A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s what you get for trusting Microsoft with anything…or Google…or Apple…or Facebook… stop tying your communication to these companies, they can pull the rug at any time.

    • bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          How do you call a landline number in a war zone through a matrix server?

          • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I was simply responding to the comment:

            You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

            the oh-so-clever smart alecks saying “whaddabout ISPs???” forgot about 2-way radio and meshnets

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Threema is what signal should have been.

            But I ain’t got in me to start forcing people again lol

            Signal it is until it is proven untrustworthy

            • Zachariah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah, they’re both good (still).

              features Threema Signal
              price $5 / 5€ Free
              account creation phone number optional phone number required
          • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            They didn’t fuck up, they made a design choice about the scope of the app. Are they also fucking up by not blurring the messages on screen? After all someone could be looking over your shoulder without you realizing it. Maybe Signal should ship with spyglasses.

            • Feyd@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re absolutely right and it’s insane I keep coming across these wild takes from people that clearly don’t understand technology

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m not sure why you think anyone would want a messenger that touts itself for its encryption to not encrypt things.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Then it’s weird they are fixing it now. Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

                  • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    It’s weird that apps sometimes change scope and add features that users want? Ones that contributers already did most of the work for?

                    Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

                    That was literally what they have been saying this whole fucking time.

                    “The database key was never intended to be a secret. At-rest encryption is not something that Signal Desktop is currently trying to provide or has ever claimed to provide,” responded the Signal employee.

                  • subignition@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    It’s really fucking annoying how relentlessly you pick fights with people these days. Wish you’d chill out dude.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              That wouldn’t shock me, but he was right that Signal was not addressing a known vulnerability. In fact, denying that it even was a vulnerability.

              For what it’s worth, I trust Telegram even less than Signal. And at least Signal seems to be finally doing something about the problem.

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s what you get

      You’re right, they deserve this. You asshole.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We had an issue a couple days ago where we couldn’t move a VIP to a new phone because the vendor wanted us to perform multi-factor auth via a device from two years ago. We had to roll back the service. Our entire lives are built atop fragile digital infrastructure with broken and poorly thought-out policies.