• LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    604
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Now watch the Republican Party of “Law and Order”nominate a convicted felon to be the next president

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      248
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      You have to understand that this isn’t ironic to them. To them, this was not a legitimate trial and trumped up charges, if you’ll pardon the pun.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        113
        ·
        6 months ago

        The guy behind me that watches fox news all day because “he needs something to help him focus” immediately started spouting fox talking points as soon as the verdict was read. My younger coworkers were like, “no way, that’s crazy” to all his bs. I just had to say, “no that’s not true. I read the jury instructions and they don’t say that.” He moved onto insisting there was no evidence and Cohen perjured himself and at that point I was already on my way out the door.

        He’s Gen x, a landlord, new York exile, classic gabagool. Ugh.

          • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Gen X here too, Lock him up!

            I think most of GenX were just crushed by the boomers, you just have to listen to GenX music to see how fatalistic and powerless they were. When Millenials came around, they started to have enough distance to the boomers to do their own thing. And i really have the highest of hopes for GenZ and beyond.

            • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Gen X came right after the Baby Boomers, just as Millennials didn’t run society for Zoomers, neither did Boomers run it for X’ers.

              So no, you weren’t overshadowed and made helpless by them, many of you outright relate with them just the same as I would a Zoomer.

              Gen X was the last generation to get a chance at the dream life of a family, a house, and a career. They’re institutionalised.

                • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  21
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You’re right, 30 year old boomers were ruining your life at the time, not the 70 year old politicians etc.

                  I’ll tell you about my life, every Gen X I’ve ever met is closer to a Boomer than a Millenial in their mindset. Even the lefter ones who went and volunteered in some developing country and did all pretend make the world better shit.

        • acetanilide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Last week I had to remind my parents that FBI agents are cops and pretty much always are authorized to use deadly force…

          • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            I asked my right wing mother if she had heard the news. She asked me if I thought the gop was finally going to pick another candidate. I like my mother.

        • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m Gen X, former New Yorker…and well, he probably is a gabagool. He is representative of all of us…too many, but not all.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        86
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe the phrase “trumped up charges” will have new meaning after today

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Right, there can’t be a legitimate trial because everything is “politicized” and “a witch hunt”.

          Weird how they can’t get DAs to bring charges against Hillary or Hunter though.

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t forget their party of “family values” and “religious morals” candidate who slept with a porn star while his wife was recovering from giving birth to their child

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You know, on balance though, I think I’m glad that being a convicted felon doesn’t preclude one from being elected president. I’ve gone back and forth on it a lot, but I think it is for the best.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Can you elaborate? My knee-jerk reaction is to be against it, but I haven’t thought about it a whole lot and I’d be interested to know why you have decided on the opposite.

        • qantravon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          6 months ago

          It means if there was an actual politically motivated prosecution, that wouldn’t stop someone from winning. ie. If Trump had managed to make some fake charge against Biden stick in 2020, if the people still wanted Biden to be president, he could be.

          • tburkhol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think it’s a powerful statement that - despite all the structural checks & balances and systems of appeal - we consider political charges and kangaroo courts a realistic possibility. It’s not just Alito’s flags - this is a long simmering loss of faith.

            • proudblond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Having been a plaintiff in a civil case, with thankfully only money on the line, it was a real eye opener for me of how little the jurors actually get to see, and how much power a single judge has (read: a LOT). It really made me reflect on how absolutely awful and terrifying it must be to have your freedom on the line, and to witness something like I did that felt horrifyingly unfair, and know you could go to jail for it. And I know it happens, a lot, and disproportionately to black and brown folk no less.

              • tburkhol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I wonder if that is part of it. As the country has gotten less white, we hear (or maybe care) more about bias-induced injustice, and it’s harder for the declining majority to be complacent when “blame the Black guy” gets a court to give you what you want. Local, elected judges have always been a partisan nightmare, but I feel like it’s really the last 10 years, since they eliminated the filibuster for federal judges, and especially since 2017 for SCOTUS, that national courts have lost credibility.

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Let us know how you get from “politically motivated prosecution” to 12 jurors (some of which are Trump supporters) finding guilt. Convicted felons by jury trial should not be public servants and most state Constitutions clearly state that (Florida for example).

