• new_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    13 Fridays the 13th

    Jason would unionize if he had that many hours of work to do

  • Kindness@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yay for The Human Calculator Calendar. Boo for not crediting sources. A missed opportunity to replace Jesse’s name with, “Scott.”

    Double boo for not explaining the extra day every year, not to mention leap year. (364 / 28 = 13.)

    Final boo for conflating the real world ~29.5 day imprecise lunar month with the 28 day English common law lunar month.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This.

        And also, it should still be 12 months, just 4 months (December, January, June and July) should have 5 weeks while the other months have 4 weeks.

        The last weeks of December and June and the first weeks of January and July then form a special kind of “half months”, where you get a half month salary and pay a half month rent, etc. Christmas and New Years nicely fit in the Jan/Dec two week holiday, which would be 15 days instead of 14.

        In a leap year, the June/July half month would be 15 days instead of 14

        This way each season/quarter is still equal to 3 months with 13 weeks. And a half year is 6 months with 26 weeks.

        Someone mentioned seasonal regression, this solution should solve that.

        And the irony of this all… This is very close to how our current calendar started before Caesars fucked it up.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          And also, it should still be 12 months, just 4 months (December, January, June and July) should have 5 weeks while the other months have 4 weeks

          But they you still have irregularities. Easier to just add Undecimber to the calendar.

          • alvvayson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            You would then lose the ability to divide the year into pieces, since 13 is prime.

            No half-yearly, quarterly or bi-monthly rhythm.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Our quarters don’t follow the actual half anyway, with the solstice and equinox not matching up with the months.

            • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              The divide is easy, and can be marked on the calendar like a holiday.

              • 3 months and a week
              • 6 months and two weeks
              • 9 months and three weeks
              • New years (or day before or after, take your pick)

              Much more convenient than making the whole calendar inconsistent.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Have a “liminal day” that serves as New Year’s Day, and then every leap year put the extra day as the last day of the leap year after the last month.

      The big trouble is that there isn’t a subdivision between the month and the year, 13 is prime, there isn’t a whole number division of months that can be used to mark say a fiscal quarter for example.

      So I say instead of a 13th month, split those 4 weeks to be an extra week at the end of every 3rd month, so March, June, September, and December would all have 35 days instead of 28.

      Kinda what Caesar was going for originally too, having the months alternate between 30 and 31 days, but he fucked it up because Romans were superstitious about February for whatever reason.

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Every new years day and leap day exists as its own thing outside of any particular month. So every year we get a full new year holiday and about every four years it’s a full blown 2 day event. It doesn’t need to even be a named day of the week or part of a named month. It can just be it’s own thing. We can number it as the 0 month if it makes you feel better and to help sorting dates. If we’re feeling sentimental, maybe we can call it Friday the 13th because those won’t be a thing anymore otherwise.

  • TheWorstMailman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kodak used to operate on this 13 month calendar. When I asked someone who used to work there, she was shocked that I knew about it and said that it was the best thing about working there. The original plan that this calendar is based on called for a liminal day between years for New Year’s Day with 2 days for leap years

    • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      I work for a company which used to have 13 financial periods. It was great. Then they switched to 12 and we now have a couple of 5 week periods thrown in to balance the year out. I don’t know why they decided that but it’s not as good now.

      • rojun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m surprised they successfully attempted that and that it resulted to be taken positively. It seems as every out-of-the-norm scheduling idea is so frowned upon that even in small companies you can steer them to anything but the same ole.

        I’ve used iso-weeks for this purpose. I don’t really care for dates if I don’t absolutely have to. It’s nice to refer to “week 44 five years ago” in my journals. Truth be told, no one else around me uses the weeks and the only mention to it I’ve heard was not positive.

        • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m responsible for our databases and work with our BI guy a lot. Changing from 13 to 12 periods was a right pain. We had snapshots, budgets and loads of forecasting data, all of which needed to be updated to reflect the new calendar. It wasn’t as easy as dumping a new calendar in, well it perhaps could have been if we were given ample time to plan it.

          In regards to week, period, year, quarter, etc that’s all easy for the user to switch to their preferred view in the BI system. The ERP system will use the financial calendar but reporting is done against whatever the user sees fit.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        13 period financial calendars don’t break down into quarters that easily. One reporting quarter will always have an extra period.

        5-4-4 creates even quarters except it requires either one extra day every year or one extra week every five to six years. It’s most beneficial for companies that either experience high seasonality or high consistency, such as retail and manufacturing.

        Most other companies just use calendar month since it’s simple, easy to determine, and allows for rather consistent year-over-year comparison.

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      As someone who has proposed this system myself, I feel the need to point out that the meme is glossing over a couple key points:

      First and foremost, 13*28 is 364 days, so to avoid slippage you’d need an extra day appended to every year, either as part of a month, which breaks symmetry, or on it’s own. You’d also still need leap years.

      And in order for the days of the week to be immutably aligned with dates, these extra days would also have to not be part of any week. Which is a big problem if you want to get anyone who practices an Abrahamic faith on board with the plan.

      • deo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        What exactly would be so troublesome with having a “special day” outside of the usual week/month cycle? You can still go worship on whatever day of the week applicable to your faith. Just make the last day of the year its own thing. We can call it “New Years Eve” and party together.

        • Malgas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It makes the calendar less than compatible with the commandment to keep the Sabbath by not working on every seventh day.

          Which is not insurmountable in practice (e.g. by keeping a separate ecumenical calendar) but you can bet it would be a significant source of opposition.

          • deo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But you’d be resting on the extra day, too (if you want, I for one will be partying). So you’d never go more than seven days without rest.

