Evangelical Christian leader Russell Moore revealed this week that many evangelical pastors have become alarmed that their Trump-loving congregants have become so militant that they are even rejecting the teachings of Jesus Christ.In an interview with NPR, Moore said that multiple pastors had told h…

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    212
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then maybe they should have corrected them when they were just starting out on all the crazy, rather than endorsing the dude that’s literally the closest thing this world has seen to the anti-christ.

  • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not surprised. I’ve heard stories as far back as 2015 or 2016 about people storming out in the middle of their pastor’s sermon because the pastor directly quoting Jesus’ sermon on the mount was too “woke.”

    Mark my words: if conservatives can no longer advance their cause under the guise of Christianity, they won’t abandon conservatism. They will abandon Jesus.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is an extremely interesting thought experiment, and one that is not without precedent. I left a comment below about the misrepresented and often repeated claims regarding Hitler’s (as well as Nazism more broadly) views on religion, occultism, and atheism.

      I bring this up again here because what happened in Germany was essentially the opposite of the proposition you are suggesting. Instead of throwing Jesus out of Christianity, Hitler made a specific and distinct push to remove any perceivedly Jewish teachings from what became German “Positive Christianity”. This included the removal of the Old Testament, the Pauline epistles, and the framing of Jesus as a dogmatic Aryan ideologue who opposed the teachings of Jewish mysticism.

      The notion that the modern crypto-fascist & christian-nationalist movements might take the opposite approach by throwing out or obfuscating the teachings of Jesus which they perceive as liberal or socialist in nature and therefore counter to the authoritarian hegemony they seem to be advocating for is a fascinating proposition. I also happen to believe you are correct, and that we have been seeing this happen in real time over the last several decades at least.

      I am sincerely afraid that the most damaging threads of the 20th century will be repeated again, and I’m not so sure that humanity is as prepared as it should be to fight against that potentiality. The destruction of education in this country, and the tears in the facade of infinite-growth-capitalism have made the United States the perfect hotbed for this kind of ideology to rise again…

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No country joined WW2 to liberate the Jews. No one is going to fight China for the Uyghurs. These are atrocities that help sell the morality of a war fought for other reasons. Defeating the Nazis was certainly a moral victory and they were a great evil, but that’s not why we fought them.

          No one is coming to the rescue of the Uyghurs. Enduring sanctions is likely to be the worst consequence China faces.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            While not the worst consequence, there’s also been a great destruction of culture.

            Japan and Korea have been becoming more popular on the world stages, where they’re celebrated for anime and pop songs. Meanwhile, for all its money, and all its genuinely rich and interesting history, entering a forum to announce you’re Chinese might end up prompting snarky responses like “Oh hey, do they give you your own Uyghur family to treat as slaves?”

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t think they’re abandoning Jesus. They will start worshipping some different badass with the same name who brings vengeance upon his enemies with swift application of firearms. They’ll call that entity Jesus, but it will have no relationship to the Christian concept of Jesus.

      • silverbax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, that’s what religious people have always done. They follow a religion until it disagrees with them, then they leave and start a new ‘slightly different’ branch which agrees with them.

        You know, sort of like how Catholicism was founded about 30 years after Jesus’ assumed death date, but then 1600 years later, Baptists decided to branch off create their own flavor.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suggest you check out the Conservapedia Bible Rewrite project/Conservapedia Bible Project for a good laugh.

    • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have a point, however, there seems to be a difference in severity. It’s like how openly and aggressively racist some of these folks have gotten. Sure, they always probably harbored those feelings, but now they are more brazen about it, and the behavior is getting worse as a result.

    • tigerhawkvok@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arguable. The stories have him talk about the right price and your rights with slaves, and as commonly understood “not one jot or tittle” would directly conflict with “let he who…”, unless the second is an edict (“hey, you, sinless one, go chuck a rock at them and bludgeon then go death”).

      Where the bible isn’t monstrous, it’s at best inconsistent.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty insane interpretation of jesus’s teachings, ngl

        Super edgy tho

    • LNSY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      I grew up fundamentalist, and they had abandoned his teachings in the 80’s in service to Emperor Reagan.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, really, when did Christians ever follow Jesus’ teachings considering how many people were converted by the sword…

        • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’ll be the ones you don’t hear about, for example my grandparents who are some of the kindest, most compassionate people you’d meet. They hosted refugees, consistently voted progressive, and changed church when their previous one started being more anti-LGBT. There’s just no headlines in Christians actually acting like Christians.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because they’re actually following the teachings of the Bible especially the notes on the hypocrites. They just do good, they don’t talk about doing good in places where people will hear them.

