let’s gooo

    • jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      111
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      So help them vote. Volunteer with efforts to get out the youth vote. Push for universal mail in voting where you are, or at least early voting. Help get politicians and initiatives on the ballot that they actually care about.

      Shaming and complaining about the demographic you want to reach accomplishes nothing.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Obligatory-

        If you are a legal resident of Wisconsin, and are not currently serving time or on paper, you can register to vote entirely online if you want, and you can request absentee ballots for all elections for the entire year (no reason needed, but necessary annual renewal, it’s my New Year’s resolution every year because it’s so easy to accomplish. entirely free of charge ofc.).

        Just go to www.myvote.wi.gov to register, request absentee ballots, check your registration, or find your polling place. If you have any difficulty with your registration, you can find your local rep and contact them directly.

        Please vote. Please vote for your own wellbeing. Please.

        Edits to fix link redirect per convo below

      • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I hope things will change, but we still have abysmal turnout. TX started allowing early voting over 40 years ago and we still struggle to get people to the polls. Early voting is a span of 2 weeks, where in the 1st week, polls are required to be open for at least 9 hours and can be open from 6 AM to 10 PM on the weekday and shortened hours on the weekend, and in the 2nd week, polls are required to be open at least 12 hours a day and typically have the same hours as election day. Yet we still have virtually no lines through all early voting and a massive line on election day.

        It doesn’t help that the news only bangs the final day of voting into peoples’ heads.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Many Republicans vote exactly on election day because they are being fed lies that early voting and mail in voting are riddled with fraud.

          • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That explains a few people, but doesn’t explain why everyone else hasn’t been utilizing the early voting system for the 40 years prior to 2020. TX cities are pretty blue and their early voting lines are always very short.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve been helping my fellow zoomers by figuring out what their townships/town wards/city districts are, then what their local/state/federal legislative/executive/judicial districts are, then who’s running for what position, then where to vote and (primaries and generals).

        Information is power!

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      But both sides are the same or my vote is worthless or it’s too hard to vote or something

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Which, while a good idea, still screws over the working class that don’t get federal holidays off. In fact in many industries they are mandatory work days because of the increased business.

          State and federal opt-out mail ballots for all I say.

      • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        if you think both parties are the same you’re living in a fkn alternate reality. Only one part is seeking to end democracy in America and set up reeducation camps

    • Machinist3359@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, but political engagement can’t revolve around voting.

      It’s shit. You have to navigate a beurocracy and don’t even always have choices down the ballot. And when you do, you often have no idea who the candidates are beyond some half baked Facebook page. It’s also a huge burnout pit. Put months of stress into a binary outcome you can barely control. And even that is if you’re engaged in canvassing and etc, otherwise it’s just a chore.

      Youth need to be mobilized in long term action projects. Something like Encode Justice for example, where they make civic engagement a part of their daily life, is far superior. It’s also harder, but that comes with doing something actually impactful.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Things can change, though. California voted for an open primary in 1996 (think that was the year) and now you can participate in either one. Prior to that, you could only vote in the primary for the party you registered with.

        • nybble41@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Open primaries invite strategic voters to sabotage the party they want to lose rather than supporting the candidate they want to win.

          Of course you can still do that with closed primaries—you just have to register as the party you want to vote for in the primaries, ignoring your own preferences. Nothing forces you to vote for your registered party in the general election. It’s slightly more involved this way since you would need to change your registration more frequently, and commit to it earlier, but that isn’t much of a hurdle.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Unless all these Gen Z kids actually fucking VOTE it won’t matter, because Boomers fucking do.

    Oh, you think the choices are trash? Well fucking vote in the primaries then. Get involved at a local level, and start promoting candidates that represent you. Don’t just bitch and moan that the choice is between a codger and senile draft-dodger.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The reason nobody young is ever is involved with primaries is because it’s driven by corporate lobbyists. How are the youth supposed to get involved with that when they are competing against billions of dollars? The choices will always be trash until we end the lobbying. It doesn’t work with just promoting candidates that represent you. It involves massive sums of money that 99.9 percent of Americans will never touch.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sanders came very close to winning the Democratic nomination two election cycles in a row, and his funding was largely individual donors, while Clinton and Biden were being funded by corporate interests. Sanders probably lost in 2016 because the DNC put it’s thumb on the scale; he lost in 2020 because many primary voters didn’t believe that he could win against Trump, and wanted a candidate that could peel away moderate Republicans. And that’s a national level.

        At a local level, there’s a lot less money, so fucking start there, where it’s not being driven by greed.

        • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sanders came very close to winning the Democratic nomination two election cycles in a row,

          That is some revisionist history, because he did not. He did better than any openly socialist candidate has in 100 years, but because of the rules of the DNC was not actually in contention at any point.

      • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        When I was young, I participated in the primaries for Obama’s first election (Texas…). I was more or less put in my damn place by the older members and not allowed to have an opinion. It was Hillary this or that and racist comments otherwise. Seriously, Gen Y & Z need to participate, vote, and get involved at the primary and electoral college level or nothing is ever going to change. Don’t let those assholes decide who gets to run. I really really wonder what kind of impact those votes, in the areas that have true primaries, will have if we step up early.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I literally have volunteered for local campaign offices every year since I turned 18. Don’t use cynicism to justify laziness

      • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You don’t need to get “involved” just go get registered and fkn vote, It has a much bigger net effect that holding up signs on a street.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Lobbyists are a crucial part of the political process as far as educating legislators and their staff. Legislators cannot possibly know the workings, let alone the body of statutory and case law at play, with every activity and industry legislatures have to regulate and facilitate.

        Seems like you realize the money they spread around is the problem: bundlers, megadonors, super PACs, dark money, financial and agency disclosure laws, etc., that’s where we need to start reforms.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s unpopular, but yeah. Also, people forget that lobbying is, at it’s core, a group of citizens with a particular interest in a specific area banding together to try and convince a politician that what they want is the best course of action. If BLM started lobbying seriously like the NAACP does (or did; I don’t know how active they are now), they’d still be working for the same cause, and likely more effectively. Yeha, you need your ground game and people in the streets engaging in protests and demonstrations, but you also need people that will directly engage with lawmakers to get shit done.

          People think of the NRA as nothing but a national organization working at the federal level, but for a long time–before they really started to suck under Wayne LaPierre–they did a ton of work with lobbying at the local level, and actively worked for what their membership wanted.

    • I agree there’s a history of young people not voting, but every presidential election year there’s a whole group of kids who were 14 at the time of the last election but are 18 for the current one.

      Every four years since I can remember, that group of kids has been increasingly engaged politically, I think recent YouGov polls on this have been like very high, like 75% intend to vote and of those like 85% intend to vote more liberal candidates.

