Mastering? It’s an OS not a skill.
Are really looking down on people because you open the terminal often instead of being able to click something?
I use Mac and also open terminal often. Then again, I’m a software engineer and I have work to do, that doesn’t include trying to troubleshoot problems with my OS.
I’m in the same position. My Linux machine is for gaming and … Interesting tasks that could be hazardous to set up on my Mac.
The hardware quality is sublime as well. However, dailing Linux for a bit and going back to MacOS made me appreciate it more. Homebrew is a hair slow tho 😂
Interesting tasks that could be hazardous to set up on my Mac.
Avast! Nothing interesting to see here mateys. It just be a Linux server serving…files. The legally obtained kind, I might add. Yarrr!
Made my day. Yarr!
Plus the Mac is a wee skiff in the open sea.
Homebrew is so convenient, yet so ridiculously slow.
There is a option to not install the kitchen sink when you brew install… I forgot what it is though…
Kindly extrapolate on the more hazardous workloads you Linux machine runs
Calculator.app
Whoa buddy, easy with the hard R!
I used to use
MacOSOS X in the mid-2000s, and the reason why I liked it was precisely because it was the best UNIX.It’s a shame Apple moved away from things like bash, Applescript, Automator, Xserve, machines with toolless chassis and good upgradability, etc.
There’s a better timeline where Woz was also brought back to Apple, OS X was just another linux distro that came with Apple’s very nice hardware, and the combined Linux and Mac user space meant game devs would take it seriously. Also, Mac/linux had a real foothold in the educational space again.
IIRC Zsh is default now.
Yeah, and that shift from copyleft to permissive (bash is GPL-licensed; zsh is MIT-licensed) is emblematic of Apple going from genuinely wanting users to have full control of their system to only begrudgingly tolerating it when they can’t stop it entirely. Apple switched precisely because bash upgraded from GPLv2 to GPLv3 and Apple was butthurt about users’ rights being better protected.
It’s this community, so yes.
Are really looking down on people because you open the terminal often instead of being able to click something?
Uh…No. Of course not. That would be silly.
It’s all in good fun…I hope.
Plus MacOS is FreeBSD based, it’s no less powerful/complex than Linux.
deleted by creator
You’re fundamentally right, but “no less powerful” is a pretty big stretch, consideration that the majority of the Internet runs on Linux servers, not Mac servers.
But your point about FreeBSD is right. It’s more work, but most software built for Linux will at least run on Mac if you know your compiler flags well enough.
But if someone tries to spin up web services on a Mac, they’re going to have a bad time. So I wouldn’t quote say “no less powerful”.
Edit: but I agree with your core point that the meme is silly and way off base.
Linux’s big competitive advantage in web servers is licensing. You don’t have to pay Apple a penny to start up a linux VM, and you don’t have to contractually run it on apple hardware.
In most modern languages, the difference in building your project on linux vs OS X is basically non-existant. I’ve spent nearly a decade working on backend web services on company MacBooks that get deployed to a linux EC2 instance. Running the server locally makes basically no difference.
Linux’s advantages are more legal than technical.
Agreed that the fundamental advantage is licensing.
But let’s not underestimate the enterprise packaging gulf that this difference has led to.
It sounds like you and I both could get a full set of web services running on Mac.
That said, among the diversity of things I’ve had to get running on Mac, it was a lot less simple than on Linux. Which is why I run as much as possible inside Docker.
Linux people on suicide watch when they see someone using plan9
Eric S. Raymond carved Plan 9’s headstone 20 years ago:
The long view of history may tell a different story, but in 2003 it looks like Plan 9 failed simply because it fell short of being a compelling enough improvement on Unix to displace its ancestor. Compared to Plan 9, Unix creaks and clanks and has obvious rust spots, but it gets the job done well enough to hold its position. There is a lesson here for ambitious system architects: the most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough.
Raymond predicted subsumation as legacy:
It may well be that over time, much more of Plan 9 will work its way into Unix as various portions of Unix’s architecture slide into senescence. This is one possible line of development for Unix’s future.
I wouldn’t call these a ringing endorsement of envy.
I’m currently using parts of plan9 (such as acme, plumber, etc) and can confirm
Not many people have actually met that plan9 using guy.
The technology labor market disagrees. Careers are built on mastering the Linux OS.
Wow, really? So, basically, since 1999 or so, I could have had a built up career because I mastered the Linux OS. I have built up a career in something else totally unrelated. Do you think I’d be richer and famouser, too? Maybe I should have just thrown myself at the technology labor market and taken control of it, like I do with the terminal app. snort reapplies tape to broken glasses snort snort readjusts pocket protector prefers platform games with a penguin over a guy with a moustache snort snort
In software, it seems incredibly common for companies to give developers MacBooks and then have their software deployed on a linux VM in AWS.
