• DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome”. this is and was always the reason american businesses were eager to force everybody back tp work. eat the rich.

  • formergijoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I agree! If Elon musk cannot show up to his offices at Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter, xAI, and Washington for 8 hours Monday-Friday, he should be fired without severance as CEO or co-chair of his government department.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So the government telling businesses how they have to operate is small government now?

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Unless Musk somehow copied himself several times, he is working remote for most of his companies each day.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Working from home for all jobs that it is compatible with should be a mandate to help lower the amount of gas necessary for commuting.

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Then they aren’t really about efficiency, are they? When properly set up, WFH for office work is very effective and efficient.

    • solomon42069@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      45 minutes ago

      Efficient for whom? The rich all have millions invested in commercial real estate so if it’s not about voluntary resignations it’s about that.

    • DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      they already said it themselves: “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome” so no, it was never about efficiency. at all.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        Don’t you love when someone from outside talks big shit pretending to know what YOUR job is and determining its not needed?

        Almost like firing people based on code written didn’t backfire last time…

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But think of the billions of dollars of now unused office space. That’s horrible for real estate pricing, which is where many of these fucks are invested.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 hours ago

    At least they’re open about it: The entire point (according to them) is attrition. The actual plan is to make work for these people much more hostile so they quit.

  • GreyYeti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It did seem weird to me that Harris or any of the other democratic candidates campaigned on remote work. Seems like a smart pro-worker position to take that would directly impact a group she was trying to court: college educated professionals who skew male. Plus lower environmental impact, cheaper gas, more opportunities for working parents, etc.

    The cynical reason I assume it wasn’t a talking point is because the 1% who directed the media conversation had a vested interest in return to pre-Covid status quo.

  • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We owe commercial real estate investors exactly jacksh’t. This is, at least in part, about securing income for commercial landlords. Their “jobs” aren’t any more precious than anyone else’s jobs that are being impacted hard by this changing era. If they would like to fill their buildings, they can fork over some cash to convert parts of them to housing.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not landlords. About securing investments in commercial real estate.

      Which given its traditional status as a rock solid baseline for investors, its not at all surprising that two rich fuckers are pushing hard to shore up commercial real estate. It probably makes a significant part of their investments.

  • nanami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    A people elected government has a mandate to protect its people. Its real frightening to see that instead it announces adopt the worst business practises of private economy.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “The Deep State appreciates your hard work, know how, and dedication. Come work for us from home and help stymie the Shallow State”