The woman accused of being first to spread the fake rumours about the Southport killer which sparked nationwide riots has been arrested.

Racist riots spread across the country after misinformation spread on social media claiming the fatal stabbing was carried out by Ali Al-Shakati, believed to be a fictitious name, a Muslim aslyum seeker who was on an MI6 watchlist.

A 55-year-old woman from Chester has now been arrested on suspicion of publishing written material to stir up racial hatred, and false communication. She remains in police custody.

Chief Superintendent Alison Ross said: ‘We have all seen the violent disorder that has taken place across the UK over the past week, much of which has been fuelled by malicious and inaccurate communications online.

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    One false statement by a random woman was like a match lighting the powder keg. I kinda always figured the British were less racist than us Americans…

    • USSMojave@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      They INVENTED modern imperialism, first trialling it in the “Irish plantations” starting in the 16th century, long before America’s colonies. If one could go back in time to stop anything…

        • denshirenji@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Before that Greece, before that Persia, before that Assyria, before that Babylonia, before that Egypt, before that Sumeria… Sometime before that Cro Magnon Man. The list gets bigger; The Mongols, Timurids and other turkic groups like the Mughals, the Han…

          Even specific to the British Isles (the Angles, Saxons and Jutes; then the Vikings; then the Normans (French descendants of Vikings).

          In other words all roads don’t lead to Rome, it’s just a thing that humans do.

          Edit: Clarity, Grammar, More Pedantry

        • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          with the difference that the old romans preferred to integrate other tribes into their empire and raise their living standards to pacify them - and not slaughter them.

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      Migration was the one big issue that carried Brexit. It made them all forget anything else and blindly believe brexiters, if only there were no more brown people coming into the country.

      It was the racist vote.

      But besides that, there is racism everywhere. How its dealt with is the difference. I’m personally very glad to see the big counter protests now. They have become too confident to be loud about their hate again and we all have to put them back into their place, making it clear that this is not acceptable.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How can we dance when our earth is turning? How do we sleep while our beds are burning?

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s a real mixed bag from what I know. They got rid of slavery much earlier, I don’t think they have the baggage of Jim Crow that US frankly still has. Afaik black people were more accepted in society. But the recent immigration trend changed things and there is real anti Islam sentiment afaik. I’m really not that well versed in it though.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They replaced slavery with indentured servitude.

        They didn’t got rid of slavery, they got rid of chattel slavery (with the State paying massive amounts of money to the slave owners) and replaced it with a different kind based on debt.

        Just like the idea that Britain isn’t racist, the idea that Britain were the first to end slavery is Image Management Propaganda Bollocks anchored on misrepresenting what actually happens.

    • kikutwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Check out the Catholic versus Protestant angle there, always good for a row.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I lived for over a decade in Britain and had both afro-descendant and muslim friends who were discriminated against over there, even before Brexit.

      Even I got discriminated against because of being Portuguese (though nowhere are much as they did).

      Britain has for long been one of the most rightwing countries in Europe, it’s just that they’re very good at image management and their far right leaders are posh types with upper class education and accents, not slang-using rabble rousing loudmouths with low-class accents.

      Brexit didn’t happen in a vacuum.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m Portuguese, lived almost a decade in The Netherlands and then over a decade in Britain.

        It’s funny that after some years in Britain, on my own I reached the exact same conclusions as this guy who is local born and bred.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Best place I ever lived in: organized without being controlling and oppressive (as you would find in Germanic nations), good quality of life, genuinely moral liberal, good salaries, great work-life balance, with Proportional Vote hence consensus politics and with people who naturally behave in a more egalitarian way (in all senses) than pretty much everywhere else. As I see it socially they’re decades ahead of the UK and Portugal, though they’ve had right-wing neoliberal governments for over a decade now and it shows.

            Would’ve gone back recently if it wasn’t for their massive housing bubble making rentals extremely expensive pretty much anywhere in the country.

            They do have one thing I really dislike which is Scandinavian levels of personal taxes but with much lower levels of Public Services than most of Europe, probably because their ultra-low taxation for companies results in pretty much the entire budget of the Dutch state being funded from taxation of people so you end up with people paying above European-average taxes and getting below European-average levels of Public Services.

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I always like to say that the USA kept all the worst parts of British culture. That’s not to say that Americans aren’t decent generally speaking. Just that…idk…imperialistic tendencies, systemic racism, highly stratified social class dynamics, random violence…kinda shitty politics dominated by 2 parties who are centre/right and shifting further right.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The British Empire was an egalitarian paradise, imo

      Edit: I guess I have to add an /s lmao

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Oh nooo. It wasnt my fault I just mindlessly spread russian lies and hate about brown people. Who would have thought that words can have consequences?!”

    What a … I don’t even have a word for so much, idk mindless hate?

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      its not consequences until it starts affecting her, which in this case did. I hope other people jointly sue her for damages or sth so that at least she has to go to court and pay lawyer fees

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        I hope other people jointly sue her for damages

        Now that would be interesting to see. With a dynamically updating billboard tallying her dues under the title “Hateful spread of online lies cost this woman GBP xxx”

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          She owes me £30 since one of the rioters stole my wheelie bin, and I’m still annoyed about it. They made a big pile of everyone’s bins at the end of the street and melted them all, twats.

