• Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m not sure what happened to fast food restaurants. Yeah, sure, they were unhealthy for us but they used to taste good. Now, the portions are smaller, they cost a lot more, they have the texture of wet cardboard with sauce, and it doesn’t taste good. I guess if all you have ever known is the fast food restaurants of the last 20 years then you probably never experienced a real Big Mac or Whopper from the 70s and even to the 80s. Somewhere around the 90s shit just started falling apart. Greed right, it’s always greed.

    • GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not a huge McDonalds fan, but I used to get lunch there occasionally because it was fast, convenient, and inexpensive. Now it’s none of those things. I think the self-serve kiosks somehow made things worse.

    • quams69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      A quarter pounder meal is around ten bucks, so is a cheeseburger and fries from a local restaurant or diner. The attractiveness was cheapness and now it’s not even that

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        29c and 39c here back in the early 90s, but couldn’t even compete at that with their next-door competitor (hardee’s) doing 25c and 35c

        • Naja Kaouthia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ah ha! That was the old price I couldn’t remember. Go through the drive through, order like 50 of them plain, toss in freezer.

      • nul9o9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        I dunno, I feel like McDonald’s fries being fried in beef fat made them the big hit back in the day.

      • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, the food really did taste better, due to the cooking process and the different ingredients that were involved.

        For example, the fries were cooked in beef tallow; the meat they used was of better quality, and more nutritious. The bread was different as well—McDonald’s changed it again only a few years ago.

        Edit—Well, they’re changing their burgers again: wsj.com/business/hospitality/mcdonalds-burger-new-menu-2400d22b

            • Ooops@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Or from which animal… More naturally grown meat has a completely different composition (also a much more elaborate texture) than the same meat from an animal quickly grown with a lot of growth hormones. But both are 100% beef.

              • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                What grade of beef trimming? What part of the trimmings exactly? What ratio of what trimmings, and how much fat is used comapred to the rest?

                Lipton is 100% “tea,” but its also the sweepings left after all the good parts of the tea leaves have been filtered out and sold as different brands.

                Thats what McDonald’s is doing.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, I know for a fact that the Whopper has been enshittified since at least the 90s. It used to be one of my favorites but now tastes like shit and costs 3x the price.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, McD’s has publicly changed various formulations over the years. Never for the better. Even just a couple years ago when they went to “never frozen” beef for some of their sandwiches - they tasted worse IMO, but I’m sure somehow it saved McD’s money.

        We’ve got a pub near us that costs about only 10 bucks more in total to carryout from there and feed my family on burgers and fries than if we go to McDs. But we get a large hand shaped patty cooked to our individual preferences, on a bun from a local bakery, generous portion of thick cut fries, and a better experience all around.

        It’s insane that McD’s prices are within spitting distance of the place. The drive-thru (and its related convenience) is the one and only benefit to McDs. I have reluctantly loved McD’s for most of my life, but there’s no doubt it’s gone downhill a few times, and for sure in the past few years. If they hadn’t also jacked up their prices it wouldn’t be so bad, but it’s really hard to justify eating there now.

        They’ve become as infested with corporate greed as every other company of any significant size.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s a McDonald’s in downtown Seattle that doesn’t even have a drive-thru. What even is the point?

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yes, people like to forget where this particular brand of greed comes from.

    • renrenPDX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I miss McDonald fries from the 80’s. Y’all just don’t know. They should bring it back for a limited time like the McRib, or offer both fries and label it as Classic fries.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Basically. When companies are allowed to pick two from

        1. faster
        2. cheaper
          or
        3. better

        They usually pick faster or cheaper unless competition forces them to improve quality in order to survive.

    • Slowy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think one factor is probably “advances” in food science. Look how many ingredients go into an average fast food bun, for example… we have so many hyper-processed foods made with not just hella preservatives, but instead of wheat flour and butter it’s like wheat and corn starch, gluten, various vegetable proteins and several different oils, etc all recombined in a rather industrial way. It’s cheaper, and it’s sometimes specifically engineered to appeal to our palates, but it’s been taken too far imo. This is not just an issue in fast food by any means.

  • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    So they’ll reintroduce the old size with a larger price tag now that they shrank the others while keeping them priced the same. More of a reason to stay away

    • USA ONE@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      McDonald’s prices are actually lower today than they were in the 1980s when adjusted for inflation.

      • naun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        However, incomes are lower than that, so we’re still paying more.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          No real incomes adjusted for inflation are higher then in the 1980s. Though comparable to where they previously peaked in the 1970s.

          https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/50-years-of-us-wages-in-one-chart/

          Current real wages are similar to that 2019 number.

          Still terrible when you consider it took 50 years for real wages to just effectively tread water though. The economy grew a ton over that time period. Means all the increased value didn’t make it’s way into more wages. So on average people make a little more than in the 1980s even considering increased cost of living, but they should be making much more even than that.

          • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It’s not the wages. It’s the proportional cost of living. Proportionality matters more than anything.

            TVs are proportionally cheaper than ever, but housing is not.

            • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That’s wages weighted to the cost of living. That’s what you’re looking at in the chart I posted. You can find the same chart from many other sources. And yes it absolutely includes housing costs not just tvs. Even includes services too. Anything people spend money on to live, and in the proportions they spend money on it. If people aren’t spending very much on tvs it becomes a smaller part of the measure and is weighted less.

              Part of the reason you see the jump in real wages in the 2008 recession on that chart is related to the crash in housing prices. If things are proportionally costing more in relation to wages then the line goes downward, if things are proportionally cheaper compared to wages, then it goes upwards. It crashed in the 1980s, was flat for many years as wages and cost of living both were increasing at about the same rate in the 90s so no real gains. It was only recently we even caught up to where we used to be in the 70s. The commenter above you said our wages are lower than they were in the 1980s, that’s just totally untrue. If they said 1970s they’d be closer to reality since we’re hovering near that number.

              Wages not weighted to the cost of living would look more like this and basically almost always be going up. I can’t find a chart of wages not weighted to that over the exact same time period though but you get the picture.

              https://www.statista.com/statistics/243842/annual-mean-wages-and-salary-per-employee-in-the-us/

              • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I find that incredibly difficult to believe considering the minimum wage is hardly gone up. That my parents were able to afford a house, but I can’t.

                • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Not disagreeing at all with you on minimum wage, you’re absolutely correct. These are average wages across the whole economy (or non supervisory wages or something but close enough). If you plotted real minimum wage vs where we used to be it’s waaaayyy lower now. It’s nowhere near kept up with increased cost of living (certainly federal, not sure if any state has increased theirs enough to compensate).

                  If you’re interested in more on how the cpi works or what is or isn’t included and some of the arguments both ways, I found this to be an interesting read that summarizes a lot of the controversies about the cpi figures well.

                  https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/24/technology/inflation-measure-cpi-accuracy.html

                  Or archive version https://archive.is/zvtPw

                  Though be aware that article is from a year and a half ago, so none of the inflation figures it gives in it are current.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I was totally ready to call your BS, but you’re right.

        Cost of big Mac combo in 1980: 2.59, 10.24 after adjusted for 2023

        Cost of big Mac combo in the app today: 9.20 (For my area anyway)

  • SheeEttin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The ⅓-pounder? A&W already tried that, and it flopped, because people don’t understand fractions.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      More likely a half-pounder. They already sell a double quarter pounder. And all Americans know that halfbacks are larger than quarterbacks, from watching Real Football every week.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      both BK and McD used to sell a 1/3-lb burger for a while in the early-mid 00s. Wendy’s, too, IIRC. to my recollection, it did ok in sales, but was maligned for being “unhealthy”, and both chains stopped selling it shortly thereafter.

      • MelodiousFunk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Meanwhile, modern Wendy’s is all, “Here’s three patties on a greasy bun slathered in ketchup/mustard/mayo, and if you manage to take a bite it’s all gonna come sliding out the other side like bloody pus. Comes with bacon as an option, too. Don’t forget your quart of sugar water.”

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve heard this a million times. And it honestly sounds like the kind of thing an executive would blame to excuse bad sales.

  • eatstorming@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    The first six paragraphs (plus the headline) of this “news article” are the same thing with slightly different wording…

    • Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve noticed that on many articles now. By the time I get to the actual article I’ve read the headline and the opening paragraph at least three times. I don’t know why but it bothers me.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not sure if that is just old fashioned lazy writing, or the even more lazy option of having AI generate the entire thing and not even bothering with proofreading it before publishing

  • Skybreaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well, they only shrank due to shrinkflation. In addition, they cost more than the bigger ones they used to make. So, really, they’re just planning on gouging us even more

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      this was my thought. they can’t shrink it down anymore without it getting ridic so now make “premium” options that they can shrinkflate on later.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      they fought for slavery and not to have to pay their taxes. i get that you’re joking, but it’s crazy to me that people still use this argument to defend… anything. Our founding fathers had some decent ideas about democracy and the separation of church and state, but when it came to their vaunted “all men are created equal” concept, they clearly didn’t mean what they said. What they really meant was, “Down with the aristocracy, down with nobility! We want all rich, white, Christian men on the same top echelon of society, regardless of bloodline!” Also, “Can i purchase that human?”

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        all men1 are created equal

        1 - Property-owning white men, no women, no poors

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It really needs to be stressed that the founding fathers were not in any way a single group with cohesive ideas. There’s a reason that 90% of early American history is these guys arguing about essentially everything.

