• wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh hey I recognize that street and that guy. He’s a free-stater nutjob who has at least one criminal investigation against him

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s with the assumption that the pedestrian getting to their destination is less important than all the drivers? If a bunch of people get held up a long time for a smaller number of people, blame the city planners.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh you mean like a bus full of people sitting behind a 1995 camary?

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, if the busses are used a lot they should get their own lanes and other special considerations.

        As long as I’m adding another comment, I should mention that it’s usually not the city planners fault. It’s interest groups leaning on elected officials to lean on the city planners, who would design safe and efficient cities if left to their own devices.

          • ceenote@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            More realistically they have to work in parallel. The NIMBYs will easily destroy a bus service that inconveniences all the drivers if nobody is riding it yet.

            • jumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              as they should, the government needs to not discriminate again their existing infrastructure unless they have a real replacement (as far as I am aware no place actually has public transit that replaces cars properly)

    • harmbugler@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not to mention the fact that to cross to the opposite corner, a pedestrian often has to press two buttons and wait for two sets of light changes. Drivers only have to wait more than one when there are too many cars.

      • snoons@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        While also sitting on cushioned seats in a closed off, air-conditioned space. The lazy bastards can fucking wait for me to mozy on by.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve always found that really stupid. Just have two buttons, one for the diagonal and one for the crossing. And if you press the button for the diagonal, it stops all lanes of traffic so you can cross diagonally. Like, you can’t tell me it would take less time having to stop the lights twice for you to cross one way and then cross the other, then it would be to just stop all the lanes of traffic momentarily while you cross diagonally.

  • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    At 800k impressions, assuming 10 seconds per view, this guy wasted about 90 days with his dogshit take

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand what he wants the pedestrian to do. Not cross at all? Wait until there’s no traffic?

  • Waffelmeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Maybe I shouldn’t tell you guys this, but sometimes I press the button even if I don’t have to cross the street. Also sometimes I cross the street really slowly, drivers get especially mad about that. Obviously I’m not from the US, since I’m still alive.

    • betelplouf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Crossing suuuper slowly when there’s a suv waiting is my fav, especially when the driver didn’t want me to cross

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I never cross the street slowly… but I never hurry, either, and even that annoys some car drivers 😭😂

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why though, people have places to go and public transport might not be available to them. You’re punishing people for their lack of choices

      • Waffelmeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah, you got it all wrong. I don’t punish them, I do them a favor. They mabe don’t know it, but it’s good for them if they stop occasionally.

        On the other hand, they punish me, every day of every week. They punish me with pollution and noise and concrete and traffic accidents and oil consumption and heat radiation.

        • horsesaysweird@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Deciding what is good for random strangers and then forcing them to enjoy whatever it is you came up with doesn’t sound like very good idea.

          And how is this helping your situation? Breaking and accelerating increases noise and pollution. If cars have to spend more time on the street instead of being at their destination, they either need more road space or they spend more time in traffic jams that, again, increase noise and pollution. Cars are the least likely to be involved in accidents when they are cruising, so you are also making your city less safe.

          Just to be clear: I’m absolutely in favour of banning cars in cities, but you are making the already bad situation worse for everyone.

          • Waffelmeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I guess I’m a litte bit accelerationist(1) with my take here. But the situation will not change if drivers have it more comfortable.

            There is so much violence in driving a car, and you argue against me because I make them stop for 20 seconds. (Inner)Cities should not be build for cruising. They should be build for pedestrians. If you want to cruise, drive on the Autobahn or some Umfahrungsstraße.

            Spoiler

            (1) DuckDuckGo translated accelerationist with beschlagnaderungsorientiert. Since you german speaking I thought you might enjoy this.

            • horsesaysweird@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              You misunderstand me. I agree that being a pedestrian or cyclist should be more convenient and safer, and I don’t care if that means car drivers are inconvenienced by whatever it is that needs to be done to achieve that goal.

              But you are inconveniencing car drivers while also making the situation worse for pedestrians, cyclists and everyone else. What you are doing has no positive effects for anyone, except maybe you feeling righteous for a moment.

              Spoiler

              “beschlagnaderungsorientiert” sounds like a dangerous words from the funniest joke in the world.

          • Swemg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Are drivers not deciding and then forcing people to “enjoy” their cars ? ^^

            • horsesaysweird@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, they don’t drive their cars because they think it’s good for you, they drive them because they think it’s good for them.

              • Swemg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Depends on the context I think, if you use even though you don’t need to then it’s a choice for you and people around you

                • horsesaysweird@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  But you are still driving your car because it benefits you. Nobody thinks they are helping others by driving through a busy city center.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Deciding what is good for random strangers and then forcing them to enjoy whatever it is you came up with doesn’t sound like very good idea.

            The birth of an authoritarian.

      • Swemg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lol wut. If a car doesn’t let me cross even though I have the priority as a pedestrian, I usually hit the side mirror or the car. They can go fuck themselves with their overpriced rolling boxes. People get so mad when you touch their cars. I like it.

        • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I often walk or cycle past a school and a daycare, and here they have recently “upgraded roads” which means that they have scraped away a few pedestrian crossings. I 100% do shitty tricks to cars driving too fast or not giving enough space, especially if I am moving around the time kids are active. (Around here kids are still allowed to walk/cycle from school and often play around the town.)

