we live in hell

I don’t even understand the pitch? you have the disc playing, in your hands, your ownership, no buffering, no subscription required. and they’re saying…hey do you want a worse experience?

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      111
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ended up giving up and just putting a Linux PC attached to my TV as a media center. I host plex on it.

          • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            while often outdated, there are youtube tutorials. you could buy a cheap thinkcentre or set up a virtual machine to try it out.

            personally, i run truenas scale with jellyfin as an “app” on my old PC.

          • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            So here’s how I’m running things: At the top level it’s a Raspberry pi 5 running raspbian, then everything else (jellyfin, prowlarr, radarr, sonarr, Usenet download software, etc) is a docker container. If that sounds like how you want to do it feel free to message me and I can try to get you on your feet

            • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not who you replied to but I’ve been looking to set up something like this (I have a year old dedicated tower for hosting)

              But I don’t know anything about docker, and it seems like a pretty big learn - is it required for the sonarr radarr and overseerr stuff, or just a nice to have thing?

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m using OMV headless and have zero luck with Docker or Portainer.

              Is it going to be easier to set up Docker using Raspbian with a GUI?

              • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I used CLI for setup, the GUI is just for ease of file management and checking libraries. I recommend hotio for super easy images to just fire and forget. Links I hope will help you: https://hotio.dev/containers/jellyfin/ https://wiki.servarr.com/

                Step 1. Get docker up and running (Portainer helps with other containers) Step 2. Use prowlarr to set up all the search engines you’ll use on other *arr apps Step 3. Set up your libraries with Jellyfin

                • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re wonderful, thank you! I’m going to leave my local OMV PI4 setup alone and when my pi5 arrives, I’ll try this!

          • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Honestly you can just run the app on your computer and tv connected devices. You don’t have to get fancy. I had trouble getting it setup to recognize and remember my library server address at first, but somehow I got it to work. I don’t like the UI though, and just use PLEX instead.

      • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see how this is giving up though. Been doing this to close to two decades in one form of another and I wouldn’t consider any other way. Except kodi instead of plexus here.

        • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, steam made it work with games, you telling me that 6-7 of these giant media companies can’t get it to work for video? The giving up part is that you have to embrace piracy (again?) to get to acceptable levels of service per dollar

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Other server software are available of course. The concept stays the same though. Very much recommend doing this. I’m halfway there, running Plex on my desktop PC and watching on my TV and other devices at home. Very comfortable setup. But I wish I had a small computer like a Pi or something, and a NAS to hold my drives. That way my desktop PC could rest.

        • Z4rK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They hit my threshold of shittiness some years back and I’ve been enjoying Jellyfin ever since. It’s a much better alternative for most!

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Plex is a great example of how proprietary software will inevitably become exploitative, and only purely Free Software systems can ever be trustworthy in the long term.

      • frokie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still get Roku recommendations on plex content from my Apple TV. They are doing content recognition off of the hdmi input

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, if you must (cringe), use anonymous credentials, have a router level VPN, and maybe even run pihole. But much better to just hook up a PC to your TV and run all of your apps off of that.

      • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just get a cheap PS4 or Xbox and watch all your stuff on there. We have an LG “Smart TV” that just doesn’t need to be connected to the internet because our PS5 (formerly PS4) is fast and snappy, and has all the apps we could want to stream off. Plus, both have a Bluray player installed right off the bat, so we can even watch those if we’re up for it.

        Don’t bother with sluggish performance on your Smart TV, it’s just not worth it.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What’s the practical difference between using a console and a smart TV? Aside from this one feature I mean, which I’ve never seen on mine.

          • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The UI is better and not as slow as on smart TVs from what I’ve heard. Plus you can play games on the console and watch DVDs and Blurays if that’s your thing. Apart from that, not much.

            • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This is true, because smart TVs have shitty processors, and consoles do not. Consoles are made for media, smart TVs have shitty embedded software on slow hardware, comparatively.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sony famously pushed DVDs into the mainstream and won a generation of console wars by building a pretty good DVD player into the PS2 which also happened to cost not much more than most DVD players did at the time

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Consoles tend to have higher power draw than a lot of simple devices. Depends on how much you care about environmental power savings or power bills.

      • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who said that? There are lots of streaming devices you can connect to your display, from game consoles to streaming boxes like Apple TV, Nvidia shield, Android box or if you really want to tinker a PC connected to the TV. The point is, don’t connect the TV itself to the internet as it has the most access to the whole viewing experience to drop ads on you.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Streaming is so much better than TV. People complain about 5s skippable ads and the pripesed solution is 5 minutes of ads?

        Also, so much more convenient than DVDs.

    • xyguy@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      1 year ago

      Connected a Samsung smart TV to my network when we first got it. The thing damn-near crashed my pi-hole asking for so many ad/tracking domains. Factory reset it later that same day. I think my % of requests blocked went from 15% to 68% in just the 3 hours or so the Smart TV was connected.

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      All new Roku devices do that, even if it’s not a Roku tv. Roku went from one of the best video devices to the worst in one fell swoop. Literally the only good off the shelf device is the Apple TV.

