The Verge published this spam article about the “best printers of 2024” to demonstrate how terrible Google’s search results are. It now appears as the top non-sponsored post if you search “best printer” on Google.

I love a good, informative troll.

  • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    373
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In my recent experience, it recommends shitty blogs loaded with adverts and keywords. Most annoyingly, it always recommends Fandom’s Wiki above better alternative wiki sites. My DuckDuckGo experience has surprisingly been more useful.

    That aside, my Brother laser printer is still working great. No complaints.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      My DDG searches have been absolute garbage for the past few months. About 75% of the time I have to re-search my keywords on Google to actually get a relevant result.

      It’s bad enough that I’m about to switch back to Google.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not been my experience. I’ve been using DDG for years, and when I first switched I would occasionally have to go find something on Google instead. That slowly fell off as the years went by because going to Google and getting better search results became rarer and rarer. It’s to the point now where I don’t even do it, unless I need to look at something on street view.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          8 months ago

          I second this, this has been my experience exactly. It’s gotten so bad that not only do I not need the Google fallback, but I’m starting to feel like the DDG results are better than the Google ones in the first place.

          • Opisek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Better than Google now, but still not better than Google back then. It my experience at least.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        It depends on what your searching. For me programming questions are way better on google.

        Also searching obvious questions like a country’s population, google still does its job there too.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I deleted their app and moved search engines, they got shit quick. So bad at their main usp. I was constantly fed hyper local results, local even with location off. And dont get me started on how bad it was for porn.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Try Startpage. I have just started using it so I can’t tell you how it compares. I also need to look up who owns it. But I have been told it has the same privacy qualities of DDG.

        • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I used to like it, but there was one incident where it fed me links to phishing sites. Like all the results were malicious. I suspect they had an internal breach or the session was somehow hijacked. That was years ago, but it made me wary. It’s usually okay.

          • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Good to know I haven’t fully switched yet. I am definitely going to look more closely at its parents company and where it has servers.

        • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Funny. I primarily used Startpage for the last few years, but have had increasing problems with them providing bad/irrelevant results and frequently straight-up blocking my IP or requiring completion of a CAPTCHA before providing results. I switched to DDG, which has been working pretty well, and seems much better to me than it had when trying it a few years ago.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      It has a partnership with bing. So sadly now it is mostly a bing clone. I have been using DDG for a decade. I noticed a distinct drop in search quality after the bing partnership.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I’m looking up something general, like some actor or tv show, then DDG is perfect. If im troubleshooting some weird software issue then i find it doesnt always list as many results, as if it hasnt indexed as many sites.

      DDG at least now means I can search random shit without it suddenly being inserted into my social media algorithms like some kind of psychological torture.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh my god the Fandom wiki for minecraft uses the same little tab icon as the actual minecraft wiki but it has a fucking “are you an adult or child” popup EVERY SINGLE TIME a page loads

      I hate it so much

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Use breezewiki extension. Redirects fandom articles to a frontend that removes their bullshit and replaces fandom with independant wikis when possible.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you have any tips or tricks for DDG please do share! I’m definitely getting better overall results there, but the local ones can still be a bit rough.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I found that Qwant gives decent results in my native non English language, results similar in quality to Google, but way better than DDG which often just gives English results.

    • rf_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      What are better alternatives to fandom? I see the incumbents name get repeated more often than the alternative unfortunately.

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        The problem is that fandom tends to vacuum up and supersede the smaller wikis, and the SEO bullshit just makes it happen even faster. The answer to your question unfortunately is “it depends on the game/show/fandom”.

    • UckyBon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      DDG tries very hard to push Amazon and Ebay to me. They’re not even available in my country 😅

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That seems like a bug assuming you have your region selected/enabled? I’d report it to DDG.

        • UckyBon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I don’t know why they would need my location/region. They’re already trying too hard to advertise stuff to me. Isn’t the internet like, international? Other search engines I never get that Ebay/Amazon stuff, it’s a DDG feature for whatever IP I get.