            If that still doesn’t fly, I suggest we combine the extra day and the previous day into a mega-day that is 48 hrs long. Then everyone except programmers will be happy (we’re never happy with datetime conventions anyway, so what’s one more if-else statement between friends).

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Did you know that the 13th day of the month is more likely to be a Friday than any of the other weekdays?

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m a nerd so I had to write code to check this out.

        https://pastebin.com/62kwesZz

        So from 1/1/1500 until 12/31/2023:

        Weekday counts: Monday: 898 Tuesday: 897 Wednesday: 901 Thursday: 896 Friday: 901 Saturday: 896 Sunday: 899

        No idea why, and other than a tie with Wednesday, this is indeed true. Well if my code is correct.

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think your code is fine. The Gregorian Calendar actually runs on a 400-year cycle (i.e. the pattern caused by 7-day weeks, variable-length months and leap years repeats every 400 years) so if you re-ran the code against a 400-year period you’d get the correct ratios.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          until 12/31/2023:

          My eyes see mixed-endian! I want them to unsee it!

          Decide already whether you want 2023.12.31 or 31.12.2023.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Landlords salivating at the prospect of an entirely new way to increase rent almost 10% for every tenant

      • miraclerandy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        As long as I get an extra payday without a decrease in payment, I’m good. I doubt that would be the case though.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Number of hours worked remains the same. TPTB would never allow this to improve the lives of ordinary folk. I say we cut a month out of the year. Who likes August, anyway?

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      But think of the possibilities. If you were born on the 31st, you’d stop aging.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Watch out for places (like gyms) that bill biweekly instead of monthly. You may think it lines up with months, but over the course of a year you pay an additional 8.6% more.

      • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But, if you get paid biweekly and all of your bills are monthly, you basically get an extra paycheck each year.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Two extra I believe. And every few years three. BTW advertisers know this and try to sell big ticket items like TVs when that happens.

  • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    See also: Metric time.

    10hrs in a day. 100min in a hour. 100 sec in a min.

    • Kindness@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hmn…

      You’d need to redefine the derived SI Units, or take new measurements for newly derived units. Newtons, joules, pascals, hertz, coulombs, watts, volts, ohms, farads, siemens, webers, teslas, henrys, becquerels, grays, sieverts, and katals.

      Also not to mention motion and heat.

      You could say there’s a large amount of pressure to not change, or that it’s a high “bar”…

      I hope you smiled, because that is one joke I will not be making again.

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You don’t need to redefine any of them if you don’t change the length of a second though, right? Because the SI unit for time is the second?

        As long as you just change the definition for non-SI units, sure kilometers or miles per hour changes, but that’s not SI, so nobody cares.

        • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          There are (roughly) 86400 seconds in a day. This metric time describes a day with 100000 seconds. If you don’t redefine the second, then I guess we’ll just redefine the day, right?

          • BluesF@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            100 seconds to a minute, 96 minutes to an hour, 9 hours in a day?? Metric with rounding.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you take rhe same 24 hour day, and convert it to 10 metric hours, or mours, and split that to 100 metric minutes, or cenutes, and then 100 meconds, one cenute is 1.44 minutes, and one mecond is 0.86 seconds. The practical difference would be almost imperceptible. A mour would be significantly longer than an hour, 2.4 times, but you’d have the metric system attour disposal to break it into decimals.

        That’s not to say we should switch, but it wouldn’t be that different.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I always thought that the argument is that metric time sounds nice but it’s actually worse than traditional time because 24 and 60 have much more factors that are more convenient in every day use. You can split them in half, in quarters, in thirds, in sixths.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can make that same argument for Imperial units like inches and feet and cups and ounces. That’s why imperial units are still popular, because decimals are great for science and conversions, but 100 doesn’t have many divisors.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also 10 days in a week. And 3 weeks in a month. Still 12 months, and 5 free days at the end. I like free days.

  • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    Except that a lunar cycle is 29.5 days long.

    The Jews recognized this and their calendar runs akin to it (https://www.timeanddate.com/date/jewish-leap-year.html), but with 7 “leap months” occurring over the course of 19 years. Of course, then they fuck it up with extra or fewer days to keep certain holidays from falling on certain days of the week. You win some, you lose some.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      So? I don’t care if it’s hot in December or not and presumably we can figure out a more sciency way to time crop planting. Not like the almanac is worth fuckall in a changing climate anyhow.

    • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      13 x 28 = 364

      Make New Years Day it’s own thing, not counted in a month (or just make the new 13th month 29 days long), and continue tacking on leap days to the end of February using the currently established rules.

      The length of the year doesn’t change and no seasonal regression. It has so many fewer exceptions than our current system that you’d wonder how we ever ended up with a 12 month calendar.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes and no. The days would be outside of the normal week (so they would be in a kind of an 8 day week), and they would be holidays to not mess up work schedules in relation to the fixed calendar.

          • dingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Many facilities are 24/7 operations that can’t just close for a holiday (ex: hospitals, first responders). It definitely would mess up people’s work schedules.

  • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve never been a fan of this idea, it doesn’t go far enough and further makes things less symmetric/divisible. I say we use 6-day weeks, 5 weeks per month, 12 months per year, and an inter-calary holiday week of 5-6 days. A six day week means 4 days working, 2 days rest, and that can be staggered more easily/equitably assuming work needs full coverage in a week. We start the new year on the Spring Equinox because it’s generally more pleasant.

    For bonus points, we switch to base-12 (or dozenal) in our numbering system because after the transition it’s a much easier system to deal with as far as division and multiplication is concerned (e.g. 1/4 would be .3 instead of .25, 1/3 is .4 instead of .333…, 1/2 is .6, etc.).