• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Micro cosmology is a problem a majority of Americans live with. If they can’t see it from their front porch it don’t exist. That played a major factor in the current shitshow preloading in d.c.

  • demonmittenhands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Two weeks, huh? The US is around 3,000 miles from coast to coast, so that puts him over 200 miles skateboarding every single day… I’m not sure, but the person who didn’t know mountains exist might be dumb.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 month ago

    Apparently, Chad Caruso set the Guinness world record as the first person to skateboard across America in 2023, from Venice Beach to Virginia Beach. It took him 57 days to cover 3,162 miles, adventure adventure of 55 miles a day.

    • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean it’s not extremely far off compared to Ultralight hiking, you can still be hygienic (like often washing clothes), of course though you’re not winning parfume contests along the way… It’s a tradeoff to make compared to having a lot of uncomfortable weight to carry around.

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Extra socks and underwear would probably be a good call, but wear one, wash the other and let it dry either overnight or throughout the day.

      • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        From the sound of it, the skateboarding guy must have never watched Forrest Gump. He would have known it would take more than 2 weeks, just by seeing Gump’s beard grow.

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nuhuh. that movie took only 2 hours and 22 minutes, and that walking sequence took up about 10~20 minutes, he just has really strong beard growth when he walks. If Forrest can do it in 20 minutes, I should be able to do it in 2 weeks! /jk

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 month ago

        When I first moved to Japan, I had to use lots of websites that used untranslatable images (not text, like png or whatever and google lens was not a thing). I got help a few times and memorized what clicking on an area did more than even what the image was (which would change sometimes). This is how I got by with ATMs and various websites for quite a while. It works until something changes. Today, screen readers, google lens, and other things exist to help as well.

        • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sounds like just learning to read would be a better use of your time then. I mean if you already speak the language it should be fairly trivial, right?

          • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            ·
            1 month ago

            I literally started with “When I first moved to Japan”.

            To answer your question, though, learning to read Kanji is not trivial especially when each one can have a number of different pronunciations or appear in compounds where the meaning can be quite different.

          • Redfox8@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 month ago

            You do realise that in Japan they don’t use Roman letters?! Sounds are one thing, a pictorial based writing system quite another! Just as in English, the same sounding word can mean several things, so the same spelt word can mean several things in Asian languages!

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I met a guy like that in the 90’s except he was on a lot of LSD and was making his way around the world. IDK if that was true but my buddy picked him up one night and we had a party with him and he cut his dreads off and burned them so a witch wouldn’t get them. Good times!

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most likely functionally illiterate and not 100% “I can’t read,” but I’ve overestimated instagrammers before

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It is easy to have motivation to skateboard across america when you don’t have enough education to understand what doing that means.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Idunno anything about this guy, but for some folks they just weren’t taught early enough. You can learn to read at any age, but no amount of motivation can match an early education

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Spelling (in non phonetic languages) has nothing to do with intelligence levels - it is all to do with memory and exposure. Perhaps he never went to school, or the level of education was pathetic… or he is incredibly dyslexic. Sorry if this answer sounds harsh but I’m pissed-off at what you wrote. I know of at least one illiterate person who stands head and shoulders above the “college kids” around them. They were such an integral part of our team that were bought them speech-to-text / text-to-speech software to keep their job.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s why I didn’t say he was stupid. I asked if he had a learning disability which is not a taboo thing and it doesn’t mean you’re stupid. If anything I complimented him on his motivation and determination. You were just out to find something to get mad and offended over so you interjected that into my comment, even though I didn’t say that. I see that happening a lot lately with Americans. They all wanna be offended so they can moralize

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Whoa there, horsey. I was making a general opening statement - not a rebuttal to a sentence you never wrote. In another reply I went into a little more detail. My main point was that if it wasn’t because of a learning difficulty then simply “motivation” isn’t always enough. A lack of facilities ( No libraries, no literate family members, no internet connection, inadequate education etc. ) could be a factor.

          On a side note, do not ever accuse me of being a septic again. There’s literally dozens of people on the internet that aren’t USian - but I understand it’s much easier to throw labels on people who don’t pander to your every post.

      • sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        or he is incredibly dyslexic

        Dyslexia is a learning disability

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes it is, so he either does have a learning difficulty (as OP suggested) and is hobbled by it or he has been let down by the education system or he’s lazy and stupid. ( might be some other reasons, too) As a result his motivation (if he had any) would be neither here nor there. Some people can’t read and write English because… they can’t. It’s that simple.

  • vormadikter@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cant seem to find this dude on ig, there are just too many that tried to cross the usa with a board.

    Does someone have a link to this specific persons ig? That would be great, thanks.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    That voter is gonna learn some stuff.

    I was not surprised by the presence of a giant cross necklace.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      If he’s from California then my vote counts a little more because my state has less population. The smaller the state’s population the more their vote counts.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wyoming has the lowest population.

        Makes sense why candidates spend all their time trying to get these powerful voters on their side. Those 3 electoral votes really makes it the most powerful swing state.

        Someone in Wyoming has more electoral votes to their votes, yes. And I believe that is the point you’re making.

        If everyone in Wyoming voted for Candidate A. Candidate A has basically the same chance of winning or losing.

        If everyone in California voted for Candidate A. Candidate A has a lot better chance of winning.

        It’s more powerful to be able to vote in something that actually matters than to vote in something that doesn’t.

        You could just not count any votes in Wyoming and still call the overall winner 99.999% of the time. It would have to come down to 3 electoral votes tie breaker for their votes to even matter. Whereas every vote in California always matters.

        Like in this last election. If Harris won every “swing state”. But Trump could have won California and he’d win the election.

        Electoral college has It’s pros and cons but “The smaller the state’s population the more their vote counts.” Isn’t true.