      Trump was so bad, for everyone. Everyone remembers Trump’s wanton child separation policy, his partisan Supreme Court picks, his COVID failures, and his constant lies and vitriol. Even small children can see Trump for what he is, maybe even with more clarity than most adults. Point, people who were ten years to seventeen years old at the beginning of Trump’s presidency are eligible voters now. The Republicans see this tsunami coming at them. TV news has been calling it a blue wave to scare up red voters, but it’s really a youth wave.

      At the same time, older conservative voters are dying off. Republicans know they will never fairly win another popular presidential election. Their plan is to steal the White House with lawfare or outright terrorism.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just be warned, not everyone thinks Trump was bad. A lot of people look at their economic situation prior to the pandemic, and think that it was pretty good, and so Trump must be okay. Sure, he raised taxes on the middle and lower class, but that was sold as a tax cut (…except that it was very, very temporary), and the hike went into effect under Biden.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            But if you want to win elections, that’s what you have to contend with. You have to accept that no everyone is going to see things the way you do, and you need to convince them. If you aren’t trying, then you lose.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Doesn’t help when the people who run the primaries go to court to ensure that they do what tf they want. 🤷

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Bud, that’s politics. Our hope is to get these young kids engaged and then send them off to a law school that focuses on public interest law and restorative justice, instead of churning out more corporate defenders.

        Growing up I’d here this phrase that I thought was some lawyer joke, “first thing we do, is kill all the lawyers.”

        I realize now it’s not a joke, but part of a fascist’s plan to legalize atrocity.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If enough young people are showing up in the primaries, then the DNC can’t easily silence them without also alienating all of their other constituents. And while the DNC wants and needs large corporate donors and PACs, they need people voting for them even more. That’s why Sanders was so dangerous to them; if he had won the 2016 or 2020 primaries, despite the DNC openly hobbling him, he would have upended their internal power structure. (And the 2020 primaries were relatively fair; Biden was seen as a safe and moderate candidate by a large number of moderates who were more worried about beating Trump than getting a more liberal Democratic candidate.)

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Super this. Don’t care what anyone privately identifies as as long as it includes “voter” in the tag cloud.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I live in the rural south. TBQH, I’d rather that most of the people around me didn’t vote, since I’m pretty sure I know which way they’re going to vote, and their votes will largely be to take away my rights.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Said every election since ever and nothing changes. Pipe dreams, like a general strike.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nothing changes because the people that say they want real, significant change never show up in enough numbers to get shit done. If gen Z really gives a shit, then they need to all get out and fucking work for it. I’ve voted in every election and every primary I’ve been eligible to, since turned 22. If 100% of the gen Z kids that are eligible to vote showed up to the primaries, they could get any candidate through that they wanted. Primaries typically attract far, far fewer voters than the general election does; in some states, primary participation is as low as 3% or eligible voters.

          • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            turnout for young voters (at least in US history) has always been low, people don’t get into politics usually until they hit their 30s

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah, why? Follow up question, do you think it’s possible to change this significantly, and if so how?

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I suspect that it’s a combination of things.

                I think that one thing that would help is if your employer was required to give you paid time-off to vote in primary, local, state, and national elections, say, four hours of time, but only if you actually voted. I’ll bet voting rates woudl skyrocket.

                • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Do you not think that maybe neither party tries very hard to court the youth vote? It’s not as if 18 year olds are donating to their PACs.

      • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, they have voted more in the last few elections. Just gotta hope they don’t get complicit and continue to show up.

      • Eyron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Vote. Seriously. (If practical: get involved, too). The U.S. is currently in the middle of a large shift of generational power.

        Many of these changes are fairly recent:

        • 2020 was the first federal election where the Baby Boomers didn’t make up the largest voting generation.
        • It was only in 2016 that the number Gen X and younger voting numbers grew larger than the boomer and older numbers.
        • Those numbers had been possible since 2010. Despite having more eligible voters (135M vs 93M), the “GenXers and younger” only had ~36M actual voters, compared to ~57M older ones.

        Looking forward, the numbers only get better for younger voters. There hasn’t been a demographic shift like this in the U.S. in a long time (ever?). The current power structures can not be maintained for much longer. It is still possible for that shift to be peaceful. Please encourage the peaceful transfer: vote. Vote in the primaries. Maybe even vote for better voting systems. This time is unique, but change takes time. Don’t let them fool you otherwise: that’s just them trying to hold on to their power.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          2020 had very flexible early voting and absentee voting and many people weren’t going to work in person anyway.

          Every prior year, being retired was a huge advantage for ability to go to the polling places and actually vote. It’s easy to see how retirees would be represented disproportionately given that reality.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Believing that nothing has changed is the most privileged form of cynicism in these threads. At ever conceivable time scale, there is plenty of progress.

        There will never be a utopia. There will always be something to improve.

        • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          RIght, people just need to pick up a book and look at statistics on racism, sexism, etc and realize it’s better than it ever has been but the MAGAs are on the rise, panicking, and trying to set up a dictatorship with Trump, so go vote or lose it all.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      With the exception of millennials, who were born between 1981 and 1996, Gen Z adults are notably less likely than those in other generations to identify as conservative.

      Or in simpler terms, both Millennials and Gen Z are equally less likely than those in other generations to identify as conservative.

      • J12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Get on board GenX. We’re the future and the soon to be majority, so you might as well join the club. We promise we’ll treat you better than the boomers treated you.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Gen X will never be the majority, Millenials are greater in number. And the older ones will be 50 by the time the boomers disappear from power.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because people are already jumping to conclusions without reading the article. Here is the core of the survey data. Identifying as Republican went from 32% in the Boomer Generation to 21% in Gen Z. Identifying as LGBTQ+ went from 4% with Boomers to 28% with Gen Z.

      The conclusion I would have jumped to is that the percentage of Gen Z who identified as LGBTQ+ would be greater than that who identified as Republican. So it seems I don’t actually need to read it. 😜

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think people are feeling more inclined to label themselves as LGBTQ when they’re heteroflexible as well as young people better recognizing things like the asexuality spectrum.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The B part of LGBTQIA+ is doing some heavy lifting in this stat. And as usual there’s probably a lot of women who are straight but think they’re Bi because “Margot Robbie could probably get it if that was an option” kinda like a lot of guys who think admitting a guy looks good makes them gay

      • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah that’s not right. No other poll shows it being that high, but they found one they “agree” with and used that number lol

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m voting for Biden unless there’s another nominee that will be the predominant choice against Trump. I don’t like either of them but the choice is easy. Biden can’t win my state, but I’m still going to vote for him literally just because he is running against Trump. I might cow about how I ate the Dems won’t run on much else, but the contrast is big this time. It’s always been really though, the Dems should be our new right wing party and a new farther left party like the Green party ought to be the more leftist faction. Dems to me already are neolibs with a neocon leaning. Leftist Populism must be embraced by the neolibs long term. Either way something has to give. Too much wealth to go around (even globally). The greedy old ideologies of constant growth at the expense of the poorest people in the world can’t go forever. Growth economics can’t go forever either. I have hope. Just go vote because that’s what we can do easily as a minimum effort.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden 100% needs our energy right now. Trump will turn America into the Fourth Reich.

