Clown emojis all around

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    368
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    this is starting to be horseshit. Every windows computer has a version of fucking solitare on it , there are other card based games that don’t get this treatment, and the lootboxes are actual gambling.

    I thought at the start it was a type of beurocratical problem, but it’s been too long.

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      149
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not entirely sure about the European PEGI, but the American ESRB is funded by the same companies that it regulates. It was created after the outcry about violent games and was the industry self-regulating to avoid the government getting more involved.

      It is a lobby group for the industry, for better and in this case very much for worse.

      I assume PEGI is little different.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        7 months ago

        PEGI and many other groups are private groups. They’re not an authority of any form. They’re not associated with government, public regulation, or public election. They’re a group of people that create their own standards outside of the ISO or any actual regulation representing the public.

        Some countries do have actual public systems, but many just have these private groups that know best.

          • Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            In Austria PEGI is “enforced” in Vienna while USK is “enforced” in Salzburg (and Germany, the reason why they buy all their games here). And PEGI might be shit, but USK is a million times worse.

            • ___qwertz___@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              USK rated Balatro with a minimum age of 12 because of “elements resembling gambling”. Sounds more reasonable to me than the PEGI rating.

              • Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                German Authorities (technically not USK but USK is affiliated to them completely banned Wolfenstein, Dying Light, etc. Not 18+ or whatever it’s straight up illegal to promote or openly sell them in Germany.

                • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I can kind of understand Wolfenstein, as Germany does seem to have this thing where they do and also don’t want to face their past.

                  But Dying light is a generic zombie game.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This is all well and true, but it’s important to note that these organizations exist as a sidestep to regulation, they are formed by industry insiders as a promise to the regulators that they will be honest about how they rate games (or movies or music) so that the government doesn’t actually get involved and do it’s job.

          It’s a form of regulatory capture that allows the industry itself to decide what is harmful to us.

          It’s basically the definition of conflict of interest.

      • tlou3please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        In fairness, I would much rather that than governments directly controlling access, creating an additional form of direct censorship.

        Not saying what we have now is great or anything though. I’m not exactly defending it.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s basically why the ESRB was created, it was “Self-Regulate, or we’re just going to ban 80% of games on the market as a scapegoat for Columbine!”

        • tb_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I largely agree, but the interests have gotten misaligned. Back then it was the threat of regulation which changed things up, I think the governments should do a little more of that.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Eeeeh, at least then there would theoretically be public accountability. The FCC has limited censorship power that they’re generally unobjectionable with.

          I’m honestly more concerned with the censorship from private enterprises than with government consorship currently. Less accountability and less recourse.

          It also really only becomes censorship if the rating system is used to prohibit speech. If we instead made it more like the nutritional guidelines on food it could instead give more of a content breakdown than setting an arbitrary age.

        • tb_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          but… Looks like they don’t audit so good, if this article is evidence

          That’s the whole issue with it being a lobby group. It makes them a ton of money, so they are incentivised against making a rating for it because that would draw more attention/limit sales.

          And that’s where the whole government lobbying part comes in.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s as much related to gambling as Balatro is.

  • caut_R@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    They haven’t understood the game at all, I wonder if they even looked at it for more than two minutes

    Run game > see playing cards and poker chips > close > PEGI 18

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re not looking into blatant gambling in AAA titles, of course they won’t take a closer look into an indie game. They’re completely useless.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah, but there are also tarot cards, which is spooky Occult voodoo magic. Balatro backwards might spell “Satan is Lord” in some ancient druidic script.

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It can’t be that easy. PEGI says that games containing gambling (real money or not) are rated with PEGI 12 to 18. So there must be something else to the game that led to this rating.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    He probably forgot to funnel millions of dollars to non-profits and businesses adjacent to PEGI decisionmakers and their family members. Rookie mistake.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      131
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the current microsoft version of solitaire has microtransactions and ads so is actually significantly worse

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        7 months ago

        They added micro transactions and ads to fucking solitaire? How have I not heard about this till now…

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          7 months ago

          This isn’t really new. Solitaire has had ads for over a decade now since Windows 8, and there is a monthly premium subscription to remove them. As I understand it they also don’t show during offline play, but might be wrong about that.

          • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            51
            ·
            7 months ago

            Offline play? It’s SOLITAIRE. Offline play should be the ONLY play, by default.

            Feeling like I took crazy pills this morning…

            • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              If it makes you feel better/worse, the subscription is shared across multiple games. I was playing a bunch of Microsoft Jigsaw at one point (don’t ask), and while you could play as much as you’d like for free, the fact that they squeezed ads into it to extort you (or more likely, clueless older people) really cheapened the whole thing.

              They had a lot of pretty photos which were probably not free, but come on, this is Microsoft, they have the money. I think this should’ve been bundled with Windows for free. I truly think a lot of people might even look back on it fondly the way they do with a lot of the older bundled-in games. We will take for granted how much the default option with any sort of technology around us has an impact on us as kids. Maybe not everyone, but not everyone loved pinball or inkball.

              Actual textbook enshittification: what was once a space for a nice default thing to fall back on if you were bored and had their operating system has now become an “opportunity” to “generate more business.” Very sad. Computers are impossibly wonderful machines, everyone who has access to one should be able to enjoy a few basic things, packed in, for free - with no strings attached (looking at you candy crush).

              I’m sure there’s a nice free or paid jigsaw game made with love out there that could satisfy that itch I felt that one week in 2020. Hm.

