SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Pete Hegseth is under increasing fire for a double-tap strike, first reported by The Intercept in early September, in which the U.S. military killed two survivors of the Trump administration’s initial boat strike in the Caribbean on September 2.

The Washington Post recently reported that Hegseth personally ordered the follow-up attack, giving a spoken order “to kill everybody.” Multiple military legal experts, lawmakers, and now confidential sources within the government who spoke with The Intercept say Hegseth’s actions could result in the entire chain of command being investigated for a war crime or outright murder.

“Those directly involved in the strike could be charged with murder under the UCMJ or federal law,” said Todd Huntley, a former Staff Judge Advocate who served as a legal adviser on Joint Special Operations task forces conducting drone strikes in Afghanistan and elsewhere, using shorthand for the Uniform Code of Military Justice. “This is about as clear of a case being patently illegal that subordinates would probably not be able to successfully use a following-orders defense.”

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 minutes ago

    Just like the Jan 6 hearings, they will drag it out for political points, but have no intention to seek actual charges, institutional change, military reform or anything.

    It will just be: “Look at all the evil shit they did! Don’t you wish something could be done! Oh well. Also Maduro bad m’kay, drugs bad m’kay, Hamas bad m’kay, we love troops m’kay. Hearing adjourned!”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That would require the administration’s own people to bring those charges.

    And I can already tell you the words you’re going to hear if this makes it to court. “Unlawful Combatant”, a designation we created so we could ignore the rules of war while fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump declared the Venezuelan drug cartels to be terrorists. Now they’re treating them like we treated the Taliban in Afghanistan.

    These guys are literally just waiting for the next outrageous thing to push this one out of the news cycle.

    And yeah, we’ve been doing airstrikes like this for 20 years.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Those asshats will manage to walk. The ICC should step in so they can only travel between the USA and fucking Russia.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Does being convicted of a war crime or murder make you ineligible to be Secretary of Defense?

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      Exactly the same amount as being a 34 time convicted felon makes you ineligible to be president

  • Yeather@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    50/50 they pardon everyone or Trump uses this opportunity to forcefully retire more generals and get Hegseth out.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      The war crimes don’t get pardons and have no statute of limitations.

      • Yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 minutes ago

        I meant they offer the other generals a sweetheart deal of early retirement in exchange for testimony against Hegseth. IIRC some of the people involved with the torture prison in Iraq got to retire for their testimony.

  • tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “held liable” means some bad press in ‘radical left’ media at this point, right?

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    See that’s why they make everyone pull the trigger when they commit murder. Now they’re all complicit, and they have to work for trump and keep him in power. Because if someone with a spine that actually follows the law and constitution gets into office they will face court-martial.

    But we all know that they’ll just get raked over the coals by some committee and told to retire, if that, should a dem take office.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Held liable by whom? The President who absolutely would say he agreed with it? The legislature that will talk a good game but fold before doing anything important? The courts who are owned by the parties? Or the police who want this to be SOP, and wouldn’t enforce any orders for arrest?