It’s just one of the lower friction corporate options for software companies. The last time I used an institutionally managed linux computer was college.
There’s definitely tech jobs where you need to know linux. But there’s also a ton of jobs where you don’t have to know much of anything about it beyond common unix stuff, and where OS X specific knowledge is more useful.
When time is money, businesses give 0 shits about your Arch install, to be blunt, OSX and Apple are there to do work… Thay being said, I loves me some Unix Porn 😅 Sorry for the spicy reply. ❤️
Companies generally want something they control, so they can lock your computer and wipe it remotely when they lay you off.
They care about your arch install because they don’t want it any more than your OS X install. Their arch install would be fine, but their JAMF controlled OS X install is probably much cheaper for them to manage, practically speaking.
Because Linux is really good at being a server, and macOS is really good at being a development OS, despite the hate it’s getting in this thread
I honestly think it has very little to do with the OS itself.
I think it’s more about practicalities and inertia - ordering laptops with the OS preinstalled, administering them, corporate VPN software, etc.
Both are great development OSs, but OS X is a better corporate OS.
+1 for the corporate part. That said I’ve been at two large corpos where Ubuntu LTS was an official, blessed, IT-managed workstation OS option. In fact some development projects have it as the default OS, because some software simply doesn’t build on non-Linux OSes and requires Linux VMs on Windows or macOS. For example AOSP.
Disagree on macOS being a really good development OS. It may be so for iOS/macOS development but for many other use cases, package managed Linux OSes are superior. Case in point, macOS has no built-in package manager that can manipulate what toolchains, runtimes and libraries are installed on the system and available for software development. You have to resort to Homebrew or Macports, both of which are inferior options than say apt in Debian-based Linux OSes. And then there’s the fact that macOS doesn’t support Linux containers without virtualization. Given how useful and how widely used containerization is for software development, it really puts the nails in macOS as a great development OS. Yes you can use containerization but at the expense of significant resource overhead. That’s not great at all. I had a 6-container stack to run for development on a MacBook Pro a few years back. It was nearly unusable on that hardware due the RAM overhead and slow macOS<->container IO. The same stack was flying on equivalent hardware running Ubuntu LTS. Beyond that, you can distribute whole consistent development environments fairly easily using Linux OSes and trivially using containers. Having used Windows, Linux and macOS for professional software development, I think macOS is easier to live with for companies without IT departments, but not necessarily as easy to live with for developers. That said people who are used to work with it might find that easier than learning something else even if that something is easier in absolute terms. Which is fine.
their software deployed on a linux VM in AWS.
Precisely one niche where mastering the Linux OS provides bread.
I mean, imagine running legacy apps… In Tomcat. I’ve seen into the void…
Don’t have to imagine it. 🥲
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
MacOS uses Bash/ZSH…
If you write the scripts in a POSIX way, you can serve both MacOS & Linux with the same script.that’s why i like linux but if we ever want the year of the linux desktop it needs distros to be more gui orientaded normal users get overwhelmed if they even see a terminal window for a second
You can get by just fine without the Terminal.
It’s called a GUI package manager…People use the phrase “year of the Linux desktop” unironically?
sadly yes i just used it to make a point ^^ in my opponion linix will never really be the dominant os
OS X is literally a heavily modified version of FreeBSD with a very shiny GUI.
It ships with a terminal that has zsh installed by default, and homebrew is a decent package manager. You can write scripts for it in precisely the same way you do for Linux.
It being closed source means you can’t edit the OS itself. And there’s certainly a bunch of weird stuff that it does. But mastering linux and mastering OS X are pretty similar things.
Mac is annoying. I think the real skill here is just being able to use a terminal. I remember when i worked at EA we had a gazillion Mac mini’s to build ios apps. Due to the way apple likes to handle their certs, you had to update them often. The majority of my coworkers would use a KVM appliance to do so, but it was like 4 commands.
Terminal for the win. I think we eventually just automated it in the build system. Also Jenkins can fuck off.
even thou i don’t really like it but macos is more refined so that it can be used more easily. most linux distros are not really eass to use you have to invest time into it and most people don’t want to do that. we as a linux community should be aware of that problem. yes it’s a problem not a feature
The more I learn, the bigger the abyss becomes. I will never master Linux. I will, at best, learn some of the currents and how to sail them safely.
deleted by creator
I hate how much I love Linux
I see it more like this:
Linux is like Democracy. There are plenty of people in it, sometimes it can be a hot messbut when it works and handled by professionals it is the best thing there is.
The rest are dictatorships. You get what they give, you do what they allow, you can change what they decide, and you pay for everything you do.
“And you pay for everything you do.”