        • MadSurgeon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I take it you’re an idealist and not a pragmatist (although I don’t think the green party is pragmatic personally)

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The neoliberals won’t embrace anything unless there’s profit in it.

        Preferential voting is the only chance of a progressive gaining the power they need to make desperately overdue changes to healthcare, worker rights, housing, cost of living, etc.

        A neoliberal government that occasionally panders to progressives is better than a neoliberal government that gets horny at the idea of spitting in poor peoples faces, which is better than fascists.

        But we need to do so much more than “not making things worse”.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Republicans know this, and push culture war issues to drive certain voters out of their states/area.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Golly I remember once on Reddit saying that people should vote and by howdy did a whole bunch of angry people vote me down double digits because, you see, apparently voting doesn’t matter and I made people feel sad.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        To be fair, I’ve voted my whole adult life and don’t really feel like anything is better off because of it. I will continue to vote for the lesser evil, but I also completely understand why people are frustrated with this system. We just keep voting between a turd sandwich and a giant douche, and it gets old. So it doesn’t surprise me when people feel like voting is useless, it feels like it’s hopeless by design. We need a new system.

      • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        People get mad when they have a problem and you provide a solution they can feasibly take part in. As soon as they have any agency/capability to take responsibility suddenly they are unable to.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          My mother in law famously stopped seeing a psychologist when they told her that she has the power to fix all of the problems in her life. She then spent the next 15 years being an unbearable cunt until her second-eldest had a child and suddenly she doesn’t want to fuck up the grand kids as much as she fucked up her own children.

  • Raz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m LGBTQ…AND republican. Although that means something vastly different where I live, haha (I live in a kingdom).

      • Zloubida@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        In my republic (France), Republicans suck too. It looks like you’re right: cool Republicans only exist in monarchies.

        • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Isn’t everyone in The France republican? Do you have monarchist French that want to resurrect King Louis? Or do they want to crown Macarone the new King?

          P.S. I had an almond croissant earlier today and took a picture of some frozen snails.

          • Zloubida@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Almost everyone is Republican, but we also have a Republican Party, which isn’t more Republican than the others, this name makes zero sense. It’s the successor of the party of De Gaulle, but I’m quite sure De Gaulle wouldn’t like what this party became.

            There are a few monarchist movements, generally far-right-leaning, like the French Action. But they are very small and divided (there are two candidates for the throne, and different kinds of monarchies), so nobody takes them seriously.

            PS: croissants are good; snails aren’t.

            • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              De Gaulle

              He really hated the English - which is a bit rich considering we sheltered him during the war. He was proven right on the EU though. We did nothing but cause trouble while in, then left. Precisely what he predicted. :(

              PS: croissants are good; snails aren’t.

              A civilised French! A rare, but welcome, breed. I forgive you for Patay, Formigny, and Castillon. Joan of Arc was obviously suffering the Snail Madness and didn’t realise English rule was superior.

              • Zloubida@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I don’t think De Gaulle hated the English, but he surely despised them. He despised almost everyone though, and maybe he despised the French more than anyone else, calling us “calves” or mocking our love for cheese, for example. Yeah, he was an asshole.

  • hereisoblivion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m a bit confused by this.

    Does this imply that the human race is drastically more sexually fluid than most species when allowed to be without oppression? Or that the culture gen z has grown up in helps cultivate a more fluid preference?

    I grew up in the 80s, so I’m trying to understand, but it’s tough meshing statements like this with my experiences.

    Please don’t misunderstand this post as disapproval. Just confusion.

        • zigmus64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Baseball (and sports in general) are wonderful man made examples of evolution and how selection pressure can force the expression of certain traits. About 25% of MLB players are left handed, versus about 10% in the general population.

          A similar thing has occurred in the NBA where the average height is about 6’6” (or 198.6cm for those opposed to Freedom Units), which is about 8 inches taller than the average American male.

          Doubtless, you can look at any top level professional sport league and find some physical trait (or set of traits) that is wholly disproportionate compared to the general population due to those traits providing some advantage(s) that is unique to that game.

          • LoraxEleven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s true… And what I was (jokingly) referencing…

            But, my Dad’s mother, my Granny…

            She was a natural Lefty…

            And musically inclined…

            Her Daddy slacked the strings on the family guitar before he left for work…

            She figured out how to tune that instrument…

            Those in her church, later, made fun of her for playing backwards chords, because she was a lefty. .

            She learned to play the other way, too… And she taught me both…

            There’s so many sides and nuances to every thought in our lives…

            It was a harmless joke, but it has roots in my reality…

            This shit is so often much deeper than we think…

            You made a fuckin hell of a statement, but it’s without context or understanding…

            I was just making an off-handed joke…

            There is a fucking shitload of lefties in baseball… Because it fucks with the righties when they’re batting…

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s mostly that very few of them identify as Republican.

      But also, the less stigma around gender expression, the more kids will be open to explore theirs.

    • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      10 months ago

      The best explanation I’ve heard is that it’s similar to the stats for left-handed people. Way back in the day, almost no one “identified” as being left-handed. But once the stigma against left-handedness was eliminated, the numbers went up.

      So in other words, yes, it’s a reflection of LGBTQ+ becoming more acceptable, particularly among Gen Z. There could be other factors, but that’s probably the main one.

      • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        28% seems huge, though. Are there any other animals like that? I’m kind of confused how it’s that high even with acceptance lol.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s mostly bisexuals. You know like Julius Caesar, Alexander of Macedon, and large swaths of people in cultures where same gender romance or sex is acceptable in certain circumstances so long as you also marry and have children.

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            10 months ago

            Julius Caesar, described by a contemporary as “Every woman’s man, and every man’s woman”

            We stan a bicon in this house

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Is there data to back that claim up?

