ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoThat's nice that they got a rejection letter though instead of being ghosteddiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1897arrow-down112
arrow-up1885arrow-down1imageThat's nice that they got a rejection letter though instead of being ghosteddiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square134fedilink
minus-squarejj4211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·14 hours agoWell they should be, but they could get litigious if they get bad exposure.
minus-squarefrog_brawler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 hours agoLitigious how? It’s not libel, slander, or defamation since it actually happened.
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·11 hours agoReality is irrelevant in a court of law.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoThe law isn’t though. In order to break a law you must actually have broken the law.
minus-squareHawk@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoRight or not, if you just threaten your opponent with enough juridical costs, they’ll most of the time give up.
Well they should be, but they could get litigious if they get bad exposure.
Litigious how? It’s not libel, slander, or defamation since it actually happened.
Reality is irrelevant in a court of law.
The law isn’t though.
In order to break a law you must actually have broken the law.
Right or not, if you just threaten your opponent with enough juridical costs, they’ll most of the time give up.