• AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    16 days ago

    Actually, the pigs lives in an egalitarian society. All three had access to straw, sticks, and bricks. Unfortunately, there was no sort of meritocracy involved until the wolf came along. The stupid pigs were allowed to do as they wished. No building codes, and no one wanted to “dwelling-shame” them.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 days ago

      Well with infinite access to resources the pigs should have been stockpiling and starting to build businesses in the expectation that they would have needed to protect their property and could have hired a bigger, badder wolf at an acceptable market rate to ensure a minimal loss

      /s in case that wasn’t clear

  • alwaysorg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    16 days ago

    The cartoon that I saw showed the first 2 pigs dancing and goofing around after they quickly built their houses, while the third pig continued working on his brick house. I always thought the moral was a simple “work now, play later”.

      • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        I thought it was that you should build your house out of decently strong materials or it may collapse under a stiff breeze

    • ReiRose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yes, exactly. If those silly poor people only worked harder they too could be aristocracy.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Because it was a message about needed to stockpile for the winter or other emergencies. It was a message from parents to their children.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    It could also be interpreted as a criticism of Libertarianism. The first two pigs didn’t go by any building codes, and instead decided that they wanted to build their shelters out of inferior materials with substandard protections against high winds. The third pig made sure that his dwelling met hurricane standards, and was saved. The story doesn’t go into the reasons why pigs #1 and #2 chose inferior building materials, so it could be interpreted in a number of different ways. It doesn’t HAVE to be about economics. It could just be that pigs #1 and #2 were big fans of Ayn Rand and reaped the whirlwind as a result.

  • spookex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t remember any of the versions of this story involving money.

    Nobody ever mentioned where the materials came from, it was just two dumbasses who decided to build their houses out of inferior materials

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      No no you don’t understand. Every children’s story is about beating your competition in the market and how regulation doesn’t actually support competition because it’s on you to analyze and prepare for market forces. Also my billion dollar vehicle company is failing because I didn’t properly prepare, I’m gonna need a major government bailout

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    The 4th pig built his house from wolf skulls, significantly less practical but it does send a fucking message.

    • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Every fairy tale with a good king/queen/princess/prince?

      Or One Thousand and One Nights has the king killing his wifes left and right, but by the end it’s alright, because he really loves his current wife now…

      Since you are asking for cautionary tales, The Fisherman and his Wife might a better fit. Just be glad of what you have and don’t strive for advancing.