• Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    Despite being the same lovely woman, I am infinitely more attracted to her in the horizontal stripes.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Razzle dazzle camouflage!

    I’m genuinely surprised so many people are familiar with this.

    It’s something talked about in perception courses/classes.

    The lines make it difficult for humans and machines to accurately gauge depth perception.

    For humans it’s related to mach bands. And the way lateral inhibition works.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_bands https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lateral_inhibition&wprov=rarw1

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    It’s funny how they also represent an era. Vertical stripes=50s horizontal=90s/early 2000s, slanted =futurama

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Something feels manipulated about this, but it also feels like the author/photographer went out of their way to make sure you couldn’t prove it was manipulated

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you zoom in and measure distances in pixels you’ll see it’s manipulated.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      17 hours ago

      What you’re likely seeing as throwing you off is differences because this is an actual human wearing this - PLUS it’s essentially an optical illusion. This isn’t 3 versions of the same image with just the pattern changed. So yeah, these are actually not perfectly matching up if you overlay them on top of each other. I wouldn’t say manipulated per se, just that they’re 3 different images so they’ll have some differences.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yup.

        So let’s take the body/pose on the right, copy it to all three positions mask the dress only, and overlay only the dress pattern in the same mask to actually show the differences between the patterns only.

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I agree with you, but if you measure the width of the dress at the tip of her fingers, the left and right are about 99-100 pixels, while the middle one is 105 pixels wide. Her face in all three images is about 38-39 pixels wide (measured at the earlobe), so that rules out they stretched the entire image slightly. But 5 pixels is significant enough to kind of muddy the validity of the OP’s message since it no longer rules out all but the appearance of the dress. It sadly happens that sometimes effects are exaggerated, even when there is a real effect at play.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Bingo

        Look at the amount of visible background inside the elbows. They are each increasing in conforming the body as you move to the right.

  • melvisntnormal@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Can someone repost this using something other than Imgur? They block the UK and Mullvad (though if someone is using Mullvad and can access it, let me know what server you’re using please)

    EDIT: nevermind, I can see it through the web version of Lemmy, just not through Sync or Imgur directly

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So which one is supposed to be the good one? Her body looks identical to me in all three photos.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Really? To my eyes, the vertical stripes are unflattering, the horizontal stripes accentuate her figure in a good way, and the diagonal stripes make her look somewhat slimmer

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There’s this old propaganda that horizontal stripes make you look “fat,” e.g. bad, and vertical stripes have the opposite effect, thinning, e.g. good. This is harmful rhetoric, as it encourages women to overprioritize looking thin.

      It is true that the horizonal stripe dress accentuates the curves, whereas the vertical stripes diminish them. But the values ascribed to these features are ass-backward. Curvy is good! Love the horizontal stripes personally.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think anyone here is against the horizontal stripes. The vertical ones don’t make her look fat, they just totally obfuscate her figure and make her look shapeless

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    First one: I better watch out, she’ll call a foul on me

    Second one: I better watch out, she’s probably a felon on the run

    Third one: I can’t watch out because I don’t know where she is

  • DearMoogle@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    Brb tossing out any horizontal stripes I have left from my closet.

    Wait what about flannel? The stripes are perpendicular, so would they cancel each other out?🤔

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Horizontal lines are known to do that but I think the photos aren’t equivalent either way. If you cover the dress up or shoulders down, the middle one has a bigger gap between her legs and wider face without being able to see the stripes from what I see.

      • Master@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 day ago

        Loading it into an editor she has about an inch less per hip in the diagonal picture. Its pretty significant.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Horizontal stripes actually look great on a skinny person. Or any person, if the pattern is good by itself — while these black/white stripes aren’t really a shining example of that (though they would work on a twig-shaped heroine in a 60s French new-wave film).

      Vertical stripes are typically boring imo.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Flannel’s plaid disrupts any curves so it’s pretty good for covering up bellies in particular. A big reason I’m a fan of the season of flannel (plus scarfs are nice, too).

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Plaid is great in all seasons. I have many pearl snap plaid shirts ranging from thick and warm flannel to super thin beach flannel to just the cotton shirts.

  • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    (from left to right) a) trying to look slim b) about to escape from prison in 1930 c) trying to confound enemy nation’s Navy