• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    That there’s a loving God.

    Now it seems clear that even if he did exist, he’s just above average asshole

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I would argue that if God exists, they aren’t intentionally being an asshole. They are being completely hands off so as not to corrupt the experiment, or override free will. After all, the only reason any god would need a prime material plane of existence is to see if they can create a peer of themselves, and at least as far as most of the major religions seem to be concerned, if someone created this universe, they decided that we have free will, so it’s kinda hard to directly intervene. They could send avatars from time to time to attempt to intervene, but they kinda tied their hands in the act of creation.

            • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              You can absolutely intervene without affecting free will and that is assuming we even have free will. I am not convinced that we do.

              Also why would you presume to know what a being (that as we imagine it) with unlimited power and knowledge would want or even need?

              If you are a god and you see 25,000 people (10,000 of which are children) starving to death every single day and you have the power to stop that and you don’t then you are an immortal monster.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I was a real piece of shit for a good handful of years when I was a kid because I believed I was destined for hell. I figured if I’m going to spend eternity being tortured I may as well enjoy life to the max, even at the expense of others. Because I’m already going to hell, so why not, right?

      Religion is fucking toxic, man. I hurt a lot of people and made a lot of decisions I can’t recover from.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m so white that Casper the friendly ghost calls me a cracker. The thugs with badges are noones friends, except the owners. They never help any situation, and can literally only destroy more lives, and make every situation they come in contact with worse. This will always be true as long as they are profit motivated, which they are, at least in the US, and many other countries that copied us.

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    I thought that dogs were boys and cats were girls. No idea why.

    Its funny, my niece made it to like 8 thinking that aunts were adults and uncles were kids. She had one young uncle, and me. Called me “Auntie Phanto.” I still haven’t lived it down.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dogs = boys due to energetic, clumsy and loud.

      Cats = girls due to classy, well-behaved and quiet.

      I’d guess it would be a trend similar to saying girls play with dolls and boys play with action figures.

    • dullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      my niece made it to like 8 thinking that aunts were adults and uncles were kids

      This fits well with the accidental mild misandry in Catholic school when we learned about differences between men and women. One of the books we had to read said something like “men consistently outperform their female counterparts at making almost miraculously stupid decisions”

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    That our blood was blue, but turned red when exposed to air and light. All because a teacher told us so.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      I heard this one from a teacher as well when I was very young! And it may well have been the same teacher telling us that blood was made of white blood cells and red blood cells, and I knew from my deep work in relevant fields (paints and crayons) that this combination did not result in blue.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        We were told that the arteries carry oxygen rich blood, that was red because of a high iron oxide content, away from the heart and lungs to the extremities of the body. At that point capillaries get involved, and it’s really best not to worry too much here. Then the veins carry the oxygen depleted blood back to the heart and lungs to be reoxygenated, and that that blood appears blue through your skin. I think copper may have had something to do with the blue coloration, but that blood is also red in color, even if you managed to pull it directly into a vacuum tube. It just appears blue because of your skin or something.

        • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oxygenated blood is bright red, whereas deoxygenated blood is a darker red. And it looks blue because blue light doesn’t penetrate the skin as deeply as red light. The ones closer to the surface appear blue while deeper ones are purpleish due to the red light reflecting deeper.

  • serpineslair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    I used to think that hair grew when it was watered - like a plant - and therefore showering was what allowed your hair to grow. No one ever told me that, I just assumed it to be true at a young age.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      it still blows my mind on a daily basis, the arrogance of humans to think they not only know what their creator-god wants but can sway “Him” with some fucking magic words

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean… If I was playing like The Sims and one of the Sims was like “yo can I get a new bike?” I might be like sure bro. From their perspective I’m a god that exists outside time and space.

        That’s not really how Christianity talks about its God though, usually. But also like the story of Job does seem like a kid and his friend fucking with their game.

    • whoareu@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think we could classify it as “false belief” since we can’t verify that statement.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure you can!

        Get a coin, and flip it 100 times. Record each time it lands on heads/tails.

        Now get a devout believer, and have the believer continuously say devout prayers petitioning God to make the coin read heads. Then, flip the coin 100 times, and record heads/tails.

        Do statistical analysis to see whether there is a statistically significant difference between the control group and the prayer group. Pretty easy to verify if true.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That line of thinking led to the “docudrama” ‘What the bleep do we know?’ and the extended version “What the bleep, further down the rabbit hole.” Both of which can appear to be rational to most laymen, but are basically religious BS forced on a quantum physics foundation.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Even a recent book advocating the efficacy of prayer in treating disease (Larry Dossey, Healing Words) is troubled by the fact that some diseases are more easily cured or mitigated than others. If prayer works, why can’t God cure cancer or grow back a severed limb?