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            if there was an actual politically motivated prosecution

            Which is, of course, the unsubstantiated claim that Trump has been making.

            Despite this entire trial not being under the jurisdiction or control of his political rival.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          In this case it seems easy to be against it because a widely unpopular candidate is the one being prosecuted.

          However, allowing felons to run for office precludes the ability for the government to silence political dissidents by making up laws/falsifying evidence that they can be imprisoned for.

          The risk of a Trump presidency is still on the table, but the US can avoid situations like what happened to Navalny in Russia as well.

          In the 1920 election, Eugene Debs campaigned as the socialist nominee for president from prison, having been imprisoned for advocating draft dodging. That is the sort of candidate I would still support, even from behind bars.

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just because you’re a felon doesn’t mean you’re not a citizen and part of the country. As such, you should be able to partake in democracy in all possible ways as well.

          I really dislike this punitive mindset of completely ruining someone’s life for being convicted of a crime. People make mistakes, but we don’t want to exclude them from society, we want to reform them and bring them back in. So yeah, I think, even excluding all this political bs, that no person should have their right to vote or run taken from them.

          • proudblond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh yeah, I agree with you. I certainly think felons should have a vote. Hadn’t really occurred to me to include running for office in the same category.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    427
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    To find out what rules he broke for each guilty verdict, search “trump rule 34”

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    411
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Count #1: Guilty

    Count #2: Guilty

    Count #3: Guilty

    Count #4: Guilty

    Count #5: Guilty

    Count #6: Guilty

    Count #7: Guilty

    Count #8: Guilty

    Count #9: Guilty

    Count #10: Guilty

    Count #11: Guilty

    Count #12: Guilty

    Count #13: Guilty

    Count #14: Guilty

    Count #15: Guilty

    Count #16: Guilty

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    385
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    When the GOP sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are convicted felons.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    289
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    An earlier article said the Trump team was hoping for a hung jury.

    Guilty all 34 counts.

    Certainly was a hung jury. Hung like a horse!

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      131
      ·
      6 months ago

      In NY, even if he’s sentenced to prison, it’s up to the judge’s discretion whether he has to report to prison while awaiting appeal…and we all know he’s going to appeal.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            We’ll see on July 11th, but most likely it’s going to be some symbolic fine or gesture, but we’re not seeing this geriatric, senile old man who is also a former president, go to prison, where he would likely die as the country faces massive terrorist attacks and uprisings of dumbasses with deadly weapons, no judge in the country would do that no matter their political leaning if they at all took their job seriously and didn’t want to have entire chapters written about them in the coming history books.

            House arrest may be an option but that would be seen as a political attack because it would stop him from campaigning and that would go straight to supreme court, which we know how that would turn out. Judges know all this, their hands are pretty much tied.

            edit: I can’t understand this internet knee-jerk response system that plagued reddit as well as here where people will just downvote a comment to oblivion if they don’t like the possible reality it presents. You’re not exercising your critical thinking here, you’re making yourself dumber by not considering things you don’t like.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              6 months ago

              If your hands are tied by the corruption of others, make them do the corruption, don’t just preemptively do it for them.

            • ulkesh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              Sorry but if they have a spine, their hands are most definitely not tied. That’s the problem with the system as it relates to this piece of shit. Everyone makes excuses.

              Fuck that. It’s time to show that the rule of law matters no matter who the fuck you are. Maybe if he’s made an example of, Presidents will think twice before breaking the law.

              But, I agree that the GOP, probably this judge, the Supreme Court, and Congress — none of them have a spine.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Fuck that. It’s time to show that the rule of law matters no matter who the fuck you are. Maybe if he’s made an example of, Presidents will think twice before breaking the law.

                Okay I’m not against this and never said I was, I’m simply saying that this outcome where Trump goes to prison isn’t going to happen and you’re going to have to deal with it. Everyone is. That’s all. You can’t make this happen, our collective voice will not make this happen. People are getting some weird sense of unrealistic entitlement about this verdict.

                The world doesn’t work the way we want and if we could all just get that through our skulls we would make better political choices and actually start focusing on what matters which is community action and organization in your local communities and districts, the places that support, prop-up and create the political theater that we wish would go away.

                • ulkesh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The world is what we allow it to be made as. You are, of course, free to be as defeatist about this as you want. Doesn’t at all mean I can’t want or expect him to sit in prison.

