Its a space of 1meter×1meterx1meter, basically a cubic meter where the matter replicator works on. (So, no replicating cars, since its too big)

How do you min-max this?

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    The obvious answer: Use your replicator to replicate more replicators.

    The correct answer: The Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer.

    The clever dick corollary: 1m3 is actually quite a large volume, and ain’t no rule says you can only replicate one object at a time. If whatever luxury item or commodity you want is small in volume, which it probably is, don’t forget you can replicate a whole bunch of it within a meter cube.

  • toxic_cloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Day 1: create 264 gallons of water (probably enough for a month)

    Day 2: create a cubic meter of food (also probably enough for a month)

    Day 3 to next rationing: spend thinking of all the awesome things I could create but end up getting overwhelmed and doing nothing instead

    • Phoonzang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Additional day 3: be overjoyed that you can just replicate your basic needs, so you now can work less (or not at all). All that free time! Think of all the projects xou could do!

      Start by replicating junk food and beer and sloth around until the evening of Day 29, panic, make plans for some way to big Project for Day 30. Day 30 replicate stuff you need for the project. Before properly starting, realize you forgot to buy replicate some crucial stuff but home depot is now closed you’ve already used the replicas quota, be discouraged, overwhelmed, give up, promise “next month is going to be different!”.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Day 1, I replicate a replicator kit and put it together. I also contact a realtor and let them know I’m interested in buying some land. Off grid, far from cities, doesn’t matter.

    Day 2, I replicate two replicator kits and put them together.

    Day 3, I replicate four replicator kits. I’ve now got eight of them. I’m not sure I’ll need sixteen, at least not right away, and my basement is starting to get a bit crowded. So I’ll leave it at that for the moment, but the moment I think I need more replicator capacity I can have it.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Plot twist: every replicated replicator degrades slightly in subtle ways, like making glass less smooth, or making food taste a little bit stale. After the fourth cycle, bananas taste a bit like warm mayo.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Have the replicator print a replicator that auto-prints identical copies of itself as often as it can so you can cause the collapse of reality without having to be involved.

      Hell, have the replicator print a replicator without the 24-hour cooldown to hurry things along a little

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was busy thinking about that. Why not make a replicator without limits if possible? No downsides because then you’d be able to create what you want when you want. Anyone dumb enough not to think of that would be stuck using it once a day while you are able to create all you want.

    • TeamBrett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wouldn’t you need two replicators? One to be replicated and one to do the replicating? And if the replicator itself is a box (assumption since it was not specifies) the replicator would have to be larger than the max size.

  • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The moment you try to min max the economy will fall apart. Replicate new PC parts? Cool, but now intel/AMD/Nvidia will go bankrupt, no more development. So I guess you could min-max the economical revolution. Capitalism doesn’t appear to make sense in a world with near endless access to anything.

    Personally I’d get heaps of food and water

    I hate that by now, I have found a way for capitalist to bill you anyways.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, economy would suffer and adapt, but not technology or science. Engineers still would get together and work on new designs, but not for money.

    • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wait… So getting ample food and water to common people is a downside to capitalism?

      Yea you are right, if people are fed and satisfied. They wont be needing any unnecessary stuff that feeds the capitalist.

  • AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    My first thought was to start work on a de-replicator. Lot of people about to have a lot of junk in their house and it’ll pile up quickly.

    Not sure how long it’ll take until the earth becomes a black hole.

    I might also try and put a few new squares on the periodic table.

  • brandon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’d probably replicate a 1x1x1m cube of tungsten, then realize I have no way of removing it from the replicator.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    I suspect a lot of guns, explosives, body armor and anti-armor munitions due to the immediate civil war that would break out in most countries as the wealthy elite tells the government to confiscate everyones matter replicators.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    First I’m gonna move out of my apartment since there will sure be plenty of geniuses who’s gonna produce 1 cubic meter of solid gold, and the building might not be happy about 20-ton blocks appearing out of thin air.

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    It only takes one person to make 1 cubic meter of black hole to destroy the biosphere by ripping Earth into an acretion disc.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I like the concept of destroying the biosphere by shredding the entire fucking planet, lol.

      Using a calculator I referenced further down in the thread, a back hole with a 0.5m radius so that the event horizon would fit within the cubic meter would have a mass of over 56 earths. We’d be proper fucked!

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So you would have to replicate a percent of the mass of the sun. Seems feasible. The electricity bill would be nuts, but the world is ending anyway.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ah, i thought it was a hole in space or something like that, so the absence of anything, and even space was something, but not matter specifically.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It is worthwhile to note that the above is highly reductive. A “black hole” is the sort of “hole” in spacetime you’re thinking of. It is caused, however, by gravitational dilation of spacetime by an incredibly high energy density. If you stuff enough matter and energy into a tiny enough space, the gravitational force will be strong enough that no other force in the universe can keep it from getting closer, and closer. Even the forces which keep neutrons and protons from combining with each other will be surmounted, as the energy density increases asymptotically toward infinity. This tiny point of effectively infinite density is the black hole’s “singularity”. Surrounding this singularity is a region where anything (matter, light, space itself) that gets within that range cannot escape. This is because objects have escape velocities based on their masses. If you’re going fast enough, you’ll fly away from the earth never to return. If you’re not going that fast, eventually you’ll fall back down. The further you are from the earth, the easier it is to escape it. The “black” part of the black hole, called the “event horizon”, is the distance from the singularity at which the black hole’s escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, meaning that, closer than that, nothing can escape it. Hence why it’s “black”, because no light is escaping from it. Technically, a black hole is not perfectly black due to hawking radiation, and a black hole with a 0.5 meter schwarzchild radius would probably be small enough to visibly glow (just a bit). (probably not, see below)

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              According to a random black hole calculator I found, a black hole with a 0.5m radius would be over 56 earth masses and the temperature would only be 0.000364 K. So, still orders of magnitude less than the cosmic microwave background.

              I know smaller black holes evaporate faster, but even that little thing (according to the calculator) would have a lifetime of a gargantuan multiple of the age of the universe. Like roughly a number followed by 45 zeros, times the age of the universe.

              The calculator: https://www.vttoth.com/CMS/physics-notes/311-hawking-radiation-calculator

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Thank you! I didn’t feel like checking with the difference in masses, and based my assumption on Stephen Hawking’s statement that an earth-mass black hole (with an event horizon the size of a pea) would glow from Into The Universe: The Story of Everything. It seems he exaggerated, assuming this calculator is accurate and my understanding of its values is fair. Such an exaggeration is disappointing, if not entirely surprising.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A cubic meter of the core of a neutron star would still count as matter. While it probably wouldn’t literally destroy the Earth, I wouldn’t want to be on the same…continent…when that thing went off.