One that comes to mind for me: “Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” is not always true. Maybe even only half the time! Are there any phrases you tend to hear and shake your head at?

    • aviationeast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah what didn’t kill me gave me a chronic disease. I’m weak as hell compared to 3 years ago.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        For me it turned me into a depressed person who no longer feels emotion the way I did before. I’m 99% numb. The other 1% is manic attacks.

        • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Shout out to my ex who started on #2 recently, as people keep telling me.

          Maybe they got therapy and will be a better person this time. Maybe #2 will be the person they need. Whatever. Peace.✌🏽

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I can relate. My experience completely changed my personality.

            I definitely look at the pre-depression version of myself and see a completely different person.

    • Juergen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      In the same vein (and at least as dangerous): “Pain is just weakness leaving the body.” No, you testosterone poisoned numb-nuts - it is your body’s way of telling you that something is not right. Stop and listen!

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m a fan of “what doesn’t kill you only serves to postpone the inevitable.” But maybe that’s a bit fatalistic.

        • tomkatt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s not a picnic, and doesn’t have to be. Without the bad we wouldn’t always appreciate the good things in life. I’ve been fortunate, I’m living well these days, happily married, and haven’t suffered from depression in probably over a decade now (though anxiety is an ever present low buzz in the background. I’m used to it).

          But that phrase is irksome. What doesn’t kill you doesn’t always make you stronger. Sometimes it fucks up your life. Sometimes it’s a roadblock, other times it’s life altering in unforeseen ways, and occasionally the consequences of what doesn’t kill is a tragic fate worse than death.

          Tripping and falling might not kill me, might just lead to embarrassment. Or it could lead to CTE or irreversible brain damage from head trauma. Certainly not stronger for that sort of thing.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Science has proven that what doesn’t kill you (like a virus) actually weakens you. But, conversely, you become more efficient at responding to that specific thing so it only appears like it made you stronger.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, no, the trauma is the event itself. The reaction to it is post-traumatic stress. If that stress gets in the way of your day-to-day functioning, then it could be called PTSD (but there’s like pages and pages of diagnostic criteria too).

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not a fan of “it is what it is”. It’s called a thought-terminating cliche. It often means “I’m tired of talking about this, do it my way” when my boss says it.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve always liked it. I guess it depends who is saying it because when my old boss said it, it meant more like, “this is the situation we’re in, let’s not waste time arguing about why it is the situation and let’s just focus on dealing with it and going forward”

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah it can have wildly different meanings depending on the circumstances in which it’s said. It can be “well we can’t change it, may as well get on with life” all the way to “well this discussion is not gonna change anything, let’s get on with fixing it”. Very similar, but polar opposite sentiments.

        • magnetosphere@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          On the rare occasions that I’ve dragged out “it is what it is”, I’ve really wanted to say something like neither of us can change it, and instead of working towards a solution, all you’ve done is COMPLAIN for the last hour. Now SHUT UP, accept the situation, and make yourself useful!

        • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You bring an interesting point! So there’s a Japanese phrase this reminds me of: Shouganai (しょうがない) which translates to “It can’t be helped”. For me, this hits differently than “It is what it is”. Perhaps it’s the context, as I know it’s said about natural disasters like tsunamis and therefore has a connotation of the “getting on with fixing it” like you said.

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure, not everything needs to be picked apart in detail. But, I never use the phrase myself. As someone else ITT pointed out, context matters, too.

        I tend to say things like, “we should fix it now, worry about blame later”. Or something along those lines.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      ,I feel like this one is context dependent. Sometimes it’s just acceptance of the situation.

      “Wish it weren’t so hot outside, but this is Texas in August. It is what it is.”

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Context definitely matters. Your example wouldn’t bother me.

        Some people seem to think it’s a mic drop in other contexts.

      • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I use it for things that can be talked about for ages, but nothing can be changed about them. I don’t use it to terminate discussion, but more of a well understood quick hand for acceptance and sometimes resignation.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “Agree to disagree” is even worse, especially since often the thing you’re arguing about is an empirical goddamn fact and they are not entitled to “disagree” about it. That’s not having a difference of opinion; that’s just fucking being wrong!

    • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use it when people keep complaining about situations they cannot change. Yes, we fell in the hole, yes it hurt, please just let’s focus on how to get out.