          I have made air kicks, always do when necessary, but sadly so far they have missed…

          • Swemg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol, if touching a side mirror gets you that angry you need to look in a mirror and think about whats wrong with you. Also I’m a carpenter, I most often have my tools with me, I could do way worse than “hitting” a side mirror if you really need something to get upset about. I bet you get half hard looking at your rolling box ^^

            • percent@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Unpopular opinion: Cars are expensive. Vandalizing them in response to an inconvenience seems like an overreaction.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s symmetrical though. Sort of like a pedestrian risking death if they inconvenience car drivers

                • percent@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad.

                  Not sure I’d consider them “symmetrical” though… Maybe I’m being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse.

                  Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy.

              • Swemg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Cutting the priority to pedestrian isn’t an inconvenience tho. It’s straight up code violation. Unfortunately it doesn’t seem to be a priority for the police 🤷🏻

                • percent@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though.

              • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                True. However given that they’re the largest “lifestyle” contributor to climate change (as opposed to things in the agricultural sector), vandalizing one in response to it simply existing seems like a slight under reaction, if anything.

          • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            A medal for meritorious public service and right of first refusal to carry out the sentence against the ecocidal narcissists? That’d be a well deserved surprise for any non-carhole who’s been making carholes angry.

      • Waffelmeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. Carbrained psychopaths look a people crossing the street and think: How dare they make me wait a few seconds longer. I’ll fucking hit them with my car.

        And they think that’s a proportinal response. It’s just deeply sick and twisted.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          How dare they make me wait a few seconds longer.

          …on purpose, just to cause a reaction. You missed that bit.

          When i’m driving vehicles i have to qualms waiting for elderly or disabled people to cross the street, regardless of whether or not the crosswalk has a light.

          Dipshits intentionally walking slow just to piss me off deserve to piss off someone who gets out of the car and demonstrates their discontent in a more direct manner.

          If you want to label dislike for lack of civility as being a psychopath so you can feel better about yourself be my guest.

          • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m going to walk slowly in front of three cars just because you made this post. It’s the only reasonable response to your lack of civility.

            Seriously, you’re advocating getting physical with someone because of a perceived lack of civility — literally walking too slow. I drive almost everywhere, have done so for decades, and this is not a problem I’ve had, even once in my life. If “people walking too slowly in front of your car” is a regular problem for you, you may need to cultivate more patience. You have lost the plot. You sound like you are the problem in this social interaction.

          • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thanks for adding more evidence to support my central thesis: good people don’t drive cars.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fucking drivers thinking they can assualt people with their cars becase they’ve been inconvenienced

  • onnekas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    While the dude who pressed the button witnessed 100 able, adult people sitting in a polluting metal box instead of walking, cycling or taking public transport.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      A polluting metal death machine. I’ve had 3 acquaintances die from being hit by some driver, and in at least 2 of those cases, the driver was younger than 25 (which is the age when your brain finishes maturing and you get better impulse control).

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That 25 number is just the age they stopped that study at, not some magical number where everyone is now officially mature. The human brain continues developing through your life.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would love to do those instead of driving to work. Walking would take 14 hours, biking 4 hours, and the closest public transport I can get on is the same distance drive to work.

      • Leviathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Got a new job and my bike commute went from 2.5 hours (tried once and it sucked) to 25 minutes. Work-life balance is 100% better, even if the bike path here bites the big one.

    • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Despite seeing drivers enraged by road safety and basic courtesy frequently while walking, this remains confusing AND infuriating as an American.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have no idea what is the supposed message of the “author”. Don’t cross the street?

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Their logic: people in cars = captains of industry who cannot be delayed as they go to their power lunches

        People on foot = slovenly, slackjawed peasants who are obviously wasting time

  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    These idiots exist

    The type who fetishise “the grind” and all that other toxic bullshit

    Not exclusive to 'Murica, but over-represented in their “society”

  • glibg10b@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They’ll just arrive 30 seconds later at the next red light where they still have to wait for the same 5 phases

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s why I no longer stop at red lights. Thats just theft of life. My car also works just fine on either side of the road; limiting it to just one is imprisonment. /s

  • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Making ~100 cars drive 30 minutes to work every day is the destruction of 50 hour of human life, 100 hours both ways, almost every single day, but apparently cars are freedom so 🤷

  • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If it’s not, I’ve been given a new mission from up on high.

    “Press ye every walk signal, both ways, on every single street ye walk on. Though ye may be turning right at that corner and not even crossing that that intersection, still press ye the buttons.”

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh cmon don’t do that. Make liberal use of the button when you’re actually crossing obviously, but don’t waste everyone else’s time if you’re not crossing (and emissions, cars require more energy to accelerate than to cruise, especially combustion engine cars).

  • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just for you, Jeff, I’m pushing every single walk button I see, especially when I’m not crossing the road.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thank you kind stranger. It makes me smile every time i arrive at a crosswalk, nobody around, and the light is already green.

      It’s a pedestrian version of drivers parking on the side walks as a courtesy to other drivers as to not block the road.