                  And since when is expecting just consequences considered entitlement?

                  I, for one, will not abide Trump, Fox News, or any other propaganda machine to eat away at the rule of law just because they or others might think something is unrealistic or unfair. He is guilty of breaking laws — of this and most likely much much more, as the future and trials will ideally prove. It’s long past time he pays for it.

            • suction@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Why are we so sure that Trump supporters are going to start major terrorist attacks and riots etc? Sure there will be some stragglers here and there but in general they are too stupid and too lazy to even start organising. If January 6th would have been prepared correctly on side of the police force, ie actual riot police present instead of beat cops and doormen, it would have been over in 10 minutes. If they were truly able to start shit, yesterday’s conviction should have triggered them already. It really shouldn’t keep Trump out of jail when the fear is that a Walmart fat guy in camo might shoot up a Starbucks.

              • eggmasterflex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Everyone likes to circlejerk about revolution or whatever, but for 99.9% of people in developed countries, life is too good to put it on the line.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m saying that people in positions of leadership, from judges to attorneys are not going to want to take that chance and be the ones responsible on even the remote chance that there’s any kind of civil unrest. This is regardless of the actual chances of anything happening, it’s about liability not probability.

                • suction@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I don’t understand what you mean. They wouldn’t be liable or responsible if they just did their job.

                  They aren’t the ones who would instruct people to riot or do terrorism, which would make them liable.

                  To construct a liability or responsibility out of their duty is what the fascist side would try to do, so I have to assume you’re one of them?

                  So far I am not under the impression that the government would not do what needs to be done. I think it’s obvious that 99% of Trump supporters are just talk, and mainly talk in anonymity on the internet.

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              and didn’t want to have entire chapters written about them in the coming history books

              So what you’re saying is he’s definitely going to prison.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          I really wonder if the judge will call out Trumps behavior, the multiple gag order violations, etc. and use all that to justify a harsher sentence. One can only hope…

        • dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          68
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Remember when Clinton lost the election because the FBI didn’t find anything on her assistant’s laptop?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            77
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean she could have spent a weekend in Michigan. That was an unforced error.

            She could have addressed her relationship with Goldman Sachs, and all the other banks that fucked over the entirety of the American people during the housing crisis that she earned millions upon millions giving “speeches” to.

            She could have made an olive branch to the progressive caucus.

            She could have not said “Sit down and shut up” to BLM activists.

            There are a lot of things she could have done.

            • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              32
              ·
              6 months ago

              Or, like, hear me out, the Democrats could have not nominated her and nominated someone who isn’t strongly disliked by both sides.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                6 months ago

                I think she would’ve won regardless of everything else, but it would’ve been closer. Really the mistake from the primaries is that she didn’t really try to incorporate any of Bernie’s ideas into her platform, or even work with him at all. She treated him as an opponent and obstacle, not as a rival and peer.

                This is where Biden was successful however – he didn’t dismiss Bernie nor his platform ideas. He did incorporate some into presidency, most obviously the climate change policies and student debt forgiveness where possible.

                And where I sincerely believe this difference came down to – Biden was friendly to Bernie in the Senate and made an effort to be friendly colleagues, if not work friends. Clinton didn’t. It shows the power of cooperation allying together with progressives, instead of allying together with “moderate” Republicans.

                • dudinax@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Maybe, but it happened right before the election. I observed noticeable shift in attitude. That’s not good evidence, I know, but Clinton’s polls which had been steady, took a 3% dip at the time and stayed down through election day.

                  People talked about the polls being off compared to the election, but the election matched the post-Comey polls pretty well. It’s only the polls that mixed pre-Comey data that were too high for Clinton.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              There were a lot of factors at play in 2016, and the margin was tiny. She had a lot of factors under her control that could’ve led to victory.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Voters decided against her for mishandling classified documents, right? So these same voters, who think things through with consistency and integrity, will decide against someone who stole boxes of documents and got CIA agents killed selling state secrets to Russia, right?

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Trying to run for president while having two X chromosomes was a massive error on her part as well.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Everyone talks about his base as an unmoving monolith. But to get elected, he needs more than his base. He needs the fence sitters. Many of these people may be very ill informed about all the corruption in his original administration and his business dealings. This result will make a big difference to them because it’s simple to understand. He’s a convicted felon.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m making a called shot of a drop into the 40’s for July’s polling.