            Not arguing but also something I hadn’t heard before. That there has been an absolutely massive increase in # of people identifying as bi and that that is the majority of LGBTQ+

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I can’t recall any off the top of my head and it’s definitely anecdotally been my experience as someone who came out about a decade ago and has been a geek about queer history for about that long. Like there are definitely more homosexuals and a lot more open trans people (but trans people are estimated at absolute highest to be 1% of the population, and more realistic high end estimates last I checked are .3%-.5%), but bi folks have been coming out of the woodwork.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s a confluence of factors. LGBTQIA+ is sort of a gender/sexuallity/ phenotype physicality solidarity alliance and the actual boundries has grown in scope since the 80’s.

      Like take for instance asexual people. Asexuallity became a part of the solidarity when people reached out over the internet and and started realizing that there were a lot of people who just don’t feel sexual attraction and that there are certain widely accepted forms of social coercion that revolve around pushing people towards sexual attraction. But asexuallity as a part of the LGBTQIA only really became a thing in the early 2000’s. Non-binary trans identities are much the same. A lot of people were feeling the way they did about themselves in isolation but they had no frame of reference to think that they were not just the odd person out.

      The other half is a society wide re-examination of compulsory heterosexuallity/cis gender hegemony. There are way more people out there who no longer define themselves by who they’ve chosen to have physical sexual experience with and now a lot more people are more frank about defining themselves by the range of people they are attracted to. Like if the majority of people artificially penalize a bi-person for choosing a same sex relationship a lot of people will just take the easier path and just narrow their choices or keep their liasons with the restricted choice secret and not assume the label.

      I before I came out as trans initially figured I didn’t count as trans because I both wasn’t physically transitioning and my industry is somewhat hostile to trans people so I was very closeted ao I figured the label only really belonged to the people brave enough to live out of the closet… But eventually someone found me and was like “No, it’s not aspirational. Even deep in the closet you are still trans.”

      This combination of destigmatization, solidarity messaging, the inclusion of whole other groups (like intersex people, gender minorities, asexuals) broadening the scope and outreach to the closeted means that more people generally self identify as LGBTQIA or queer.

      Animal kingdom wise we’re still less observably sexual fluid than other primates. Bisexuality is actually pretty ubiquitous particularly amongst male primates with it actually being the overwhelming norm in some species so chances are we are probably actually haven’t seen the curve level off from suppressive stigma.

    • Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I believe it’s your first option, acceptance for being yourself is the normal instead of a beating from your parents like pre 2000.

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I would assume they are more honestly/aware of their preference.

      I am a gay dude, and I have had friends/coworkers who identified as straight say things like “Why does everyone need to label things? I am 100% straight, but sometimes on a road trip, you just wanna suck the other guy off. Both of us are still straight though”

      Every time I have heard thigns like this, it’s GenX, or older Millennial. Older than that, they don’t bring up “queer” things, younger than that, they just say that they are “mostly straight”, or “barely-bi”, or “up for whatever”.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think most species are more fluid than you realize, and humans are just normal. Especially for apes that share a common ancestor with bonobos.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      The 11% dip for the GOP makes sense. Their policies are just not in line with what young people value.

      That said, the +24% gain in LGBTQ+ identification is fascinating and I would love to know how nature, nurture, taboo, and oppression play impact that. This would be a really cool time to be in university and studying human sexuality and gender.

    • jackalope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      LGBT as a category has been increased a lot over the years. Asexual or people who don’t feel they conform to super strict gender norms are all included as “queer” now. So I imagine it’s a combo of things, some people being trendy, some people being freer and not feeling the need to hide, some people who previously didn’t identify being included.

      Left handedness was persecuted and after it stopped being persecuted there was a massive rise in people who were left handed. But it plateaued and has remained pretty stable since then.

    • Fudoshin ️🏳️‍🌈@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      drastically more sexually fluid than most species

      Have you heard about bonobos? They shag anyone for anything and they’re one of our closest relatives. Friends have mutual wanks. Enemies have makeup sex. Threesomes, foursomes. Horny bunch of fuckers.

    • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My (admittedly relatively hot) take as a younger millennial indoctrinated by the 2nd wave feminists (who weren’t huge on the third wave) is that what gender means has shifted. I didn’t experience myself as particularly gendered growing up in the 90s and early 00s and certainly wouldn’t consider it part of my inner essence. I don’t give a shit how strangers refer to me or whether they think I’m a dude or not. I found it to be a slightly annoying category imposed by everyone else. Something I needed to understand because it impacted how I was received by others, but not something that was core to my self-understanding. In school I studied the humanities which reaffirmed to me that gender was an annoying external category that put people in boxes—we didn’t want gay female CEOs, we wanted to get rid of gender altogether.

      I think gen Z actually has a similar thought but instead of doing away with the gender categories many have chosen, on an individual level, to make them their own a bit more in line with 3rd wave ‘boss bitch’ vibes. This still undermines the oppressive nature of the gender roles because it it kind of divorces gender from the societal gender role.

    • sethboy66@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      We are indeed more sexually fluid than most species and given it’s “most” and not “all”, this isn’t unprecedented. It’s also not a new phenomena, in Ancient Greek and early-mid Ancient Roman societies queerness was quite common. In fact homosexuality was so prevalent that that the Romans didn’t even have a word for heterosexual/homosexual; instead one was either dominant or submissive (e.g. giving or receiving) with the assumption being that most were bisexual and would take partners as they saw fit.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        There would still be a stigma around being the receptive partner. The idea being that a higher status man can penetrate lower status people (younger men, slaves, women). A high status man being penetrated by a lower status person would be worthy of mockery.

        Samurai were gay as fuck though. Sengoku period you could even be romantic with other dudes, women are for making babies. I have an 1940s (iirc) English translation of a book of 16th century gay samurai love stories - the guy who wrote the forward thought it was because “mongoloid” people look more feminine 😅

    • Crow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Putting sexuality in such a defined state is relatively new in human culture. So most often no one would have the worlds to talk about it or even know it could be classified differently.

    • jak@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think about cultures that have a focus on same sex sexual contact- most people, if they had been born there would probably participate. If they’re born somewhere where it’s forbidden, most people don’t engage in it.

      Some people are hardwired about it in either direction, but the majority are more flexible

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Our closest related species gets it on so much in so many ways it is one STD away from extinction. It might be that we really are like this. Maybe the norm for humans was to have random homosexual and hetrosexual orgies everywhere. It was only because it became important to know who the daddy was that things changed? Or the sampling of the survey wasn’t great. You know groundbreaking or meaningless.

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some of it is a rejection of previous values - toxic masculinity and toxic femininity. Some of it may be standing with their peers even if it does not apply directly to them. Some of it is trendiness. Some doctors are even predatory, seeking to sell their extraordinarily expensive surgeries for tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Older, established trans communities in Europe even are shocked at how young we allow surgeries in the USA, before someone knows who they truly are.