            Good on them :)

      • havokdj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t alive during the crusades, but I think that would be a pretty good starting place.

    • el_twitto@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Christians have ignored the teachings of Jesus from the start. Just one example: You cannot serve God and money. Matthew 6:24. I think Jesus was a communist who would probably also be crucified today by the people who proclaim to be Christians.

      • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paul derailed the Church right out of the gate. Here’s a guy who has had an absurd amount of control over the fate of Christianity who never met Christ, and who advocates principles that directly contradict Christ’s own teachings while being very similar to the teaching of the Jewish temple Paul previously held power in as a Pharisee. Paul took Christ’s teachings and merged them into a contemptible, incoherent hybrid of Christ’s message and the Jewish law-focused faith, brought full circle back into a religious bureaucracy by the Roman Catholics.

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one hates Jesus and his teachings as fiercely as a Christian. Christians would be the firsts in line to crucify Christ for his hippie, soft ideas again if he were to resurrect, this has been known for centuries.

    • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a 20 year old t-shirt that says “If Jesus comes back we’ll kill him again” on it in tiny white script. People always thought it was a statement of my intentions but it was always just a comment on society.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of the South Park ep Hare Club for Men, when Bill Donahue, of the Catholic League (read: assholes with persecution complex), says to kill the Jews (Jesus was Jewish). Jesus wasn’t hardline enough.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s simply not true. A truthful statement is that these people were never Christians. They flew the Christian flag because it lent them credibility and control. But it has been a long time since we’ve seen any Christian values from the loudmouths we see in the news claiming to be Christians. Actual Christians aren’t the people you see on the news. I know a few and they’re great people who do a lot for their communities and the people around them.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A truthful statement is that these people were never Christians.

        This is like the most very basic “No True Scotsman” that you can do.

        These people are Christian, whether you like it or not. You don’t get to decide that they aren’t. All Abrahamic religions and their holy books are full of awful awful stuff. And no, not just the Old Testament.

        Now you know how most Muslims feel.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re not at least attempting to follow the teachings of Christ, then you’re not a Christian. Just calling yourself something doesn’t make you that thing. I can say I’m a Rock Star until I’m blue in the face, that doesn’t change the fact that I’m not even musical.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What you’re missing is that your rational response doesn’t let people feel justified in hating people

            You know, like atheists think religion makes you act. Turns out that’s a humanity thing and not a religion thing

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not a true Scotman. Read a history book. Christians have been beheading, slaving and murdering people ever since Constantine converted in his death bed. It was never about being a good Christian in the eyes of God. Religion has always been about power.

  • victron@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shouldn’t he be like the false prophet they warn themselves about? I mean, is not that I expected some of those dumbfucks to even know what the bible says, but fuck, the level of idolatry is astounding.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “I never thought the leopard would eat MY face.” These people got in bed with quite possibly the most godless person on Earth, Trump is very likely one of the first true Atheist Presidents we’ve ever had. He’s probably paid multiple women for sex and abortions, cheated on all of his wives, lies on a constant and regular basis, and is just generally a shitty person on every level. This is the person they hitched their wagon to to get Roe v Wade overturned. I sure as hell hope it blows up in their face.

    • thewebroach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it already is blowing up in their face, and agree fully with your sentiment. While atheists dont depend on religion to define their morals, they get the opportunity to self-define their morals. A narcissistic egotisticial born-with-a-silver-spoon person like Trump is a wolf in sheep’s clothing parading as one of them. He decays or corrupts everything he touches, and the GOP and evangelical Christians have been rubbing all up on him for 7 years. Both groups are in crisis these days.

      The GOP has no true platform beyond revenge politics, and the churches are bleeding congregation members… people leaving either because they aren’t on board the crazy train of their church peers or leave because they’ve allowed their beliefs and morals to twist out of whack in conflict of scripture.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only that, but all of that was well known prior to him winning the election.

      They don’t care.

