• HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    I can barely even understand how anyone could think PBS is propaganda.

    None of these chuds have ever watched a minute of PBS in their adult lives.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      134
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Its a mistake to believe that this is an irrational or ignorant decision. These guys KNOW what the message of PBS is and there is a reason they don’t want it to get to kids. They are making child soldiers and they don’t want people giving them inconvenient values.

      You guys are telling jokes while the other side is building an army. Maybe start taking this shit seriously.

      • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        100%. American liberals really do think this is just more of the same old Bush-era GOP misbehavior and are responding to it as such.

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          25 days ago

          The thing is, if you’re an American and you know how hard it is to simply vote out fascism, and if you understand how close America’s empire is to the brink of disaster, you’re either running or, lacking the means, mentally preparing yourself for a struggle to survive.

          I pulled up stakes and left, but I still have to keep my sense of humour to stay sane.

    • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s really easy! If you imagine that a black person and a white person could never be friends or spend positive time together, and then you saw a show that had them together, you might conclude the show is trying to convince you something is okay that you know is not. Propaganda.

      If you imagine that a gay person is inherently wrong, and that bad things deserve to happen to them as punishment for their choices, and then you watch a show where a gay person is happy and normal and respected, you might conclude the show is trying to push an idea on you that you already know isn’t right. Propaganda.

      It’s sad, and dangerous, but it’s not complicated.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Thank you so much for commenting this. It’s so annoying to see both the original screenshot and so many exchanges in here either playing dumb or actually being dumb about WHY they see PBS as propaganda. As always, people are more interested in appearing to preach epic gotcha wins to their own choir, while totally sweeping the real meaning of their opponent’s statement under the rug. It’s not being nice and learning to read that the right takes issue with PBS over, it’s race, gender, and sexuality issues. But rather than respond to them on that more difficult ground, the masses choose to go for pointless low hanging fruit like “lol so you hate kindness???”, and then congratulate the OP for owning the right, meanwhile the right is totally unphased by that completely off-topic mark-missing response. And then we wonder why the right sees us as a bunch of circlejerky bubble-world morons.

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Tolerance for others and their inherent traits is basic kindness. So yes, if you are not OK with black/queer people than you hate kindness.

          And then we wonder why the right sees us as a bunch of circlejerky bubble-world morons.

          Modern western “right wing” are outright fascists. We should not concern ourselves with what they think of us, except if it helps us fight their ideology. You won’t be able to convince them with logical arguments of any quality, because they hold their position not because of logic but because of repeated propaganda that leverages the inherent human fear of unknown and different.

          The most realistic way I see of things changing is as follows:

          Capitalism will inevitably squeeze those people harder and harder, until they can’t afford groceries and rent, despite millions of immigrants being deported and woke TV programs being banned. At that point they might question their ideology and yearn for change, and the left needs to be ready. If the western left once again squanders its potential and do-nothing neolibs (a-la Biden or Harris) get back in office, you can kiss your civil rights goodbye, because they won’t fix the fundamental issues with the system and the voters will swing to fascists again the next cycle.

          What needs to happen is that at least demsocs like Mamdani getting into offices all over the country. If that happens, they might at least do something to fight against capitalism and unlimited extraction of surplus labor, and improve material conditions for people, at least a little bit. If that happens under left’s watch, people will associate the ideology with good material conditions, and will appreciate its other tenets (human rights, equality, tolerance, inclusion) more. Whether this leads to vaguely left-wing rule for a while, a-la FDR, or an actual outright revolution is of course questionable, but it’s the only way forward for the US IMHO.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      I can barely even understand how anyone could think PBS is propaganda.

      Propaganda, that’s how.

      The Reich wing is infuriatingly effective at using projection as both a defensive measure and an assault.

    • CerineArkweaver@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      I have an uncle who thinks anything to the left of NewsMax or OAN is “too liberal” (yes that includes Fox News). The indoctrination is real

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Or maybe they did. Seaseme Street might go over the heads of maga voters. And Mr Rodgers messages of inclusion and empathy are far out of their mental grasp.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 days ago

        And there’s always the George Carlin perspective:


        Think of how stupid the average person you meet is.

