• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You know you’re dealing with sane people when their first response is that genital inspections would solve the problem. /s

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, it might actually bring these lunatics to their senses if they were forced to strip for inspection before using the bathroom.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hahaha. That’s the job you signed up for. Repubs treat everyone like shit and you earned their attention by being his detail.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m laughing at the institution of the Secret Service, not the women within that maga shitheads are complaining about.

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Do you think that Trump’s secret service people are there because they’re loyalists? I doubt they get to choose their details.

          It’s only leapords meme worthy if it’s someone who was gladly supportive of (in this case) sexism against others beforehand… we have no evidence of that here.

            • Chozo@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              I imagine that sitting presidents are able to hand-pick their detail, but do former presidents also get the same freedom to choose their own staff? I would assume that former presidents just get who they get, unless there’s a legitimate problem with the assignment.

              • kobra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Isn’t this just a natural thing that would happen in this instance? I can’t imagine the number of secret service agents that want to be specifically assigned to trump is that high.

                Conversely I would assume the number of secret service agents that don’t want that detail is fairly high. I assume a sitting president detail is more engaging for most in that line, plus the trump camp comes with its own special flavor of volatility.

                I would assume those two things work together to essentially mean that trump did mostly have his choice for who works with him but who knows really

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Nobody is forced to do any job when your career is such that you’re working for the president. Resignation is always an option.

            And no, they were gladly supportive of someone who supports sexism. And then sexism. Thus, the leopards.

          • Wogi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The leopards part happens when Trump throws his own security detail under the bus to stir up his base, which if his past is anything to go by, he’ll be doing shortly.

            THEN we can have the leopards meme about the secret service. Pop it back in guys it’s not ready yet.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              You think any security at any level actually care about the property or people they’re tasked with protecting?

              It’s a job.

              • foggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yes, I’m told I need to put my body, flesh and blood, before the president of it seems he may be shot.

                It’s a job, okay. Just like any other.

                /s

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hey hey, that’s not true! If you have inherited wealth or you hate minorities, they will admire you for life…

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    One social media post, by a user described as a “MAGA2024 Ex-con deplorable” and viewed 10m times, shows a male officer carrying a large gun next to a female agent in action at the Trump rally.

    Its caption says: “Secret service agents: Before DEI vs After DEI.”

    As the article says, the first female agent was appointed in 1970.

    Someone tell me who the woke liberal pro-DEI president was back in 1970 because Republicans must really hate him.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      They started allowing female secret service agents in 1971–firmly in the middle of the Nixon administration.

      He must have been woke. /s

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It sure seems like there were some serious concerns ahead of the shooting and I’m astounded there isn’t a policy in place where anyone at whatever level of the command structure could call a code word and immediately put the candidate in full protection mode until the all clear was given.

    Sounds like another Uvalde excuse where command structure wasn’t clear cut, quick to react, and decisive, but I guess we will see.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m sure they do, and the word is probably just “gun”. Seems like nobody called it, though.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s because even the secret service is security theater and many are playing dress up. They aren’t actually prepared when shot goes down. A public librarian, social worker, or nurse will react better.

      • kevindqc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        A librarian will react better than someone trained, albeit inexperienced? I doubt it. The USSS agent should act equally or better on average, probably much better.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You have no idea what bullshit public librarians put up with and they don’t carry guns.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, some dipshit keeps coming in and moving the Bible and koran to the fiction section to take pictures for /r/atheism. THATS NOT HOW THE DEWEY DECIMAL SYSTEM WORKS. This is worse than Dachau.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I will say those particular women that I saw were a bit short compared to the person they were guarding. When the agents ringed around him, his head was clearly visible above those ladies. That part seems suboptimal. This of course is true for some men too though.