cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/28131779

In addition to “climate change” and “green,” EERE forbid officials from using “emissions” to avoid the implication that they are a negative. Climate change is caused by rising greenhouse gas emissions, which is driven primarily by burning oil, coal and natural gas for energy.

Other terms officials must ditch include “energy transition,” “sustainability/sustainable,” “‘clean’ or ‘dirty’ energy,” “Carbon/CO2 ‘Footprint’” and “Tax breaks/tax credits/subsidies.”

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    4 days ago

    Imagine being so invested in bullshit that you have to censor any and all terms that contradict it.

    Really, it’s no wonder that Trump and his cronies and minions are so filled with rage - they’re in a constant state of extreme cognitive dissonance.

    And it makes sense in a way that they direct their rage at “woke” people and positions. From their limited, animalistic points of view, all they understand is that when they think of “woke,” they’re filled with rage. They aren’t conscious enough to understand that the source of the rage isn’t the positions or the people, but the cognitive dissonance they experience when they cling to their opposition to simple and obvious truths.

    It has to be a miserable way to live, and if they weren’t an existential threat to me, my family and friends, and society as a whole, I’d feel sorry for them.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      his cronies and minions are so filled with rage - they’re in a constant state of extreme cognitive dissonance.

      And that will be their own undoing. Fascists are fully driven by emotions. They are anti-liberal and anti-intellect after all.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The only way they could be more of a threat to us is if they were literally holding guns to our heads. And we may not be far off from that.

      They are America’s enemies. They are democracy’s enemies.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Free speech (conservative newspeak): Calling black people the N-word and not receiving any social backlash.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not American but I know American academics and they have told me they are being pulled into meetings and given lists of words they must not use. So much for all the “free speech” whining from Republicans.

      • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        “Free speech” for republicans is just “I want to say the worst hateful, racist, bigoted shit out loud without repercussions”

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Conservatives are, and have always been, about power over others. We kept their more evil nature’s focused externally for a while with cold war, but without an external threat to point them at, they always turn on their neighbors eventually.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      The government is owned by billionaires and they ban words that make line go up slower.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is, literally, a fascist government. Why is this surprising to anyone?

      People who were paying attention warned that they would operate as a fascist government. People still thought it would be cool to vote 3rd party or not vote. Now it’s happening.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m not sure how they mean it here. But “banned words” aren’t always meaning censorship. In an academic or journalistic sense it can just mean replacing words with more accurate phrasing or more clearly defined words to ensure consistency.

      Unfortunately, it’s also used to spin a narrative or outright censor things as well. Like the NYT banning the word “genocide” during an active genocide.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        You mean banning science liberal shit talk non facts?

        (how every conversation starts looking next year)

      • itztalal@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They have morons on both sides already eager to do that for them.

        Remember when science could be debated? Now we just have to accept everything as fact without question if it supports the correct agenda.

        Questioning science gets you banned, lol. It may as well be religion at that point.

        • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Remember when science could be debated? Now we just have to accept everything as fact without question if it supports the correct agenda.

          Questioning science gets you banned, lol. It may as well be religion at that point.

          Questioning what science gets you banned from what, by whom? Scientists question science all the time. That’s how it progresses. You’d need to give examples to explain what you’re referring to. And can you give an example when we’re expected to simply “accept everything as fact without question”?

          Edit: It has been a day. I guess there are no examples coming.

        • Flamekebab@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          If one side of a discussion on facts has data and the other has opinions what is there to debate?

          I remember a time when hard data was debatable - it was ten minutes ago. We’re trapped in a timeline where data is disregarded in favour of comfortable lies.

          Why address climate change if one can instead engage in mass self-deception.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because the old “$2.99 looks more like 2 dollars than 3 dollars” works on the masses they discovered that through social fuckery and behaviourism they are able to make us think and do almost anything. Fuck this bullshit. Let’s find the warm sun again and start building a future and leave all of this power crap behind.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Other terms officials must ditch include “energy transition,” “sustainability/sustainable,” “‘clean’ or ‘dirty’ energy,” “Carbon/CO2 ‘Footprint’” and “Tax breaks/tax credits/subsidies.”

    Can’t wait for press conferences from these officials to be stripped down to Kevin’s level.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      It was almost 90°F here today. You can’t tell me global warming doesn’t also fucking apply to climate change.

      It doesn’t matter what doublespeak they use, it’s still happening

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        How can you be so obtuse? Do you not recall when a US Senator brought a snowball onto the floor of the senate to completely disprove this hoax?

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Ha ha ha, nice try. This is like trying to convince someone you never fart. Proof of idiocy.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Assholes have never even heard of a thesaurus. Plus, we now have AI at our backs. Behold, what ChatGPT ginned up for me a second ago:

    1. Global heating
    2. Planetary warming
    3. Atmospheric instability
    4. Rising planetary temperatures
    5. Ecological overheating
    6. Weather system disruption
    7. Global temperature shift
    8. Planetary imbalance
    9. Atmospheric warming trend
    10. Earth system disturbance
    11. Heat-driven weather extremes
    12. Long-term planetary warming
    13. Rising global heat levels
    14. Ecological destabilization
    15. Planet-wide heat surge
    16. Environmental overheating
    17. Temperature-driven disruption
    18. Global heat imbalance
    19. Accelerated warming of Earth
    20. Planetary-scale weather disruption

    I get that this works as long as they’re willing to play by the rules they set. But if it comes down to getting the word out, and silencing science that could save lives, it’s worth trying.