What about the assassination of a senator? Did that also upset the right, or where they all cheering?
It’s okay if they kill a demon-rat. The brain washing combined with stupidity dissolves them of any wrong doing.
What other time in history did people call other people rats and cockroaches?
Can’t recall. There’s nothing Tutsi here though.
On one hand, I agree with the point. Political assassinations should be condemned by the right, and it shouldn’t be acceptable to have people giving a pass on political grounds.
On the other hand, I was reading the comments on here after Kirk was shot, and almost without exception, people here were cheering. I saw one or two comments from people saying something like “political assassinations are bad”, and people heavily downvoting them.
Now, okay. I can’t prove that some of the users commenting and cheering on the assassination weren’t, say, bots aimed at trying to create political division and polarization, though I doubt that the Threadiverse is likely the juciest of targets for that sort of thing; not a huge userbase. But my strong suspicion is that we are failing to meet the bar being asked of the right here.
I certainly see where you’re coming from; there’s a difference though.
Charlie Kirk was fighting to overturn the social contract; he didn’t think the country has to accommodate LGB (and especially T) folks, atheists, Muslims, leftists, single women, et cetera. Hell, he loved political violence directed against Democrats.
People who break the social contract should not be surprised when they lose its protection.
Tolerance is not a paradox; it is a social construct. The difference between the assassination of the Minnesota state rep and the assassination of Charlie Kirk is that the Kirk was openly inciting violence against others. He rejected the social construct and was thus no longer protected by it.
You know Charlie Kirk repeatedly said dead children were a small price to pay for the second amendment?
Do you weep for dead Nazis? I don’t.
Yeah, the problem I’m seeing now is that everyone on the right is seeing the left’s reaction. And now they don’t care if the shooter actually was someone from the left or not.
The response they see is all they need to justify any reaction. Of course they’re conveniently forgetting their own response (and Charlie Kirk’s response) to Pelosi’s attacker.
I’m of two minds about celebrating his death, in that I do, but I agree that people cheering vigilante killings is a sign of an unhealthy society. We definitely have an unhealthy society, and it seems like there’s not a functioning justice system for prosecuting people who foment hatred or commit societal murder, but this could lead to an American Reign of Terror, which would obviously be tragic.
That said, there’s a difference between being glad someone’s gone and declaring war on half of the political spectrum. I won’t say it definitely didn’t happen, but I didn’t see anyone suggesting that we take revenge for that senator, even on Lemmy. Certainly not in as widespread a manner as I’m now seeing it for Charlie Kirk.
Lemmykins are incredibly hypocritical.
And of course the right winger regurgitates the old moronic “So much for the tolerant left”.
Read up on the paradox of tolerance.
Swing and a miss.
No right minded person is going to give empathy for a dead Nazi, but look at you go.
Stop feeding the troll. Block it and move on.
Strike two!
I hope you don’t fall off all the way up there bud
Maybe, yeah. But I’m thinking more that it’s that they’re human, and maybe humans on both sides aren’t all that great at holding themselves to that bar. Like, maybe it’s not that Threadiverse users are particularly abnormal as people go, and more that the normal person isn’t very good at refraining from giving “their side” a pass.
But I’m thinking more that it’s that they’re human, and maybe humans on both sides aren’t all that great at holding themselves to that bar.
Oh, you’re absolutely right. Both sides absolutely think “I’m going God’s righteous work” and that the other side is simply “evil”. The hyper-partisanship has been crazy for some time on both sides. And then along comes a sociopath authoritarian (Trump) to just kick it all up to 11…
deleted by creator
State level politicians are less likely to have impact outside their state. Nobody knew Hortman. Kirk was known by virtually everyone. Much bigger impact, much bigger reaction.
2/4 of the people I talked to yesterday had no idea who he was, so not as big to folks who don’t end up seeing the full stage.
I only knew of him as some right wing edgelord troll type until a month ago or so. Never saw him speak.
Given that the reaction from media on the left also shows a very different reaction Kirk vs. Hortman, I think your estimation of the difference between the two is not reflective of what’ll be the final reaction to these two events.
These are national talking heads. They know about all these events.
I was going to note that it’s not known who did it or why, but that doesn’t really matter, does it?
Nope. This shit is even on linkedin. And that includes my braindead countrymen too. They’re blissfully unaware that the melon-headed fuck would’ve called them unclean, stinky, smelly pajeets. Fucking morons.
It never has before so why start now? Any excuse to bully and kill.
So, people on the right are calling for violence against the left? And this is different from any other day ending in Y because…?
This is something a lot of people don’t seem to understand. The right has already been calling for leftists to be dragged to the streets and executed. Celebrating a dead Nazi isn’t going to change that.
In DC they just straight up fabricated some bullshit. People who think kirk getting a lead pill changes anything are delusional.
Let’s get some National Guard troops on the ground in Utah! DC was invaded because a little shit was beaten up by a child. No talk of Utah and an actual killing. Typical.
Utah is a republican-ran state, unlike the ones he’s already deployed troops into
That’s my point, he makes these flimsy reasons for invading but the big ones he just shrugs. Keeps making him look weak. Such a pusillanimous.