      Mainly we just have an extremist society here, egged on in large part by our predatory clickbait media that always has to come up with something to say sell, so it ignores the >80% in the middle and focuses exclusively on the flashiest content it can find. And then kids hear that and wonder how they fit into it - ofc they never see the “middle ground”, b/c in the media it just isn’t there.

      Take a look also at how shockingly high rates of suicide and opioid and other drug use are. The younger generations are desperate to become anything else besides what boomers are telling them they must be: literal slaves to the corporate empires.:-(

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow, a news story that makes me think my kid could actually live in a better political climate than me in a few decades. I forgot what this feeling was like.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Bro, I’ll tell you the same thing I was told as a young guy in my career. I’m in my 40’s now and this was about 20 years ago. An older guy about to retire said something like ‘ya know, everyone always says that the younger generation is lazy, or dumb, but from what I noticed you guys are doing it smarter and you’ll be better than us.’ I kinda thought that, but it was nice to hear.

      Now I’ll say about 10 years ago, I was recruiting in high school and those kids were leaps and bounds ahead of where my generation was. It was crazy how much they could socialize across cliques and it not matter. Now that I am in my 40’s I have some family members in high school, and I just see them being better. I don’t know how this will translate into the work force or a fight for a labor reform, but I think we need to be more open to their ideas than our elder generations were to us.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly! Even if it makes us uncomfortable. I can’t relate to gen z, but I’m sure anyone from any other time in history would be unable to relate to me.

        That doesn’t matter. It isn’t my world. I’m only here for a time. It’s our world.

        Whatever direction society takes has my support as long as they aren’t imposing themselves on other people.

        Freedom is beautiful even when I can’t understand or relate the ways people use their freedoms. I’ll vote for freedom no matter how I feel about things or how much I long for the comfortable world of my youth. I don’t matter. Civilization matters. Freedom matters.

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am right there with you. I didn’t understand Vine, I don’t get all these Tiktok challenges. The short repetitive nature is bothersome to me which is funny when I think about the number of times I replayed old Atari and NES games growing up. The point, though, is I don’t need to understand it. Just accept that it’s something they like to do and move on.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I think the generation currently entering adulthood is seeing enough bullshit that they might do a great job leading this country, as long as they get a chance.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why do you think the GQP is panicing. Demographics are changing and they can’t rely on old white male voters to shift the tide because they’re all dying. Covid put a dent in them too.

  • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    As it should be. FUCKING VOTE! And remember, by not voting for Biden, you are voting for Trump whether or not you actually cast a vote. ALL of the Trump supporters WILL show up on the day.

    • licherally@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Either way you’re voting for a Palestinian genocide and the continuation of neoliberal imperialism.

      Edit: the future is bleak either way, Biden has explicitly shown support for the continuation of support for Israel as well as the bombing campaign in Yemen and Syria. All this is to say that there is genuinely nothing we can do to help the middle east in this election.

      But sure, we can get a better minimum wage or whatever.

      • maxy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        But only one of the genocidal imperialists will peacefully step down in 2029.

        • licherally@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I truly don’t think that matters. If Biden wins trump is just going to claim that the election was falsified again. We’re looking at a boiling point situation with no real answer.

          Don’t get me wrong, I’m probably still going to vote for Biden unfortunately. But people acting like the choice is so clear are not reading the writing on the wall.

          Edit: people down voting this forgot that trump and his supporters literally have stated that if he is not in office this year, they will do more than they did on January 6th. Many of them will call for an all out civil war. The problem isn’t the end of the next term, it’s the inauguration.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If they try again to do another January 6, or if they had tried to go further last time, they would have been met with force of the US military and they would be absolutely crushed.

            Also, the Civil War was organized and planned in secret, long before the NSA and FBI existed, predator drone and hellfire missiles. I don’t think another one could get far enough along to pose an existential threat.

            The capital insurrection ended exactly how a 3%'r civil war would end: they’d smear a bunch of shit on the walls until one of them fucks around and finds out, and then they’ll hide their faces as they scurry away out the back door, back into their mom’s basements and motor homes.

            https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/JCS Message to the Joint Force JAN 12 21.pdf

            • licherally@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The same could be said for trumps proposed future attempt to remain in office. The military did not ever really side with trump.

      • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Grow up bro, we don’t care about your pet bleeding heart topic, either vote for Biden or be prepared to be persecuted in a Trumpian dictatorship.

        • licherally@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You don’t care about Palestinian hospitals and children being firebombed? Dope.

          Edit: I’m sorry but telling me to grow up while also saying the phrase “trumpian dictatorship” has gotta be one of the funniest things I’ve ever read.

      • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden is awful, but I would take him over orange Hitler any day of the week. Heck, I would take DC’s Joker over Trump… that will put a smile on everyone’s faces.

        • licherally@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah I feel like people misunderstand what I’m saying as though I’m considering voting for trump. I’m not at all. I’m just trying to figure out how well voting for Biden sits on my conscience, or if id rather write in daffy duck this year.

          Trump is not on the menu for me, and I feel like I’ve made that fairly clear but not once talking about voting for him.

          • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Of course, no one here is seriously accusing you of voting for Trump; the thing I’m trying to say is that there are a lot of magadiots who will do everything in their power to get Trump back in the White House. There is also a lot of voter suppression in poorer neighborhoods with minorities who tend to vote blue in hopes they give up and go home, which gives republicans an advantage.

            There is a very real chance Trump will win in the coming elections, so everyone who opposes Trump and what he stands for should absolutely vote for Biden even if he is awful, because if Trump is back in the White House, there is a real possibility this will be the last election.

            I’m saying this as someone who was very cynical about politics for years and didn’t always vote during my life, and have come to regret not voting immensely.

            • licherally@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I understand where you’re coming from, but I still don’t think it’s anyone’s right to tell me or anyone else that they are obligated to vote for any president.

              Vote for everything else, vote in your local elections. That’s what changes things. But I don’t believe it’s my duty to vote for one of two pieces of shit every election just because of some screeching fucking retards on the Internet.

              • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m not telling you you are obligated to do anything, I’m just asking you to reconsider because I’ve been there and deeply regretted not having voted in the past.

                Yes, voting in local elections is probably going to make an immediate and tangible difference to your community, and should be encouraged for everyone to participate, but it’s still really important to vote in the presidential elections to keep Trump out of the White House. There is a real risk that if Trump wins in 2024, there won’t be a 2028 election at all…

                • licherally@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  No, there is no concern that the term limit will be removed or expanded. It hasn’t happened since the amendment was ratified, even after multiple attempts from politicians of various rank and from each party.