        – Carl Sagan, The Demon Haunted World (1995)

        See also https://www.whywontgodhealamputees.com/

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m completely on board with that, except for the “wish fulfillment”. I don’t know how it got twisted around that you could presume to tell God what to do or that he would - it seems so entirely inconsistent with anything else about religious beliefs

        So we have this all powerful and all knowing supreme being , right? And he’s got a plan for the entire universe and all of time, right? But he’ll disrupt all of that to grant you a favor if you wish hard enough? Or you can blame him if something bad happens to you specifically, out of all the universe over all time? What hubris, what ego could make us think we’re in control and can use it for personal gain?

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    That my parents never had parents. Sure, I had grandparents and saw them daily, but I somehow never realized that they were my dad’s parents.

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    My mom told me that Dad went to work to make money, and I actually expected to see money making machines when I visited him at the office.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Oh dear. I hope for his sake that he understood polynomial expressions, otherwise he was constantly being berated for “his stupid decisions,” by parents that also didn’t have any data to back them up.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dpkg is the low level tool for Debian packages.

        Apt-get is the original frontend for dpkg. It is a full featured tool that lets the user give commands to dpkg, along with apt-cache, which displays information to the user.

        Apt is a high level tool for user friendliness. It combines some features from apt-get and apt-cache, as well as adds progress bars and other quality of life features. It also strips down some features the average user doesn’t use.

        So neither is a wrapper for the other. They are two similar tools that do the same job. Apt-get is better for scripting due to being a more rigid tool while apt is nicer for end users.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        When I started on Debian, there was only apt-get. (And dpkg if you manually pulled .debs from somewhere).

        Then a little while later, there was aptitude, which was nice.

        apt the command didn’t show up until 2014.

  • circledsquare@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    I believed that peas were the pupa of something similar to a butterfly or a moth. I refused to eat peas for years because I felt so bad eating little baby critters. I think my aunt might’ve “encouraged” me to think that.

      • circledsquare@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Had to watch a YouTube video about Metapod to know what you were talking about. I don’t think Pokemon existed when I was a kid but Metapod isn’t a million miles away from what I imagined.

    • dullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This removed comment said “That I could have being a successful adult when I grow up, falling in love, making with my own family, and have a job.”

  • littlecolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    I thought that if you swallowed your gum, it would stay in your stomach forever, so you had to make sure to never do it because eventually there would be no room for food anymore.

    Also, old CRT TVs had this static electricity sort of fuzzy feeling on the screen, and if you ran your hand over it, it would dissipate. I thought that by doing that, you were absorbing the TVs power and if you did it too much, it would eventually stop working.

    Lastly, I believed with all my heart that all the pets you ever owned were waiting for you in heaven and it made me mad when my (very devout Catholic) grandma told me that pets and animals don’t have souls and so they didn’t go to heaven. I said if that was true then I didn’t want to go to heaven! I’m atheist now, so I don’t even believe that anyone goes to heaven, but if anyone deserves to go, it’s all the kitties, puppies, and various rodentia I’ve loved in my life.

    • dullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      At my Catholic high school, one of the teachers who was a Dominican sister told us that animals can’t go to heaven but it’s possible for them to be recreated in heaven.

      I feel fine as long as my rabbit didn’t go to purgatory or hell, but non-eternal souls are hard to relate to

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      My stomach one was watermelon seeds. My brother told me that if you swallowed them they would grow in my stomach and of course I believed him. There’s plenty of water and nutrition in there and every time I open my mouth they could be getting sunlight.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The Rainbow Bridge, is part of Catholic Dogma according to Pope John Paul II

      Then in 1990, Pope John Paul II reversed that thinking and proclaimed that animals do have souls and are “as near to God as men are.”

      Side note: At that time in my life, one of the schools I regularly attended as a non-Christian was a Catholic school that was called Pope John XXII, and I was legitimately confused as to how there were only 2 Pope John Pauls, while there were at least 23 Pope Johns. I think I thought that since a pope doesn’t have term limits, that there must not have been too many more popes than British Prime Ministers. Having grown up, I can safely say that while I wasn’t exactly incorrect, I was still criminally underestimating the sheer number of people that held both titles.

  • kindenough@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    That people with a beard where poor people. I always felt sorry for them not able to afford a shaving kit.

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh yeah I had a few.

    • That the moon you see during daytime is actually Mars (I then repeated that to my big sister and she believed it for an embarrassingly long amount of time)
    • That the “up” arrows on traffic lights were for planes
    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well Mars and The Moon are relatively similar in size compared to The Earth. Mars being about twice the size of The Moon, therefore making Mars roughly 1/2 the size of The Earth, and The Moon roughly 1/3 the size of The Earth.

      If Mars happened to be in an orbit roughly 500,000 mi or 800,000 km away from The Earth, it would appear that we would have two “Moons” the size of The Moon to the visible eye, giving the possibility of some absolutely crazy solar eclipse events. I don’t think it would even drastically change the tides or the overall gravitational well of The Earth and its various current natural satellites all that much, thanks to the inverse squared law with gravity.

      Maybe that was what was going on with several different worlds in SciFi that had multiple massive moons…