• iviattendurefort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Edge of Tomorrow. Not a huge Tom Cruise fan, but that one really gets me. Emily Blunt is awesome in it. Went in not expecting much, but I was blown away.

    Watched it last year and immediately searched to see if there was sequel in the pipe. Development hell.

      • pangolinpalantir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        In the book there are some references to Rita (Emily Blunt) fighting in various places and I think her getting her start in South America. Might be remembering that one wrong, but a prequel with her learning how to fight the monsters would have been good if they stuck more to the book.

  • hactar42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Fifth Element

    I’m glad it didn’t get a sequel because it is such a good stand alone movie. I’m just shocked the studio didn’t try to milk it for everything it had.

    • GrimChaos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I liked Rick Moranis’s idea for it, Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II.

      I feel like you can modify it to include both ideas Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II: The Search for More Money

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Thanks-killing did that, skipped a sequal and the third film was about destroying the second (that dosent exist).

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          They’d have trouble fitting all the gags about repetition and nostalgia in a reasonable running time.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      They made that, it was just split into three movies and made by Disney, with different titles.

      Underwhelming too.

    • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can we get Jews in space and Hitler on ice. I mean technically space balls was the former but what would be the latter.

  • Jonathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not necessarily surprised this one didn’t get a sequel, but I really wish it had!

    Event Horizon (1997)

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          The theory is basically that in 40k ftl works by sending the ship through the warp (hell). Humans use a Gellar field to keep a bubble of reality around the ship while in the warp. The theory is this is humanities firstf tll so they don’t know they need a Gellar field.

          It’s fun but other then the ftl is hell doesn’t fit at all with the rest of 40k lore.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It was apparently too intense for test audiences, and this was in the pre-DVD-special-features era when no one bothered to keep cut footage. Maybe they cut too much. I watched it recently because I had heard fantastic things and I was just… generally unimpressed. It was an interesting concept that really wasn’t very well explored, and the writing was so stiff.

      • Jonathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would love to see some sort of remastered directors cut of that movie. It has definitely started showing its age, but it’s still high up on my list of great movies.

  • Ixoid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Alita: Battle Angel. I’ve heard there is a sequel planned, but it’s been a few years since the first movie. James Cameron is still involved as a producer, but I guess his blue-skinned money machine has kept him busy lately.

  • Nefara@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Still waiting for the Zootopia sequel. Genuinely good and creative movie that used the format to talk about tricky topics with some cushion and then became a cult favorite. They added some extra stuff under Zootopia+, they tee’d up the buddy cop format, did all this world building and then… what, Disney, this is the one IP you’re not going to squeeze for all its worth? Where’s the next one?

  • Mokopa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 years ago

    Master and commander… They had the ship built already too - why not make a sequel? There’s about 20 books worth of material.

    • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I saw something on this that it was the last “great epic” type movie before Hollywood was run over by the MCU. Absolutely fantastic series of books, which translated well (IMO) in the movie, but…pew pew lazereye firerboys demigods won the day.

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    Adventures of Tintin. Peter Jackson was supposed to direct it, but unfortunately he got busy with Hobbit.

    Apparently they were supposed to adapt Prisoners of the Sun, which is arguably the best Tintin storyline to make a movie of.

    • Dethedrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I grew up with the original series and couldn’t agree more. It was fun and only very slightly marred by no Mister T cameo.

      • juiceclaws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Fwiw I think rampage did a pretty solid job as BA, especially considering the pressure and expectations of having to replace mister t

        • Dethedrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I absolutely agree. I just missed him having a cameo like the rest of surviving main cast.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 years ago

            It is explained in the link, but to summarize: The director wanted to name it John Carter of Mars because yes, that it would make more sense to name it after the main character for movie audiences. Then some dumbass Disney exec made them drop the ‘of Mars’ part because they didn’t like the performance of other recent movies with ‘Mars’ in the name.

            The reason dropping ‘of Mars’ was stupid is because it just made it someone’s name which only works with a decent advertising campaign for a straightforward movie like John Wick.

      • Jonny@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeah, it was one of those movies that I think was ruined by the advertising. All the adverts at the time tried to make it seems like a star wars rip off, when it wasn’t anything like star wars really.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          John Carter inspired the inspirations for Star Wars, including Dune. Heck, if they had advertised it as the story that inspired [list of movies] it would have gone a long way in making it clear that it wasn’t a ripoff.

      • TehBamski@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Working out the numbers on IMDB, the estimated budget was $250,000,000. Gross worldwide: $284,139,100. Total from these numbers: $34,139,100.

        The number(s) that are not represented, is how much Disney spent to market the movie. And since it was supposed to be their latest tentpole movie franchise, they must have spent the same amount they did on production (and perhaps more,) to market it. This means that Disney might have put $500 million or more into the whole project. Then they would have lost $215,860,900 or more.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I can see why it bombed. It’s one of the very few movies I ever turned off before it was over, and I watch a lot of movies. It was just so dull and had no soul. I could not bring myself to care about what was going on. Haven’t thought about it since, until this thread.

  • Ecksell@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    Man of Steel. It was a shot in the arm for DC movies, and the Superman character in film. Why they didnt follow up with a direct sequel, and instead released that dumpster fire Batman v Superman instead, I will never understand.

      • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You’d think after the second or third time they tried to skip a rung on the ladder and smacked their face in humiliation they would have learned. At least it seems they’ve learned now and put people who actually understand story in charge rather than people who just chase box office numbers.

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I will forever be mad about that. I was defending Man of Steel, while others shit talked it. I thought it was a great beginning for a Superman franchise. Sure he killed Zod, but imagine how this will change Superman to never want to kill again? But they never went back to do a solo Superman movie. Poor Caville was shafted hard by WB suits who wanted their own Marvel franchise.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      DC tried launching into their own DCU way too fast. Whereas Marvel setup most of the major characters beforehand and let it simmer for a little bit before jumping into the ensemble movies, DC just tried jumping right into their cinematic universe. DC just can’t seem to do anything right when it comes to their movies unless by accident (or if it’s an animated movie). Maybe James Gunn will be able to turn it around and put together something cohesive, but it’s hard to tell where anything starts or stops with DC now, it just feels like a convoluted mess. Plus, the whole superhero movie trend may be dying out anyways thanks to Disney’s/Marvel’s lazy writing.