                  There are plenty of things to be concerned about, but the “trump will become the life long leader of the United States in his presidency” rhetoric is stupid and unfounded.

                  Nixon couldn’t do it, truman couldn’t do it, trump is not as competent or capable as either of these presidents. It will not happen. This is literally the same shit republicans used to say about Obama and it didn’t happen then.

                  He would have to convince 3/4s of the states in both the house of representatives and Congress to ratify, and there is no way he could do that.

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

    • Kentifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      10 months ago

      No. You don’t get to tell me that I have to vote for Biden when he’s not doing anything to earn my vote. He’s allowing Israel to carry out a genocide. So he’s not actually less evil than Trump. You’re just upset because Trump’s shitty policies will impact you more than Biden’s shitty policies. Biden has the lower approval ratings than Trump did at this point. He has not earned a second term.

      How about the Dems run a candidate who isn’t dog shit? I vote for Dems as a form of harm reduction, but they aren’t reducing harm anymore. So what’s in it for me? Dems haven’t not done anything about the supreme court, student loans, or threats to democracy and they are largely supporting the actions of Israel. If I’m right, and this is a genocide (I am), then voting for anyone who supports it would be an evil act. They’re going to have to make some changes if they want to earn the votes of people who don’t want to see a genocide carried out on our watch with our bombs.

      That said, it would be a real problem if Trump won. So if that happens, I hope you’ll be willing to place the blame where it belongs: with the Democrats. They are the ones doing nothing to earn our votes. Biden isn’t even campaigning.

        • Kentifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          10 months ago

          Okay. But Palestine still gonna be fucked. I get that you don’t care if Palestinians die. But I do. So I get to not vote for the guy currently enabling their genocide. “Trump would do it too” so you admit it’s bad? Demand better from your politicians you weakling.

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you think Palestine is still fucked either way then choosing to empowerer Trump makes even less sense. I think it’s a fact that Trump will be far worse for Palestinians than Biden, but even if we assume they will both be just as terrible on this issue, Trump is also terrible on every issue. If your choice is terrible and completely terrible, logically you should go with terrible. The other choice is even worse.

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              10 months ago

              How could trump be worse?what is worse than arming the Israelies while they engage in genocide? Unless you don’t believe that’s what is happening. In which case,you have been misinformed. Genocide is genocide. Why am I the asshole here for not wanting to vote for someone who is enabling a genocide? Why isn’t Biden the asshole for enabling the genocide or not stepping down?

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                ah, so the single-issue voter. actually it’s not even single-issue, that’s just giving up status quo in order to effectively vote for worse than status quo. that’s called having a narrow view on the world, you know the middle east isn’t the only thing that exists in american politics right? there are still other things to improve on rather than just saying “oh israel-palestine conflict is going to shit either way therefore why even bother, might as well fuck up every other political issue, it’s useless if we can’t have this one win”.

                grow up, you’re effectively casting all your friends and loved ones into the flames with your stubbornness, and casting palestinians into the flames considering trump is going to rail way harder against palestine than biden does. it’s not like not voting means no palestinians die, why do you have this delusion that you have blood on your hands if you vote but no blood on your hands if you don’t. it helps nobody and improves nothing except your own ego because you get to say “oh well i didn’t vote for genocide!” even though you practically voted for more genocide.

                • Kentifer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It’s not my only issue with Biden, but it is my biggest and the fact that it doesn’t even seem to register as a problem for you is very telling. You don’t care about anything that’s happening to anyone outside of the US huh? Your world is that small? Get a grip. We all draw our lines in the sand somewhere and when the line is crossed, that’s usually the thing we’re going to yell about. I think “I can work with you on anything other than genocide related crimes” is pretty fucking lenient, don’t you?

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                How could trump be worse?

                Trump (to black Americans) in 2016: What do you have to lose?

                You’re basically just spouting Trump talking points.

                Trump would obviously not only support Israel’s position he would sell them more weapons…wouldn’t care at all about the Palestinian human rights angle and he would allow Russia to walk into Ukraine and that’s just the “foreign relations” plan…domestically, he’s planning on setting up concentration camps for the homeless and undocumented.

                • Kentifer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  So he would do what Biden is doing but more… Justify voting for him however you want. Biden is just as supportive of Israel as Trump would be.

              • ultranaut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you can’t see how Trump is worse than Biden I don’t know what to say. It should be self evident at this point that a second Trump presidency will be a disaster for the world. As far as Palestine goes, Biden has pissed off Netanyahu and there’s a whole diplomatic row unfolding right now because Biden said there has to be a two state solution and Netanyahu says no. I guess you’re unfamiliar with Trump somehow but based off his previous behavior he would be more likely to help Netanyahu and encourage him to do even worse things. Trump certainly wouldn’t be getting into a public spat where he’s insisting on a Palestinian state, he’s definitely not going to do anything to stop what Israel is doing, or even to discourage them.

                • Kentifer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t believe this “row” with Netanyahu will amount to anything, which I am basing on Biden’s record of always backing Israel every single time. You and I agree about Trump. We’ve clearly come to different conclusions about Biden. I don’t think we are going to get any further in this conversation.

                • Kentifer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Also, the idea that Trump “certainly” wouldn’t get in a public spat when he is, in fact, Donald Trump and public spats are exactly his MO is fucking laughable.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Not arming the Israeli’s and letting Iran try to start a war it cannot win, which would result in a domino effect of failed middle eastern states, tens of millions of deaths, and tens of millions of war refugees.

                Oh but by all means burn the fucking planet down and destroy democracy for 350,000,000 Americans because you want everyone to know how super sad you are over 25,000 avoidable deaths.

                • Kentifer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The fuck? So just let Israel kill civilians. Cool. I was wrong. You’re not a psychopath. You’re someone who would have gone along with the Nazis.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Some might say it’s the weakling that can’t make the right decision to vote for the lesser evil even if they don’t like them.

            Like I said in the last reply, you get to vote however you like. But if you publicly share your choice, others are free to comment on it.

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              There it is! The right decision! See and I think you’re making the wrong decision. Aren’t perspectives fun?

          • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Bro I don’t care about Palestine that much right now, nothing we can do there, that’s on Israel, Iran and the middle east, you better look in your own fkn back yard because dictatorship is just around the corner while everyone is worried about the next marvel movie and causes they don’t really have any power to effect.

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              We’ve been selling Israel weapons while they declare exactly what they want to do. What the fuck are you talking about? Biden has gone around Congress twice to sell weapons to Israel. But sure. Nothing we can do. Get fucked.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Palestinians don’t care if Palestinians die. They huddle up around Hamas members and tunnel entrances to die as proud martyrs, human shields for their terrorist captor’s absolutely deranged anti-social and religious beliefs.

