There is no such thing as an “unreviewable” decision. Even if the decision is backed by the law, it can still be reviewed, in order to confirm that it is indeed backed by the law.
Trump is not just arguing that he has the right to do this; he’s arguing that there should be no legal review process at all, which is an argument any kinds of checks and balances whatsoever. He’s demanding total autocracy.
Kinda sad that this comment could be applied to most of his actions.
Removed by mod
When all this is over, every single Trump enabler needs to be disbarred or otherwise have their professional credentials permanently revoked
How about jailed, at least?
I mean, well, after a review.
Oh sure. Everyone deserves the trial that they didn’t wanted to give to others because we are better than them, we WILL give them the rights they denied to others
lol that would be nice
Department of Justice lawyers representing the Trump administration returned to court today to repeat their maximalist argument that the president has the authority to commandeer state National Guards troops and that judges have no authority to second guess him.
“Maximilist” is doing a heavy lift to help the author avoid say “Fascistic.”
Here’s an image of what the world would look like right now if we listened to all the lawyers who have lawyered for Trump. And I use the term “lawyered” loosely.
What, just the ones that were paid, or . .
“When the president does it, it’s not illegal.”
NIXON’S BAAAAACK
…but they’ve been reviewing them. Are they switching languages to Klingon? Why would they suddenly be unreviewable?
So he thinks he is advice the laws?