        He wont’ drop below 25%, ever. That’s his core. They may never support another candidate again.

        However, dropping to high 30’s low 40’s only puts Trump back to par with Biden. Hardly a W, but at lease Biden would be back in the running.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean it in a “There are still people who think gamestop is going to be a billion dollar stock” manner.

            See: https://lemmy.world/c/gamestopstock

            Cult/ Cargo cult level “They will never support another candidate again” is what I mean. They’ll write him in. They’ll have wild conspiracy theories. Not need to push. It will happen it on its own.

            I would guess its around 25-30% of Republican voters. Its the conspiracy theory mind-set cutting backwards against those that seed it. There is no undoing this.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              If Donald could please just die and they continue writing in his name for all future votes that would be great. They are the most ignorant and racist people within a party wholly committed to cultivating ignorant and racist voters.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Thats what I’m conjecturing. This is the cohort that thought JFK was going to show up to some event or something a few months ago.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  A few months ago? Jesus Christ, I remember that dumb shit from the numerology crew and I had kinda lost track of them for a couple of years. This country would be so much better if they would throw their ballots in the trash. Here’s hoping.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        I suspect some people will mental gymnastics themselves into thinking this isn’t a serious crime, and stipulating an abstract ‘serious crime’ yields more extreme results than we’ll see as a result of this verdict.

        But a few percentage point swing in a few key states is enough to ensure a Biden victory, so it may be enough.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The fact of the matter is for a lot of white Americans it’s either support the republican nominee or those scary minorities will take over. To them, a white criminal is preferable to what they see as guliable saps at best or race traitors at worst.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The end of the article after discussing the failure of the impeachment of Clinton to actually change polls despite a difference in the hypothetical poll question before it occurred:

        “It’s possible for people to say a conviction would change their minds, but when/if [a conviction] happens, it’s possible (even likely) that it won’t matter at all."

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think “all 34 counts” is more meaningful than 33 out 34 or anything less.

      Any truly room temperature IQ folks out there can maybe see the light. Maybe.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or they see it as “See? The courts are obviously corrupted. Not even one count was innocent? There’s no way he committed THAT much crime.”

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Anecdotal… we drove through rural Ohio a few weeks ago. In several hours of travel we only saw ONE trump sign. The same place in 2016 or 2020 would have been full of them. Regardless of the impact of this, the enthusiasm is dead. There might be “maga guys” on Twitter but they’re largely disengaged in real life.

      • Daze@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Can confirm the other way around; Saw one sign in all of Iowa. None in Nebraska. It was pleasant aside from all the Jesus/Abortion signage lol

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I rode the MABDR last week which for me involves traveling through a wide swath of rural Pennsylvania. Nearly all of the Trump paraphernalia is gone from people’s yards. I used to see hundreds of Trump signs and flags, confederate flags, the works. Now there are only a few dedicated nutters left. They know who they are.

          1. The Stan Clark Military Books store on 30 west of Gettysburg that has a massive “Don’t Blame Us, We Voted For Trump/Pence” sign (notably, still including Pence!) right out front of their business. Here it is on Street View. As an extra slap in the face, this is right on the edge of the Gettysburg battlefield and memorial.
          2. The twerp in Biglerville who has his tiny front yard fenced off with chicken wire and used to have a life sized Trump mannequin in his lawn dressed up in propaganda T-shirts all the time. I thought for sure he moved since all was subdued there for a few months last year, but now he’s got all kinds of Trump and alt-right flags all over his lawn and porch. His place was looking comparatively tame last year.
          3. The marquee on what I assume is the old bank building in Red Lion which has a marquee on it that reads “If Biden is the answer, how stupid was the question?” Street View link here.. The sides of it read “Frauds of 2020” and “Pause for enlightenment.”
          4. The guy on 896 just south of Ninepoints with the giant “Trump Not Bought Or Sold” sign (except by the Russians, of course). He has another massive sign next to it with some anti-Biden thing on it but I can’t remember what it says offhand. Alas, his Street View photo was apparently taken in 2019 which was before the signs went up.