            It’s very sad that 600,000 to 800,000 people in Gaza ignored the evacuation warnings or were held as voluntary and involuntary human shields by a terrorist organization. The terrorists and their patron state Iran are absolutely psyched that Kentifer got tricked into openly supporting terrorism by these otherwise easily avoidable deaths. Really, it’s very sad that Hamas has no regard for the lives of the people it falsely claims to serve.

            The hard right authoritarians of the world support Hamas and call these deaths genocide; Iran, Malaysia, Brazil, Iraq, Syria, etc.

            The liberal world order supports Iarael’s right to self defense; America, the EU, NATO, UK, France, Australia, Norway, Austria, Poland, Germany…even Canada.

            Think about that and consider whether it not maybe you really have been tricked, why you’re siding with Iran over Canada?

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              You are a genocide apologist and I hope you live to feel the shame you deserve to feel.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Of course nobody can tell you who you have to vote for.

        But regardless of your choice and your reasons, the math of the votes in our stupid system does mean that voting for anybody but Biden, including voting for nobody, helps Trump or his Republican replacement.

        If you don’t care about that, that’s fine. Some might argue that you SHOULD care, but that’s a different conversation. The voting decision is a private one that’s yours alone, but understanding how the choices affect the outcome is good for everybody.

        • Kentifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          I do care about those things. But I also care about Biden not being president for different, equally valid, equally moral, reasons. Also for pettiness sake, he fucking said he’d be a one term president before he ran in 2020 and we should fucking hold him to that but no one fucking remembers it. I cannot bring myself to vote for a man who has said and done the things he had said and done. So if I care about those things as I “should” and if I also care about doing something about the runaway supreme court and not arming a genocidal right wing government (just to name a couple of my objections to Biden’s presidency), who do I vote for? Do I just give Biden another 4 years because the other guy sucks? Even though I know that it means that he will allow a genocide to be carried out and join wars to defend that genocide which will lead to untold deaths?

          Like, even in your comment, while you tell me it’s a personal decision, you’re still laying it on a bit thick and its clear what you think I should do with my vote.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Since we’re talking about the general election, I’m looking at it in a pragmatic cause and effect way. We ARE going to get either the R or D nominee at the end of the election. If you literally do not care who gets elected, and you morally can’t throw support behind either, then a third party or non-vote is the right choice for you.

            And while I’m not really trying to hide that I would 100% vote against Trump if he’s the nominee, I’m trying to phrase this all in a way that is very neutral. I’ve gone out of my way to not say you’re a fool or that you’re throwing away your vote. Like I said above, if they are literally the same to you, then voting for neither is the correct choice to represent your views.

            When it comes to my personal views and voting decision, I’m not a Biden fan, but the difference between the conservative status quo Democrats we’ve been offered lately, and the MAGA controlled Republican Party, is so great in my eyes that I have no question about voting against Trump regardless of how exciting or lame the Democrat is. This isn’t how I want it to be. The two party death grip is the result of how our elections are structured. Changing that system is the dream, but we need the two parties to implement it, so yeah.

            I feel like the folks in the good timeline got Bernie in 2016 and saw some of the benefits people in other developed countries enjoy.

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Do I just give Biden another 4 years because the other guy sucks?

            Yes. The choice is one or the other so you pick the least bad option. You’re not voting on whether or not to do a genocide, that’s not what this election is deciding. If you genuinely care about the Supreme Court, it’s fucked up because of Trump and if he wins he will stack it even further. And do you really think Trump is going to sell fewer weapons to murderous right wing governments than Biden will? Again, the choice is one or the other so you either vote for Biden or you are serving to empower Trump. You don’t have to love Biden or feel good about voting for him, but please recognize that an even worse scenario will unfold if Trump wins.

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              No. That is a false dichotomy, as I have said to literally everyone else who has tried to use that argument. There are other options here. The DNC’s and/or Joe Biden’s unwillingness to explore those options doesn’t make them not options. It just means we need to push them harder. Your unwillingness to do so does not mean that the options don’t exist. I am not required to subscribe to your way of viewing politics.

      • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        okay, then welcome your next dictator Donald Trump and all that implies (Gilead like conditions, rescending civil and gender rights, requiring Christian worship or prison/execution, an end to all journalism and only Trumpian little red books where you pledge allegiance to him every day or get reported to the police)

        • Kentifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          And I will thank dems for running centrists while Gilead kills me for a trans queer person. Dems aren’t helping prevent Gilead as much as you think.

      • fosho@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think it’s pretty obvious where the blame would be if Trump wins: the stupid folks who refused to vote out of principle. If it was possible that neither could win then your strategy could make sense. But there are ONLY 2 OUTCOMES. Requiring dems to earn your vote is unfortunately meaningless when the only other option is FAR WORSE YOU CRETIN OF INANE CONCLUSIONS.

        • Kentifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s simply not true. Biden has the option to step down and let a Democrat who isn’t dog shit run in his place. He and the DNC are choosing not to do so. The election is months away. He can still back out if he wants. It is not Trump or Biden unless Dems refuse to listen to voters.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Talk about unrealistic.

            Has an incumbent ever just bowed out due to pressure from the fringe?

            Do you think a new, unknown candidate could drop into the race and have any chance against the right-wing cult that will 100% turn up to vote?

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              10 months ago

              You’re inability to imagine a scenario does not make it impossible. You gave me a false dichotomy, I gave you an explanation of why it was false. You don’t have to like it. Nobody does. But they would have months to campaign. The primaries aren’t even over yet, so it wouldn’t theoretically cost then anything. Dems just need to do it. They’ve had since October. They’re the ones making the choice here. They could make a different one.

              But they won’t. Because they care more about making sure the “right people” have power than representing their constituents or even doing what’s right. This isn’t the first time and it won’t be the last.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                It’s called being realistic my dude. If you want further left politicians and policies, organize and turn out the vote. If you don’t you get the most milquetoast people-pleasing centrist democrat ever because the DNC is trying to placate as many people as they can.

                Have you seen what the right wing has done over the last decade or so with the Tea Party morphing into the Freedom Caucus? There are right wing groups showing up to school board meetings and running for city councils all across the country. They’ve mobilized and are going out and taking what they want and now the formerly “mainstream” Republicans are completely beholden to them and afraid of being primaried in the next off-year election.

                The left needs to do the same thing over the next decade or two (or three), that’s the only way we can actually win long term.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That said, it would be a real problem if Trump won. So if that happens, I hope you’ll be willing to place the blame where it belongs: with the Democrats. They are the ones doing nothing to earn our votes. Biden isn’t even campaigning.

