• blue_berry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes, and if called out, they say it happens for freedom of speech, which is absurd given that the richest man on earth provides the infrastructure and has a large presence on the platform himself.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yup.

      In case anyone hasn’t noticed, the goalposts for norms have significantly shifted in the last decade. This is historically how it always begins.

      Buckle up. Protect yourself.

    • blue_berry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes, and if called out, they say it happens for freedom of speech, which is absurd given that the richest man on earth provides the infrastructure, (soon) influences the legislative rules and has a large presence on the platform himself.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hope everyone is ready for this to be at least the next 4 years of our lives.

    I say at least because these losers ran on fundamentally changing how our government works. In 4 years they may be able to create a scenario in which it’s literally impossible for them to lose an election. Not to mention the effect this will have on global politics.

    We let the Stupids have total control of our federal government. Suffering will become the norm. And if you think we’re suffering now? Well, might be time to pick up a history book.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can’t wait to see what these fuckheads have in store for America, and the rest of the world. Plus, Canada is getting it’s own version of Trump next year, so that’s incredible too.

      What wonderful times we live in.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is why billionaires shouldn’t exist.

    The other thing I need to mention is that is that Elon Musk is far from the only billionaire with a massively disproportionate influence on elections and society. Or even the biggest. He is just the biggest attention whore of them all.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Holding Western stability hostage in the name of the oligarchs, good job voting everyone…

  • Juigi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    This guy is the future vice president. Fuck you people of America.

    • ROAGO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      More than likely future president. Trump served his purpose in getting his cult to take over America. He’ll probably step down to play golf and have sex with minors.

      • joker125@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’ll be the 25th amendment.

        The fun part will be watching Trump and his maga cult fight it, cope with it, and eventually come to terms they have been grifted.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is why people say Americans are morons, because they elect shitheads like this.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I believe I speak for all of us Europeans when I say he can go fuck himself while sucking off Elon’s micropenis.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not even in office yet, and already making threats.

    I’d like to see Europe tell Vance to fuck off. I suspect that if Europe gives in now, the Trump administration will make this same threat every time Europe does something he doesn’t like.

    Trump will be an unreliable NATO ally anyway, so it isn’t much of a risk on Europe’s part.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      And this was from September so not even elected yet.

      Tbh it kinda sounds like they just want to leave NATO regardless.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        I get the same feeling, too. They’re just looking for an excuse to ditch Europe - perhaps as a sacrifice to Putin.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ofc they won’t SAY that - they’ll talk about “what a fantastic savings it will be, to not spend that money”, and probably they’ll work up gently to the point of sending US citizens to become meat shields like the North Koreans and so many others lately. But at each stage, it will always be what “we” wanted to do - it’s “our” idea to do it, I tell you!?

          img

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’d be amazed if he does any of it tbh. Last time he just spent most of it playing golf, and sticking his goofy-ass signature on anything they stick in front of him.

        The last thing they want to do is actually deal with the boogeyman issues. If they did that they’ll have nothing to campaign on next time.

        Most of this will be spent lining their own pockets.

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          4 days ago

          This is such an optimistic take. I am very concerned they will spend the next 4 years making sure whatever election we have next is more similar to a Russian “election”.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Why wouldn’t they try? They’ve done everything they could so far and face no repercussions, why not go ahead and try to be king? A few people will fret and tut-tut but if nobody is going to do anything it doesn’t amount to much.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well, Trump specifically may not try because the risk/reward isn’t really good for him.

              As it stands, he gets to declare an unambiguous “victory” where he won at life. He got to be president with ultimately a clean sweep of the swing states and the popular vote and served as many terms as he is allowed to serve. Thanks to the rules, he doesn’t need to compete again, and he can stop even pretending to work after 4 years.

              Meanwhile, a push to establish him as “dictator for life” might at best buy him another few years in office before his health will fail. Such an effort comes with high risk, of him going down in history as more of a “bad man”, of personal risk for being targeted by violence.

              Now JD Vance might be game to make a go of it, he’s got decades left in the tank. Of course broadly speaking there’s a balance of power, with those currently in power relatively comfortable knowing that the vote serves as a nice way to get pushed out of office before people get pissed enough to put you in real physical danger. Plenty of opportunities to be self-serving with a pretty safe retirement should things start going awry. Fanaticism can drive people to go further, but I would like to think a pragmatic person with a sense of self-interest can see the value in a peaceful voting out versus having those same millions of people losing their political voice.

        • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          The fact that he’ll spend all his time playing golf or whatever will leave ample room for all his appointees to actually govern. It’s not Trump we should be worried about.

      • x4740N@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If I recall correctly countries can’t withdrawl from the UN without their approval

        Problem is though that the un-united dystopia of america could cause issues in the UN

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The US pulling out of the UN would allow them to pass all sorts of cool stuff, like recognizing and admitting Palestine and calling for a ceasefire, recognizing the universal rights of children, and condemning the far-right, all of which the US used its veto power to stop against overwhelming support on the other side.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s going to be a hell of a long 4 years, for America and the rest of the world. Damn.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      4 days ago

      EU countries could start by carryng their weight in NATO.

      Ukraine war exposed EU as incoherent imbeciles unable to maintain a proper security posture, esp Germany and their Nazis nepo baby regime… Straight 🤡

      Vance behavior is out of line but you need to check that bravado that is not support by anything.

      Pay for your own defense and help Ukraine properly… This is your fucking war that was caused by German being a Putin’s bitch. Industrial economy relying on a geopolitical adversery for energy while 40k American protect it from Russia for free. Classic parasite behavior.

      Mutti merkal so good 🤡

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The EU has by now significantly outpaid the US, and out-supported the US in Ukraine. However, for historical reasons, it lacks certain items which Ukrainians badly need (tactical ballistic missiles and anti-missile defense, to bring good examples).

        On the matter of aircraft, I should especially emphasize that EU countries have given fighter aircraft, but the US has not. The US is currently attempting to get through the bureaucracy of approving a Swedish AWACS aircraft (with some US components) going to Ukraine.

        Educate thyself here, military people use this resource and approve of it:

        https://protectukrainenow.org/en/report

      • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Europe is about to experience what africa and south america have been experiencing for decades.

        Buckle up.

        • coyootje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          4 days ago

          The difference is that Europe should be more capable of resisting America. We’ll see if that actually happens but given how things have gone before when the EU went after American companies I don’t think they’ll budge easily.

          • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            4 days ago

            Not when combined with “completely unrelated” tarrifs and psyops from china and russia.

            10 years until europe falls.

        • tibi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          Not being able to access American sites will allow local competitors to appear. Back in 2005-2010, before Facebook, there were many local social platforms and forums. For example, these are all from Romania.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The fucking Government of Putin wants to kill off the US defense industry. If the asswipes do this, they will cutoff the spare parts to keep the weapons maintained. Fuck that shit, it’s time for the EU to purchase and use EU made weapon systems because the USA will become an unreliable partner. Furthermore, the US military can leave all their installations in Europe and rebuild them in fucking Russia for all I care.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    4 days ago

    These autocrats have always wanted to drop NATO.

    Let’s not pretend like X is their reason. Supporting autocracy is their reason, and now they’re trying to come up with excuses to get the public onboard.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, but they need to repay the rat elon for all his support during the campaign. This might even be true

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        So, NATO had a problematic operation, trying to establish (and coordinate the establishment of) guerilla stay-behind troops to use in the event of Soviet takeover - and the operation went especially problematic in Italy during the Years of Lead, where some of those guys associated with right-wing terrorists. The year was 1969 or so.

        Basing on this, how do I conclude anything about the NATO of today?

        Disclaimer: I was asked to hold an anti NATO speech during a protest event during a NATO summit. Being a moderately honest anarchist, I held a speech denouncing the practises seen in Afghanistan (the year was 2012), but emphasized that collective self defense is a valuable thing to have (a common attitude here in Eastern Europe), and added that if the alliance would bother doing what it says on the sticker, I would support it.

        NATO is an alliance of various countries. Some of them aren’t nice or democratic (classic example: Turkey). Mixed bag, and constantly changing. Membership in NATO is not a letter of indulgence for a member state to do anything - allies are obliged to help only if someone attacks a member state. If a NATO member attacks someone else, allies can ignore the affair or even oppose the member (example: Turkey recently bombed Kurdish troops in Syria so sloppily that threatened US troops shot down a Turkish drone).

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          “According to several Western European researchers, the operation involved the use of assassination, psychological warfare, and false flag operations to delegitimize left-wing parties in Western European countries, and even went so far as to support anti-communist militias and right-wing terrorism as they tortured communists and assassinated them, such as Eduardo Mondlane in 1969”

          Based on this conclude what you want about the NATO of today.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steadfast_Defender_2024

          • perestroika@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Based on this, I conclude: the NATO of today is a mostly defensive alliance with some taints in its history.

            It is currently very busy doing a real job - opposing a conquering dictator named Vladimir Putin.