          Edit: also the racism is bad too I suppose.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    In hindsight, maybe the police saying nothing didn’t help matters.

    The internet exists, and it’s fast. Waiting a few days to say the suspect was British was not the right call. Especially when they’d already said the wonderful phrase “police do not believe the incident to be terror related” which as far as I can tell is code for “the suspect is not white, and Tommy Robinson is already on his way”.

    If you create a void of information, somebody will fill it. There were plenty of eyewitnesses going around telling people what happened, and it’s not a far cry from “he was black” to “he was an asylum seeker”. There are bad actors out there, and they will use that void to their advantage.

    Like you don’t need to give out personal info, or make stuff up, but a simple “police believe the suspect to be British” might have saved a lot of trouble.

    • fox2263@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      Unfortunately their hands were tied. They don’t release information about minors. That’s just the law. It was determined shortly after by a judge to release the information due to the growing disinformation to quell violence, but the die had already been cast.

      The reason they don’t release information is simply because they’re children, and they don’t want idolisation but also harassment to occur.

      Same reason why names of mass murder events shouldn’t be released anyway, to prevent the perpetrators from becoming martyrs. They’re just known as “the killer” etc

      Now this usually works fine as much as there are arguments for and against, however this event became somewhat a unique case, and an opportunity was found by malicious actors to use it for their own benefit.

      After the Reform party gained considerable ground, they now need to keep momentum of having a constant “enemy” and “other” in the public eye, a never ending threat. Fascism 101.

      And so, stoking the flames of the current migrant “crisis” if you let slip in certain places that the perpetrator was a migrant Muslim, you hope that the snowball can become an avalanche. And avalanche it did.

      All the while the leaders such as Farage can claim innocence with very particular wording to wriggle out of any scrutiny.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The police cannot be going around releasing information the otherwise wouldn’t do just to stop dipshits online. There’s a reason they don’t release this information right away.

      Let’s say there’s an investigation and somebody is murdered and in the course of the investigation for some reason the police think that you might be the murderer. They arrest you, and you provide DNA and it proves that you are innocent. I am sure you would not want your information released to the public in advance of a conviction.

      This isn’t just a hypothetical either there has been plenty of cases where innocent people have been accused of a crime, and then exonerated, but by that point the damage to their reputation has already been done even though they did literally nothing wrong. The police have to confirm that the person they have in custody is the right person before they release info to the public. Also if the person is a kid there are even more protections in place.

      • Owljfien@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not super relevant, but don’t they apparently have more info on the Jack the Ripper killings that they still won’t release? Makes me think the “right away” is on a geological time scale

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        While I agree about releasing identifying information. A quick release of, “we have a suspect, they are not an immigrant.” right after that first night would go a long way.

  • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is surely well educated society - always redy to commit random violence based on some karen troll post…

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love watching these diseased imperialists desperately try and excuse their population showing their true colors. First it was musky moo who used X, now it’s this stupid blonde lady, who is next? Actual politicians who have been chanting for racial violence for years? God I hope the whole stupid island implodes lmao

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m just enjoying watching the conservative party eat themselves alive. They are all trying to out racist each other, while at the same time condemning the racists for being racist. It’s pretty spectacular mental gymnastics, they should win a medal.

  • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yay another win for not having such a backward, archaic law like Free Speech ©®™

    Edit - Christ on a bike, my most misread comment yet lol

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      While I agree that this is a win overall, even in the US there are limits to free speech; you can’t falsely yell fire in a crowded theatre, threaten an individual with bodily harm, or incite others to do so, without any risk of repercussion.

    • jorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Individualist ideas of freedom and rights are not as useful to a functioning society as collective freedom and rights.

      Freedom to incite a violent attack against a marginalized group isn’t a useful kind of freedom.

      Individualists seem not to get this idea.

    • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Should I be allowed to feed rabid folks misinformation to encourage them to murder you and your family, with no repercussions? Yes or no, please no long winded diatribes.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ali Al-Shakati was the suspect, he was an asylum seeker who came to the UK by boat last year and was on an MI6 watch list. If this is true, then all hell is about to break loose.

    That sounds like she’s repeating a rumor; she even says that it might not be true. Is this illegal in the UK?

    • Blackout@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Ali Al-Shakati was the suspect, he was an asylum seeker who came to the UK by boat last year…” Does not read like restating a rumor

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also, she can’t provide any source where she heard that rumor, almost certainly because she just made it up herself and just threw in the “if true” bit to avoid being held responsible

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      She says she read it on another post and reposted it, adding in the “if this is true”. She deleted her tweet later on and said that people should’ve been doing their own fact-checking, a comment I found a bit rich considering that she didn’t fact-check before making her own post.

    • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The UK doesn’t have the same freedom of speech as the US, no 1st ammendment. So it very well could be illegal there, Idk.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      She should’ve checked before spreading hateful lies then, will not lose sleep over this.