      “Ah fuck, this hole sucks! Who even dug that here!? My shoes are dirty, my pants are a mess!” …

      “Well… It is what it is. Let’s get out.”

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I like it. It’s premise is accepting things beyond your control, allowing someone to stoically move forward rather than dwell in anxiety and disbelief.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Ooo I get that one, but kinda the opposite way. I tell someone it has to be done this way, or to a certain standard, for it to be right. They don’t want to, so they respond with that nonsense.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree, when it’s used as a thought-terminating cliché. It’s also very applicable to impart acceptance of something that you can’t control.

      • mmhmm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I used it today to communicate my feelings on a topic I can’t control. Like, me venting isnt going to improve my or the questioners situation.

        In principal I am against thought-termination. Sometimes, like a good dog, you gotta put a thought out of its misery

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I use it more in acceptance, like if I’m late for work and I hit traffic. Short of driving up the shoulder like an asshole, I’m going to be late. So rather than be stressed for the rest of my commute, I just accept that I’ll be late. It is what it is.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Interesting. I use it to indicate I may not like a situation, but I have to play the have I was dealt to the best of my ability, and sometimes… Well to quote lyrics, “got to know when to hold cem, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away, know when to run.”

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s good for when talking about things beyond your control. They way your boss is using it is bullshit. In that case, it is what he’s choosing to decide it is.

  • lady_maria@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Everything happens for a reason .”

    No. Fuck no, and fuck you. I DARE you to say that to the faces of the endless innocent people—many of whom are CHILDREN—who have been murdered, tortured, abused, enslaved, raped, ect.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      I hate how people use this but not the phrase itself.

      Everything DOES happen for a reason. It’s literal, precise, and accurate. Reasons dont need to be mysterious, aloof, or unknowable. They often are because we choose to stop learning but everything does happen for a reason so start looking for better questions

      • Enkrod@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The reasons just don’t necessarily come with any moral take away attached.

        Children get bone cancer for purely physical reasons, yes, but there is no plan behind it, nothing that makes the situation better in any way and this is how the phrase is usually being used. It’s people saying: “Don’t be sad, something good will come of it.” to the faces of grieving parents or deathly ill people who have nothing to look forward to but pain.

        Religious/spiritual proselytising has completely alienated the phrase from the methodological naturalism it could express.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Children get bone cancer for purely physical reasons, yes, but there is no plan behind it, nothing that makes the situation better in any way and this is how the phrase is usually being used

          My exact point. Im glad you agree with me

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      All those innocent people being abused usually have a reason behind it too; it’s just that the reason is usually corporate greed and a lack of ethics in politics.

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, everything does happen for a reason. It’s just that most of the time, the reason is “because so-and-so is an asshole”. It makes it essentially a useless platitude, but not an untrue one. I definitely take issue with the implication of it, that there’s some supreme, all-knowing authority in the universe who has this complicated, labyrinthine plan for everyone that involves massive amounts of suffering. That whole “mysterious plan of God” thing is a way for Christians to take credit for all of the good stuff that happens, while downplaying all of the bad stuff that happens as just “part of God’s plan!” It’s insidious.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Second time I’m bringing it up in this thread, but in response to exactly that kind of thinking is why I’ve adopted “the universe doesn’t care, so we have to” as a phrase I try to live by.

      There are so many popular ways of thinking that absolve humans and humanity of various kinds of responsibility.

      It’s not good.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      My preferred response to this is, “Entropy. The eventually and unstoppable heat death of the universe where none of this matters is the reason.”

    • grepe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think I get the sentiment that you are angry at but there is nothing wrong with that statement. It just doesn’t mean “whelp, there must be some higher purpose those things are serving that we don’t see” and is more like “there are some awful people doing bad things” or “they just were living in a seismic area” or “they had some genes not compatible with their survival”… There are always reasons. Not satisfying or purpose fulfilling reasons, just reasons.

    • Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I used to say this when I was a cringy 20-year-old, before I really saw and understood the world (and still believed in a god).

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “He/she just tells it like it is” No, they are just saying things that resonate with you, but have no actual alignment with data, facts or morality. Simply saying things with no filter doesn’t equal “like it is”. I find it is usually attributed to, at best, oversimplified or completely ignorant statements, at worst, misleading and/or hateful statements.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      “they say racist things and i like that because people don’t like it when i say it. this way i can be racist but outsource the messaging”

      good for other kinds of bigotry and douchebaggery

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      You just reminded me of this

      Those who champion “brutal honesty” are more interested in the brutality than the honest

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it depends on the context. If we have an expert on a topic who tries to use some form of simplified Modell and direct speach to make his knowledge more understandable for everyone it is true. Even tho it may be simplified it still contains the most important parts.

  • BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unused ram is wasted ram. Pisses me off to no end. What I do with my ram is my concern, I don’t want you bloating up and using it.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      RAM usually sits at 95% utilized anyway. People who say this dont know the first thing about operatig systems. They cache files…

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That currently unused ram has use later on. I don’t use my second ram stick without booting up a game, doesn’t mean it’s a waste.

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Depends on the context, I suppose. I always say to get twice the RAM than you think you need when building/buying a system. Like storage space, the ideal memory usage is 50 percent with the biggest memory eaters you have running. Enough to run everything you have and room to grow for the future.

      Or as I prefer to say, no such thing as too much RAM (assuming your system supports it)

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean it still technically is. Modern web browsers for example use as much memory as they can do for efficiency, but they will free up memory (to certain point) if other applications need it.

  • Wolfeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 months ago

    In response to gross privacy violations from big companies and governments:

    “If you’ve done nothing wrong, you’ve got nothing to fear.”

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Here’s a great response to that:

      If you’re at a house party and you need to take a shit, do you do it with the door wide open so everyone can see and smell you? Or do you actually understand, when it comes down to it, that there are valid reasons for wanting privacy other than wanting to get away with something wrong or illegal?

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I try to only use that when it’s information I expect the person already knows and can answer quickly (i.e. generally very concrete yes/no questions of low complexity)

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I use it in contexts where if they know the answer offhand, great please help, but if they don’t know, I’m not requesting they spend time or effort looking it up. I can do that myself and don’t intend to offload that part.

        It’s like a short answer question on a quiz rather than a research paper term assignment, except leaving the answer blank on the quiz is an acceptable answer.

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use this, and I struggle a little to disengage when the person I ask interprets it as “help me figure out how to solve this” when they don’t actually have the “short answer”.

    • StoneyDcrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “God loves you” is fine for me. they are usually simply wishing us happiness in their own way (sure it can be passive-aggressively throw to people they call “sinners” too).

      What I really despise is “god has a plan” as words of comfort.

      A plan for fucking what? Noahs ark V2? cleverly getting around the “promise not to flood the earth” clause by having greedy assholes pollute the earth in his stead ?

      “Ah little 4 year old Andrew would fuck up my plans, better give him cancer… Hm, let’s hit Jane with a truck just incase”

      I don’t appreciate that you somehow think a magic man in the sky planning something so cruel would be of any comfort to me.

      • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        What I really despise is “god has a plan” as words of comfort.

        I got that one a lot after my son killed himself.

        • StoneyDcrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m sorry to hear about your son, and I apologise if my comment brought up some difficult memories.

          For me, it was my best friends funeral and his family had an insufferablely god-fearing priest speaking for part of it who knew him from his childhood. He was telling stories were “he found God”, “god has now welcomed him” and “he now knows God’s love”. I don’t recall exactly what he said word for word, I just remember quietly seething throughout his whole speech and also afterwards my other best friends were venting that the whole thing was disrespectful to his memory.

          My friend wasn’t religious in the slightest. it felt like a complete stranger trying to convince a room of grieving people comforting lies that he is “in a better place”, when it was clear he didn’t know him at all.

          • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I apologise if my comment brought up some difficult memories.

            You are fine, I have to terms with his suicide. I miss him greatly, but I understand why he did it. I think about him all the time. He was my first born, but now technically my youngest of 4. His baby brother is now about 18 months older than he was at his death.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I especially hate it here in the South, as it’s used as a sanctimonious “fuck you” while dishonestly claiming righteousness.

      For example, the last time that was said to me was when some asshole crossed a double-yellow to pass me while I was doing 22 in a 25 mph school zone (which means he was doing at least 35 or 40). When I pulled up next to him at the red light and pointed that out, he bitched at me for taking the lane instead of riding in the bike lane (that didn’t exist! It was half a block of shoulder that ended!). He continued to argue that cyclists weren’t entitled to use the street, then as the light changed said “bless you” as if he fucking won and drove off.

