• takeda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    It actually looks like ByteDance is blocking them to generate uproar. The law only required to remove the app from app store

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I’ll add, “my government might get pissed off at one of the companies involved” to my list of reasons why always-online games are a terrible idea.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Or “the company might get pissy with your government for any reason”. No reason to let them off the hook, either.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah. You might want to look into some other foreign owned companies as well. Tencent owns a metric shit ton of “American” companies for instance, I bet there’s several on that list that would surprise you.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 days ago

        Tencent I’m aware of, there was quite a bit of controversy about them a few years back

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          17 days ago

          Tencent happen to own large portions of nearly every video game company on the planet to start with, and a ton of other large companies, 600+ of them in fact. Large enough positions to directly affect board decisions if they wanted to. And that assumes overt sudden changes and not more subtle things.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            17 days ago

            IIRC the reason for this is that China requires that games published there be published by entities that are at least some arbitrary percentage Chinese owned. So basically if you want access to that huge market - that loves video games - you have to cut a deal with Tencent or someone else like them.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          They invested money, I don’t remember hearing that it got them any share of the company.

          • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 days ago

            That’s typically what you get in return for an investment. The only question is if it’s enough of a share to give control or at least influence.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s not made by Bytedance. It’s made by one company and published by a second, different company who is owned by Bytedance.

    • Zugyuk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Not made by, the studio is “second dinner” the same guys that made hearthstone, but in their own studio.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    17 days ago

    Why does nearly everything entertaining support oligarchs

    Nevermind, rhetorical question. There’s no ethical consumption yadayada

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      You have it backwards, oligarchs are controlling the media

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Yeah, oligarchs are controlling the media they own, and consuming their media supports oligarchs.

        What part of what they said was backwards?

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I feel like bytedance is doing this on purpose to rule people up, as these kinds of services weren’t explicity called out.

    It may backfire though. I don’t think most Americans know how much is influenced/owned by Chinese companies.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      They did. And they’re already are rolling it back, specifically thanking trump for helping to “restore service”. It was all a political stunt, and nobody’s gonna care cause their skinner button got turned back on again.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Hmm, I may be reading it wrong, but it’s just talking about the distribution/updating of foreign controlled applications. Based on what I’ve seen Marvel Snap isnt controlled by them, they just provide services for the application, so it wouldn’t technically apply. However, I’m not a lawyer and may have the wrong read on the app, but given the game developers were surprised I’d think that’s the right read.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    This feels like ByteDance going out of their way to paint the outgoing president and party as truly awful and give the victory to Trump in a week

    • invertedspear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think they know that saying “you’ll look better than Biden” is a great way to manipulate trump into doing just about anything.

  • Bieren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    Trump will fix this. After a small payment from the companies. And then just ignoring the law.

  • Hellmo_luciferrari@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    Its almost like there are consequences of banning something folks don’t understand the full scope of…

    • B312@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Rivals isn’t that bad. It has its issues but it doesn’t warrant a ban

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      You care nothing of freedoms do you? I don’t use either of these apps but I still think it is outrageous to strip people’s ability to choose their actions because politicians are worried they can’t control enough of the media.

      “Find a new game” is just “fall in line”

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        They’re not banning Mastodon, or the Fediverse, or EU based messaging apps.

        i.e. the objection is not that the US government doesn’t control it, but that the Chinese government does.