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Strange how Google became the default search engine back in the day because they were so good at filtering out the dumb websites that just spam search terms all over the page.

    They’ve regressed and become Yahoo

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not sure if you read the recent article or not, but the guy responsible for this enshittification came from Yahoo, where he applied the same policies. So you’re more literally correct than you may think

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Except there isn’t much of a Google stealing their thunder. Bing isn’t better. DDG isn’t better.

      • Kyouki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 months ago

        Personally really like ddg over it though. Only gotta be more precise with keywording for finding what you need.

        • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I use DDG but i do wonder what i dont see sometimes.
          I often google a specific brand of components at work and even with the exact brand and/or part number in the search it sometimes doesnt turn up any results (say 5-7 random unrelated webpages) and thats it. Then i put the same search in google and bam, top result.

          • Kyouki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s what I said - the right key wording. It’s pretty strict, whereas Google’s results sometimes are a tiny bit more loose understanding of what you roughly mean. Though not always, and on Google I found myself often just adding “Reddit” for specifics. Though really really depends on what you search.

            For me DDG offers a lot more than just search results, the bangs and features like I added a script to directly port my questions to some AI is really useful.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Quotes help. So "model" "part number" since those force them to be in the results. DDG likes to ignore parts of your query to get more results.

                • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  “DDG likes to ignore parts of your query to get more results.”

                  Wow sounds extremely useful and like a feature I want. I love searching for something specific and they are like “did you mean totally unrelated thing?”

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Reddit used to be better, but now any time you search for advice on good _____ to buy, the only answers you can find are “use the search function, this question has been answered already”

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Are they actually recommending the Reddit search function? We shit on their internal search function for over a decade, and told people to just use Google and site:Reddit in the search.

        • duffman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          That was my issue with old school SymForums. I don’t see that so much on reddit.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        To be fair when Google solved SEO spam in 1999, thanks to pagerank, it was no small feat. The others were bad not because they abused ads but because they didn’t know how to deal with cheating webmasters.

        • sanguinet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve found DDG to be adequate for the majority of things I search, but when I need something specific or with some nuance, it fails miserably. For that reason I still use Google when I do stuff for work, or when I do troubleshooting. For my daily usage DDG is just fine, though.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think it takes a while for that kind of competitor to emerge and gain enough traction to become a genuine alternative option. The primary option everyone long since adopted kinda has to suck for a while :/

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          It also is going to take another leap in algorithm.

          It was a hard problem to solve when Google’s founders cracked it, but it’s an even harder problem to solve now that you have state of the art spam bots filling the Internet full of shit that looks like it was composed by humans.

          If someone cracks how to figure out whether something is ai or not (for real, not the fake solutions we have now) and adds that to a good search algorithm and filters the fake shit by default, they will have a hell of a product on their hands.

          • Hypx@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m of the opinion that it will require human interaction to fix this. It can’t be purely solved via algorithms.

            What people don’t realize is that the original Google search algorithm, PageRank, effectively looks at how real humans interacted with the websites they were indexing. Only websites referenced by other websites were being considered by Google’s search engine. And at the time, that meant real human beings were making those links. This gave them a real advantage over other, purely algorithmic search engines.

            Something like this will have to be recreated. We will have to figure out a way of prioritizing search results that real human beings have found to be useful.

        • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m almost convinced that Kagi comments on Lemmy are spam. Please prove me wrong:

          Has anyone here tried Kagi because of a recommendation from here and, well, actually found it better than the rest?

          • jmanes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I didn’t get recommended it here, but elsewhere. I ended up paying for a years worth last year and yeah I like it better than pretty much everything else. There is still a rare occasion that I need to use Google, but that is maybe once a week whereas with DuckDuckGo it was multiple times per-day.

          • im sorry i broke the code@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I did lol, why the hell would I recommend it otherwise?