        Biden is governing. He’s doing the job he was elected to do. Perhaps that’s enough to earn some votes? Or are votes only earnt by rallies and advertisements?

        In any case, it’s completely silly to blame the Democrats for losing if you don’t vote for them yourself. If you prefer Democrats over republicans, then you have to vote for them. Even though they aren’t perfect. If you don’t vote, then it is totally unreasonable to blame anyone else for getting an undesired outcome. Not voting implies that you have no preference.

        (And yet again, this is another case where ‘ranked choice’ voting / preferential / instant-runoff would make this whole situation a lot easier. USA could really use some serious electoral reform.)

        • Kentifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t currently prefer democrats over Republicans. I think they are equally harmful in different ways. What do I do? I agree that Republicans are wrong on everything, but Dems are wrong on enough things, and majorly so, that I don’t think that they can be reformed. RCV is a pipe dream for the US at large. Especially with dems in positions of power. They haven’t historically been willing to give up power once they have it.

          • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Vote however you want. It’s your choice. If you prefer Republicans, then vote for them. I’m just saying that if you choose not to vote for Democrats, it’s silly to then go on to blame the Democrats for Trump being in power. ‘Blame’ implies that you are unhappy with the outcome, but it is effectively an outcome that you yourself chose with your vote.

            If you don’t want Trump to win, then you should choose to vote against him. If you don’t, you yourself are the one to blame. (That said, if you are happy to have that demented tyrant as your president, then go ahead and vote for him. It’s your choice.)

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              If Dems need my vote to win, then they need to run a candidate that doesn’t support genocide in Palestine. If they can’t or won’t do that, then they are forfeiting my vote. If they do that and lose, then they are the one’s “at fault” for losing.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t currently prefer democrats over Republicans. I think they are equally harmful in different ways. What do I do? I agree that Republicans are wrong on everything, but Dems are wrong on enough things, and majorly so, that I don’t think that they can be reformed.

            Honestly? You grow up and read some books. Start with any of Bernie’s books. As you read, try and answer why Bernie, the most popular and longest serving third party politician in history, ran for president by seeking the Democratic nomination instead of running as an independent.

            The answer is that the DNC can be changed and has shifted significantly to the left in the last eight years, and will continue to do so. However if you idiotically allow Trump to win the presidency, it will likely be the last presidential election you ever get to vote. The DNC might be made illegal.

            The choice is hope for the future or no hope for the future.

            • Kentifer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              And Bernie failed to make any headway because the private club shut him out. How about you grow up and stop making excuses for voting for an old man who aids and abets genocide?

      • licherally@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Man it’s crazy how these people think they can instill some false duty onto any leftist to “do the right thing” without actually weighing each of the choices carefully. They just see a D next to someone’s name and think they must be the good guy, regardless of what they say.

        Did we all forget about the kids in cages on the border? Or the lack of free healthcare/college? Did we forget about the union busting? Biden is not a good guy, he’s just barely better than Trump. He’s certainly better at hiding the heinous shit from everyone.

        But yeah man, were all bad people and unamerican for wanting a better choice and hating our hand I guess?

          • licherally@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Explain to me how being reluctant to vote for one of two presidential candidates due to their policies and global politics is immature. Am I supposed to just say “well millions will die either way but at least sleepy Joe relieved some student debt?”

            What’s impractical is running a country off of the lesser of two evils vote.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not buying it. Probably just scared of the well deserved ridicule received if they identify as Republican. We’ll see how the vote goes.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re dubious because why? Do you think there were only two options? Do you identify as republican or LGBTQ?

      • Cicraft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        What they’re saying is it’s more embarrassing for a teen to come out as republican than LGBTQ+ (obviously depends on the area)

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is actually quite interesting. For me, answering a questionaire like this is frustrating because the true answer is much more nuanced than what the given options are and I feel like I know what they’re trying to ask but my honest answer is going to give them confusing results from which they’re going to pull incorrect conclusions from.

      For example: Politically I’m slightly right from centre but I’ve always voted left. I’m also non-straight but I don’t identify as LGBTQ (I literally had to look up the correct way to type that)

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Because people here are smart enough to not comment on whether someone has an authentic identity, what that identity is, what it should be, etc. You do you. It does also sound a bit like you’ve decided that you don’t fit other categories just because but you may not also know in which ways or why.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’ll say it, because I ran out of fucks a long time ago and I couldn’t give a fuck about down votes:

            You are a moron.

            And that’s fine. Someone has to prop up the bottom half of the intellectual spectrum. The problem is self awareness.

            Forest Gump knew he was a moron. Most morons don’t.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m also non-straight but I don’t identify as LGBTQ (I literally had to look up the correct way to type that)

        If you identify as non-straight then you’re identifying as LGBTQ. Don’t get hung up on the specific letters in the acronym, that sort of changes from year to year. You can pretty much sum it up to literally mean anything that isn’t straight which is what you said you are.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you identify as non-straight then you’re identifying as LGBTQ.

          No I don’t. That’s the point; if this is asked on a questionaire my answer will be no. It’s irrelevant if other people want to label me like that - I don’t.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You labeled yourself non-straight. That falls under LGBTQ.

            Edit: I’m not trying to force you to use the acronym, I’m just saying “non-straight” most definitely falls under it.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s irrelevant if other people want to label me like that

            Correct. You get to label yourself and no person on Earth has a right to comment on that. You’re choosing not to and it’s unclear why or to what end.

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              …it’s unclear why or to what end.

              The abbreviation in question has negative cannotations in my mind and thus I don’t want to be accociated with it. I prefer the term sexual minority if I absolutely need to be put into a category.

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                has negative cannotations in my mind

                I feel like you may have just demonstrated the importance of the study being reported here. The people responding affirmatively do not carry that burden.

                As a piece of advice: this is a “you” thing. Whatever you need to do to get there, learn to be ok with yourself and stop worrying about what others think of you.

                • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  My point is that people answer these kind of questionaires differently. Just like I may not check a box others might think I should have, some other person checks a box others might think they shouldn’t have. Just because one thinks of themselves as native american for example doesn’t mean others do. That nearly 30% LGBTQ rate indicates, to me atleast, that something like this is going on here aswell.

                  I don’t consider myself to be especially worried about what other people think of me. I don’t know what makes you feel like I do.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        non-straight but I don’t identify as LGBTQ

        This is pretty much what the “Q” part is. Queer in this context refers to not conforming to standard roles in some way or another.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Weird that your response got downvoted, but that seems to be how things go on here. Weird, but not surprising. If you’re slightly right from center, you sound like a centrist Dem.