• humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Data published Wednesday by ACEA found that Tesla’s car sales in the European Union, Britain and the European Free Trade Association fell to 13,863 units in May, down 27.9% year on year.

    Tesla’s European market share also dropped to 1.2% from 1.8% in May 2024.

    European/other than China EV makers also did well, that this and other headlines this year, intentionally obfuscate. The combination of both above numbers means overall EV growth was about 25%. 93% is non US/China.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Even before the current political situation I wouldn’t have bought a Tesla. They have a documented quality problem and not very good customer service at least outside of the US.

    Why would I buy a car that is not only more likely than most to break but when it does break it’s hard to get fixed. Spare parts are notoriously hard to get hold of and you usually have to deal with Tesla directly which is a problem because they don’t have a lot of dealerships in the UK. Also they won’t come to you, so if your car won’t start you have to arrange a pickup.

    • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They have terrible customer service in the US too. I think it’s their business model: find people who enjoy being treated like an asshole and sell them overpriced shit.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I used to like and look up to SpaceX for the interesting stuff that they build,

    but nowadays i don’t care anymore. The company can fail for all i care. Musk spoiled it.

    The tipping point, for me personally, was when Musk seriously threatened to slash public spending in February this year. It shows a clear disrespect to the people, and frankly, a sociopathic attitude.

    Musk had everything, lots of money, lots of fame, lots of influence, but he threw it all away when he decided to threaten the wellbeing and lifelyhood of a lot of people just so that rich assholes can make an extra buck through tax cuts.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Agreed. This system of giving out money and getting what we paid for sold back to us is fucking dumb.

      • Tillman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Who in the current admin would you like to see run it? Because one of them would if it were nationalized. Who would be your pick?

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The current regime is full of ignorant buffoons but at least in that case it would normally be temporary.

          In the private model where the gov pays for everything anyway, the taxpayer pays the cost of doing the thing plus whatever profit the oligarch wants to make and you have no way of switching to another oligarch should the current one becomes unacceptable. There is simply no upside to SpaceX as a private entity

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          It would be under NASA, but the argument is moot, since it wouldn’t happen under a MAGA Nazi administration. It will have to wait until Americans take back our government. Then we can nationalize Space X, confiscate the DOGE Goblin’s fortune, and deport him back to South Africa.

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I wonder what continues to motivate the uber rich to seek more wealth-you simply can’t buy any more tangible amount of happiness through material or influence after a point.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Once you have enough money, anything you do makes you money.

        Elon blew 44 billion or Twitter, axed the servers, staff, and the name, and he was able to leverage that into a government job where he could kill investigations into his companies years later. You could say it’s intelligence, but I’d say it’s a combination of luck, and the resources to blow 44 billion and not have it affect you personally in any way.

  • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Chinese electric cars are just better. BYD is what Tesla wanted to be, but actually fulfills its promises. Plus it isn’t ran by a nazi dictator.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Watch the RichRebuilds review of Chinese EVs. There is a lot of “make it look good” in their engineering, like massive painted brake calipers…that are a single piston. The cars probably aren’t as quality as other EVs, but the prices, specs, and niche features are very compelling. I’d definitely consider one in the US. Anything that isn’t a Tesla or a massive crossover would be great.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Looking forward to Tesla reporting Q2 earnings next month. I assume another round of disastrous numbers paired up with some vaporware distraction. Perhaps they can keep this charade going, but at some point reality will catch up.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t think that has ever been true, really. Nor should it be, Laissez Faire is a trainwreck waiting to happen, probably literally and figuratively.

        Textbooks will tell you that the USA, and other countries like China and Russia, are a regulated “Market System” which in some markets teeters on strict Oligopoly.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Oddly libertarians never acknowledge that market leaders ask for theses things. The biggest threat to the free market are capitalists themselves.

        • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          They know, they just have too much invested in their 401k to think about their own best interests. Sold themselves and their future families for a couple more % points of growth yearly.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            16 hours ago

            There are 2 types of libertarians.

            One group is comprised of people who think the government should basically keep the military going, and handle foreign relations when that doesn’t impede private citizens.

            The other group is just Republicans who don’t like being called Republicans.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think that’s the invisible hand of the market. The visible part is the products you don’t get to have.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    30 minutes ago

    USA could have spent money developing an electrified economy but the republicans are focusing on bringing back coal mining and reshoring shoe manufacturing instead.

    This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

    ETA - what I mean is that China is rampaging on in electrification, developing manufacturing skills, infrastructure, and design/engineering/technology around renewables and electrification. Europe is thinking about it but not going crazy to the extent China is, because legacy - China doesn’t have 100 years of cars and 150 years of trains; they’re building new. USA meanwhile is actively regressing under Republican policies.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      Which kind of blows my mind. Coal miners should love EVs. There was a story in the news a few years ago about how nice it was for the miners to help someone in an EV, as if they should be mortal enemies.