        Some were genuine true believers in Enlightenment philosophy. Some agreed with it in principle but were willing to make sacrifices for the sake of pragmatism. Some didn’t give a shit but saw which way the wind was blowing and realized it would be more profitable to go along. And some were simply virulent pieces of shit.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          And some were simply virulent pieces of shit.

          enough that slavery, racism, sex/gender inequality, the inherent exploitation of a capitalist system, and many other terrible things were enshrined into our constitution from the start.

          as for their cohorts whose noble and enlightened ideas fell to the wayside? well, when they could stand up to a king but wither at the idea of standing up to their peers - especially in the name of profitability - there could hardly be argued to have been any honor in it. This just sounds like the “it’s a few bad apples” bs we hear whenever there’s some news story about police bruality/corruption.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            enough that slavery, racism, sex/gender inequality, the inherent exploitation of a capitalist system, and many other terrible things were enshrined into our constitution from the start.

            Well… Yes. That’s how politics work. You need to live with and agree with those people about how we’re going to govern society. What do you expect to happen?

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That, in retrospect, we would see them for who they really were, not for who we wished they were. 

              • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Please. This is the MAGA philosophy. Kick and scream until you get what you want and burn everything down if you don’t. 🙄

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Uh… I’m not following you. Reading what I’ve said, how could you connect me with their philosophy? How could you say that the simple act of protest equals MAGA philosophy?

                  Look, I don’t really think you believe that. And I’m not trying to shut anyone down. What I’m trying to say is that the founding fathers were a lot more flawed than most people realize, and we should stop worshipping them. It’s time we moved on and started forging a new republic founded on modern concepts of equality and equity rather than the compromised, elitist, and extremely bigoted attitudes of 300 years ago.

                  OK?

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The refresh includes having thicker bun bases to preserve heat, pieces of onion poured directly onto some of the patties as they cook, and adding more sauce to Big Macs,

    Oh sure, just what they needed… More bread and sauce. Fucking gross

      • Lightsong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Big Mac sucks. They’re mostly buns and they use tiny patties from cheeseburger. It’s basically double cheeseburger but with 3 thick ass buns with sauce. Why the fuck do people like those?

        McDouble is where it’s at.

        • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          McDouble like a Mac. I discovered it when I had no money, but even now that they have closed the gap (they charge for the sauce and lettuce and probably an assembly fee because why not) I order a McDouble like a Mac over a Mac everytime. What’s this garbage middle bun for?

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    the value and the experience of fast food is just not there anymore. some startup is going to disrupt all of this with something so deliciously reasonable soon i hope.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Food is a much harder industry for new tech to disrupt, because no new startup can ever compete with the beef supply chains that McDonalds etc. have established.

      It’s easy to launch a website to a some online thing. It’s much harder to an absurd amount of agricultural products all over the country for cheap.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If it was that easy, we’d be flooded with reasonably priced sources of food and other things.

      The ability for the “free market” to fix all our problems has always been vastly overstated.

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The ability for the “free market” to fix stuff is antiproportional to the stupidity of customers being manipulated by obvious advertising lies.

        The solution is education and teaching critical thinking skills.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Thats one aspect, yes, but capitalists aren’t just going to stop being capitalists because people are a little less likely to succumb to advertising. People still need food, still need housing, still need fun and leisure to stay sane. And there will still be people there eager and willing to exploit that need to the best of their ability… and more than willing to ignore them if its not worth their time.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Let me guess, they’re patriotic Americans so intentionally coming out with a 1/3 pound burger to disprove that apocryphal internet story once and for all. When it takes off, it proves Americans really can do basic math

    • the_q@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yup and the staff won’t get a penny of that increase. Hell, the materials purchased probably won’t cost them more either so it’ll just be profit.

      Kill yourselves eating the garbage and pay more for it. Ba dap bap bap baaahhh…

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve seen that, like Oklahoma Turnpike. One, they should be paying us to drive through Oklahoma. But anyway, with a little planning ahead you can eat something else… I have Celiac disease and can barely eat at McDonald’s in the US safely at all, so I take my own food and kitchen supplies on road trips.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think they needed to see WALL-E to decide that if they can sell even more meat for Americans to stuff into their fat faces, they will do so.

  • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    So are they returning to the original sizes of burgers before shrinkflation?

    • Overzeetop@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, since the original patties have always been 0.1lb precooked weight and the quarter pounder has always been (checks notes) 0.25lb precooked weight, I’d say shrinkflation is one thing that hasn’t come to McDs. Actual inflation? Oh, yes - $4 for a double cheese burger (with 0.2lb of beef) is straight up insane. That’s $10 for a half pound burger - nearly the same cost per ounce of burger as a Five Guys standard burger, which isn’t even in the same league.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        more fat in them nowadays than there used to be, and the buns have less ‘substance’, too… oh, and the cheese is wafer thin now. so yea. ‘shrinkflation’ has definitely hit even mcdonalds