• TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    ·
    7 months ago

    Some critics argue the DEA shouldn’t change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn’t necessary and could lead to harmful side effects.

    I wonder who those fuckheads are and how much of their portfolio is invested in for profit prisons.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        Frfr, they always say harmful side effects but never mention side effects for whom lol

    • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      While I agree it should be 100% legal across the board someone made a good point. Once it’s rescheduled we could see it be classified at a medicine and ban recreational use then they’ll shoot the price through the roof re-opening the black markets. It’s worth treading carefully while we learn future plans that aren’t being spoken of loudly enough.

      • Almrond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        The thing is, if it gets rescheduled it will be entirely up to the states to handle growing the plant. I fully expect places like Wyoming to continue the draconian laws (like they just did with D8, it’s a felony after June 1st, farm act be damned) but most places will just regulate based on their current laws. What worries me is the ATF being assigned as the federal regulatory body, but that would only happen with it being a taxable, saleable, product. I don’t forsee big pharma being able to do much with rescheduling, it’s too easy to grow.

        • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Holy hell, conservatives are such gigantic pieces of shit. Fuck red states, their beauty is absolutely destroyed by these anti-freedom cretins.

          • Almrond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, red states are holding this nation back in a huge number of ways. Wyoming still publicly defends racism and hate speech under the guise of “free speech”. Check out the statements made by the University of Wyoming regarding a guy that comes onto campus specifically to harass and spew hate at transgender people this year. The college not only gives him his own table in the student Union, they encourage him to harass people. It sparked entire groups of people to literally scream racism and hate speech at people all over town because “muh freedoms”. It’s bad. Being a minority in this state is legit scary.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some critics argue the DEA shouldn’t change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn’t necessary and could lead to harmful side effects.

      I wonder who those fuckheads are

      https://duckduckgo.com/?&q=police+no+longer+allowed+to+use+smell+of+marijuana+for+probable+cause

      Search link not because I’m being a smartass, but because there are so many articles with the same context in different parts of the country.

      Womp womp. Sorry you’ll have to give up your second favorite pretext, cops.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    The DEA’s proposal, which still must be reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, would recognize the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledge it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs. However, it would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use.

    I am really sorry for those of you who use it recreationally, because it deserves to be legal for you too, but as a medical user in a non-legal state, this is amazing news.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am really sorry for those of you who use it recreationally, because it deserves to be legal for you too, but as a medical user in a non-legal state, this is amazing news.

      One step closer, IMO id rather medical people get it first ASAP anyways. Us recreational users have fun with it and it’s far better than say alcohol for a good time, but at the end of the day I don’t need it.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think someone said the whatever agency needs to reclassify it before legalization can happen. I have no idea why or how it works. But this could be the start of legalization from Congress.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      which still must be reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget

      sigh So it hasn’t actually been rescheduled yet.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    tl;dr: DEA moving cannabis, ketamine, and some other stuff to schedule III; first it goes to OMB for approval, then they have a comment period, then they issue their final ruling.

    Better a couple decades late than never, I suppose, but they should really just take it off entirely. Psilocybin too.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Seriously fuck the fact that Marijuana is still illegal, broken ass racist bullshit system while alcohol is legal and marijuana is not.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Still makes me sick to think of all of those cunt fucking cops who sent people to prison for this shit.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Absolutely, and the DEA is a fucking failure, we have an opioid epidemic and they’ve done absolutely nothing to help the US. Complete fucking bullshit agency that does NOTHING to help the American people.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just a reminder that if trump is elected, he will reverse this immediately only because Biden did it.

    That’s not speculation. That’s a godamn fact.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you wanna burn yourself and all of us down then vote Trump/don’t vote. At least with Trump you won’t ever need to vote again.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        You realize you’re inside the circus right? Burning it down quite probably means you and everyone you know burns to death too right?

  • kinsnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    i wish that they would also reschedule lsd and psilocybin to schedule III, but at least some progress is better than no progress

      • jeansburger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        It is arbitrary. While what classification a substance is may have some grounding in research, it’s mostly up to what interest group has either lobbied to get something under or whatever group law enforcement wants to be able to get easy charges for. Cannabis was Sched I because it made it easy for law enforcement to get big sentences for minorities and the counter culture participants of the day. Same thing with LSD and psilocybin.

        All the DEA scheduling is just pick and choose your charge for whatever ideological ax they want to grind. Hence why things don’t line up with reality

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      And MDMA? It shows a lot of promise in therapeutic use. Schedule 1 is for substances with “no currently accepted medical treatment use”.