      Non-EV cars don’t run on coal, they run on gasoline. EVs on the other hand can run on coal, natural gas, solar, wind, you name it - and still are more energy efficient than cars burning gasoline. In a sane world, coal miners would be throwing their support behind electric vehicles. The utility companies seem to understand this, but seems like the support hasn’t made its way up the supply chain.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

      Again. They already enshrined “billionaires get all the money” in the one legislative victory of trumps first term.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      This isn’t exclusively a problem of the new administration, or the previous. All administrations since the late 20th century have been compliant in allowing the offshoring of most industry

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not just industry. Now they’re killing the development of skills and knowledge in engineering (hardware, software) and design

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      But… but… those good ol’ days felt so good! We need to relive those days!

    • killabeezio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think that’s what they meant. I think they are just saying that people are still buying EVs, but they are just going to Chinese and other manufacturers instead of buying a Tesla. The article specifically calls out the stupid shit Elon has been doing.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah. Good to know- I didn’t read the article, but that’s kind of my point, really. Most people don’t, and media outlets know that. The headline is all that “carries”. A better headline would include the Nazi stuff AND Chinese EVs. I think they deliberately avoided that and tucked it in the article.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          The headline to me clearly is stating that people are not buying Teslas and are buying alternative Chinese based EVs instead. I think that anyone that’s heard Elon’s name over the past 6 months can read between the lines and understand the causation here.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well - I would hope. But that’s not the same as putting it in there is it.

            “Tesla sales drop as EU consumers choose Chinese brands plus Musk is y’know WINK”

            I mean, I can see why they didn’t go with that one but still. There are plenty of people who don’t understand Elmo is an out-and-out nazi, cozy with putin and Peter Thiel and will destroy the country as soon as possible. Not mentioning him and his drugged-out asinine ideas in the headline is a missed opportunity.

            • BassTurd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              The title isn’t there to tell the whole story though. It should give a high level summary and then the details are in the article. If you hypothetically put something like what you suggested, it still doesn’t give all of the context, and the title would need to be longer to include the history of Musk, his drug use, his position with Tesla, etc, and you can’t put that all in the title. I’m all for dunking on that Nazi whenever we can, but I personally don’t think that the title of this article deserves any criticism, especially in the age of clickbait titles that don’t give anything, this one is decently descriptive.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                I’ll give you that. I just want more. Elmo’s such a stain that not factoring it directly to Tesla-going-down stories seems like skimping.

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We have 2 BYD plug-in EVs in our house, absolutely delighted with the brand. Before that I had a Model 3 Tesla, which I could not get rid of fast enough.

      Honor where honor is due, Tesla did open the door for mainstreaming EVs, there’s no doubt about it, but it was through marketing based on gimmicks, not through quality products. But the reality is that BYD, Xiaomi, Avatr and a few other Chinese manufacturing cars are way better value and even quality than their Occidental counterparts.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      how many cameras does it have? be pleased about all your, and your neighbourhoods everydays be uploaded to china, to train face recognition and whatever else

      I hate teslas, but byd’s are not even slightly better in my eyes.

      I don’t like the feeling that we may never see a consumer friendly EV anymore, but only ones that exploit their users in any ways they can

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        China can have all the images they want from my car’s. I don’t live in China or anywhere near them. I’m more concerned about US made EVs and their surveillance because I travel there regularly, and they are digging hard on everything for people coming into the US.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I live neither in china or the usa, but I don’t want myself be recorded by either of their appliances that I use. and that naturally also extends to my neighbors and wherever I go.

          its quite interesting how many people suddenly started to love mass surveillance

      • hietsu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Don’t know why exactly are you downvoted but this is exactly what is going on as cars get more ”connected”, following Tesla & BYD lead. Just like with phones at the moment, everything tries to spy on you a little to tap into that sweeet targeted ad revenue, or something else.

        For example I bet the insurance companies love to have some driver behaviour data about you, and the big retail likes to know where/what time you are on the move (though they already get it from the dozens of apps on your phone that have access to location data, like Google Maps).

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Don’t know why exactly are you downvoted

          It’s very weird. maybe I was a bit too harsh in the beginning, but I don’t think it was nearly this bad.

          For example I bet the insurance companies love to have some driver behaviour data about you, and the big retail likes to know where/what time you are on the move (though they already get it from the dozens of apps on your phone that have access to location data, like Google Maps)

          there are ways to clean it out of a phone, but cars are much more closed down, and if I had to guess they are probably even protected against you cleaning it out software-wise by safety regulations

  • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hitler was “incendiary” and “political” but I think there’s a four-letter word so much better, so much more concise, that this wording is actual disinformation.