KEY POINTS

  • The Department of Justice late Tuesday indicated that it was considering a possible breakup of Google as an antitrust remedy.
  • The DOJ said it was “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search.”
  • The judge has yet to decide on the remedies, and Google will likely appeal, drawing out the process potentially for years.
  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Good

    Now do the same with Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Comcast, Disney, all the current major Hollywood film studios, all the major internet providers, major airlines, and we’re going in the right direction of a start.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      How about we nationalize all three instead, start operating them for the public good?

      ^^^I ^^^know ^^^this ^^^dream ^^^is ^^^impossible

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      And then everything too big to fail! Too big to fail = too big.

      It’s not like the knowledgeable people, or systems/infrastructure all disappear if a business fails. Business is basically a bunch instructions for people moving a bunch of shit around for money. Literally nothing about it is so unique it cannot be reproduced.

      And then also Physically split up Elon, billionaires need to learn how to exist in a society of laws and consequences instead of above it.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have no doubt Alphabet Google would try to delay any breakup as long as physically possible, but this would be a huge win against big tech if it went ahead. It’d probably be quite the win for public privacy as well, as it’d decouple these widely used platforms from Google.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      5 years from now, things will go full circle and YouTube will be Channel 487 on Comcast cable as “YT” but it will be a documentary channel on how to cane rocking chairs.

  • KNova@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I know very little about the operating structure of Google, but I wonder how this would work functionally. Doesn’t most of their revenue come from ads? So like you couldn’t have google search’s ad business help to prop up the lines of business that don’t make money (Youtube, chrome development)

    I’m not anti-breakup but I just wonder if this would imperil some of their lines of business. Like would Youtube shove even more ads down your throat post-breakup?

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      A great question, Id never considered that previously.

      My instant gut feeling would be that they would all just continue selling adds, but as separate entities?

      Also how does breaking up google work when the current structure is that Alphabet is the primary company now?

      • KNova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I took “breaking up Google” to mean the Alphabet suite of companies; I had presumed “Google” was just shorthand for “Alphabet”. But I might be wrong

        • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You’re most likely right, they recognize the headline saying “DOJ considering breaking up Alphabet” would be meaningless to most people.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Correct. They’d just sell ads the same way other services sell 3rd party ads through Google (or rarely, other services. Doubleclick was a big one before, you know, Google bought them)