        It’s the middle size, “swing states”, that the voters have the most powerful.

        You aren’t a drop in the bucket like California, but your state has enough electoral votes to actually swing things.

        • sour@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It wasn’t about how much the states electoral votes matter, but how much a single persons vote matters in the entire election.

          If 50.000 people in California changes their vote it hardly matters. If 50.000 people in wyoming do that, it heavily influences the outcome of who wyoming votes for.

          1 person in wyoming matters more than 1 person in California.

          • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It wasn’t about how much the states electoral votes matter, but how much a single persons vote matters in the entire election.

            How electoral votes matter is the whole point. If it was done by pure population they would have equal voting power. They do not have equal voting power because the electoral votes matter.

            1 person in Wyoming makes more difference in how Wyoming election turns out. Less population, more influence.

            There are 538 electoral votes divided over 50 states

            Wyoming has 3

            California has 54

            Wyoming has 584k people

            California has 39m people

            In Wyoming each voters has 5.137E-6 electoral votes to cast

            In California each voters has 8.98305085E−7 electoral votes to cast

            Now winner takes all electoral votes aside. Someone in Wyoming is contributing more electoral votes to their candidate than someone in California.

            This is what’s always argued when talking about voting power based on population

            If the candidate needs 270 to win, if I am able to give more to a candidate with my vote, my vote is more powerful in a way.

            There has been two elections decided by 3 electoral votes. 1876 Hayes and 1796 Adams. Total electoral votes at the time were 261 and 138, respectively. It would be equivalent to winning by 6 and 12 votes today with the 538 electoral votes. So while it was 3, those 3 votes meant a lot more back then when it was 3/261 or 3/138.

            If 50.000 people in California changes their vote it hardly matters. If 50.000 people in wyoming do that, it heavily influences the outcome of who wyoming votes for.

            Like I said earlier, yes, Wyoming voters have more influence on who wins their electoral votes and they have more electoral votes per person

            California with 53 electoral votes is a 106 point swing. Taking 53 electoral votes from the winning candidate and giving it to the runner up would change the majority of all the elections.

            Think of it this way:

            2 states just California and Wyoming. California has 53 votes, Wyoming 3.

            56 votes total. Need 29 votes to win.

            Biggest issue the candidates are running on is spending money on beaches.

            Candidate A: For spending

            Candidate B: Against spending

            California wants A, Wyoming wants B.

            If what you’re saying is true, then Wyoming should have the most power in this election because each of their votes count more than a person in California.

            584k deciding 3 electoral votes vs 39m deciding 53 electoral votes

            Yet every single person in Wyoming could vote candidate B, and it’s still going to be up to California to decide

            So would you want to be a voter in Wyoming or California?

            California because your vote doesn’t matter in Wyoming. No matter who you vote for in Wyoming, California is going to decide. You want to be able to cast your vote in California to hopefully swing the state

            If you gave those 584k Wyoming voters the chance to not cast their vote in Wyoming but instead cast their vote in California against the 39m, they would be wise to do it. Doesn’t matter where 3/56 electoral votes go, it matters much more where the 53/56 electoral votes go.

            So yes, while each voter in California has less effect on the California electoral votes. California has more effect on the total electoral votes.

            Being able to participate in a more important election is worth more than having more influence in an election that is next to meaningless.

              • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                TLDR:

                Only 2 states to simplify things

                Wyoming 3 EV

                California 53 EV

                56 EV total, 29 EV need to win

                Wyoming still has more EV per capita

                California wants Candidate B

                Wyoming wants Candidate A

                Who decides the election? (California)

                If what you’re saying is that the smaller population with more EV per capita has more pull in an election, then Wyoming would actually have a shot at making Candidate A win by themselves.

                California has 53/538 EV.

                California controls 10% of the total EVs

                Wyoming controls .06%

                TLDR again:

                As a voter, being able to effect 10% of the total EVs is more powerful than being able to effect .06%.

                • sour@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You’re missing the point. The viewpoint in the argument is from a single voter. One vote in wyoming weighs more than one vote in California

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      The idea behind wisdom of the crowd is that the people who don’t know the answer cancel each other out. It’s the reason why the audience joker on who wants to be a millionaire is so powerful.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wisdom of the crowds works when people are making somewhat educated guesses. It falls apart though if everybody groups themselves into camps that either think A or B and no other option because their camp leader has told them that they think A or B

    • Sonor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      This might not be true. Depending on where you live, your vote could be worth about 0.8th of what this guys vote is worth

      • Homescool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Casper and Cheyenne Wyoming have the 75k most powerful voters in the country.

        They control the same number of US Senators as the world’s 5th largest economy.

        The fact that 75k can filibuster 40m is the peak of absurdity.

    • little_tuptup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Devil’s advocate. We should only let a select few who we deem as intelligent to vote for us?

    • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Such a shame. We ought to implement some type of criteria based on reading and comprehension skills that allows you to vote.

      A literacy test, if you will.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not many sites seem to deal in distance when talking about replacing skateboard wheels, but I was able to find this:

      https://skateboardscan.com/skateboard-wheels-last/

      So according to that he’d need 10-30 sets of skateboard wheels to cross the country.

      Of course if you’re just riding on the side of highways in a straight line forever you could probably get a little more out of them since you’re not doing any precision work or tricks.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Not so sure. A road surface tends to be rougher pavement than sidewalks or skate parks. I’d imagine the side of a highway chewing those parkboard wheels away at record rates.

        I’m honestly kinda shocked anyone attempting this wouldn’t use a longboard with some chonkier wheels.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Oh, he’s probably thinking he can stay on the sidewalk most of the way.

          I’m not sure how he even got as far as the Rockies since there’s a desert you have to get through first.