Good thing crime can’t happen in red states.
If you’re R in a red state, “crime” doesn’t exist for you. It’s a thing brown people do.
A single and fatal shot fired from the roof of a tall building 200 yards away while Kirk was under a canopy.
Despite strict lockdown procedures being a normal part of every college campus in 2025, the college officially evacuates the campus and the shooter just walks away.
The FBI quickly catches and releases the wrong suspect twice, and the only description they can offer is a man in dark clothing.
I have to admit this does have government conspiracy written all over it, but guess who currently controls the government?
Well, that side has been itching to start their civil war, and they’re absolutely capable of sacrificing one of their own in order to obtain the license they think they need. Stranger things have happened.
Yeah that shot was masterful… conspiracy or not, this was a trained sniper.
Nooot really? I mean I’m not gonna lie I haven’t really looked into the exact shooting here but 200 yards isn’t really that crazy of a shot. If you assume the shooter was aiming for the neck it becomes a bit of a crazy shot, but I bet they were aiming for the head or body.
I’m sure many people who regularly go hunting could land a 200 yard shot. Heck I bet if you gave someone a few weeks of practice in a range they could consistently land 200 yard shots.
I say this from a place where I actually have fired guns before, including things like Ar-15s and an assortment of hunting rifles. They’re just too easy to use.
Not sure it was just the fact they made the shot. They also got away.
For now sure. I doubt the killer will get away with it forever, and even if he does, I won’t be shocked if someday we found out that it was just a hunter, who escaped into the local desert/woods/mountains whatever is near that town.
I have little faith in cops in general to do the right job, and with the amount of confusion, “We got him!” “No we didn’t!” “We got him!” “Also not this guy!” on the scene it’s not astounding that the shooter wasn’t caught immediately, at least to me anyway.
Make no mistake someone is going down for this. I get the sense they have no idea who it was so they are just gonna pick someone up after awhile.
Yeah, this wouldn’t surprise me.
I’d probably aim for the neck to be honest. Gives room above and below for error.
The shooter was very professional and shot him in the upper chest. The bullet ricocheted off his armor plate and into his neck. When the bullet hit the vest, it flattened and the jagged edges cut that main artery instantly and he bled out. The shooter was probably about 70-80 feet above Charlie, with 3,000 people around, a tent probably covering Charlies head, and had to flee the scene and blend in with the crowd running.
This sounds like government job all day long.
Could have been former military? They used a single shot and then eloped with no trace. Very clean and professional.
200 yards is anything but masterful, with even a low-end scope its an easy shot if you’ve spent more than a day or two practicing at a range. The armys qualifying target is a human silhouette set at 300 yards and they are using open iron sights with no magnification or aid whatsoever.
I’m a hunter. I shoot my guns maybe 3-4 times a year (couple days at the range and a couple actually hunting). Like, less than 100 rounds/year between four guns. So I’m not a great marksman, and definitely not a “trained sniper”.
This would be an easy shot for me. At 150 yards, I can shoot a 1/2" grouping, and I have a low-end rifle and scope. You don’t have to account for bullet drop or wind at that distance. Just aim and shoot.
Could have been luck. I agree with you, but I’m just saying that it also could have been luck.
The GOP is already at war with us. They are stealing all of our public funding, they are taking away vaccines that save our lives, they are sending in armed military to keep us in fear, and they have purchased the supreme court to give them whatever they want.
The war started in January when the pedophile got into office.
They’re just mad they got punched back
We don’t even know that. Its completely possible kirk was cheating on his wife with the killer and things did not end amicably.
In most cases of murder the murderer is somebody the victim knew.
Please God, if you exist, let this have been done by a jilted lover. Give us a sign that there’s a light at the end of the tunnel and we’re on track towards the funniest timeline.
I hope it was a diehard Trump supporter.
They always lie and say it was a leftist anyway. The truth is what trump says not what we see with our eyes.
Yeah… I know. I can hope though.
Supposed pictures of the shooter are out now. It’s a white male, who could have figured that one out!?!?!
Retribution against who? We don’t know who did it or if they were associated with any group.
The ‘who’ was decided long before Kirk was shot. Trump has been praying for this day. He doesn’t give a shit about who shot Kirk. Trump can tell his cultists anything and they will believe it. Shit, Trump could have shot Kirk himself, on camera, and his imbecile army would believe it was the ghost of Jimmy Carter if Trump said so. People are saying that this is the spark that will touch off Trump’s retribution. Bitches, his retribution was already well underway.
Shit, Trump could have shot Kirk himself, on camera, and his imbecile army would believe it was the ghost of Jimmy Carter if Trump said so.
This is actually unironically true, and it’s unbelievably sad.
Yep.
The fbi fuck didn’t make a “mistake”.
This was planned
to justify the violence they want to do
against the “left” aka anyone who doesn’t go along with the nazi “maga” project 25 agenda.
I’m pretty sure you know who: whoever they’re scapegoating this month, which is probably us.
But the real reason they want a civil war is that they think they have the upper hand and can establish minority rule.
