Things continue to look bleak for the original robot vacuum maker. iRobot’s third-quarter results, released last week, show that revenue is down and “well below our internal expectations due to continuing market headwinds, ongoing production delays, and unforeseen shipping disruptions,” said Gary Cohen, iRobot CEO, in a press release.

This meant they had to spend more cash and are now down to under $25 million. “At this time, the Company has no sources upon which it can draw for additional capital,” said Cohen.

The Roomba manufacturer has been struggling for several years in the face of increased competition from Chinese manufacturers. A sale to Amazon in 2022 looked to be its lifeline; however, regulatory scrutiny scuppered the deal, and the company was left in further turmoil. It laid off over 30 percent of its staff, lost its founder and CEO, Colin Angle, and was left with substantial debt as a result of the fallout.

This year, iRobot launched an entirely new line of robot vacuums, ostensibly to better compete with companies like Roborock, Ecovacs, and Dreame, adding lidar navigation to its line for the first time (over VSLAM). The new models look significantly different from the original Roombas and more like their competitors. They also use a different app with fewer features, but added some new hardware features the previous models lacked, including spinning mop pads and a roller mop.

In a regulatory filing earlier this month, the company warned it may be forced to seek bankruptcy protection following the breakdown of advanced negotiations with a potential buyer, and if it couldn’t secure additional funding.

Roomba customers are understandably concerned about the impact these current financial troubles might have on their home cleaning robots.

Earlier this month, fellow American robot vacuum manufacturer Neato, which shut down in 2023, pulled the plug on its cloud services, leaving its robots unable to communicate with the Neato app. However, the vacuums can still be controlled manually.

Similarly, if iRobot goes out of business and its cloud shuts down, most Roombas should still continue to work in offline mode — pressing the physical button on the robot to start, stop, and dock it. However, they likely wouldn’t be controllable via the app for features like scheduling or specific room cleaning, or via voice commands. This potential dilemma just further highlights that cloud-connected devices should be enhanced by connectivity, not reliant on it.

    • dieTasse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Sure, if you want China to have videos of you, your kids and your home. Roomba so far has the “best” privacy policy from all the companies. I am not saying its warranted, it never is with proprietary software/hardware, but Chinese companies are known for ignoring laws regarding privacy.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is why IoT isn’t sustainable. If you don’t have total control you’re fucked.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Customers shouldn’t need to be concerned because the company going down should not brick your PHYSICAL PRODUCTS

    And yet, here we are

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I’ve got one, and it works well enough when offline.

      If not, I could set up Home Assistant and self-host it.

      It’s a shame, as Mozilla gave iRobot one of the better privacy ratings. That’s the only reason I allowed it in my house to begin with.

    • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But, clearly, a Google Home or Amazon Alexa needs cloud connectivity to function. And short of Stop Killing Games regulations forcing companies to release software to keep purchases functional after server shutdowns, there’s going to be no alternative when they shut down the servers.

      But where do we draw the line?

      A smart fridge should obviously keep working without cloud connectivity, since cloud features aren’t relevant to its core functionality.

      A spyware house-scanning vacuum robot, on the other hand, that stores video of your entire house on web servers “to map your home” may not have the processing power to model the home based on its surveillance video recordings. So, is it reasonable, then, that these break when servers go offline?

      Without any regulations, the answer is just “consumers can go fuck themselves”, which clearly isn’t a good answer.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This potential dilemma just further highlights that cloud-connected devices should be enhanced by connectivity, not reliant on it.

    This should be everyone’s takeaway.

    The problem isn’t the company possibly going out of business, its the loss of online service nerfing the device that is the real issue.

    • ready_for_qa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We could have consumer protection laws that mandate when a service that a consumer product relies on is no longer being served by the company, they must release the source code as FOSS for the community to carry it on if they so chose. This could apply to video game servers as well as robot vacuums.

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I bought a robot vacuum, rooted it, and installed Valetudo (Wyze WVCR200S w/motherboard from a Viomi V6 - same robot).

    I don’t have to worry about this shit anymore. The vacuum still does the vacuum thing whether or not it’s connected to the internet.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Do people genuinely rely on these or are they really just a novelty?

    • pix_wbmr@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      I have a dog and a cat. It saves me ~3 hours of work every month. I make abput 21€ per hour. So that’s basically 63€ I saved monthly.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      rely? no

      find it a useful assist? yes

      the Roomba can:

      • get under couches that my other vacuums cannot

      • deal with 90% of the average mess (dog hair and miscellaneous crumbs) without my input

      • pick up the little bits that you can never manage to sweep into a dust pan

      • do this within about 10-20% of the time it would take me to do it myself

      things it cannot do:

      • vacuum carpets

      • get into corners

      • deal with large messes

      typically, I will sweep crumbs and crap out of corners into the middle of a room. I do this all the way around this level of the house in under two minutes, which includes picking up the large clumps of fluffy dog hair that have accumulated along the walls and tossing them in the garbage and putting the broom back. I can then run the Roomba, and the only thing left to do after is brush/vacuum the carpets & rugs well.