      • phar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can get mini PCs for solo cheap now and just load Linux up on it. Check out Beelink brand. I have a couple and they’ve been great.

        Edit: so, not solo

      • Trollception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I prefer the Nvidia shield over Apple TV. It supports direct streaming of Dolby Vision/Atmos on Plex. Pretty sure the Apple TV is missing some key codecs.

    • slinkyninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, the fault is with the people who make the TV. It’s not the customers fault that other people are evil.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s kinda both. Like, if I walk up to someone on the street who says they’re gonna stab me, and I get stabbed, the fault is obviously on them for stabbing me, but at the same time I got exactly what he said I’d get

      • Trollception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mine doesn’t have anything like this and is connected to the internet, no settings to change either. LG Oled

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have an LG OLED too. There’s a setting for recommended content, or something like that. I turned anything off that looked like it meant ads or tracking.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anytime you see the word “smart” in the name of the product, remember to mentally replace the word “smart” with “tracking”.

  • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is called Automatic Content Recognition and it can be disabled in the settings, highly recommend doing that. It should have asked you whether you wanted it enabled when you set up the TV, as it’s legally required to be opt-in in the US opposed to opt-out. Since you’re using a Roku Smart TV, it specifically is taking two full resolution “video snapshots” every second.

    • YoorWeb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      "To disable ACR on a Roku TV, the privacy policy says to “visit your Roku TV’s Settings menu (Settings > Privacy > Smart TV Experience) and de-select 'Use Info from TV Inputs.”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since you’re using a Roku Smart TV, it specifically is taking two full resolution “video snapshots” every second.

      “Got a data cap? Ha ha, fuck you.” – Roku

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re taking pictures of what you’re watching on the screen and sending it to random 3rd party data collectors to analyze and then harass you with ads.

        • gentooer@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would it be possible to argue that this is copyright infringement? They’re basically screencapping copyrighted content at a shitty framerate and distributing it over the internet.

          • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whooops! You accidentally thought that companies have to follow the same rules as civies, silly you!

          • Kogasa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re not distributing it. They’re taking a screenshot, identifying the content, and transmitting hashed and aggregated data. Even if they were transmitting screenshots, they’d be transmitting it to their own systems to be hashed and analyzed, not watched.

          • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, see my comment to FlyingSquid about how I assume things work under the hood. The only logical design choice I can imagine is that a hash of the content snapshot is being computed locally, and only the hash is transmitted.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You agreed to it when you set up the device. It should be illegal to have incredibly obtuse and impossible to read T&C, they should make it abundantly clear exactly how much of your personal information is being given away, but unfortunately it’s legal to just have a little checkbox that lets you lie about reading them.

      • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but they do take snaps of the screen and send it to advertisers. Almost all “smart” TVs do this.

      • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then someone gets the idea to find a way to play a VHS instead and be like “Let’s see you read that, you fucking spying idiots!”

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if you must own a smart TV (because it’s impossible to buy a large-ish TV anymore that isn’t), I see no reason to actually connect it to any network. But! I notice recent models will bitch at you on every single power on if you leave them disconnected. So you’re not even safe from being annoyed then.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some people get big computer monitors instead of a TV, because of shit like this.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the route I took. I recently bought a 48" 4K monitor, hooked a mini PC up to it, and now I stream my movie and TV show collection through Plex. I still have Internet access on my “TV,” but I’m in control of what pops up (I block all ads on my home network). I just use a small wireless keyboard and mouse instead of a remote.

        I haven’t actually owned a TV since about 2008. I have better media options through computers, and the technology just keeps getting better. Cable and public access television are a pain because you’re constantly bombarded with ads. With my own computer, I can circumvent ads and get a solid viewing experience.

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did a projector. Pretty close in price and I have a very modest, but serviceable 135" screen and no ads.

    • mvilain@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I found out a TV required internet access to function, I’d return it to wherever I bought it next day.

      Luckily I have a old-ish flatscreen that doesn’t require internet but does have a netflix and other channels I can setup if I want. The Netflix client is so old it won’t connect to their servers any more. That’s OK. My Roku still works.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have yet to see one that won’t eventually let you use it as a dumb display after you dismiss one (or more) nags first. But I’m sure that’s coming eventually. The worst offender I found yet is the “cheap” Black Friday sale Amazon Fire TV my boss got to use as a security monitor in one of our satellite locations. That fucking thing won’t even show a picture until you dismiss its network nag, and then its sign-in-with-Amazon nag. At least I found you can disable the Amazon account nag in the options. The network connection one you can’t.

        We’ve just resolved never to turn it off. You can’t dismiss the nag screen with the bezel buttons, either. You have to use the remote, so that’s now permanently double-stick taped to the desk the TV is on.

        Next time he’ll just buy a fucking computer monitor like I told him to.

      • RandomPancake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The TVs I’ve seen that do this have been smart enough to not get naggy about a lack of Internet until 30+ days after first power on. Then you get popups or autoplay videos begging you to connect it.

        My Hisense has been pretty decent, surprisingly. But for my next TV I’m honestly thinking of going with a commercial display.

        • RooPappy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bought a 65" HiSense last month. I was psyched the first time I set it up, and it gave me the option to configure it as a dumb TV without the Android TV experience or a network connection.