              Edit: I have now redownloaded Microsoft Jigsaw and might just expand this comment into a full post/rant about the state of modern consumer software through the lens of Microsoft’s current casual games suite

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Damn I have fond memories of those games back in xp and 7 era but ig enshitification is evitable when it comes to Microsoft

            • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              There are daily challenges and things like that which is what I would refer to as online play. Not that crazy imho of you’ve put thousands of hours into vanilla solitaire that you may welcome something to spice it up.

        • Zangoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          Step 1: Add ads into [insert app of choice here] that are really annoying

          Step 2: Make people pay to get rid of them. Bonus points if it’s a subscription

          Step 3: People hate your app but it’s the one that’s installed by default so they use it anyway

          Step 4: Profit

              • FuzzyDog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Real question, why wouldn’t the win95/xp version satisfy someone? Isn’t it the same thing with simpler graphics?

                • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I can’t speak for other people, I don’t even play solitaire. Realistically, I imagine most people get new PCs with newer Windows versions and play whatever solitaire is on there.

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I also don’t think it comes pre-installed anymore, you have to get it through Microsoft’s meme store that no one uses.

      • warmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Supertux depicts imagery of speeding, misdemeanor and felony. +18 Age rating for Torvalds and all of his derivatives.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe look into the game being discussed even a little before commenting on it.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I did. I’m not going to go buy it for this though. They literally use poker terms, poker imagery, and real poker hands. Saying it’s just because there’s cards involved is disingenuous.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            And yet you say it’s cause of “gambling”. So you’re either lying about looking into it or lying about what you saw.

          • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You could use the same for majong or pachinko like games like Peggle. The issue is the actual gambling, not just the game elements or risk, reward, and points going up. Loot boxes are 10× worse.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, we know that stuff that glorifies addictive activities can recruit or cause relapse as well.

  • derpgon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fuck PEGI, their ratings always sucked and weren’t useful at all. Full blown swearing? 13+. One cigar through 500 hours of gameplay? Adults only. Never cared, never will.

  • tlou3please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wish lawmakers had some balls on this subject. If there’s gambling, they should have to register as a gambling company and comply with all the other restrictions on gambling advertisements in each jurisdiction.

  • Rose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hngh. Balatro already had a bunch of hassle on Switch eShop due to the PEGI ratings change.

    Earlier, Nintendo somehow got a PEGI 12 rating for 51 Worldwide Games, which includes poker and blackjack. I wonder what they argued to avoid the 18 rating. “Sure, this compilation has poker and blackjack, but it’s not like we made it fun.” (It’s adequate but compared to Balatro it’s very much a non-frills experience.)

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      “sure our game has gambling elements, but we’re Nintendo so shut the fuck up and give us a better rating because you’re a private company in the business of giving ratings”

    • RixMixed@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe 51 Games came out right before the stricter PEGI policy. Same year at least. The whole thing is very silly.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reminds me of that Australian law that was proposed to make anything with a relation to casino games Restricted 18 but merely mature for exploitative slot machine loot box mechanics.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      I haven’t seen Loot Boxes in a game in awhile, I kinda prefer those to FOMO…

      I think the perfect system is you earn Loot Boxes by playing that can contain anything, but you can buy the specific things you want at any time, the boxes themselves are unlocked through gameplay.

      Heroes of the Storm did this, and god I miss that game.

      I wish DBD did it

      • Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        HOTS 2.0 did so much good, man. It’s a shame the game’s basically dead. Was a lot of fun to play with my brother

        I realised that what brought me back to League was Wild Rift. Maybe of HOTS had a “mobile” adaptation, I’d come back. Just not much (if at all) a PC gamer nowadays

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          There were rumors Microsoft were going to revive it, which lead to people playing the game, which lead to it getting balance patches again… but no new content drops sadly

    • jagungal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sounds about right. I’d seen “slot machines” (we call em poker machines or “the pokies”) more times than I can remember before I was 18.

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    let’s just do like all parents buying the last Call of Duty to their 10-year-old and just don’t give a fuck about PEGI.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing is, this is likely going to affect their sales to some degree.
      As a parent, you may have age lock on your child’s account, or search games by rating, or just not know what this game is when asked to buy it but judging by rating.

      I don’t know how significant of an impact that is, but it’s unfair.

      • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think they’ve done them a favour in a way. If this was day one then it might hurt them but they’re past the point of like 90% of their sales I bet, and now pegi looking like incompetent dinosaurs is just a free second wave of social media exposure

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          One of the big advantages of steam and online storefronts in general is that it bypasses PEGI / ESRB and their unnecessary Draconian nonsense.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    Might as well go all in on that new rating.

    Balatro 1.5 Patch Notes.

    • All the Jokers now hang dong.

    • Big naturals Queens are worth double.

    • wavebeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The ESRB isn’t awful, it’s not perfect of course, but I think it’s pretty dang good for what it is.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean the point of all rating systems in the US was fear of government regulation of content and having to fight that particular legal battle. It basically exists because moral busybodies were upset about Night Trap, Mortal Kombat and Doom.

        • wavebeam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, this is true. And I think the industry managed to pull together a pretty decent one.

  • Juigi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    NBA 2K literally had slot machine in it. System is corrupt.

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    When I was young I always wondered why the nhl games had a 16+ rating and Fifa had 3+. Figured both of them where ordinary sports.

    Apparently fighting automatically shoots that nhl rating to the same level as GTA and balantro.