      I also like the mopbot thingy because that definitely takes less time than doing it myself

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Same, I have a Roborock and it cleans my house 3 times a week, mops and vacuums. I still need to vaccums in corners and narrow spots occasionally but the bot does 95% of the work for me

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If the apartment/house layout is good for the roomba, it is a great tool. It doesn’t replace vacuuming and floor washing, but it does reduce the dirtness on the floor.

    • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Don’t have a roomba (shark owner) and me and my two other vacuum cleaners depend on my robot vacuum to help pickup both my godwn retriever and corgi hair on a daily basis.

    • 0000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It makes my life easier for sure. I just start it when I head outside for work, errands, etc, and it’s done by the time I get back home.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The entire problem is that automobiles have become an accepted housing option, and Roombas don’t operate well in a vehicular environment, thus drastically cutting into their sale.

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Kodak said “we don’t believe digital photography will take over” and iRobot is like “we’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas”

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        They fucked up by making their robots last seemingly forever, due to the fact they spy on you and get stuck every 15 mins so you never want to turn them on.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not a single one of the robot vacuums that I’ve bought in the last 2 years seem to be able to function without internet access.

      It’s asinine.

      Also they break down so freaking fast. It’s not even funny. Even worse when the part that’s broken is non-replaceable and it’s like a $3 part.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You can’t do shit on those roombas without a connection to the manufacturers servers.

      On and off is the most you can do.

      In order to make them work again once the servers are down, you need to spoof the dns to a local server that you then need to reverse engineer from the api.

      If you are lucky the thing has home assistant integration because some awesome people already did exactly that or the manufacturer was kind enough to give access to the bot api

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    It would be easy enough to force vendors to make the URL the device connects to, configurable and to publish the API the device is using. Two minuscule changes that can prolong the life of devices by decades.

    • lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That would make the husk of the company truly worthless, and I’m not sure private equity will allow that.

    • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair, many roombas have a mini DIN connector somewhere, which opens up the possibility for external control - what I plan to do when mine stops working due to server shutdown. However, getting replacement parts will get more and more tricky as time goes by.

      I just had to through out a mostly functional airfryer because the drawer rail disintegrated and the replacement part is no longer manufactured. The oldest one I could get was a “new” version with more plastic and a slightly bigger size, so it didn’t fit by about 5%.

      It really should be illegal, there is no logical reason for 500 slightly different models and inoperability of basic functions (drawers, APIs, …) aside from malignant greed and planet destruction.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Gods, I fucking hate this so much. I’ve got a ninja blender that the lid seal is broken, and the lid alone is like 50-70% of the cost of a whole new unit. It’s ridiculous how impossible it is to find replacement parts for simple things anymore.

  • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh look, another example of a product that worked fine without internet connectivity and was improved by adding extra bullshit you don’t actually need that then gets worse when those features can’t function properly because their server is offline.

    We got a basic roomba 650 (the one that crashes into stuff and randomly cleans) like 10 years ago and it still works fine (well, as well as it ever worked which wasn’t great), you program the time and day of the week with physical buttons, and leave it alone.

    • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah. I’ve got an 870 that’s still cleaning. It gets stuck under furniture and needs to be rescued at least once a week, and last week it lost its ass dustbin somehow mid clean, but it’s still kicking.

    • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately, it doesn’t appear to support anything from iRobot. I’m hoping that there will be a jailbreak made available before they go bankrupt, but I doubt it.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Not supporting iRobot vacuums isn’t necessarily a bad thing, considering that at the price iRobot is asking for their vacuums, a lot of the other companies in the space offer much nicer models with more features.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ve been eyeballing this, doesn’t seem too difficult for most compatible models either. Might be a little after Christmas project

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, Chinese manufactures cloned the design and came in well under price, took the Chinese market, then improved the product and challenged iRobot globally.

      Embrace, extend, extinguish.

      • B0rax@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        I would not say they cloned the design. The first breakthrough for Roborock was the S5, which had LiDAR and a map. Both was not something iRobot had at the time. iRobot simply chose to not innovate in the areas people wanted first. People didn’t like the random cleaning that the roombas did for a long time compared to the structured of almost everybody else.

        • FackCurs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I used to work at iRobot. Chinese manufacturers cloned Roomba so well that parts from their robot like wheels assemblies could be dropped in and the Roomba would work.

          The issue is that iRobot decided not to litigate patent infringement in China because it’s an uphill battle.

          I agree that iRobot was very slow to innovate. They were on the brink of releasing a lawn mower robot but covid hit and the C suites made the decision to kill that product and fire that team to reduce risk…

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I was working with the education division about a decade and a bit ago when they had an open source platform with sensors and motors. Then iRobot abruptly killed that division too, right as our project was getting going.

            I haven’t felt good about that company since.

            • FackCurs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The saddest news is that they are down to like 4 mechanical engineers. There were at least 30 when I was working there.

              I was told all the engineering actually gets done by the contractors in China. The engineers just send a wish list and the China team hacks it together.

              iRobot not going to make it. 4 engineers can’t innovate just like that.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Really? It’s not a mystery. China. For the past 5+ years they have had better and cheaper vacuums. Meanwhile innovation has been at a standstill with irobot for the past decade.