            It’s a search engine, so to be better than the others it’s obvious it would have to return better results than the usual ad-based crap — and it does. There is a free trial and you can check out if it’s worth it for you btw

            It has quite a lot of QoL features for searches, but their main one — searching — is worth the cost; if you do a search once in a blue moon or append “Reddit” at the end of a query, it’s not imo since any search engine is “good enough” for that. If you instead actually do a search without having a specific website in mind, it’s good. You can also filter out the quora and other shitty websites results, which is nice

            • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I did lol, why the hell would I recommend it otherwise?

              Not directly saying that you’re doing this, but c’mon, you know the answer. Why would anyone recommend a paid product?

              There is a free trial and you can check out if it’s worth it for you btw

              Nice! I didn’t know there was a trial. Good to know.

              You can also filter out the quora and other shitty websites results, which is nice

              Oh, now we’re talking!! That’s very cool.

      • kronisk @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m starting to feel like a shill because I say this so often, but Kagi is the only one I’ve found that actually does the job anymore. To me a search engine that works is worth the small cost each month, but unfortunately I don’t see paying for search becoming mainstream anytime soon.

        • GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I was sceptical at first too, but a not-paid-for search engine will either have ads, paid results or try to monetize the search data in some way. I feel it helps me find what I need, better than the alternatives I tried, and I like the features and configuration options it has.

  • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The demise of google search is by design. https://www.techspot.com/news/102765-who-prabhakar-raghavan-why-accused-killing-google-search.html TL;DR. Management noted that search revenue was not growing, so the head of google search Prabhakar Raghavan made it worse so you have to click more to get what you want. More clicks = more money = growth = happy investors = enshitification. Fuck you Prabhakar Raghavan.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Zitron, though, describes him as “a computer scientist class traitor who sided with the management consultancy sect.”

      Based

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really need to go through my old files and find The Screenshot from around 1999-2000. Basically, I searched for something in AltaVista and got back a page that was super chock full of ads and “portal crud”. …and a tiny little text that you really had to squint for, somewhere in the middle, that said there were no search results, actually. I got the strong impression that this search engine was fucked.

    Sometimes Google’s results are kind of starting to look like the same, except the crud is in the actual results. Which is something Google could do something about. I mean, they used to care about SEO spam.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There was an article about that recently. Apparently Marketing won the battle for control over Google Search. So it’s no longer focused on quality of product.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Google has also gotten lazy. Their first dozen or so searches are either YouTube or Reddit results. (And that’s only when they want to pretend they’re a search engine).

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    From the article…

    Don’t feel compelled to do it; my only ask is that you make this article go viral by sharing it in faux-outrage that the EIC of The Verge has published an article partially generated by AI, because after the buttons I am going to include a bunch of AI-generated copy from Google’s Gemini in order to pad this thing out.

    I have to admit, it was an interesting read, not quite like anything I’ve ever read before, for a review.

    I honestly can’t tell if this is just some genius way of sliding in some AI generated content into a review and getting it to pass our review, or just an editor-in-chief really frustrated with Google’s search algorithm paying attention to manipulation by others, so trying to really get their stuff out there for us to see.

    Either way, it’s definitely worth the read.

    As far as Brother printers go, I own an all-in-one laser that’s over a decade old, and it’s still going strong. And it actually works with Linux to boot. I do hate though that they do some squirrely stuff to try to get you to buy a new toner cartridge early, but if you mask sensors and such, then an existing toner will work forever.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are very few printers that don’t work with Linux. Linux has drivers to interface with most of them through whatever means you like, right in the kernel.

      That’s one of the reasons my android phone (Linux kernel, remember) is better at finding and queuing up prints on a network printer than any windows machine I’ve ever used.

      I just hit share on a document, choose print… And then it just works.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There are very few printers that don’t work with Linux.

        I was speaking with the all-in-one types, that includes scanners and fax machines.