    • JustADrone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s not that he’s athiest - he still firmly believes in a God and a Supreme Being™, it’s just that he sees himself in the role…

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just a note… whether he is atheist or follows a religion isn’t actually related to his garbage character.

      I get it… I know some religious people mistakenly think that morals come from religion. So it’s interesting they pick someone who doesn’t even put on a show of practicing their religion.

      Of course, as the rest of us know, any amount of observation in life will show that there are both decent and despicable people in both religious and non-religious camps.

      But, yeah it is painfully ironic that religious people hitched their wagon to that lying, adulterous, greedy, gluttonous, (etc) slime bag.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      All that immoral behavior you mentioned reads much more like the behavior of an outspoken conservative Christian rather than an atheist. You know, all the “rules for thee but not for me” type stuff.

      It may be true that neither of them really believe deep down, but only one is using it to look good while being shitty.

  • graycube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    They like the “is Lord” part. The idea of divine royalty and unquestioning loyalty. They aren’t so keen on teachings of kindness, introspection, self awareness, caring, mutual respect, humility, poverty, etc.

      • Hallainzil@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the 30+ year old words of Bill Hicks:

        They believe the bible is the exact word of God - Then they change the bible! Pretty presumptuous, huh? “I think what God meant to say…”

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They keep saying that Jesus will return. Yet if he ever did they would dismiss him as a “dirty hippie” and cheer for the cops who beat him to death.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Moore also said that one problem is that many Christians simply feel alienated and lonely, as politics have come to take over the community outlets that churches once held.

    Oh, hey, it’s basically me. There isn’t room for “love your neighbor as yourself” in the Republichristian party. I don’t feel welcome at church anymore.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Separation of church and state was created to protect both the state AND the church. Churches are not supposed to be political organizations for their own good. Dividing into camps along political lines and shouting at each other is what happens out in the world. It’s not supposed to happen at church.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dividing into camps along political lines and shouting at each other is what happens out in the world. It’s not supposed to happen at church.

      Wait, I thought this was their main feature…

      The comedian Emo Philips has a well-known joke about religion that may explain some of the decline in membership… "Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump. I said, “Don’t do it!” He said, “Nobody loves me.” I said, “God loves you. Do you believe in God?”

      He said, “Yes.” I said, “Are you a Christian or a Jew?” He said, “A Christian.” I said, “Me, too! Protestant or Catholic?” He said, “Protestant.” I said, “Me, too! What franchise?” He said, “Baptist.” I said, “Me, too! Northern Baptist or Southern Baptist?” He said, “Northern Baptist.” I said, “Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist or Northern Liberal Baptist?”

      He said, “Northern Conservative Baptist.” I said, “Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region, or Northern Conservative Baptist Eastern Region?” He said, “Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region.” I said, “Me, too!”

      Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879, or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?" He said, “Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912.” I said, “Die, heretic!” And I pushed him over."

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s nothing special about churches. The ACLU has the same tax breaks and associated restrictions.

        It’s why the ACLU is actually 2 different organizations. There’s the ACLU and the ACLU Foundation. ACLU is a political lobbying group that is directly involved in political activities and therefore has to pay taxes and donations to it are not tax-deductible. The ACLU Foundation other is a legal services charity that is tax-exempt and donations to it are tax deductible.

        Churches simply don’t have the direct political arm. If they do, then they should be taxed. I once saw a church lose it’s tax exemption when the pastor told the congregation they should vote for Obama.

        If churches should be taxed then all non-profit organizations should, and you therefore shouldn’t be able to make any kind of tax-deductible donations.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If churches should be taxed then all non-profit organizations should, and you therefore shouldn’t be able to make any kind of tax-deductible donations.

          That is acceptable to me. I have run two 501©3 entities, and guess what, we got audited every year and had to pay taxes if we turned a profit.

          Also since those personal donations are just used by the rich to not pay their fair share, close the loopholes.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Churches literally don’t have profits. There are no shareholders or anything. There are employees, but pretty much all non-profits have staff, and paying staff (who still have to pay income tax) isn’t “profit.”

            The only issue I have with auditing them is that the vast majority of small churches that are struggling to keep the doors open literally can’t afford an audit, and the big, corrupt churches enriching corrupt assholes are still technically non-profit and won’t be hurt.