          • RandomPancake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m tempted to do a master reset on mine to see if I got that option. I have the Roku edition and I know that I can specify what source it defaults to on power on. I can also turn off content recognition, which is what’s going on in OP’s case. But using it as just a dumb TV would be awesome.

            • RooPappy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Theres definitely a setting for turning off content recognition… but… even if I say “no”, I don’t trust my dogs not to eat food I leave within reach.

              These companies want the data, they profit from the data, they probably won’t get caught if they take the data, and even if they do they won’t get punished, and even if they do it’ll still be worth it. You have to turn off the network or block the traffic to be sure.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s why I’ve come to just pay the premium for professional displays instead of consumer TVs.

      • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a great way to go. There are also still some budget options (Sceptre comes to mind) that don’t have any smart features in some models. My buddy just picked one up.

        It’s an absolutely terrible TV, but for his use case it’s perfect. He’s using it as a karaoke monitor for parties at his house. It’s mounted in a covered patio and is dumb as hell.

    • EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you serious?

      My LG you had to scroll down (with no scroll indicator) below the screen to find the hidden option to not connect it to the internet on set up.

      If I the TV nagged me every start up I’d get rid of it.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thankfully mine (about two yrs old now) only whined for the first couple weeks then gave up on me.

      Now the only issue I have is the time it takes for android to boot. It’s like having to wait for your tv to warm up all over again except without the high pitched noise old tv sets had.

    • daisyKutter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think newish tvs offer advanced image quality features like HDR and Dolby Vision through their own apps rather than through web browser; if you don’t have a new generation console in your house and wanna enjoy your new TV full capabilities you will need to connect the damn thing to the internet

      • PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, what? I’m thinking about getting the LG C2/3, and wasn’t going to connect it to the internet.

        Guess I’ll have to get myself a PiHole and figure out how to block tracking.

        • daisyKutter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have an LG C3 and that thing is amazing; the issue with HDR/Dolby Vision/etc is not because LG, but rather that you need a system that has an app that supports those capabilities, like if you have a subscription to Apple TV and don’t wanna connect your TV to the internet you need an Nvidia Shield/Apple TV/PS5/Xbox series X because just a HTPC won’t do it because the web browsing app doesn’t offers HDR and the Apple TV Windows app is trash

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with you for the most part that there’s no reason to connect them to the internet, however:

      Most modern TVs have Bluetooth and WiFi radios, therefore they’re never truly isolated, and consequently that means if there’s a security flaw, it can potentially be exploited without physical access.

      Now your priorities (and frankly, hardware) will obviously differ from mine, but that risk alone is enough of a reason for me to connect things up in order to receive software updates. Of course, the privilege of getting software updates for your telly is not ubiquitous, but most manufacturers can issue updates if there is a good enough reason to do so

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If its never been connected to the internet…wtf are they gonna do if they hack it? what are they going to get? it will have no credit card information, no personal information of any kind.

        • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is that because the hardware is there, a determined person with physical access can change the settings to join a network you don’t control.

          Ideally, you can open the TV and remove the wifi modules but I suspect that might be beyond the skills of most TV owners.

          Tbh, I stopped owning a TV since college. I watch everything on my computer or phone now.

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wait…so the fear here is that they will take my tv, that i don’t have connected to the internet and…connect it to a network i don’t have? Whats the point of going through that trouble? Whats the gain?

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those radios may have a flaw that allows someone to connect to them without direct physical access, wardriving is a similar idea. Particularly the Bluetooth stack, since modern TVs often use Bluetooth for their remotes, so it’s always going to be powered and active.

          Then you’ve got to remember a lot of TVs have shit like cameras and mics now days. Even without that, if an attacker can take control of something with a WiFi radio, it can become a jumping point to exploit other devices near your TV. I mean it doesn’t even need to be an exploit, e.g. if your phone disappears from WiFi range, maybe you’ve gone out—that’s a good time to rob you.

          Sure it’s all pretty unlikely, but it’s a non zero threat. Particularly when you consider that TV OS software is often like swiss cheese when it comes to security.

    • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have mine connected so I can control it from Home Assistant. It’s blocked from WAN though.

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    You like this episode of Futurama. Would you also like to watch this episode of Futurama?

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The SMART thing to do is to buy a DUMB TV. Pay a little more and get a real TV- you know. A display, with speakers and HDMI inputs. Nothing else.

      • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I blocked the servers with my pihole. Coincidentally, my two smart TVs are the two most blocked devices on my network. It’s not even close.

        https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/a8efac43-9e00-4f4d-b30b-0ce6d5246f06.jpeg

        This was with only ~1 hour of TV watching, while the device in the third spot is my phone (which I had been using all day). And yet the second TV still had almost 3x as many blocked requests.

        Smart TVs are fucking invasive.

          • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s easier than ever these days. The hardest part is figuring out how to configure your router to point devices to it. Because router manufacturers love to bury that setting somewhere deep. For actually setting up the pihole, it’s usually just a matter of flashing the memory card with the right image, then finding some decent block lists. But even the block lists are easy to find nowadays.