• theangryseal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That just screams that folks don’t actually read the Bible.

    Well, that, or 7 year olds just took context and ran with it.

  • cygnosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Our thinking can be so twisted by religion. Imagine someone long ago wants to build a really tall tower. Nobody knows engineering, material science, etc. They just start stacking rocks on top of each other like they do when they made short buildings. Eventually it’s so tall and heavy that it’s no longer stable, one side sinks into the ground, and the whole thing falls over. And what’s their takeaway? Is it about learning from their mistake and trying again? No, it’s “God is punishing your hubris!” Religion just poisons the mind.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It also explains why people started speaking different tongues. And Warns the young to not build a thing so ridiculously big, building fall down.

      Trying for what is progress, but in sight so you can achieve it is better.

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The Icarus myth is still a useful analogy, even if you don’t believe it actually happened.

      And what’s their takeaway? Is it about learning from their mistake and trying again? No, it’s “God is punishing your hubris!”

      Just substitute any force or phenomenon bigger than human ability for “God” in that sentence and it’ll still apply to a lot of situations.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Builder: “I’m not incompetent! Uh… God didn’t want it to happen. Yeah, that’s it; the collapse definitely wasn’t my fault at all!”

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          That, and accurate observations that they couldn’t correctly explain. For example, prohibiting eating pork because it’s “unclean,” while having no clue about trichinosis. They don’t know (scientifically) how to mitigate it, so they just tell people it’s a sin.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      -said in a world full of weaponized drones, AI deepfakes, and lying, lying nazis who don’t have the slightest clue how life works.

      The tower of babel is a great lesson.

  • orbitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There’s a Big Finish Dr Who audio story, well two I think, where the bad guy is named Nimrod. A scientist in their stories. So not everyone thought the name was an insult…or maybe they did, huh, but figure if the name gets to be known as a main guy the Doctor clashes with they can’t really think he’s a complete fool.

    Though I always remember the cartoons first.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Same, our church growing up never talked about that. (disclaimer atheist now)

      I know that scholars understand the “official” Bible as a combination of earlier sources. Still, it’s funny how much Bible fanfic there is. How do you decide which stuff is real and which stuff is too crazy.

      • Szyler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        How do you decide which stuff is real and which stuff is too crazy.

        You selectively choose during each argument whichever fits your personal agenda.

  • MU5T4N6@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Wasn’t it Daffy Duck who compared Fudd with Nimrod? Bugs Bunny calls Yosemite Dam Nimrod.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yes, Daffy did it first. Maybe Bugs popularized it if more people saw the cartoon he said it in later, though.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I remember being so confused by why the X-Men villain was named Nimrod when I was a kid. I always assumed it was ironic or something but never really got it. Then as an adult I learned about the biblical Nimrod and was like…“oh”. I wonder what if would have been like if I hadn’t been exposed to Looney Tunes first.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Imaging him returning now. “I am Nimrod!!… wait, why are you all laughing at me?”

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Imagine a book full of ahistorical stories being taken as historical. Now imagine anything that it says mattering at all. It doesn’t.