            I wish it luck, as long as it sticks to its declared purpose. If it oversteps, I will revise my opinion.

            • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              taints in its history

              Ooh, let’s play “find the dark history”! What better way to distract from today’s issues and avoid talking about solutions for tomorrow’s problem!

              This is me agreeing with you, to be clear. The description “taints in its history” is so ubiquitous as to be useless. Yes, acknowledging the errors of the past is important to learn from them and improve, but the focus needs to be on that learning and improving.

              The NATO has potential to be a force of security. In a modern world, conflict between peers is more destructive than ever and the returns on aggressive action are more strongly affected by the strength of the defense, such a union of forces can discourage attack by making it too unprofitable.

              Of course, that requires the union to actually stand united and the potential aggressor to be reasonable and motivated by the state’s prosperity. Neither of those seem entirely guaranteed right now…

            • andxz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Your opinions are certainly grounded in reality at least. It’s refreshing to read something sensible for a change.

            • index@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              It is currently very busy doing a real job

              Yes i’m sure they are doing a very busy job like they were in their tainted history (false flag operations to delegitimize left-wing parties in Western European countries)

              If it oversteps

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Response

              “Several of the operations were along the coast in the borders between sea and land, and together with roads and populated areas. Surveillance, patrols, road control posts, vehicle inspection, control of air space, minesweeping, evacuation of civilians, and riot control were important part of the exercise.”

              • perestroika@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                If you are sure about something, then bring evidence of considerable off-label activities.

                In response to your response about “Nordic Response”:

                Surveillance, patrols, road control posts, vehicle inspection, control of air space, minesweeping, evacuation of civilians, and riot control were important part of the exercise.”

                Those are realistic military duties in war time. Every military practises them. Where do you find a fault?

                An example from real life: the Ukrainian military has checkpoints on roads near the frontline. Moving with a vehicle, you’d expect to show papers, say a few words and maybe even show transported goods. The purpose? Finding reconnaisance / sabotage groups, which every competent enemy is expected to send. If an opponent doesn’t send recon or saboteurs, they are fools. If a military doesn’t learn how to deter those, they’re fools.

                How does one learn? After dry reading in a classroom: one holds an excercise. There’s a home team and an opposing team. The home team checks, the opposing team infiltrates. Both teams report what they achieved, results get compared. If the blue team found the “saboteurs”, good. If the red team “blew up” all bridges and pipelines in the area, people think hard about what they did wrong. If they don’t practise, they don’t get to think hard.

                • index@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Those are realistic military duties in war time. Every military practises them. Where do you find a fault?

                  Where do i find a fault in conducting vehicle inspections and riot control at peace time, from an organization with a shady past involving false flag operations, psychological warfare and assassinations aimed at delegitimize left-wing parties.

                  Dunno buddy let me keep thinking

                  An example from real life: the Ukrainian military has checkpoints on roads near the frontline. Moving with a vehicle, you’d expect to show papers, say a few words and maybe even show transported goods. The purpose? Finding reconnaisance / sabotage groups, which every competent enemy is expected to send. If an opponent doesn’t send recon or saboteurs, they are fools. If a military doesn’t learn how to deter those, they’re fools.

                  The ukrainian military also have checkpoints in the west border to make sure any male between 18 and 60 doesn’t leave the country so that they can be forced into war.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilization_in_Ukraine

                  How does one learn? After dry reading in a classroom: one holds an excercise. There’s a home team and an opposing team. The home team checks, the opposing team infiltrates. Both teams report what they achieved, results get compared. If the blue team found the “saboteurs”, good. If the red team “blew up” all bridges and pipelines in the area, people think hard about what they did wrong. If they don’t practise, they don’t get to think hard.

                  To me this sound like military rhetoric coming from a military man. You self defined yourself as being a moderately honest anarchist, i suggest you to keep doing your anarchist readings and re-read the works of Emma Goldman and Errico Malatesta.

                  https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-preparedness-the-road-to-universal-slaughter

                  https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/errico-malatesta-the-european-war-and-the-international-workers-organization

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            As if the US and a whole lot other countries are not doing Psy-Ops and other behind the scenes actions. pulling strings on the world stage.

          • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah dude! Tell them! Also tell them what was the normal operations at the time! And what are Russia and China doing today!!!

      • sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        You wanting the same thing JD Vance wants should trigger a warning in your brain before you say anything else.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Now is the time for Europe to rally behind Ukraine. We really should have upped military funding and arms production in preparation for this outcome.