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, MDMA also doesn’t belong in schedule I, although it is definitely more risky than lsd and mushrooms

          • kinsnik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Overdose of MDMA can cause seratonin syndrome, which can be fatal; and long term use might be linked to depression and anxiety (again, by the way it interacts with seratonin)

            It definitely should be rescheduled too, since it is not dangerous enough and definitely has potential for medical use (couple therapy was it’s original use)

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m sure all the “stroke of a pen” trolls are going to be here to apologize any second, right?

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      60
      ·
      7 months ago

      Probably not, all of the hardcore Biden supporters I’ve met on this website are just utter scum who will never admit to anything no matter how obvious it is, like how this obviously could have been done at any point but was saved for an election year, or how rescheduling it instead of just descheduling it entirely keeps it federally criminal and breaks campaign pledges he made in 2019 and 2020

      Best thing you can do is just try to leave some truthful information where some people might see it and ignore the replies

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know Biden tasked the FDA to investigate reclassifying it, which should be a win, but until the FDA actually finishes the reclassification it won’t show in the polls. If the bureaucracy can move fast enough for this to get done before the election, it could mean a decent little bump for Biden.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The reactionaries in the GOP will immediately start trying to prevent this from happening, of course.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t smoke, but I don’t care what you do to your own bodies as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else.

    The same goes for women’s autonomy and assisted suicide. It’s your god damn body. As long as you don’t hurt anyone else. Who fucking cares.

    I’m also in the same boat for AI generated porn. If it doesn’t hurt anyone, who cares.

  • manucode@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Maybe the drug control agency should clarify that marijuana shouldn’t be consumed at beer festivals, to protect the children.

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Maybe we shouldn’t make laws about what adults can do because it wouldn’t be good for children. Unless you think we shouldn’t have beer festivals, to protect the children, and no food not pureed should be available for purchase, to protect the children.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I say this as a pothead. If you’re smoking in a public area where it’s not specifically designated and there’s people there that don’t want you to, you’re an ass.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Honestly, I would have absolutely no problem with cannabis being legal but you can’t use it in public. If I can buy it, take it home and use it without fear of arrest, that’s all I ask.

          • Alto@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            To an extent, smoking in public is fine. My regular smoke spot is in a park. But I also hike 20 minutes to it explicitly because its as far away from everyone else as possible, and the wind is usually going away from them.

            Maybe I’m overcautious, but I remember walking down the street as a kid and just hating the smell of cigarettes. I never found weed as bad, but I don’t want to br the asshole who’s the reason some poor 8 year is holding their breath as you walk past them.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              My teenager still holds his breath as we walk by pot smokers …. Tobacco smokers are much rarer in public where we live

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I was thinking public municipal streets and the like, not out in the middle of nowhere.

              And honestly, I’d apply that to cigarettes too if we wouldn’t be forcing a bunch of addicted people to quit cold turkey because they can’t take smoke breaks at work.

              • Alto@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Really the biggest thing is just having some common courtesy and being considerate of where and when you do it.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            My biggest objection to smokers is the stink. Maybe it’s not as cancerous as tobacco, but why should I be stuck with a jacket that smells like pot after walking out the entrance to my building or walking through the park? Can’t smokers (of anything) just try to be courteous of non-smokers?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I have sympathy for them because they’re kind of fucked. They’re addicted, but they can’t smoke inside, and their job only gives them a few minutes to take a smoke break, so what else can they do? I hate the smell too, but forcing an addict to just stop smoking is not fair to them either.

          • hook@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Just treat cannabis the same way we treat alcohol and I’ll be happy. It’d be nice if we had cannabis bars where I can buy it and consume it in the location.

      • manucode@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sorry for making such a niche reference. I was joking about a specific tweet by a specific German politician. This was only meant for any German reading the comments.

  • bazus1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    I guess this is what you do when you want to win an election, but make it still look close.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      This isn’t a new position for Biden with regards to his presidency. Here’s his statements on it over 4 years ago in Feb 2020:

      Biden’s campaign told POLITICO that in his remarks on the recording, he was simply “restating his cannabis policy,” which includes eliminating criminal penalties linked to marijuana, erasing marijuana-related criminal records and “letting states set their own policies regarding legalization of recreational marijuana while further effort is made to study the effects of cannabis use.”

      source

        • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          If he wanted to do that he’d have pushed his AG to deschedule it entirely

          The attorney general doesn’t set the drug classification level, that’s the DEA. This is power was established by a law passed by congress, so if Biden had his AG try to overrule that some states would sue and the Supreme Court would clearly side with them. He could have his AG refuse to prosecute any cannabis crimes, but that would immediately be undone the next time a conservative AG takes over and prosecutes everyone who got a pass now. Also, they’ve already been ignoring any cannabis prosecutions where it’s someone following state law.

          Apart from congress passing a law legalizing cannabis (which is not possible with the republican house, not to mention most of the senate) having the DEA reschedule it is the only “permanent” path forward. And it has to be done to the letter of the law because you know some republican states will challenge this move.