          The remainder of these dillweeds seem to be… curiously silent compared to previously. It’s kind of weird.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you sneak into their safe spaces online you can definitely tell they are unmotivated compared to 4-8 years ago.

        They liked Trump because he bullied others publicly. They don’t want to side with the guy currently getting bullied, goes against their survival instinct.

      • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        All the people in my development that had them up still have the signs from 2020 going strong… It’s still pretty split from talking with neighbors. One person near me is in business selling heavy equipment and they’re looking forward to trump because they feel they sell more equipment when republicans are in office. I guess that’s a viewpoint… For sure.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wait… But Biden passed a massive infrastructure law. There’s a lot of people who could feel like he didn’t really do anything to improve their economic outlook, but a guy who sells heavy equipment shouldn’t be one of them.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      My gut feeling is there’s nothing in this world that will sway his core supporters. Those rabid mouth-breathing dumbass kool-aid drinking dipshits would disown their own children if they thought one of them voted for a democrat.

      However, I think it could sway a lot of swing voters away from Trump. In American elections for POTUS, swing voters are extremely important.

      Unfortunately, Biden is fucking up so bad on foreign policy (Gaza) that will lose Biden a lot of swing voters, too. Still anybody’s race is my guess.

      This is just all my gut. It’s hard to trust polls anymore.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Anyone who gives a shit about Gaza probably should try to ensure the country doesn’t elect a Muslim Ban guy who wants to accelerate the genocide and deport anyone protesting it.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fuck off to Nick Fuentes then.

        FYI: Those leftists are right wing trolls under a false flag, exactly like those “Biden takes 100% blame for Israel’s every action” guys. They come from /pol and Telegram.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      This matters to intelligent, educated, and critically-thinking people. So, no, it doesn’t matter to his sycophants.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Doubt it, but I don’t care. They are basically a cult at this point, no rational thought.

      This matters to everyone else. And it could keep him from being president again.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      It emboldens his supporters because they believe the “deep state”, “witch hunt”, “Democrats paid off the jury” etc according to social media now.

      I could see Biden dropping out of the debate also saying “I don’t debate felons”.

      • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        6 months ago

        I doubt Biden would use this as an excuse to drop out of the debate. His campaign thinks the debate will help him more than Trump, and they’re probably right. Outside of his diehard supporters and people keeping up with politics, most voters haven’t heard Trump speak at length since the end of his presidency. The debate is an opportunity to remind them how fucking weird he is.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe his core supporters, but past elections have shown that he can’t win the popular vote. He is dependent on swing states where there are more people on the fence, and this might be enough.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think a lot of his supporters are mostly burnt out on him. Even the hardliners are really just in this for the Wrestlemania storyline quality and this guy isn’t entertaining anymore, he just has legal bullshit around him, he says the same catchphrases all the time, he’s looking older and more haggard than we’ve ever seen, and conservatives are super fixated on superficial appearances.

      I don’t think we’re “safe” by any means, but I think a lot of people are going to fall off and it might make a large difference.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wish you were right. I live in Trumpistan and this will only make people like him more. The only way we can stop this madness is actually have him in an actual jail. Even then I’m not so sure.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          They can only vote once. At least until Trump wins because from then on we’ll have elections Russia-style.

    • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think this will only strengthen his core supporters because they’ll view him as a martyr. It might push away some people on the fence. But I think the martyrdom angle and the increased media spotlight could pull some people back in. Personally I think it probably won’t make a difference overall. All publicity is good publicity.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nope, it’s just going to be more proof that he’s the guy to take on the ‘deep state’ and so on in their minds.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      It emboldens them because he already painted himself the victim, the outsider. He literally called it a witch hunt.

  • nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Holy crap… Did you guys read the bottom bit about Georgia voters?

    "Another man Bob, playing with his bluegrass band outside a café, was more sure. He wanted a positive outcome for Donald Trump and said a conviction would not change his mind. What would?

    “If he was convicted of murder, I’d be like that’s not a guy I want to go for!” "

    Not surprised, tbh, but I still find it ridiculous to read.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good now that he’s a convicted felon he can’t run for president just like you can’t vote, right? …right? Fuck this system.

  • MoonJellyfish@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m googling “Trump rule 34” but can’t find anything related to his trial. Can you link some relevant article?