I dunno I don’t feel like this applies to just Windows or Mac when you consider Red Hat’s acquisition. Windows is popular because of the powerful tools it provides to manage businesses and it goes it well.
Shit on Microsoft all you want but the systems work well for businesses. I would charge others too if my product was popular and did what others needed it to do.
Linux isn’t immune to be used to being made to make money and I really think the Linux community forgets that money talks. Get it in enough businesses and their is potential for someone to charge.
Linux is used to make money, no doubt, as a professional tool or platform, utilizing a lot of good will out of the open source coder community.
Microsoft’s suite of tools are vendor locked to an ecosystem, just like Redhat is doing. Also, short of their cloud service and office suite, I see only their gaming sphere of influence. Both the cloud and the office suite are replaceable, but both are managed in vendor lockin and monopolistic manners.
I have and will resent both Microsoft and RedHat.
I do not resent SUSE, in spite of them being all business, because they are much less tyrannical. They create their own versions of cloud stack projects, SAP and other software while customizing a Linux distribution to deliver said tools.
I’m sure if I’ll dig deep down, I’ll be able to find shenanigans, but I haven’t heard much about them in the media so I consider them decent. Might be wrong, though.
I am root
I am root
I am root
PC won’t boot
Locked away in a box for years and suicidal?
Considering they often have the same shell, this is pretty funny
I copied my .zshrc from my Linux laptop to my work Mac, and yep, it all feels the same. A few minor differences (
lson Linux will allow arguments after the files, on Mac it won’t) and a few things to learn (I never really usedopenon Linux, but it’s essential on Mac), and the clipboard interface is different (xclipvs.pbcopy— but that doesn’t really count, since it’s a GUI thing).deleted by creator
The only weird difference I’ve run into has been the
statcommand behaving differently with dif args
I approve of this message.
Glad to see my template being put to good use.
So then Windows is one of the random genocidal Soong cousins?
Windows is Jar Jar who somehow found his way here.
Windows is B4 🤡
I’ve had to use a M2 pro for a month now. I expected dumb design choices. I did not expect the amount of bugs and incorrect implementations. MacOS feels like such a shitty operating system. Hardware is decent though.
I’m still on 12.x, works just fine for me. Got a nice M1 for work and a Dell running Ubuntu for home.
It’s so bad, it feels like using an ipad. Notifications are buggy as hell and you can’t even disable notification center with terminal like you could on x86 macs. I’m keeping an eye on Asahi linux but it seems a little too rough to be daily driveable yet.
Sort of unrelated but the apple support threads are all infuriating because they never answer the question. They embody the “it’s not a bug” motto until it’s clear there is a bug at which point they just say apple must be fixing it soon and to just keep your computer updated.
This. In the days of 10.7 it was surprising how well everything worked together, now its a buggy mess. But everything is in the cloud bro.
Apple Music is a great example, its still old iTunes but so much shit has been stuck to it over the years it sometimes fails to play music, not even mentioning handling cloud library well. Using it makes me think im on windows.
I don’t think there is much of that legacy code floating around. Apple has been pretty public about rewriting that client. 2 years ago they also killed the parts of the app that were basically web content. Browsing the catalog is now a fully native experience.
If you’re having playback issues, you may want to post something to one the Apple communities here. That not normal.
Oh I thought so as well, until I installed 10.8 on another computer to sync my ipod and started to clean up the library and buy on iTunes store whichever from my AM songs I wanted to have on the iPod.
Its the same software, but some parts are cut out and some are sawn haphazardly in. Remember how you could have changed the volume or EQ individually for each track? I wanted to use that option recently, and the UI is still there on the info pane, but it does absolutely nothing. The old tabular library view is still the same, and you can still browse iTunes Store in parallel to looking at the same stuff in Apple Music.
Weird, I had no idea that features was buried in there. I’m going to use that thing. That’s pretty cool.
I just played around with it and was able to reproduce the bug. If you get to Info via the meatball menu in the now playing panel, track specific audio controls are disabled. But if you get to the info panel via the meatball menus in playlists and album lists, it works fine.
My guess is that this feature probably isn’t getting a lot of regression testing because it’s probably not being hammered on by lots of folks. To reproduce this you need to be a power user going through a specific workflow.
Yeah, I reckon the same, but just the fact they keep dead UIs in the software shows what we can expect quality wise.
I agree, Apple’s quality has definitely slipped. I’m just saying that most of the code likely OG iTunes. They’ve been pretty public about throwing out old tech stacks and rearchitecting that app to support new hardware architectures, new frameworks, new service architectures, etc.
Hey it’s me Nix but also it’s me Nix flakes and that’s not all it’s me Nix language
Apple: Fisher-Price of the nix world
But man do they make great hardware.