        Most printer companies don’t make their drivers work well with Linux (or at the very least used to not), and even Brother was in that same boat early on.

        But as of late they’re much better, so when you run a Brother installer for the drivers it just installs and works now, where in the past you had to worry about 32 bit versus 64 bit libraries in the OS and how they interact with the brother drivers, etc., etc.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I have an MFC-9340 and have also run into this problem. The drivers available in cups allow me to either print two-sided in b&w, or print single-sided in color (at least for the drivers that work at all with the printer). I finally broke down and installed the binary from Brother to get it working fully, but it’s annoying that I can’t just use a generic driver with this printer.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      they do some squirrely stuff to try to get you to buy a new toner cartridge early

      My Brother is newer than yours (the cheapest one I could get that prints on both sides of the paper), and has a setting to toggle how it behaves when toner is low.

      The default is to pause printing until you replace the toner - honestly that’s not entirely wrong. Having the printer run out of toner half way through an important print job could be a disaster.

      The alternative mode is to just show a “low toner” warning badge whenever you print a document. That’s what I use, but I also check if it printed properly before closing the document which a lot of people don’t do. It looks like this:

      As far as I know it’s just a simple counter - how many pages have you printed since it was replaced. Obviously that’s never going to be particularly accurate.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Having the printer run out of toner half way through an important print job could be a disaster.

        What, like the printer would explode or something similar kind of disaster?

        Or the kind of where the printout doesn’t come out well, and you put a new cartridge in, and then you reprint and it looks fine, type of disaster?

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • NateSwift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          He’s the one that would be doing the review. It isn’t about trying to “sneak in” AI content

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            8 months ago

            It isn’t about trying to “sneak in” AI content

            But he says right in the article that he’s including AI content at the bottom of the article, to pad it out.

            an article partially generated by AI, because after the buttons I am going to include a bunch of AI-generated copy from Google’s Gemini in order to pad this thing out.

            My point is if he’s being honest and that’s the true reason, or just being sneaky and trying to slip in AI content into a human written article.

            Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well if he announces it, I’m not sure how it’s being sneaky and slipping it in. But either way, what would that achieve?

                • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Nilay Patel - the editor in chief is anti-AI especially when it comes to article content. He doesn’t allow anyone at the company to use generated content except when they are writing an article about AI and even then only to demonstrate a point - e.g. “here’s a comparison of two LLMs with the same prompt”. It was also his decision to stop AI’s from crawling any content on their website.

                  He used AI to pad the article because that’s what real spam articles do. It had nothing to do with acceptance.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      One of my housemates has a brother printer and I was testing some stuff out on LMDE and noticed it was available to print to. No searching for it or driver to be installed or anything. I don’t actually need to print but that’s pretty cool.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        One of my housemates has a brother printer and I was testing some stuff out on LMDE and noticed it was available to print to. No searching for it or driver to be installed or anything. I don’t actually need to print but that’s pretty cool.

        People keep missing that I’m talking about a all-in-one, and not just a simple printer-only.

        I never had a problem with the printing part of the all-in-one printer, but the scanning and faxing stuff required the Brother driver support, and that wad not natively supported, or were supposed to be supported but it didn’t work well, or at all. There were issues with 32-bit versus 62-bit libraries, etc.

        Took years to get to a point where the brother drivers would just install and everything would work right. And not everything ever worked right from native Linux.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The comment I replied to didn’t mention you had any issues. I just wanted to mention something I had noticed that I thought was cool. Not trying to get into a debate about it.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    8 months ago

    Google used to list sites with backlinks highly, it was their first ever search algorithm iirc. Once people learned you could game that by planting useless backlinks, Google realised it was a bad idea.

    Somehow, they’ve reinvented this all over again with parasite SEO that fundamentally works the same way. All they did was add some “domain ranking”. Now, unreliable-but-popular sites coughredditcough will always score highly regardless of quality, because Google deemed them superior.

