying about WMDs. Outright lying - not “wrong” - outright lying.

      They had a secret meeting to plan this war before Sept 11, and now they were hell bent to do it. But, because this was pre-trump, they needed to at least snow everybody under enough to make it look “legitimate”.

      NPR ran every bullshit lie straight up as if it were true - and, listen, everybody knew; everybody from the CIA down to Joe from Joe’s Bar and Grill knew - it was absolute garbage BS. But there they were promoting the lies just like Fox News, only with a little twist - a little “critics say” coda at the end, a totally useless nod.

      GeeDubz wasn’t doing press conferences then. Like at all. For a year, I think. Anyway, he’s finally going to do one. Several major networks are going to be allowed one question each. NPR is one of them. The day arrives, we all listen in to see what flimsy crooked tacked-on part of their insane plan they’ll work to expose. The question comes.

      It was the most mealy, softball, worthless question imaginable. NPR had sent Juan Williams to ask it. I think he’s still lying for Fox News where he went several years later.

      That, and NPR outright refusing to call “enhanced interrogation” what it was; that’s when I told them to GTFO. Never went back.

      Listen, they’re as liberal as a chain store. Their whole purpose is to deflect progressive narratives. And that’s all they do.

    • relativestranger@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      all the magats here are glued to fox ‘news’. many even pay the $100+ a month for cable or satellite and literally never change the channel from it.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So Republicans distrust media overall much more than Democrats.

    If it wasn’t for the Fox News and Joe Rogan trust, i would say Republicans seem more media literate than Democrats. Although in these case the Republicans also distrust them relatively more than the Democrats do for some of “their” media. In particular the NYT and CNN deserve much more distrust imo. It is clear that they are agenda driven, usually against the interests of the middle class.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Dems hate it cause they know it’s a shitty right wing tabloid. Reps hate it because they don’t read / don’t know what it is, but it’s from New York so it must be liberal.

  • MisanthropiCynic@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m Surprised WaPo didn’t score better with Rebuplicans. I only see it’s opinion pieces but it’s very right leaning imo

  • passepartout@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Democrats: There definitely are some news sources you could at least compare to each other if not trust.

    Republicans: Fox news and Joe Rogan all the way folks. Nothing else to see here.

    Edit: There is an App called Ground News. It tries to outline which topics get reported by which outlets and where the left and right have their blind spots.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Fox has a 2.67 factor of trust/distrust among Republicans. Rogan has a 3.44 factor for Republicans.
      Meanwhile CNN has 4.14 trust/distrust among Democrats and the NYT has a factor of 7 among Democrats. MSNB still comes above a factor of 4 and WAPO is about the same factor like Rogan.

      So it is not as much “all the way here” for Republicans. They are relatively more distrusting of all media, including “their” media.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The lower trust in their own media might have something to do with how blatantly dishonest those sources are. But it also likely means that their viewers have lowered any standards they might have ever had. They aren’t going to be shocked if they see the lies exposed, they can just shrug and say that everyone lies but the other side lies more.

        Obvious falsehoods are dismissed as hyperbole, close enough to the truth that it doesn’t matter if it’s not entirely accurate. Omissions are just distractions cooked up by the other side to keep us from talking about the real issues. There’s no expectation that reporting should be factual and follow journalistic standards, the only measure of the quality of the news source is how much they agree with it. They’ve been inoculated against reality.

  • SteveCC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wow! Looks like one could say that Dems generally trust “mainstream” media and Reps generally don’t.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Doesn’t Fox News being “The Number One Cable News Network” make it mainstream? I know my mother shutdown when I asked her.