        Now, realize that half the population is dumber than that.


        To give some uh, anchoring to this…

        The average American adult… a d u l t …

        Is currently as literate as a 5th to 6th grader.

        In conclusion; Yes, it is objectively correct to state and believe that most people are idiots, at least if we’re talking about the US.

        … and Arkansas… is pretty damned close to winning the idiot contest.

        “Powerful stupid”, you might say.

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      25 days ago

      If it’s not their propaganda they think it is the other way… instead of ya know… just facts or basic learning.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      How many children upvote this nonsense?

      PBS is literally overt propaganda. The amazing thing is how people don’t see it. We’re so immersed in the hegemonic narrative, the droning voice of the state that we can’t recognize the obvious overwhelming bias.

      The most glaring recent example is their complete endorsement of the genocide in Palestine. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

  • Marinatorres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    24 days ago

    PBS isn’t perfect, but it’s publicly accountable and transparent—more than most for-profit networks.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      The exact reason it has to go. Too much oversight, not enough pandering and way way too much science.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      PBS is part-funded by government, but also relies on transmission fees paid by the affiliates for network programming, as well as corporate and viewer donations. This will further reduce the money in the PBS system as it will no longer get fees or donations from Arkansas.

      • zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        It’s brought to you by viewers like you. If you watched PBS, especially during pledge drive time, you would know today about 75% of funding comes from small donors.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    25 days ago

    The fact that American taxpayers actually finance right-wing indoctrination to a considerable extent seems to be overlooked here, which is probably due to this very right-wing indoctrination.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe, WhY bOtHeR vOTiNg

    Then chalk this item up with the million-and-one things that are completely ignored by the spiritually purified lazy mediocre idiots who passively let all this happen, this death by a million-and-one cuts, since Reagan.

    But boy oh boy by golly, they sure do feel they are doing their part by chuckling at political zingers online, after the damage is done, because they let the mouth-breathers through the front door and gave them the goddamned keys to the house and car in the first place.

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      24 days ago

      Keep pretending that the Democrats lost the election because of a conspiracy of online users further to the left of you, and not because they ran a botched campaign with an unelectable candidate.

          • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Keep pretending like “Abandon Harris” and shit like that wasn’t pushed relentlessly offline by “Bernie Bro” idiots.

            • ultranaut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              24 days ago

              It was mostly different elements of the Left, not really “Bernie Bros”. Bernie himself was out there campaigning for Biden and Harris the entire time. I think we need a better name for the Left factions who supported Trump in the election, misidentifying them is only going to create more divisiveness. Those “Bernie Bros” who listened to Bernie during the campaign and did what they could to stop Republicans don’t deserve to be lumped in with the dumbasses who actually helped them win.

      • drhodl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        An “unelectable candidate” is not an obstacle. I mean, look at what the GOP ran…!

          • drhodl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            Have you actually had your eyes open for the last 10 years?

            FFS a convicted rapist and 32 time fraudster, probable pedophile, who’s using the office of POTUS to enrich himself and his awful family? A man whose negligence and mismanagement in his first term lost over a million extra lives to Covid. A man who betrayed all undercover CIA assets to Russia. A man who betrayed long time allies, the Kurds, to a genocide by Turkey. Who betrayed all the Afghans who helped America, to the Taliban. A man who is bombing small boats in the Caribbean, and double tapping any survivors. A man who is selling out Ukraine to please his owner, Putin, and of course for his own personal profit, and who has already done the same to the Palestinians… A man who is disappearing American citizens, and other LEGAL visitors off the streets, to third world prisons… Even though he “won” ( and I believe Elmo committed some fraud to help him win a second term…), by every metric and standard that exists outside of tRump America, the man is unelectable. I don’t even think he’s human, tbh…he’s some sort of lizard creature with no normal human qualities. The fact that you even ask such a question tells me all I need to know about YOU, magat !

            • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              24 days ago

              You can make the list as big as you want. Trump is a pedophile and a fascist, and I’m a European communist who hates his fucking guts. But the measure of electability is NOT being a good, moral person, it’s winning elections. I also hate Obama for his warcrimes, but he was electable as fuck.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        unelectable candidate.