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 months ago

      reddit is a very good search resource though because it has 15 years of real people giving real information. I imagine reddit from here on out will be going hard on the enshitification train so it’s value as a search resource will rapidly decline.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        8 months ago

        Anything post-2022, and probably post-2020, is suspect on Reddit because it became abundantly clear how steerable it was and how easy to generate sales as long as you didn’t do anything too “suspicious”. Current ‘ad guides’ tell advertisers not to link things because just saying the name reads as more authentic.

        Before that it was legitimately people discussing, e.g., the best flashlight for x-y-z purposes. But a decent amount of old stuff has been gutted by people deleting their posts/accounts.

          • TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Politics on Reddit has always been shit. Product reviews and recommendations were good. How-to’s and troubleshootings that don’t fit on stackoverflow are still good.

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    With the prevalence of reddit google was of the most useful tools I’ve seen in my 40 years on earth. Only to go to absolute shit in the last 2-3 years.

  • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 months ago

    Best breadcrumb from article:

    I wanted to understand: what kind of human spends their days exploiting our dumbest impulses for traffic and profit? Who the hell are these [SEO/Google] people making money off of everyone else’s misery?

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t get ads in general. They don’t work. I never bought something that got presented to me from an ad because I know ads are deliberately lying to me, so the product they show is the first product I don’t consider purchasing.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Missing the days of Consumer Reports. I think the velocity of new products is too high for them to be relevant for more than a few months once they release a report anymore.

    • CaptSneeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still sign up with them when I’m researching bigger, or long-lasting, purchases. Cars, washing machine, and that sort of thing. I’m always a little annoyed at the price, but the content is SO MUCH better than any other online review source that I’m always happy with my decision in the end. Reddit comments are probably second, but I’ve found those to be littered with what seem to me to be suspiciously positive reviews for items that are not significantly better than their competition. I feel like I need to dial up my critical nature to 10 to fight against the echo chamber and/or the covert advertising.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I saw a website that was selling Reddit bot services to companies that want to review their products. They would just send a swarm of bad accounts in there and make nice comments. Even replying to their own comments.

        After that I stopped trusting almost every Reddit review (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

        *Edit: meant to say bot accounts but leaving it

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      And Wirecutter used to be good but they will occasionally point out how highly rated something is, and cross checking against falespot et al indicates a lot of fake reviews.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sigh. So many things in the world are like this. It’s not a bad idea, in theory, to favor more recent pages in search results. Finding 4 year old information is often not what you want. But in practice, when everyone knows this bias exists, they just fiddle with their pages daily to try to fool the algorithm. It must be aggravating to be Google, because as smart as they are, the entire world is engaged in an unending and ruthless quest to game their results for personal gain.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yup, and that’s why we shouldn’t have one dominant search engine, but a few that all do things differently. That way gaming the system is a lot more difficult. But I guess that’s not the world we live in, because everyone wants to use “the best,” which means “the best” will eventually degrade due to everyone gaming it.

  • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 months ago

    This was actually a very funny read.

    Also yes, Brother printers are the best because they actually work.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The next good search engine will unironically be a Microsoft chatbot of some kind

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      You mean current Bing co-pilot?

      Bing has gotten so much worse in the last 5 years, it’s not even better than google anymore

      Search results aside, why can I no longer copy the result from Bing’s calculator anymore

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I only ever knew Bing as being good for porn. Maybe a porn aficionado can confirm if it still is

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah Bing used to be lagging behind Google on censorship so you could find shit that Google wanted to hide once. Now, it all sucks.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Their video pages gives way fewer results than before

          Just did a test searching “porn” and scrolled for 3 seconds before reaching the end of the results

          If I do a search though I can get the same 3 results for 20 pages before finding a new one

  • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    yes i also noticed google search is absolute trash lately. so i switched to searx and life is better. i only go to google for street view and reverse image search now.