      It is the most condescending, assholish thing you can say to a person and it makes me want to punch you in your smarmy goddamn face every single time.

  • perishthethought@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sure I’ll get guff for this but, “common sense”. Throughout my youth, when people told me something was common sense, I usually thought they were wrong.

  • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    “it’s just a few bad apples”

    That’s only half the saying. It is used most of the time as if the full thing is “a few bad apples aren’t a problem because the rest are fine” rather than the real thing “a few bad apples spoil the lot.”

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah. I always vehemently agree with the person misusing. “Yes! That’s exactly it. A few bad apples spoil the bunch. Perfectly captures the problem, friend! Good call.”

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Boys will be boys”

    How about you teach your kid how to behave and respect others so they don’t grow up to be an entitled asshole.

    • Matty_r@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think this one just morphed over time to be misused to excuse poor behavior. I always took as like boys rough housing each other and mucking about or eating dirt etc.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Rough housing/mucking are container words. Blanket terms that can contain anything including dismissed sexual assault and other poor behaviour that influence children. This is the whole point of why umbrella terms like ‘boys will be boys’ is bad. It helps brush over the plethora of problems inside of these containers instead of address them directly.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            -Said the abuser. When Grabbing towels and pinching penises in the boys locker room shit gets defended as ‘rough housing’ you sick fuck.

            Especially considering the era in which ‘rough housing’ was coined. Layers of old, stale toxicity there, gramps.

            • Matty_r@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              You’ve proven my initial comment. The term is misused and then people like yourself come along and perpetuate it’s misuse.

              Going from mucking around to abuse like there’s not a hundred other perspectives and factors at play.

              • Smoogs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Right because misusing a fucking pathetic phrase that seems to be your hill to die on is the real take away here. Not the rampant toxic masculinity getting slipped under the radar.

                You. You and your fucked up syntax fucking thinking like this are the problem with everything that’s gone wrong with the big picture items. You don’t give a shit about anyone but your little pet peeves. You just proved that you bring nothing to any table ever and do not ever intend to you impotent little narcissist.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was taught about respect and consent, but I was also taught that women largely will not give me the same respect and there’s no convincing the world to fix that.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    people talking about not being old enough to retire.

    Retirement is a function of finance not age.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      You can’t take money from certain funds like 401k before reaching certain age without paying hefty penalty tho

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are parts of the world where it is a function of age, or at least of the number of years you’ve been working, because the government will pay you a pension after you worked and paid taxes this many years.

  • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    When you forget what you were about to say:

    “Must not have been important”

    How in the ever-living fuck could anybody come to that conclusion?

    • BangersAndMash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’d only ever say it while referring to myself, and when I do it’s not of a consolation to myself or maybe as a way to tell the other person to not feel sorry about distracting me and making me forget. Is that the same way you interpret it?

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I appreciate this alternative interpretation. Many of the responses here are helping to show the many lenses that can be looked through at the same phrases!

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Every single time that’s happened to me and I later remembered what it was, it wasn’t important.

    • Zeoic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I meean, if it was really important, it’s very unlikely you would forget it. We use that saying a ton here

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you numb and traumatized, not stronger. Big difference.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Whatever doesn’t kill you might make you stronger, but it might also make you weaker. It’s highly dependent on the circumstances.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I liked the quote from Dr. Hibbert on the Simpsons:

        “You know what they say, whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger!”

        “Oh ho ho ho, no… It’s made you weak as a kitten!”

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeaaahhhh Nietzsche was making a very different point about convalescence but of course popular culture bastardized it. If Nietzsche knew that he was going to become an anthem for white girl positivity, he would… well, he’d probably gloat because he predicted that. But his gloating would look like misery.

      • Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nietzsche and out of context excerpts, you can’t possibly name a better pair.

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      money can’t buy happiness, but it can create the environment and conditions in which you can more easily become happy.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      This one is only true after a certain point which depends on the cost of living where you live. Money absolutely buys happiness up to a point.

    • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      It fundamentally can’t. Humanity has seen plenty of miserable rich folks to know the innate truth of that.

    • Kuma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree to some extent. I would say money is exchanged time, you earn it by using your time and use it to have more time. You can trade your time (money) for things you dislike to do or will help you to faster achieve what you actually want to do so you can use your time on things you like which makes you happy. But there are things you can’t trade with money and you have to actually use your own time instead of your earned time.