        It’s a FPTP system. She literally just had to be not worse than Trump. She was fine.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        24 days ago

        How the FUCK was Harris an “unelectable candidate”?

        Keep pretending that your “both sides” bullshit was 1.) limited to the internet and 2.) didn’t have a massive impact on lowering voter participation.

        You’re STILL FUCKING DOING IT, DUMBASS. You are saying, right here and now, that Harris was worse than Trump. HOW? For ONCE, fucking explain yourself.

        • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          How the FUCK was Harris an “unelectable candidate”?

          She lost the election, have you heard of that?

          You are saying, right here and now, that Harris was worse than Trump

          No, I’m saying she was less electable. She decided to run a campaign of satisfying her Zionist overlords instead of gaining popular vote, she got the results she wanted. The Democrats would rather lose the elections than present an antizionist candidate

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe, WhY bOtHeR vOTiNg

      Seriously, the fake “progressives” who refused to vote are the most detestable group in this mess. At least Trump supporters are brainwashed idiots. Fake “progressives” knew better and STILL helped Trump come back to power.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    25 days ago

    How does the state have the power to prevent PBS from being broadcast? PBS is broadcast on affiliate stations that aren’t owned by the state (usually)

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      25 days ago

      AETN was the affiliate there, they cut ties. State is taking credit cause racing to the bottom is Arkansas to a T

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    24 days ago

    When your entire platform is “dumb people will let us do whatever the hell we want”, reading and education become your enemies.

    • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      Nova

      I know plenty of people who think saying the earth is >10,000 years old is propaganda.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        There was a Nova episode in the 1970s that was dedicated to a crazy rich guy’s hare-brained scheme to mine minerals off of the sea floor.

        Then, about thirty years later another Nova episode revealed that the mining scheme from the earlier episode was a CIA cover story to cover up for a top secret claw game operation to lift a sunken Soviet submarine off of the sea floor.

        So I guess the first one was fake news.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    24 days ago

    When the orange rapist dies these freaks are going to keep dragging this nation down for the remainder of our lives.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      The people financing Trump are the puppeteers, they will immediately switch to another puppet.

    • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 days ago

      I always wondered about this actually. Why the two radically different pronunciations of “Kansas” between the two states so close to each other.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        24 days ago

        Also wondered that. Looks like it was based on how the French transliterated the names of native groups and then how Americans ended up pronouncing each one.

        Kansas comes for the native group called the Kansa. The French added a consonant on the end, which is not pronounced in French. Seems the French added that final “s” to indicate a people rather than individual, like les Illinois. So in French, Kansas meant “the Kansa people” and was pronounced “Kansa”.

        In English, that final “s” is pronounced, so we have Kansas.

        Arkansas originated with the French transliteration of the Quapaw native group. The Quapaw and Kansa were originally part of a larger group that split when it migrated down the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, so neighboring tribes referred to them all as “akansa” or “arkansa”.

        So the French called the Quapaw branch “Arkansas” without pronouncing that final “s”. This time, however, when English speakers predominated, they retained something closer to the French pronunciation, leaving us with “Ar-kan-saw”.

        Apparently it kind of went back and forth for a bit. In 1881, the Arkansas state legislature put an end to the debate, declaring “Ar-can-saw” the official pronunciation, my guess would be to differentiate them from Kansas.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 days ago

          Part of the reason it the French pronunciation survived in Arkansas is probably because there used to be a decent French and French Creole speaking populations in the region. Hell the Ozarks were largely colonized by the Scots-Irish and if my Irish-Louisianian ancestor is anything to go by then they may have adopted French along side English and possibly Gaelic. Hell my ancestor spoke English, Gaelic, and French natively since his father was Irish and his mother was French Louisianan.

  • ellieficent@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Its such an insignificant amount of money to fund PBS. It’s mostly paid by donations and sponsors anyway. If they really wanted to save taxpayers money they should look elsewhere first… but thats a harder question that might rustle a few of their own feathers. Not only do they try to take the easiest route that doesn’t involve their side, but they want to make people think it’s a win. PBS isnt greasing their palms, so out it goes.