That’s an impressive amount of exactly-right squeezed into very few words.
They do have the upper hand. They have the military, the supreme court, the congress and the executive. The 2024 election was literally the last chance to stop what’s here and what’s to come.
You’re dumb, the right always know who did what. They are basically all Sherlock Holmes. /s
You think that’s going to stop a determined idiot?
No, the question is purely rhetorical.
Headline: Ammo Found In Charlie Kirk Assassination Engraved With Pro-Trans, Anti-Fascist Ideology
My understanding is that info is bogus. Notice it comes from the WSJ.
Multiple outlets are reporting the same information though.
All of the ones I can find point back to the WSJ as the source. Are there any that have a different source saying that?
Here’s more, but you can just google the keywords “charlie kirk shooter trans” and find more. It’s not fully confirmed by every agency yet, I’ve just seen it reported by multiple sources is all.
Neither of those articles mention the word “trans” at all. It looks more likely that that part’s BS.
Ok now you google “charlie kirk shooter groyper”
Screenshots obtained by The New York Times paint a picture of zero remorse, just meme-fueled mockery as authorities scrambled in a manhunt. “Tyler killed Charlie!!!” one user tagged him hours after the shot; Robinson fired back, “My doppelganger’s trying to get me in trouble.” When someone quipped about snagging the FBI’s $100,000 reward, he shot back, “Only if I get a cut.” And in a sick twist, he joked about ditching a “manifesto and exact copy rifle” lying around— all while monitoring news coverage and mocking the engravings on his ammo that screamed ANTIFA ideology.
This is not a groyper, but again, the truth will continue to come to light. The FBI already found the copy rifle from other sources I’ve seen, but they have everything they need to prosecute.
Hilarious, this has now been proven false, the FBI is now about to contact the furry groups that were coordinating on discord. You should see the chat logs, multiple people knew about it about to happen and were cheering, but the truth will all come to light soon enough.
I don’t think it’s a false flag operation. But this makes it sound like a false flag operation
War against who? Do we have the perpetrator? Do we know their political affiliation? The Trump shooter was a registered Republican. Are they waging war against their own party?
Obviously they don’t need evidence to be horrifically violent shit stains, they’ve managed that well enough so far.
I love how some officials are already calling it a “political assassination” and everyone is talking about “political violence” when there’s not even a suspect.
We don’t know what the shooter’s motives were, but there’s a whole bunch of people who really want this to be political.
I love how some officials are already calling it a “political assassination” and everyone is talking about “political violence” when there’s not even a suspect.
It’s probably not a good idea to beat around the bush with this one. The mango in chief himself is saying this shit (TW: the link is truth dot social).
At about 3 minutes in:
“Radical-left violence has hurt too many innocent people and taken too many lives.”
Followed by bullshit about how great of a person Charlie Kirk was, and then
“Charlie was the best of America and the monster who was attacking him was attacking our whole country”
the monster who was attacking him was attacking our whole country
Almost got it. He wasn’t attacking the “whole” country, just MAGA. I doubt that I would have to worry about my safety with the killer. A MAGA Nazi should, though.
Was he though? Nobody has been arrested and charged yet so for all we know the shooter could be a jilted lover etc. might not even be a “he” for that matter
I’d just woke up and hadn’t read this mornings news yet.
I mean, it’s pretty obviously political. We may not know the exact motives but the victim and timing make it clear that politics is involved in one way or another.
It’s pretty clear it was a political hit. It’s doubtful that his wife hired a hit man sniper to kill him because he was cheating or something.
The shooter could be a sitting MAGA congressman, and they’d still say he was a liberal.
When 9/11 happened, they were scheming in the White House the next day about how they could blame this on Iraq, because that’s who they wanted a war with, even though everyone knew that it was Al Qaeda, led by Osama Bin Laden, and financed by Saudi Arabia.
Guys if we’re not careful they’re going to turn the US Military on blue cities!
…oh wait.
Crime in Utah is out of control. Fucking red state criminal haven, send in the Guard!
We are already living under a vengeful president’s regime. America rejected him once, and he never stopped bitching about it. But you don’t get to reject a narcissist. So he’s taking it out on the people that did so.
All this killing does is give his sycophants a little more fuel on the bonfire of fear they’ve been stoking since 9/11. Who are they declaring war on? We don’t even know who did this. It’s always a fucking war with these whiny piss baby conservatives. It changes nothing.
Reagan declared war on America forty-five fucking years ago.
The business Round Table in 1972 set up the long game to kill the Republic in all but name that led to Reagan and everything else since.
I can excuse a room full of slaughtered schoolchildren, but I draw the line at one dead guy!
Retribution against who, exactly…? Who do they randomly want to lynch in the street? Just the next person they see with hair that’s too long/short in their view? Maybe they want to shoot up some more gay bars…?
Let’s invade Afghanistan once more!
If this is a false flag then the invasion will be of parts of the US. Just as Trump has been rambling on about for weeks now.
So should it have been war when that nightclub happened in Florida? Or maybe all schoolchildren in the country oughta declare war on everyone else.
